Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 10/2014

01-10-2014 | Knee

Is tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance an appropriate measure for the identification of knees with patellar instability?

Authors: N. Caplan, D. Lees, M. Newby, A. Ewen, R. Jackson, A. St Clair Gibson, D. Kader

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 10/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance (TT–TG) has been regarded as a useful tool for establishing therapeutic choices for patellar instability. Recently, it has been shown that TT–TG negatively correlated with the quadriceps angle, suggesting that if used individually, neither provide a valid measure of instability. This study aimed to compare TT–TG distance between both knees in patients with unilateral instability to assess whether this measurement is a decisive element in the management decisions for patellar instability.

Methods

Sixty-two patients (18 male and 44 female), reporting to a specialist patella clinic for recurrent unilateral patellar instability, were included in the study. Patients underwent bilateral long leg computed tomography scan to determine TT–TG distance in both knees. Tibial TT–TG in symptomatic and asymptomatic knees in the same individual was compared statistically.

Results

Mean TT–TG distance in the symptomatic knee was 16.9 (±4.9) mm, compared to 15.6 (±5.6) mm in the asymptomatic knee. Tibial TT–TG was not significantly different between stable and unstable knees (n.s.).

Conclusions

The lack of difference in TT–TG distance between stable and unstable knees suggests that TT–TG distance alone may not be a decisive element in establishing therapeutic choices for patellar instability. It should, therefore, be interpreted with caution during clinical evaluations.

Level of evidence

II.
Literature
1.
Aglietti P, Insall JN, Cerulli G (1983) Patellar pain and incongruence. I: measurements of incongruence. Clin Orthop Relat Res 176:217–224PubMed
2.
Balcarek P, Jung K, Ammon J, Walde TA, Frosch S, Schuttrumpf JP, Sturmer KM, Frosch KH (2010) Anatomy of lateral patellar instability: trochlear dysplasia and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance is more pronounced in women who dislocate the patella. Am J Sports Med 38(11):2320–2327PubMedCrossRef
3.
Balcarek P, Jung K, Frosch KH, Sturmer KM (2011) Value of the tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance in patellar instability in the young athlete. Am J Sports Med 39(8):1756–1761PubMedCrossRef
4.
Barnett AJ, Gardner RO, Lankester BJ, Wakeley CJ, Eldridge JD (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of the patella: a comparison of the morphology of the patella in normal and dysplastic knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(6):761–765PubMedCrossRef
5.
Carrillon Y, Abidi H, Dejour D, Fantino O, Moyen B, Tran-Minh VA (2000) Patellar instability: assessment on MR images by measuring the lateral trochlear inclination-initial experience. Radiology 216(2):582–585PubMedCrossRef
6.
Cooney AD, Kazi Z, Caplan N, Newby M, St Clair Gibson A, Kader DF (2012) The relationship between quadriceps angle and tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance in patients with patellar instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(12):2399–2404PubMedCrossRef
7.
Dandy DJ (1996) Chronic patellofemoral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(2):328–335PubMed
8.
Dejour D, Le Coultre B (2007) Osteotomies in patello-femoral instabilities. Sports Med Arthrosc 15(1):39–46PubMedCrossRef
9.
Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C (1994) Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2(1):19–26PubMedCrossRef
10.
Diederichs G, Issever AS, Scheffler S (2010) MR imaging of patellar instability: injury patterns and assessment of risk factors. Radiographics 30(4):961–981PubMedCrossRef
11.
Drexler M, Dwyer T, Marmor M, Reischl N, Attar F, Cameron J (2013) Total knee arthroplasty in patients with excessive external tibial torsion >45° and patella instability–surgical technique and follow up. J Arthroplasty 28(4):614–619PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
Elias DA, White LM, Fithian DC (2002) Acute lateral patellar dislocation at MR imaging: injury patterns of medial patellar soft-tissue restraints and osteochondral injuries of the inferomedial patella. Radiology 225(3):736–743PubMedCrossRef
14.
Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, Silva P, Davis DK, Elias DA, White LM (2004) Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 32(5):1114–1121PubMedCrossRef
15.
France L, Nester C (2001) Effect of errors in the identification of anatomical landmarks on the accuracy of Q angle values. Clin Biomech 16(8):710–713CrossRef
16.
Goutallier D, Bernageau J, Lecudonnec B (1978) The measurement of the tibial tuberosity. Patella groove distanced technique and results. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 64(5):423–428PubMed
17.
Kita K, Horibe S, Toritsuka Y, Nakamura N, Tanaka Y, Yonetani Y, Mae T, Nakata K, Yoshikawa H, Shino K (2012) Effects of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction on patellar tracking. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(5):829–837PubMedCrossRef
18.
Lustig S, Servien E, Ait Si Selmi T, Neyret P (2007) Factors affecting reliability of TT–TG measurements before and after medialization: a CT scan study. Rev Chir Orthop 92:429–436
19.
McNally EG, Ostlere SJ, Pal C, Phillips A, Reid H, Dodd C (2000) Assessment of patellar maltracking using combined static and dynamic MRI. Eur Radiol 10(7):1051–1055PubMedCrossRef
20.
Monk AP, Doll HA, Gibbons CL, Ostlere S, Beard DJ, Gill HS, Murray DW (2011) The patho-anatomy of patellofemoral subluxation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(10):1341–1347PubMedCrossRef
21.
Nikku R, Nietosvaara Y, Aalto K, Kallio PE (2005) Operative treatment of primary patellar dislocation does not improve medium-term outcome: A 7-year follow-up report and risk analysis of 127 randomized patients. Acta Orthop 76(5):699–704PubMedCrossRef
22.
Pfirrmann CW, Zanetti M, Romero J, Hodler J (2000) Femoral trochlear dysplasia: MR findings. Radiology 216(3):858–864PubMedCrossRef
23.
Philippot R, Boyer B, Testa R, Farizon F, Moyen B (2012) The role of the medial ligamentous structures on patellar tracking during knee flexion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(2):331–336PubMedCrossRef
24.
Seitlinger G, Scheurecker G, Hogler R, Labey L, Innocenti B, Hofmann S (2012) Tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament distance: a new measurement to define the position of the tibial tubercle in patients with patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 40 (5):1119–1125
25.
Shen HC, Chao KH, Huang GS, Pan RY, Lee CH (2007) Combined proximal and distal realignment procedures to treat the habitual dislocation of the patella in adults. Am J Sports Med 35(12):2101–2108PubMedCrossRef
26.
Sillanpaa P, Mattila VM, Visuri T, Maenpaa H, Pihlajamaki H (2008) Ligament reconstruction versus distal realignment for patellar dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(6):1475–1484PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
27.
Smith TO, Hunt NJ, Donell ST (2008) The reliability and validity of the Q-angle: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(12):1068–1079PubMedCrossRef
28.
Turner MS (1994) The association between tibial torsion and knee joint pathology. Clin Orthop Relat Res 302:47–51PubMed
29.
van Huyssteen AL, Hendrix MR, Barnett AJ, Wakeley CJ, Eldridge JD (2006) Cartilage-bone mismatch in the dysplastic trochlea. An MRI study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(5):688–691PubMedCrossRef
30.
Wilson T, Kitsell F (2002) Is the Q-angle absolute or a variable measure? Measurement of the Q-angle over one minute in healthy subjects. Physiotherapy 88(5):296–302CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance an appropriate measure for the identification of knees with patellar instability?
Authors
N. Caplan
D. Lees
M. Newby
A. Ewen
R. Jackson
A. St Clair Gibson
D. Kader
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2954-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2014

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 10/2014 Go to the issue

Knee

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with bioactive synthetic ligament is an option. A 3-year follow-up study

Knee

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar maltracking following total knee arthroplasty is effective

Knee

Measurement of tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance: evaluation of inter- and intraobserver correlation dependent on the severity of trochlear dysplasia

Knee

A validated cadaveric model of trochlear dysplasia

Knee

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) for chondral defects in the patellofemoral joint

Knee

Quantitative stress radiography of the patella and evaluation of patellar laxity before and after lateral release for recurrent dislocation patella