Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Knee

Evaluation of trochlear dysplasia using MRI: correlation between the classification system of Dejour and objective parameters of trochlear dysplasia

Authors: M. Nelitz, S. Lippacher, H. Reichel, D. Dornacher

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Trochlear dysplasia is considered to be one of the major factors causing patellofemoral instability (PFI). Dejour’s classification is widely used to assess the severity of trochlear dysplasia. Additionally, in current literature, different quantitative parameters are recommended to distinguish between a normal trochlea and a dysplastic trochlea. In order to achieve a more objective evaluation of the trochlea, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether specific measurements of the femoral trochlea can be assigned to the qualitative classification system of Dejour.

Methods

Transverse MRI T2-weighted scans of 80 knees with symptomatic PFI and varying severity of trochlear dysplasia were classified according to Dejour (type A to D). For all MRI scans, quantitative measurements with parameters as described in the literature were applied. The values were then allocated to Dejour’s classification. In addition to the four-grade analysis, two-grade analysis was also performed (Dejour type A against type BCD). Dependent on the cut-off values, specificity, sensitivity and Youden index for each parameter was defined.

Results

The allocation resulted in the following distribution: type A trochlear dysplasia n = 25, type B n = 23, type C n = 18 and type D n = 14. In descriptive statistics, none of the measurements proposed in the literature could be assigned to the four-grade classification system of Dejour. For the two-grade analysis at the cut-off, sensitivity ranged from 75 to 86 % and specificity from 76 to 84 % for lateral trochlear inclination, trochlear facet asymmetry and depth of trochlear groove. All other measurements showed a poor sensitivity ranging from 49 to 67 % and specificity from 40 to 72 %. Interobserver and intraobserver repeatability for the measured parameters was fair to moderate (ICC values 0.34–0.58) in high-grade dysplasia (type BCD) and substantial to almost perfect (ICC values 0.71–0.88) in low-grade trochlear dysplasia (type A).

Conclusion

Quantitative measurements of the femoral trochlea have shown to be of limited value for the assessment of trochlear dysplasia. None of the quantitative measurements of the trochlea on transverse images could be assigned to the four-grade descriptive classification of trochlear dysplasia of Dejour. Additionally, measurements could not be reliably performed in high-grade trochlear dysplasia. However, trochlear inclination, trochlear facet asymmetry and depth of trochlear groove may help to distinguish between low-grade and high-grade dysplasia.

Level of evidence

II.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Balcarek P, Ammon J, Frosch S (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of the medial patellofemoral ligament lesion in acute lateral patellar dislocations considering trochlear dysplasia, patella alta and tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance. Arthroscopy 26:926–935PubMedCrossRef Balcarek P, Ammon J, Frosch S (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of the medial patellofemoral ligament lesion in acute lateral patellar dislocations considering trochlear dysplasia, patella alta and tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance. Arthroscopy 26:926–935PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Biedert RM, Bachmann M (2009) Anterior-posterior trochlear measurements of normal and dysplastic trochlea by axial magnetic resonance imaging. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1225–1230PubMedCrossRef Biedert RM, Bachmann M (2009) Anterior-posterior trochlear measurements of normal and dysplastic trochlea by axial magnetic resonance imaging. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1225–1230PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Carrillon Y, Abidi H, Dejour D, Fantino O, Moyen B, Tran-Minh VA (2000) Patellar instability: assessment on MR images by measuring the lateral trochlear inclination—initial experience. Radiology 216:582–585PubMedCrossRef Carrillon Y, Abidi H, Dejour D, Fantino O, Moyen B, Tran-Minh VA (2000) Patellar instability: assessment on MR images by measuring the lateral trochlear inclination—initial experience. Radiology 216:582–585PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Colvin AC, West RV (2008) Current concepts review: patellar instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2751–2762PubMedCrossRef Colvin AC, West RV (2008) Current concepts review: patellar instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2751–2762PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dejour D, Le Coultre B (2007) Osteotomies in patello-femoral instabilities. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 15:39–46CrossRef Dejour D, Le Coultre B (2007) Osteotomies in patello-femoral instabilities. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 15:39–46CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier CH (1994) Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:19–26PubMedCrossRef Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier CH (1994) Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:19–26PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Diederichs G, Issever AS, Scheffler S (2010) MR imaging of patellar instability: injury patterns and assessment of risk factors. Radiographics 30:961–981PubMedCrossRef Diederichs G, Issever AS, Scheffler S (2010) MR imaging of patellar instability: injury patterns and assessment of risk factors. Radiographics 30:961–981PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Donell ST, Joseph G, Hing CB, Marshall TJ (2006) Modified Dejour trochleoplasty for severe dysplasia: operative technique and early clinical results. Knee 13:266–273PubMedCrossRef Donell ST, Joseph G, Hing CB, Marshall TJ (2006) Modified Dejour trochleoplasty for severe dysplasia: operative technique and early clinical results. Knee 13:266–273PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fucentese SF, von Roll A, Koch PP, Epari DR, Fuchs B, Schottle PB (2006) The patella morphology in trochlear dysplasia: a comparative MRI study. Knee 13:145–150PubMedCrossRef Fucentese SF, von Roll A, Koch PP, Epari DR, Fuchs B, Schottle PB (2006) The patella morphology in trochlear dysplasia: a comparative MRI study. Knee 13:145–150PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fucentese SF, Zingg PO, Schmitt J, Pfirrmann CW, Meyer DC, Koch PP (2011) Classification of trochlear dysplasia as predictor of clinical outcome after trochleoplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1655–1661PubMedCrossRef Fucentese SF, Zingg PO, Schmitt J, Pfirrmann CW, Meyer DC, Koch PP (2011) Classification of trochlear dysplasia as predictor of clinical outcome after trochleoplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1655–1661PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Koeter S, Bongers EM, de Rooij J, van Kampen A (2006) Minimal rotation aberrations cause radiographic misdiagnosis of trochlear dysplasia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:713–717PubMedCrossRef Koeter S, Bongers EM, de Rooij J, van Kampen A (2006) Minimal rotation aberrations cause radiographic misdiagnosis of trochlear dysplasia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:713–717PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lippacher S, Dejour D, Elsharkawi M, Dornacher D, Ring C, Dreyhaupt J, Reichel H, Nelitz M (2012) Observer agreement on the Dejour trochlea dysplasia classification. A comparison of true lateral radiographs to axial magnetic resonance images. Am J Sports Med 40:837–843PubMedCrossRef Lippacher S, Dejour D, Elsharkawi M, Dornacher D, Ring C, Dreyhaupt J, Reichel H, Nelitz M (2012) Observer agreement on the Dejour trochlea dysplasia classification. A comparison of true lateral radiographs to axial magnetic resonance images. Am J Sports Med 40:837–843PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nelitz M, Theile M, Dornacher D, Wölfle J, Reichel H, Lippacher S (2012) Analysis of failed surgery for patellar instability in children with open growth plates. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:822–828PubMedCrossRef Nelitz M, Theile M, Dornacher D, Wölfle J, Reichel H, Lippacher S (2012) Analysis of failed surgery for patellar instability in children with open growth plates. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:822–828PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pfirrmann CW, Zanetti M, Romero J, Hodler J (2000) Femoral trochlear dysplasia: MR findings. Radiology 216:858–864PubMedCrossRef Pfirrmann CW, Zanetti M, Romero J, Hodler J (2000) Femoral trochlear dysplasia: MR findings. Radiology 216:858–864PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Redziniak DE, Diduch DR, Mihalko WM et al (2009) Patellar instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2264–2275PubMed Redziniak DE, Diduch DR, Mihalko WM et al (2009) Patellar instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2264–2275PubMed
19.
go back to reference Salzmann GM, Weber TS, Spang JT, Imhoff AB, Schöttle PB (2010) Comparison of native axial radiographs with axial imaging for the determination of the trochlear morphology in patients with trochlear dysplasia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:335–340PubMedCrossRef Salzmann GM, Weber TS, Spang JT, Imhoff AB, Schöttle PB (2010) Comparison of native axial radiographs with axial imaging for the determination of the trochlear morphology in patients with trochlear dysplasia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:335–340PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schoettle PB, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann C, Bereiter H, Romero J (2005) Trochleaplasty for patellar instability due to trochlear dysplasia: a minimum 2 year clinical and radiological follow-up of 19 knees. Acta Orthop 76:693–698CrossRef Schoettle PB, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann C, Bereiter H, Romero J (2005) Trochleaplasty for patellar instability due to trochlear dysplasia: a minimum 2 year clinical and radiological follow-up of 19 knees. Acta Orthop 76:693–698CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tecklenburg K, Feller JA, Whitehead TS, Webster KE, Elzarka A (2010) Outcome of surgery for recurrent patellar dislocation based on the distance of the tibial tuberosity to the trochlear groove. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1376–1380PubMedCrossRef Tecklenburg K, Feller JA, Whitehead TS, Webster KE, Elzarka A (2010) Outcome of surgery for recurrent patellar dislocation based on the distance of the tibial tuberosity to the trochlear groove. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1376–1380PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Toms AP, Cahir J, Swift L, Donell ST (2009) Imaging the femoral sulcus with ultrasound, CT, and MRI: reliability and generalizability in patients with patellar instability. Skeletal Radiol 38:329–338PubMedCrossRef Toms AP, Cahir J, Swift L, Donell ST (2009) Imaging the femoral sulcus with ultrasound, CT, and MRI: reliability and generalizability in patients with patellar instability. Skeletal Radiol 38:329–338PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Van Huyssteen AL, Hendrix MRG, Barnett AJ, Wakeley CJ, Eldridge JDJ (2006) Cartilage-bone mismatch in the dysplastic trochlea: an MRI study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:688–691PubMedCrossRef Van Huyssteen AL, Hendrix MRG, Barnett AJ, Wakeley CJ, Eldridge JDJ (2006) Cartilage-bone mismatch in the dysplastic trochlea: an MRI study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:688–691PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Walch G, Dejour H (1989) Radiology in femoropatellar pathology. Acta Orthop Belg 55:371–380PubMed Walch G, Dejour H (1989) Radiology in femoropatellar pathology. Acta Orthop Belg 55:371–380PubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of trochlear dysplasia using MRI: correlation between the classification system of Dejour and objective parameters of trochlear dysplasia
Authors
M. Nelitz
S. Lippacher
H. Reichel
D. Dornacher
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2321-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1/2014 Go to the issue