Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Knee

Joint line reconstruction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development and validation of a measurement method

Authors: Patrick Weber, Christian Schröder, Rüdiger Paul Laubender, Andrea Baur-Melnyk, Christoph von Schulze Pellengahr, Volkmar Jansson, Peter E. Müller

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Preservation of the joint line in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has shown to be an important factor for the long-term outcome, especially in revision TKA. For unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), the role of the joint line has neither been investigated nor is it consciously respected during implantation. Thus, the aim was to establish and validate a standardised measurement method to determine the joint line in UKA.

Methods

As there is no established method to evaluate changes in the joint line radiologically, we introduced two methods and correlated them. The methods were first validated in a cadaver model by a controlled rotational study. Then, the joint line of 29 patients with an UKA (Oxford, Biomet, Bridgend, UK) was determined on pre- and post-operative radiographs. Both methods were tested by intra- and inter-rater reliability.

Results

Both methods showed a good intra- and inter-rater reliability. Furthermore, there was only little bias in agreement between both methods and raters. Measurements of the 29 UKA patients revealed that the joint line was more distally by a mean of 4.4 ± 1.2 mm after surgery.

Conclusions

The study provides for the first time a reliable and standardised measurement tool to determine the changes in the joint line after implantation of an UKA. The instrument should be used in further studies to evaluate the impact of the joint line on the long-term outcome, the load in the two non-replaced knee compartments and on the ligaments.

Level of evidence

Diagnostic study without a universally applied ‘gold’ standard, Level III.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anagnostakos K, Lorbach O, Kohn D (2012) Patella baja after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1456–1462PubMedCrossRef Anagnostakos K, Lorbach O, Kohn D (2012) Patella baja after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1456–1462PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Blackburne JS, Peel TE (1977) A new method of measuring patellar height. J Bone Joint Surg Br 59(2):241–242PubMed Blackburne JS, Peel TE (1977) A new method of measuring patellar height. J Bone Joint Surg Br 59(2):241–242PubMed
4.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Carstensen B, Simpson J, Gurrin LC (2008) Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements. Int J Biostat 4(1):1–26 Carstensen B, Simpson J, Gurrin LC (2008) Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements. Int J Biostat 4(1):1–26
7.
go back to reference Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P, Lerat JL, Dejour H (1982) Patella infera. Apropos of 128 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 68:317–325PubMed Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P, Lerat JL, Dejour H (1982) Patella infera. Apropos of 128 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 68:317–325PubMed
8.
go back to reference Classen T, Wegner A, von Knoch M (2009) Modification of the method of Figgie for determination of joint line shifting in total knee arthroplasty. Radiologe 49:533–537PubMedCrossRef Classen T, Wegner A, von Knoch M (2009) Modification of the method of Figgie for determination of joint line shifting in total knee arthroplasty. Radiologe 49:533–537PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Deschamps G, Chol C (2011) Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Patients’ selection and operative technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:648–661PubMedCrossRef Deschamps G, Chol C (2011) Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Patients’ selection and operative technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:648–661PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Eliasziw M, Young SL, Woodbury MG, Fryday-Field K (1994) Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther 74:777–788PubMed Eliasziw M, Young SL, Woodbury MG, Fryday-Field K (1994) Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther 74:777–788PubMed
11.
go back to reference Figgie HE III, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS III, Gordon NH (1986) The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1035–1040PubMed Figgie HE III, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS III, Gordon NH (1986) The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1035–1040PubMed
12.
go back to reference Floren M, Davis J, Peterson MG, Laskin RS (2007) A mini-midvastus capsular approach with patellar displacement decreases the prevalence of patella baja. J Arthroplast 22(Suppl 2):51–57CrossRef Floren M, Davis J, Peterson MG, Laskin RS (2007) A mini-midvastus capsular approach with patellar displacement decreases the prevalence of patella baja. J Arthroplast 22(Suppl 2):51–57CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hauptmann SM, Kreul U, Mazoochian F, Schulze-Pellengahr V, Jansson V, Muller PE (2005) Influence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis on functional outcome after unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Orthopade 34:1088–1093PubMedCrossRef Hauptmann SM, Kreul U, Mazoochian F, Schulze-Pellengahr V, Jansson V, Muller PE (2005) Influence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis on functional outcome after unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Orthopade 34:1088–1093PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hvid I, Hansen SL (1985) Trabecular bone strength patterns at the proximal tibial epiphysis. J Orthop Res 3:464–472PubMedCrossRef Hvid I, Hansen SL (1985) Trabecular bone strength patterns at the proximal tibial epiphysis. J Orthop Res 3:464–472PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Insall J, Salvati E (1971) Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology 101:101–104PubMed Insall J, Salvati E (1971) Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology 101:101–104PubMed
16.
go back to reference Kubat P, Ptacek Z (2011) Biomechanical parameters and clinical outcomes of the Oxford Phase III unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 78:367–372PubMed Kubat P, Ptacek Z (2011) Biomechanical parameters and clinical outcomes of the Oxford Phase III unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 78:367–372PubMed
17.
go back to reference Laskin RS (2002) Joint line position restoration during revision total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:169–171PubMedCrossRef Laskin RS (2002) Joint line position restoration during revision total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:169–171PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Liddle AD, Pandit H, Jenkins C, Price AJ, Dodd CA, Gill HS, Murray DW (2012). Preoperative pain location is a poor predictor of outcome after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 1 and 5 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2211-3 Liddle AD, Pandit H, Jenkins C, Price AJ, Dodd CA, Gill HS, Murray DW (2012). Preoperative pain location is a poor predictor of outcome after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 1 and 5 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-012-2211-3
19.
go back to reference R Development Core Team (2011) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Development Core Team, Vienna R Development Core Team (2011) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Development Core Team, Vienna
20.
go back to reference Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (2001) The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:45–49PubMedCrossRef Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (2001) The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:45–49PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Springer BD, Scott RD, Thornhill TS (2006) Conversion of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:214–220PubMedCrossRef Springer BD, Scott RD, Thornhill TS (2006) Conversion of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:214–220PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tinius M, Hepp P, Becker R (2012) Combined unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:81–87PubMedCrossRef Tinius M, Hepp P, Becker R (2012) Combined unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:81–87PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Joint line reconstruction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development and validation of a measurement method
Authors
Patrick Weber
Christian Schröder
Rüdiger Paul Laubender
Andrea Baur-Melnyk
Christoph von Schulze Pellengahr
Volkmar Jansson
Peter E. Müller
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2617-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2013 Go to the issue