Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 4/2011

01-04-2011 | Knee

The fixation strength of a novel ACL soft-tissue graft fixation device compared with conventional interference screws: a biomechanical study in vitro

Authors: Camilla Halewood, Michael T. Hirschmann, Simon Newman, Jaffar Hleihil, Gershon Chaimski, Andrew A. Amis

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons is an established surgical procedure but some grafts fail due to poor fixation. This study compared the fixation of a new ACL graft fixation device (the EZ KneeSpan) to conventional soft-tissue threaded titanium interference screws (IS). The EZ device was designed to provide secure fixation while avoiding soft-tissue graft damage associated with use of an IS. Eight paired fresh-frozen cadaveric human knees and bovine digital extensor tendons were used. Two tunnels were placed in each tibia and femur, and grafts were fixed using the EZ device and the IS in each bone. Cyclic tensile loading and pull-out testing measured graft slippage (mm) and ultimate strength (N) of the fixation. The results were compared using the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Graft slippage after cyclic loading was significantly lower in the EZ group at 2.4 ± 0.1 mm versus 9.5 ± 6.2 mm for the IS group in the femur and 3.3 ± 1.4 mm versus 17.7 ± 13.6 mm in the tibia. The mean ultimate load for the femoral EZ group was significantly higher than the IS group (769 ± 223 N versus 468 ± 60 N), but they did not differ significantly in the tibia (518 ± 48 N versus 546 ± 139 N). Our results indicate that with the EZ device the initial fixation of cyclically loaded hamstring grafts could be superior to that with an IS. The EZ KneeSpan device also had similar tibial and higher femoral ultimate fixation strength than an IS.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ahmad CS, Gardner TR, Groh M, Arnouk J, Levine WN (2004) Mechanical properties of soft tissue femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:635–640PubMedCrossRef Ahmad CS, Gardner TR, Groh M, Arnouk J, Levine WN (2004) Mechanical properties of soft tissue femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:635–640PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Amis A (1988) The strength of artificial ligament anchorages. A comparative experimental study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70-B:397–403 Amis A (1988) The strength of artificial ligament anchorages. A comparative experimental study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70-B:397–403
3.
go back to reference Coleridge SD, Amis AA (2004) A comparison of five tibial-fixation systems in hamstring-graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:391–397PubMedCrossRef Coleridge SD, Amis AA (2004) A comparison of five tibial-fixation systems in hamstring-graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:391–397PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Donahue TL, Gregersen C, Hull ML, Howell SM (2001) Comparison of viscoelastic, structural and material properties of double-looped anterior cruciate ligament grafts made from bovine digital extensor and human hamstring tendons. J Biomech Eng 123:162–169PubMedCrossRef Donahue TL, Gregersen C, Hull ML, Howell SM (2001) Comparison of viscoelastic, structural and material properties of double-looped anterior cruciate ligament grafts made from bovine digital extensor and human hamstring tendons. J Biomech Eng 123:162–169PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fu FH, Cohen SB (2008) Current concepts in ACL reconstruction. SLACK Inc, Thorofare Fu FH, Cohen SB (2008) Current concepts in ACL reconstruction. SLACK Inc, Thorofare
6.
go back to reference Herbort M, Weimann A, Zantop T, Strobel M, Raschke M, Peterson W (2007) Initial fixation strength of a new hybrid technique for femoral ACL graft fixation: the bone wedge technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:769–775PubMedCrossRef Herbort M, Weimann A, Zantop T, Strobel M, Raschke M, Peterson W (2007) Initial fixation strength of a new hybrid technique for femoral ACL graft fixation: the bone wedge technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:769–775PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Herrera A, Martinez F, Iglesias D, Cegonino J, Ibarz E, Gracia L (2010) Fixation of biocomposite wedge interference screw in ACL reconstruction: effect of screw length and tunnel/screw ratio. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:139PubMedCrossRef Herrera A, Martinez F, Iglesias D, Cegonino J, Ibarz E, Gracia L (2010) Fixation of biocomposite wedge interference screw in ACL reconstruction: effect of screw length and tunnel/screw ratio. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:139PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Järvinen TLN, Nurmi JT, Sievänen H (2004) Bone density and insertion torque as predictors of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation strength. Am J Sports Med 32:1421–1429PubMedCrossRef Järvinen TLN, Nurmi JT, Sievänen H (2004) Bone density and insertion torque as predictors of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation strength. Am J Sports Med 32:1421–1429PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Khan R, Konyves A, Rama KBS, Thomas R, Amis AA (2006) RSA can measure ACL graft stretching and migration: development of new method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 448:139–145PubMedCrossRef Khan R, Konyves A, Rama KBS, Thomas R, Amis AA (2006) RSA can measure ACL graft stretching and migration: development of new method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 448:139–145PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kleweno CP, Jacir AM, Gardner TR, Ahmad CS, Levine WN (2009) Biomechanical evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament femoral fixation techniques. Am J Sports Med 37:339–345PubMedCrossRef Kleweno CP, Jacir AM, Gardner TR, Ahmad CS, Levine WN (2009) Biomechanical evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament femoral fixation techniques. Am J Sports Med 37:339–345PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Krupp R, Nyland J, Smith C, Nawab A, Burden R, Caborn DNM (2007) Biomechanical comparison between CentraLoc and Intrafix fixation of quadrupled semitendinosus-gracilis allografts in cadaveric tibiae with low bone mineral density. Knee 14:306–313PubMedCrossRef Krupp R, Nyland J, Smith C, Nawab A, Burden R, Caborn DNM (2007) Biomechanical comparison between CentraLoc and Intrafix fixation of quadrupled semitendinosus-gracilis allografts in cadaveric tibiae with low bone mineral density. Knee 14:306–313PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Andrish JT (1987) A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 15:225–229PubMedCrossRef Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Andrish JT (1987) A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 15:225–229PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Martel O, Carta JA, Garcés G (2007) A new device for the fixation of anterior cruciate ligament tendon grafts: design and experimental study. Med Eng Phys 29:163–168PubMedCrossRef Martel O, Carta JA, Garcés G (2007) A new device for the fixation of anterior cruciate ligament tendon grafts: design and experimental study. Med Eng Phys 29:163–168PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Micuci CJ, Frank DA, Kompel J, Muffly M, Demeo PJ, Altman GT (2010) The effect of interference screw diameter on fixation of soft-tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Athroscopy 26:1105–1110CrossRef Micuci CJ, Frank DA, Kompel J, Muffly M, Demeo PJ, Altman GT (2010) The effect of interference screw diameter on fixation of soft-tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Athroscopy 26:1105–1110CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Milano G, Mulas PD, Ziranu F, Piras S, Manunta A, Fabbriciani C (2006) Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis. Arthroscopy 22:660–668PubMedCrossRef Milano G, Mulas PD, Ziranu F, Piras S, Manunta A, Fabbriciani C (2006) Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis. Arthroscopy 22:660–668PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Milano G, Mulas PD, Ziranu F, Deriu L, Fabbriciani C (2007) Comparison of femoral fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft: a mechanical analysis in porcine knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:733–738PubMedCrossRef Milano G, Mulas PD, Ziranu F, Deriu L, Fabbriciani C (2007) Comparison of femoral fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft: a mechanical analysis in porcine knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:733–738PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nyland J, Kocabey Y, Caborn DNM (2004) Insertion torque pullout strength relationship of soft tissue tendon graft tibia tunnel fixation with a bioabsorbable interference screw. Arthroscopy 20:379–384PubMedCrossRef Nyland J, Kocabey Y, Caborn DNM (2004) Insertion torque pullout strength relationship of soft tissue tendon graft tibia tunnel fixation with a bioabsorbable interference screw. Arthroscopy 20:379–384PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pinczewski L, Roe J, Salmon L (2009) Why autologous hamstring tendon reconstruction should now be considered the gold standard for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes. Br J Sports Med 43:325–327PubMedCrossRef Pinczewski L, Roe J, Salmon L (2009) Why autologous hamstring tendon reconstruction should now be considered the gold standard for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes. Br J Sports Med 43:325–327PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Roy S, Fernhout M, Stanley R, McGee M, Carbone T, Field JR, Dobson P (2010) Tibial interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without autograft bone augmentation. Arthroscopy 26:949–956PubMedCrossRef Roy S, Fernhout M, Stanley R, McGee M, Carbone T, Field JR, Dobson P (2010) Tibial interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without autograft bone augmentation. Arthroscopy 26:949–956PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Salmon L, Pinczewski L, Roe J (2009) The science of rehabilitation of the ACL injured and reconstructed knee. J Sci Med Sport 12(Suppl 1):S59–S60CrossRef Salmon L, Pinczewski L, Roe J (2009) The science of rehabilitation of the ACL injured and reconstructed knee. J Sci Med Sport 12(Suppl 1):S59–S60CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Shelbourne KD, Klotz C (2006) What I have learned about the ACL: utilizing a progressive rehabilitation scheme to achieve total knee symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sci 11:318–325PubMedCrossRef Shelbourne KD, Klotz C (2006) What I have learned about the ACL: utilizing a progressive rehabilitation scheme to achieve total knee symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sci 11:318–325PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Shen H-C, Chang J-H, Lee C-H, Shen P-H, Yeh T-T, Wu C-C, Kuo C-L (2010) Biomechanical comparison of cross-pin and endobutton-CL femoral fixation of a flexor tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction–a porcine femur-graft-tibia complex study. J Surg Res 15:282–287CrossRef Shen H-C, Chang J-H, Lee C-H, Shen P-H, Yeh T-T, Wu C-C, Kuo C-L (2010) Biomechanical comparison of cross-pin and endobutton-CL femoral fixation of a flexor tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction–a porcine femur-graft-tibia complex study. J Surg Res 15:282–287CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tetsumura S, Fujita A, Nakajima M, Abe M (2006) Biomechanical comparison of different fixation methods on the tibial side in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in porcine tibial bone. J Orthop Sci 11:278–282PubMedCrossRef Tetsumura S, Fujita A, Nakajima M, Abe M (2006) Biomechanical comparison of different fixation methods on the tibial side in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in porcine tibial bone. J Orthop Sci 11:278–282PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Vergis A, Gillquist J (1995) Graft failure in intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a review of the literature. Arthroscopy 11:312–321PubMedCrossRef Vergis A, Gillquist J (1995) Graft failure in intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a review of the literature. Arthroscopy 11:312–321PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Walsh MP, Wijdicks CA, Parker JB, Hapa O, LaPrade RF (2009) A comparison between a retrograde interference screw, suture button, and combined fixation on the tibial side in an all-inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 37:160–167PubMedCrossRef Walsh MP, Wijdicks CA, Parker JB, Hapa O, LaPrade RF (2009) A comparison between a retrograde interference screw, suture button, and combined fixation on the tibial side in an all-inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 37:160–167PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wilcoxon F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull 1:80–83CrossRef Wilcoxon F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull 1:80–83CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wu J-L, Yeh T-T, Shen H-C, Cheng C-K, Lee C-H (2009) Mechanical comparison of biodegradable femoral fixation devices for hamstring tendon graft—a biomechanical study in a porcine model. Clin Biomech 24:435–440CrossRef Wu J-L, Yeh T-T, Shen H-C, Cheng C-K, Lee C-H (2009) Mechanical comparison of biodegradable femoral fixation devices for hamstring tendon graft—a biomechanical study in a porcine model. Clin Biomech 24:435–440CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The fixation strength of a novel ACL soft-tissue graft fixation device compared with conventional interference screws: a biomechanical study in vitro
Authors
Camilla Halewood
Michael T. Hirschmann
Simon Newman
Jaffar Hleihil
Gershon Chaimski
Andrew A. Amis
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1255-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 4/2011 Go to the issue