Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Knee

Far anteromedial portal technique for posterolateral femoral tunnel drilling in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study

Authors: Atsuo Nakamae, Mitsuo Ochi, Nobuo Adachi, Masataka Deie, Tomoyuki Nakasa, Goki Kamei, Atsushi Okuhara, Takuya Niimoto, Shingo Ohkawa

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To identify the relationship between knee flexion angle and femoral tunnel length, as well as the exit points of guidewires, when using a far anteromedial portal technique for posterolateral femoral tunnel drilling in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Methods

Using the far anteromedial portal technique in 8 cadaveric knees, femoral tunnel drilling for the posterolateral bundle was performed at 3 knee flexion angles: 90°, 110° and 130°. We measured the femoral tunnel length and the distances from each guidewire to the closest relevant structures.

Results

The mean tunnel length at 90° knee flexion (25.8 ± 1.8 mm) was significantly shorter than the length at 110° and 130° knee flexion (32.1 ± 2.6 and 33.1 ± 2.5 mm, respectively). The average distance between the exit point of the guidewire and the posterior articular cartilage of the lateral femoral condyle was the shortest at 90° knee flexion (3.3 ± 2.2 mm). The distance between the guidewire and the centre of the origin of the lateral collateral ligament was the shortest at 130° knee flexion (8.0 ± 1.8 mm). The guidewires penetrated the origin of the lateral gastrocnemius tendon in 2 cases at 110° knee flexion and in 1 case each at 90° and 130° knee flexion.

Conclusions

When using the far anteromedial portal technique, more than 110° knee flexion is desirable to achieve ideal femoral tunnel length and avoid articular cartilage injury. In addition, the risk of damage to the origin of the lateral collateral ligament increases when the knee flexion angle increases to 130°. A knee flexion angle between 110° and 120° was recommended when using the far anteromedial portal technique.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Araujo PH, van Eck CF, Macalena JA, Fu FH (2011) Advances in the three-portal technique for anatomical single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1239–1242PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Araujo PH, van Eck CF, Macalena JA, Fu FH (2011) Advances in the three-portal technique for anatomical single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1239–1242PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Basdekis G, Abisafi C, Christel P (2009) Effect of knee flexion angle on length and orientation of posterolateral femoral tunnel drilled through anteromedial portal during anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 25:1108–1114PubMedCrossRef Basdekis G, Abisafi C, Christel P (2009) Effect of knee flexion angle on length and orientation of posterolateral femoral tunnel drilled through anteromedial portal during anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 25:1108–1114PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bedi A, Raphael B, Maderazo A, Pavlov H, Williams RJ 3rd (2010) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of femoral tunnel length and obliquity. Arthroscopy 26:342–350PubMedCrossRef Bedi A, Raphael B, Maderazo A, Pavlov H, Williams RJ 3rd (2010) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of femoral tunnel length and obliquity. Arthroscopy 26:342–350PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Branch TP, Siebold R, Freedberg HI, Jacobs CA (2011) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction demonstrated superior clinical stability to single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a matched-pairs analysis of instrumented tests of tibial anterior translation and internal rotation laxity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:432–440PubMedCrossRef Branch TP, Siebold R, Freedberg HI, Jacobs CA (2011) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction demonstrated superior clinical stability to single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a matched-pairs analysis of instrumented tests of tibial anterior translation and internal rotation laxity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:432–440PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Fischer S, Mader K, Koebke J, Schneider T (2009) Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:220–227PubMedCrossRef Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Fischer S, Mader K, Koebke J, Schneider T (2009) Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:220–227PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Farrow LD, Parker RD (2010) The relationship of lateral anatomic structures to exiting guide pins during femoral tunnel preparation utilizing an accessory medial portal. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:747–753PubMedCrossRef Farrow LD, Parker RD (2010) The relationship of lateral anatomic structures to exiting guide pins during femoral tunnel preparation utilizing an accessory medial portal. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:747–753PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gabriel MT, Wong EK, Woo SL, Yagi M, Debski RE (2004) Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res 22:85–89PubMedCrossRef Gabriel MT, Wong EK, Woo SL, Yagi M, Debski RE (2004) Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res 22:85–89PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hall MP, Ryzewicz M, Walsh PJ, Sherman OH (2009) Risk of iatrogenic injury to the peroneal nerve during posterolateral femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 37:109–113PubMedCrossRef Hall MP, Ryzewicz M, Walsh PJ, Sherman OH (2009) Risk of iatrogenic injury to the peroneal nerve during posterolateral femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 37:109–113PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Järvelä T (2007) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:500–507PubMedCrossRef Järvelä T (2007) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:500–507PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, Amis AA (2010) Biomechanical comparisons of knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2 clinically available transtibial procedures: anatomic double bundle versus single bundle. Am J Sports Med 38:1349–1358PubMedCrossRef Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, Amis AA (2010) Biomechanical comparisons of knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2 clinically available transtibial procedures: anatomic double bundle versus single bundle. Am J Sports Med 38:1349–1358PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lubowitz JH (2009) Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions. Arthroscopy 25:95–101PubMedCrossRef Lubowitz JH (2009) Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions. Arthroscopy 25:95–101PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lubowitz JH, Konicek J (2010) Anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel length: cadaveric analysis comparing anteromedial portal versus outside-in technique. Arthroscopy 26:1357–1362PubMedCrossRef Lubowitz JH, Konicek J (2010) Anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel length: cadaveric analysis comparing anteromedial portal versus outside-in technique. Arthroscopy 26:1357–1362PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mae T, Shino K, Miyama T, Shinjo H, Ochi T, Yoshikawa H, Fujie H (2001) Single versus 2-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. Arthroscopy 17:708–716PubMedCrossRef Mae T, Shino K, Miyama T, Shinjo H, Ochi T, Yoshikawa H, Fujie H (2001) Single versus 2-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. Arthroscopy 17:708–716PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Miller CD, Gerdeman AC, Hart JM, Bennett CG, Golish SR, Gaskin C, Miller MD (2011) A comparison of 2 drilling techniques on the femoral tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:372–379PubMedCrossRef Miller CD, Gerdeman AC, Hart JM, Bennett CG, Golish SR, Gaskin C, Miller MD (2011) A comparison of 2 drilling techniques on the femoral tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:372–379PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Musahl V, Voos JE, O’Loughlin PF, Choi D, Stueber V, Kendoff D, Pearle AD (2010) Comparing stability of different single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: a cadaveric study using navigation. Arthroscopy 26:S41–S48PubMedCrossRef Musahl V, Voos JE, O’Loughlin PF, Choi D, Stueber V, Kendoff D, Pearle AD (2010) Comparing stability of different single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: a cadaveric study using navigation. Arthroscopy 26:S41–S48PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nakamae A, Ochi M, Adachi N, Deie M, Nakasa T (2012) Clinical comparisons between the transtibial technique and the far anteromedial portal technique for posterolateral femoral tunnel drilling in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 28:658–666PubMedCrossRef Nakamae A, Ochi M, Adachi N, Deie M, Nakasa T (2012) Clinical comparisons between the transtibial technique and the far anteromedial portal technique for posterolateral femoral tunnel drilling in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 28:658–666PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nakamura M, Deie M, Shibuya H, Nakamae A, Adachi N, Aoyama H, Ochi M (2009) Potential risks of femoral tunnel drilling through the far anteromedial portal: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 25:481–487PubMedCrossRef Nakamura M, Deie M, Shibuya H, Nakamae A, Adachi N, Aoyama H, Ochi M (2009) Potential risks of femoral tunnel drilling through the far anteromedial portal: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 25:481–487PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Neven E, D’Hooghe P, Bellemans J (2008) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study on the posterolateral tunnel position and safety of the lateral structures. Arthroscopy 24:436–440PubMedCrossRef Neven E, D’Hooghe P, Bellemans J (2008) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study on the posterolateral tunnel position and safety of the lateral structures. Arthroscopy 24:436–440PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nishimoto K, Kuroda R, Mizuno K, Hoshino Y, Nagamune K, Kubo S, Yagi M, Yamaguchi M, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2009) Analysis of the graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:270–276PubMedCrossRef Nishimoto K, Kuroda R, Mizuno K, Hoshino Y, Nagamune K, Kubo S, Yagi M, Yamaguchi M, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2009) Analysis of the graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:270–276PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Otani M, Nozaki M, Kobayashi M, Goto H, Tawada K, Waguri-Nagaya Y, Okamoto H, Iguchi H, Watanabe N, Otsuka T (2012) Comparative risk of common peroneal nerve injury in far anteromedial portal drilling and transtibial drilling in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:838–843PubMedCrossRef Otani M, Nozaki M, Kobayashi M, Goto H, Tawada K, Waguri-Nagaya Y, Okamoto H, Iguchi H, Watanabe N, Otsuka T (2012) Comparative risk of common peroneal nerve injury in far anteromedial portal drilling and transtibial drilling in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:838–843PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Palmar I (1938) On the injuries to the ligaments of the knee joint. Acta Chir Scand 81(suppl 53):3–282 Palmar I (1938) On the injuries to the ligaments of the knee joint. Acta Chir Scand 81(suppl 53):3–282
22.
go back to reference Pujol N, Fong O, Karoubi M, Beaufils P, Boisrenoult P (2010) Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:43–46PubMedCrossRef Pujol N, Fong O, Karoubi M, Beaufils P, Boisrenoult P (2010) Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:43–46PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Shino K, Horibe S, Hamada M, Nakamura N, Nakata K, Toritsuka Y, Mae T (2002) Allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Tech Knee Surg 1:78–85CrossRef Shino K, Horibe S, Hamada M, Nakamura N, Nakata K, Toritsuka Y, Mae T (2002) Allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Tech Knee Surg 1:78–85CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Siebold R, Benetos IS, Sartory N, He Z, Hariri N, Pässler HH (2010) How to avoid the risk of intraoperative cartilage damage in anatomic four tunnel double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:64–67PubMedCrossRef Siebold R, Benetos IS, Sartory N, He Z, Hariri N, Pässler HH (2010) How to avoid the risk of intraoperative cartilage damage in anatomic four tunnel double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:64–67PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Silver AG, Kaar SG, Grisell MK, Reagan JM, Farrow LD (2010) Comparison between rigid and flexible systems for drilling the femoral tunnel through an anteromedial portal in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 26:790–795PubMedCrossRef Silver AG, Kaar SG, Grisell MK, Reagan JM, Farrow LD (2010) Comparison between rigid and flexible systems for drilling the femoral tunnel through an anteromedial portal in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 26:790–795PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Taketomi S, Nakagawa T, Takeda H, Nakajima K, Nakayama S, Fukai A, Hirota J, Kachi Y, Kawano H, Miura T, Fukui N, Nakamura K (2011) Anatomical placement of double femoral tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial tunnel first or posterolateral tunnel first? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:424–431PubMedCrossRef Taketomi S, Nakagawa T, Takeda H, Nakajima K, Nakayama S, Fukai A, Hirota J, Kachi Y, Kawano H, Miura T, Fukui N, Nakamura K (2011) Anatomical placement of double femoral tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial tunnel first or posterolateral tunnel first? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:424–431PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wang JH, Kim JG, Lee do K, Lim HC, Ahn JH (2012) Comparison of femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between transtibial technique and transportal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1584–1593PubMedCrossRef Wang JH, Kim JG, Lee do K, Lim HC, Ahn JH (2012) Comparison of femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between transtibial technique and transportal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1584–1593PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Zantop T, Haase AK, Fu FH, Petersen W (2008) Potential risk of cartilage damage in double bundle ACL reconstruction: impact of knee flexion angle and portal location on the femoral PL bundle tunnel. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:509–513PubMedCrossRef Zantop T, Haase AK, Fu FH, Petersen W (2008) Potential risk of cartilage damage in double bundle ACL reconstruction: impact of knee flexion angle and portal location on the femoral PL bundle tunnel. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:509–513PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Zantop T, Kubo S, Petersen W, Musahl V, Fu FH (2007) Current techniques in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23:938–947PubMedCrossRef Zantop T, Kubo S, Petersen W, Musahl V, Fu FH (2007) Current techniques in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23:938–947PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Zelle BA, Vidal AF, Brucker PU, Fu FH (2007) Double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: anatomic and biomechanical rationale. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:87–96PubMed Zelle BA, Vidal AF, Brucker PU, Fu FH (2007) Double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: anatomic and biomechanical rationale. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:87–96PubMed
Metadata
Title
Far anteromedial portal technique for posterolateral femoral tunnel drilling in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study
Authors
Atsuo Nakamae
Mitsuo Ochi
Nobuo Adachi
Masataka Deie
Tomoyuki Nakasa
Goki Kamei
Atsushi Okuhara
Takuya Niimoto
Shingo Ohkawa
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2346-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1/2014 Go to the issue