Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2008

01-05-2008 | Knee

In vivo analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon during computer navigated ACL reconstruction

Authors: Clayton G. Lane, Russell F. Warren, Fatima C. Stanford, Daniel Kendoff, Andrew D. Pearle

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

ACL insufficiency can be documented clinically with the pivot shift maneuver, but the specific pathologic kinematics of the pivot shift is difficult to quantify. Navigation provides an opportunity to analyze in vivo the motions that comprise the pivot shift and the kinematic changes that are inherent after ACL reconstruction. We hypothesized that tibial rotation, anterior tibial translation (ATT), acceleration of posterior translation (APT) and the newly described angle of P, quantified during navigated pivot shift examination, correlate with clinical grading of the pivot shift phenomena. Navigation data from 12 patients who underwent navigated ACL surgery were retrospectively reviewed. A characteristic P-shaped track of motion is recorded by the navigation software during the pivot-shift examination. The “angle of P” was developed as a means characterizing this track of motion and was measured in all cases. The tibial rotation, maximum anterior tibial translation and acceleration of posterior translation during the pivot shift were also measured. The charts of these patients were reviewed to obtain information on the clinical grading of the pivot-shift before and after ACL reconstruction. Spearman correlation analysis was then used to identify significant correlations between clinical grade of the pivot shift and the angle of p measured with computer navigation. After reconstruction, the clinical grade of the pivot shift was zero in all patients. The tibial rotation, maximum ATT, APT and the angle of p also decreased. On analysis of 24 EUAs, 12 before reconstruction and 12 after, there was excellent and significant correlation between the clinical grade of pivot shift examination and the angle of P (R 2 = 0.97, p < 0.001). Only good correlation was noted between the clinical pivot shift and the rotation (R 2 = 0.77, p < 0.0001), maximum ATT (R 2 = 0.87, p < 0.0001) and APT (R 2 = 0.81, p < 0.0001). There was a stepwise increase of 6–7 mm of translation and 5–6° of rotation for each increasing grade of pivot shift. There were also increases in the angle of P and APT for each increasing grade of pivot. A decrease in tibial rotation, maximum ATT, APT and angle of p is detected by computer navigation with ACL reconstruction, correlating with clinical grading. Clinical quantification of the distinct elements of the pivot shift may allow for more accurate evaluation of different ACL reconstruction constructs. There is also potential for these variables to be measured intraoperatively and guide ACL reconstruction when computer navigation is employed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bach BR Jr, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL (1988) The pivot shift phenomenon: results and description of a modified clinical test for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 16(6):571–576PubMedCrossRef Bach BR Jr, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL (1988) The pivot shift phenomenon: results and description of a modified clinical test for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 16(6):571–576PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP (2006) Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36(5):267–288PubMed Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP (2006) Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36(5):267–288PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bull AM, Amis AA (1998) The pivot-shift phenomenon: a clinical and biomechanical perspective. Knee 5:141–158CrossRef Bull AM, Amis AA (1998) The pivot-shift phenomenon: a clinical and biomechanical perspective. Knee 5:141–158CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bull AM, Earnshaw PH, Smith A et al (2002) Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(7):1075–1081PubMedCrossRef Bull AM, Earnshaw PH, Smith A et al (2002) Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(7):1075–1081PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Colombet P, Robinson JFRCS, Christel P et al (2007) Using navigation to measure rotation kinematics during ACL Reconstruction. Report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:59–65PubMedCrossRef Colombet P, Robinson JFRCS, Christel P et al (2007) Using navigation to measure rotation kinematics during ACL Reconstruction. Report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:59–65PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G et al (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(5):720–726PubMed Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G et al (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(5):720–726PubMed
7.
go back to reference Fukuda Y, Woo SL, Loh JC et al (2003) A quantitative analysis of valgus torque on the ACL: a human cadaveric study. J Orthop Res 21(6):1107–1112PubMedCrossRef Fukuda Y, Woo SL, Loh JC et al (2003) A quantitative analysis of valgus torque on the ACL: a human cadaveric study. J Orthop Res 21(6):1107–1112PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Galway HR, MacIntosh DL (1980) The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop (147):45–50 Galway HR, MacIntosh DL (1980) The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop (147):45–50
9.
go back to reference Georgoulis AD, Ristanis S, Chouliaras V et al (2007) Tibial rotation is not restored after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft. Report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:89–94PubMedCrossRef Georgoulis AD, Ristanis S, Chouliaras V et al (2007) Tibial rotation is not restored after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft. Report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:89–94PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Nagamune K et al (2007) In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device. Am J Sports Med 35(7):1098–1104PubMedCrossRef Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Nagamune K et al (2007) In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device. Am J Sports Med 35(7):1098–1104PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlstrom K, Lind J (2004) Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 75(5):594–599PubMedCrossRef Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlstrom K, Lind J (2004) Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 75(5):594–599PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kanamori A, Zeminski J, Rudy TW et al (2002) The effect of axial tibial torque on the function of the anterior cruciate ligament: a biomechanical study of a simulated pivot shift test. Arthroscopy 18(4):394–398PubMedCrossRef Kanamori A, Zeminski J, Rudy TW et al (2002) The effect of axial tibial torque on the function of the anterior cruciate ligament: a biomechanical study of a simulated pivot shift test. Arthroscopy 18(4):394–398PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kaplan N, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (1990) Primary surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A long-term follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 18(4):354–358PubMedCrossRef Kaplan N, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (1990) Primary surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A long-term follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 18(4):354–358PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK et al (2004) Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32(3):629–634PubMedCrossRef Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK et al (2004) Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32(3):629–634PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kubo S, Muratsu H, Yoshiya S et al (2007) Reliability and usefulness of a new in vivo measurement system of the pivot shift. Clin Orthop 454:54–58PubMedCrossRef Kubo S, Muratsu H, Yoshiya S et al (2007) Reliability and usefulness of a new in vivo measurement system of the pivot shift. Clin Orthop 454:54–58PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kvist J (2004) Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury: current recommendations for sports participation. Sports Med 34(4):269–280PubMedCrossRef Kvist J (2004) Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury: current recommendations for sports participation. Sports Med 34(4):269–280PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Leitze Z, Losee RE, Jokl P et al (2005) Implications of the pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee. Clin Orthop (436):229–236 Leitze Z, Losee RE, Jokl P et al (2005) Implications of the pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee. Clin Orthop (436):229–236
18.
go back to reference Lie DT, Bull AM, Amis AA (2007) Persistence of the mini pivot shift after anatomically placed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Rel Res 457:203–209 Lie DT, Bull AM, Amis AA (2007) Persistence of the mini pivot shift after anatomically placed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Rel Res 457:203–209
19.
go back to reference Noyes FR, Grood ES, Cummings JF et al (1991) An analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon. The knee motions and subluxations induced by different examiners. Am J Sports Med 19(2):148–155PubMedCrossRef Noyes FR, Grood ES, Cummings JF et al (1991) An analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon. The knee motions and subluxations induced by different examiners. Am J Sports Med 19(2):148–155PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pearle AD, Solomon DJ, Wanich T et al (2007) Reliability of navigated knee stability examination. Am J Sports Med 35(8):1315–1320PubMedCrossRef Pearle AD, Solomon DJ, Wanich T et al (2007) Reliability of navigated knee stability examination. Am J Sports Med 35(8):1315–1320PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Plaweski S, Cazal J, Rosell P et al (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using navigation: a comparative study on 60 patients. Am J Sports Med 34(4):542–552PubMedCrossRef Plaweski S, Cazal J, Rosell P et al (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using navigation: a comparative study on 60 patients. Am J Sports Med 34(4):542–552PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tashman S, Kolowich P, Collon D et al (2007) Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running. Report. Clin Orthop Rel Res 454:66–73CrossRef Tashman S, Kolowich P, Collon D et al (2007) Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running. Report. Clin Orthop Rel Res 454:66–73CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Woo SL, Kanamori A, Zeminski J et al (2002) The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon. A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(6):907–914PubMed Woo SL, Kanamori A, Zeminski J et al (2002) The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon. A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(6):907–914PubMed
Metadata
Title
In vivo analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon during computer navigated ACL reconstruction
Authors
Clayton G. Lane
Russell F. Warren
Fatima C. Stanford
Daniel Kendoff
Andrew D. Pearle
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0504-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2008 Go to the issue