Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2007

01-11-2007 | Shoulder

Evaluation of BioCorkscrew and Bioknotless RC suture anchor rotator cuff repair fixation: an in vitro biomechanical study

Authors: Jennifer Tucker Ammon, John Nyland, Haw Chong Chang, Robert Burden, David N. M. Caborn

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 11/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

This in vitro biomechanical study used cadaveric specimens to compare the rotator cuff repair fixation provided by BioCorkscrew and Bioknotless RC suture anchors. Three cm wide by 1-cm long full-thickness supraspinatus defects were repaired using either two BioCorkscrew suture anchors with combined vertical and horizontal mattress sutures (n = 7) or three Bioknotless RC suture anchors with simple sutures (n = 7). Therefore, the BioCorkscrew suture anchor group had two sutures per anchor (four total sutures), while the Bioknotless RC suture anchor group had one suture per anchor (three total sutures). Two-phase cyclic (5–100 N, 1,000 cycles and 5–180 N, 2,000 cycles) and load to failure tests (31 mm/s) were performed. Non-parametric statistics were used to compare group differences (P < 0.05). All of the BioCorkscrew group specimens (seven of seven) completed the two phase cyclic test regimen without failure or gapping ≥ 5 mm, compared to only three of seven of the Bioknotless RC group (Fisher’s Exact test = 0.03). Groups did not differ for repair site gapping during the 5–100 N cyclic test phase (Fisher’s Exact test = 0.77), however more of the Bioknotless RC group displayed gapping ≥ 5 mm during the 5–180 N cyclic test phase than the BioCorkscrew group (P = 0.02). The BioCorkscrew group also displayed greater yield load during load to failure testing (492.2 ± 204 N vs. 296.4 ± 155 N, P = 0.03). In this in vitro biomechanical study, the BioCorkscrew group with combined vertical and horizontal mattress sutures displayed greater cyclic test survival, less repair site gapping, and superior yield load compared to the Bioknotless RC group with simple sutures. These results in human cadaveric rotator cuff-humerus specimens suggest better immediate post-operative repair site strength and a reduced need for post-operative restrictions. Clinical studies are needed to determine how these rotator cuff repair modes withstand the forces of early rehabilitation and activities of daily living that potentially influence patient outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anderson SD (2006) Practical light embalming technique for use in the surgical fresh tissue dissection laboratory. Clin Anat 19(1):8–11PubMedCrossRef Anderson SD (2006) Practical light embalming technique for use in the surgical fresh tissue dissection laboratory. Clin Anat 19(1):8–11PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Barber FA, Cawley P, Prudich JF (1993) Suture anchor failure strength—an in vivo study. Arthroscopy 9:647–652PubMedCrossRef Barber FA, Cawley P, Prudich JF (1993) Suture anchor failure strength—an in vivo study. Arthroscopy 9:647–652PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Burkhart SS (1998) Biomechanics of rotator cuff repairs: Converting the ritual to a science. Instr Course Lect 47:43–50PubMed Burkhart SS (1998) Biomechanics of rotator cuff repairs: Converting the ritual to a science. Instr Course Lect 47:43–50PubMed
5.
go back to reference Burkhart SS (1995) The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south Texas fence line. Arthroscopy 11(1):119–123PubMedCrossRef Burkhart SS (1995) The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south Texas fence line. Arthroscopy 11(1):119–123PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Burkhart SS, Fischer SP, Nottage WM et al (1996) Tissue fixation security in transosseous rotator cuff repairs: A mechanical comparison of simple versus mattress sutures. Arthroscopy 12(6):704–708PubMedCrossRef Burkhart SS, Fischer SP, Nottage WM et al (1996) Tissue fixation security in transosseous rotator cuff repairs: A mechanical comparison of simple versus mattress sutures. Arthroscopy 12(6):704–708PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Burkhart SS, Nottage WM, Ogilvie-Harris DJ et al (1994) Partial repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 10(4):363–370PubMedCrossRef Burkhart SS, Nottage WM, Ogilvie-Harris DJ et al (1994) Partial repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 10(4):363–370PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Burkhart S, Pagan J, Wirth M, Athanasiou KA (1997) Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: Confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation. Arthroscopy 13:720–724PubMedCrossRef Burkhart S, Pagan J, Wirth M, Athanasiou KA (1997) Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: Confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation. Arthroscopy 13:720–724PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cummins CA, Appleyard RC, Strickland S, Haen PS, Chen S, Murrell GAC (2005) Rotator cuff repair: An ex vivo analysis of suture anchor repair techniques on initial load to failure. Arthroscopy 21(10):1236–1241PubMedCrossRef Cummins CA, Appleyard RC, Strickland S, Haen PS, Chen S, Murrell GAC (2005) Rotator cuff repair: An ex vivo analysis of suture anchor repair techniques on initial load to failure. Arthroscopy 21(10):1236–1241PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cummins C, Murrell G (2003) Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:128–133PubMedCrossRef Cummins C, Murrell G (2003) Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:128–133PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Demirhan M, Atalar AC, Kilicoglu O (2003) Primary fixation strength of rotator cuff repair techniques: a comparative study. Arthroscopy 19(6):572–576PubMedCrossRef Demirhan M, Atalar AC, Kilicoglu O (2003) Primary fixation strength of rotator cuff repair techniques: a comparative study. Arthroscopy 19(6):572–576PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gazielly DF, Gleyze P, Montagnon C (1994) Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop 304:43–53PubMed Gazielly DF, Gleyze P, Montagnon C (1994) Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop 304:43–53PubMed
13.
go back to reference Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Beck M, Schlegel URS (1994) Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(3):371–379PubMed Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Beck M, Schlegel URS (1994) Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(3):371–379PubMed
14.
go back to reference Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bergageau J et al (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop 304:78–83PubMed Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bergageau J et al (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop 304:78–83PubMed
15.
go back to reference Harryman DT, Mack LA, Wang KY et al (1991) Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:982–989PubMed Harryman DT, Mack LA, Wang KY et al (1991) Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:982–989PubMed
16.
go back to reference Hecker AT, Shea M, Hayhurst JO et al (1993) Pull-out strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff and Bankart lesion repairs. Am J Sports Med 21:874–879PubMedCrossRef Hecker AT, Shea M, Hayhurst JO et al (1993) Pull-out strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff and Bankart lesion repairs. Am J Sports Med 21:874–879PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Liu SH, Baker CL (1994) Arthroscopically assisted rotator cuff repair: correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. Arthroscopy 10:54–60PubMedCrossRef Liu SH, Baker CL (1994) Arthroscopically assisted rotator cuff repair: correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. Arthroscopy 10:54–60PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Loutzenheiser TD, Harryman DT, Yung SW et al (1995) Optimizing arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy 11:199–206PubMedCrossRef Loutzenheiser TD, Harryman DT, Yung SW et al (1995) Optimizing arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy 11:199–206PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ma BC, Macgillivray JD, Clabeaux J, Lee S, Otis JC (2004) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff stitches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(6):1211–1216PubMed Ma BC, Macgillivray JD, Clabeaux J, Lee S, Otis JC (2004) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff stitches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(6):1211–1216PubMed
20.
go back to reference MacGillivray JD, Ma CB (2004) An arthroscopic stitch for massive rotator cuff tears: The Mac stitch. Arthroscopy 20(6):669–671PubMedCrossRef MacGillivray JD, Ma CB (2004) An arthroscopic stitch for massive rotator cuff tears: The Mac stitch. Arthroscopy 20(6):669–671PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mansat P, Cofield RH, Kersten TE, Rowland CM (1997) Complications of rotator cuff repair. Orthop Clin North Am 28:205–213PubMedCrossRef Mansat P, Cofield RH, Kersten TE, Rowland CM (1997) Complications of rotator cuff repair. Orthop Clin North Am 28:205–213PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Reed SC, Glossop N, Olgivie-Harris DJ (1996) Full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a biomechanical comparison of suture versus bone anchor techniques. Am J Sports Med 24:46–48PubMedCrossRef Reed SC, Glossop N, Olgivie-Harris DJ (1996) Full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a biomechanical comparison of suture versus bone anchor techniques. Am J Sports Med 24:46–48PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schneeberger AG, Von Roll A, Kalberer F, Hilaire J, Gerber C (2002) Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff stitches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(12):2152–2160PubMed Schneeberger AG, Von Roll A, Kalberer F, Hilaire J, Gerber C (2002) Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff stitches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(12):2152–2160PubMed
25.
go back to reference Thal R (2001) A knotless suture anchor: design, function, and biomechanical testing. Am J Sports Med 29(5):646–649PubMed Thal R (2001) A knotless suture anchor: design, function, and biomechanical testing. Am J Sports Med 29(5):646–649PubMed
26.
go back to reference Waltrip RL, Zheng N, Dugas JR, Andrews JR (2003) Rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical comparison of three techniques. Am J Sports Med 31(4):493–497PubMed Waltrip RL, Zheng N, Dugas JR, Andrews JR (2003) Rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical comparison of three techniques. Am J Sports Med 31(4):493–497PubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of BioCorkscrew and Bioknotless RC suture anchor rotator cuff repair fixation: an in vitro biomechanical study
Authors
Jennifer Tucker Ammon
John Nyland
Haw Chong Chang
Robert Burden
David N. M. Caborn
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-007-0321-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2007

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2007 Go to the issue