Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2007

Open Access 01-11-2007 | Knee

Analysis of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the minimally invasive technique in patients aged 60 and above: an independent prospective series

Authors: Nanne P. Kort, Jos J. A. M. van Raay, John Cheung, Casper Jolink, Robbie Deutman

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 11/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

We present the outcome of an independent prospective series of phase-3 Oxford medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement surgery. Eight surgeons performed the 154 procedures in a community-based hospital between 1998 and 2003 for patients aged 60 and above. Seventeen knees were revised; in 14 cases a total knee replacement was performed, in 3 cases a component of the unicompartmental knee prosthesis was revised, resulting in a survival rate of 89% during these 2–7 years follow-up interval. This study shows that mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally invasive technique is a demanding procedure. The study emphasises the importance of routine in surgical management and strict adherence to indications and operation technique used to reduce outcome failure.
Literature
1.
Verdonk R, Cottenie D, Almqvist KF, Vorlat P (2005) The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: a 2–14 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:163–166PubMedCrossRef
2.
Tabor OB Jr, Tabor OB, Bernard M, Wan JY (2005) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term success in middle-age and obese patients. J Surg Orthop Adv 14:59–63PubMed
3.
Saxler G, Temmen D, Bontemps G (2004) Medium-term results of the AMC-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 11:349–355PubMedCrossRef
4.
Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard U (2005) Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:171–180PubMedCrossRef
5.
Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:983–939PubMedCrossRef
6.
Svard UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:191–194PubMedCrossRef
7.
Murray DW (2005) Mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. Orthopedics 28:985–987PubMed
8.
Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, Dodd CA, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW (2001) Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 16:970–976PubMedCrossRef
9.
Pandit H, Jenkins C, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2006) The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:54–60PubMedCrossRef
10.
Tibrewal SB, Grant KA, Goodfellow JW (1984) The radiolucent line beneath the tibial components of the Oxford meniscal knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:523–528PubMed
11.
Ahlback S (1968) Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) Suppl 277:7–72
12.
Lewold S, Goodman S, Knutson K, Robertsson O, Lidgren L (1995) Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis. A Swedish multicenter survival study. J Arthroplasty 10:722–731PubMedCrossRef
13.
Jeer PJ, Keene GC, Gill P (2004) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an intermediate report of survivorship after the introduction of a new system with analysis of failures. Knee 11:369–374PubMedCrossRef
14.
Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (2001) The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:45–49PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Analysis of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the minimally invasive technique in patients aged 60 and above: an independent prospective series
Authors
Nanne P. Kort
Jos J. A. M. van Raay
John Cheung
Casper Jolink
Robbie Deutman
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-007-0397-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2007

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2007 Go to the issue

Knee

Effects of arthroscopic meniscectomy on the long-term prognosis for the discoid lateral meniscus

Ankle

The biomechanical influence of tibio-talar containment on stability of the ankle joint

Knee

The use of frame fixation in the management of open distal extensor mechanism avulsion fracture in a dislocated knee

Knee

Outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar instability: a systematic review

Knee

Avulsion of the fibular head post-total knee replacement

Knee

Bilateral patellar tendon ruptures: a missed diagnosis