Published in:
01-04-2015 | Knee
Comparison of tendon–bone healing between autografts and allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using magnetic resonance imaging
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 4/2015
Login to get accessAbstract
Purpose
The purpose of the study is to compare tendon–bone healing between autograft tendons and allograft tendons after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging.
Methods
A total of 36 participants (18 with autograft and 18 with allograft reconstruction) underwent MRI scans at least 2 years after the ACL reconstruction operation. Oblique axial images were obtained on three-dimensional dual-echo steady-state images and imported into solid modelling software for three-dimensional model reconstruction of the bone tunnel. The graft signal intensity in the tunnel, tendon–bone interface, tunnel morphology, and tunnel area was analysed using the Siemens software packages to determine the tendon–bone healing between the groups.
Results
For the tunnel morphology, both groups exhibited bone tunnel enlargement either at the femoral or tibial tunnel aperture. For the tendon–bone interface, one patient in the autograft group and two patients in the allograft group exhibited a significant fibrous scar tissue bands at the tendon–bone interface. The graft signal/noise quotient values of the allograft group were higher than the autograft group. However, there was no significant difference in the tunnel area between the allograft group and the autograft group.
Conclusions
Although the autograft tendons exhibited a better remodelling effect than did the allograft tendons in the bone tunnel, there was no significant difference in the tendon–bone healing between the autograft tendons and the allograft tendons postoperatively. These findings indicate that the biomechanical effect of graft motion may play a significant role in the tunnel aperture.
Level of evidence
III.