Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2007

01-08-2007 | Knee

Development of a simple device for measurement of rotational knee laxity

Authors: Volker Musahl, Kevin M. Bell, Andrew G. Tsai, Ryan S. Costic, Robert Allaire, Thore Zantop, James J. Irrgang, Freddie H. Fu

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 8/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

The goal of this study was to develop a new device for the measurement of rotational knee laxity and to measure intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in a cadaveric study. An array of established tools was utilized to design the device with a basis that consists of an Aircast Foam Walker™ boot. A load cell was attached to the boot with a handle bar for application of moments about the knee. An electromagnetic tracking system was used to record the motion of the tibia with respect to the femur. The total arc of motion ranged from 23° at full extension to 46° at 90° of knee flexion. The intra-tester ICCs ranged from 0.94 to 0.99. The ICC for inter-tester reliability ranged from 0.95 to 0.99. In summary, the new device for measurement of rotational knee laxity is simple, reliable, and can be used in a non-invasive fashion in the office or surgical suite document clinical outcome in terms of rotational knee laxity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Daniel DM et al (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(5):720–726PubMed Daniel DM et al (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(5):720–726PubMed
2.
go back to reference Uh BS et al (2001) A new device to measure knee laxity during weightbearing and non-weightbearing conditions. J Orthop Res 19(6):1185–1191PubMedCrossRef Uh BS et al (2001) A new device to measure knee laxity during weightbearing and non-weightbearing conditions. J Orthop Res 19(6):1185–1191PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Highgenboten CL, Jackson A, Meske NB (1989) Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons. Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Sports Med 17(6):743–746PubMedCrossRef Highgenboten CL, Jackson A, Meske NB (1989) Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons. Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Sports Med 17(6):743–746PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Almquist PO et al (2002) Evaluation of an external device measuring knee joint rotation: an in vivo study with simultaneous Roentgen stereometric analysis. J Orthop Res 20(3):427–432PubMedCrossRef Almquist PO et al (2002) Evaluation of an external device measuring knee joint rotation: an in vivo study with simultaneous Roentgen stereometric analysis. J Orthop Res 20(3):427–432PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Christel P (2005) Anterior cruciate ligament and rotation stability. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 91(S8):18–22PubMed Christel P (2005) Anterior cruciate ligament and rotation stability. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 91(S8):18–22PubMed
6.
go back to reference Koh J (2005) Computer-assisted navigation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: accuracy and outcomes. Orthopedics 28(Suppl 10):s1283–s1287PubMed Koh J (2005) Computer-assisted navigation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: accuracy and outcomes. Orthopedics 28(Suppl 10):s1283–s1287PubMed
7.
go back to reference Zaffagnini S et al (2006) New intraoperative protocol for kinematic evaluation of ACL reconstruction: preliminary results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(9):811–816PubMedCrossRef Zaffagnini S et al (2006) New intraoperative protocol for kinematic evaluation of ACL reconstruction: preliminary results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(9):811–816PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Martelli S et al (2006) Validation of a new protocol for computer-assisted evaluation of kinematics of double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21(3):279–287CrossRef Martelli S et al (2006) Validation of a new protocol for computer-assisted evaluation of kinematics of double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21(3):279–287CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, Fu FH (2002) Current opinion on computer-aided surgical navigation and robotics: role in the treatment of sports-related injuries. Sports Med 32(13):809–818PubMedCrossRef Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, Fu FH (2002) Current opinion on computer-aided surgical navigation and robotics: role in the treatment of sports-related injuries. Sports Med 32(13):809–818PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Moore SM et al (2004) Multidirectional kinematics of the glenohumeral joint during simulated simple translation tests: impact on clinical diagnoses. J Orthop Res 22(4):889–894PubMedCrossRef Moore SM et al (2004) Multidirectional kinematics of the glenohumeral joint during simulated simple translation tests: impact on clinical diagnoses. J Orthop Res 22(4):889–894PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bull AM et al (2002) Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(7):1075–1081PubMedCrossRef Bull AM et al (2002) Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(7):1075–1081PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kurosaka M (2006) Comparison of double bundle anatomic, single antero-medial, and single postero-lateral ACL reconstructions. Short term prospective-randomized follow-up study. In ACL study group. Hawaii, USA Kurosaka M (2006) Comparison of double bundle anatomic, single antero-medial, and single postero-lateral ACL reconstructions. Short term prospective-randomized follow-up study. In ACL study group. Hawaii, USA
13.
go back to reference Benoit DL et al (2006) Effect of skin movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and cutting motions measured in vivo. Gait Posture 24(2):152–164PubMedCrossRef Benoit DL et al (2006) Effect of skin movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and cutting motions measured in vivo. Gait Posture 24(2):152–164PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Leardini A et al (2005) Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. Gait Posture 21(2):212–225PubMedCrossRef Leardini A et al (2005) Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. Gait Posture 21(2):212–225PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fujie H et al (1993) The use of robotics technology to study human joint kinematics: a new methodology. J Biomech Eng 115(3):211–217PubMed Fujie H et al (1993) The use of robotics technology to study human joint kinematics: a new methodology. J Biomech Eng 115(3):211–217PubMed
16.
go back to reference Rudy TW et al (1996) A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to determine in situ forces of knee ligaments. J Biomech 29(10):1357–1360PubMedCrossRef Rudy TW et al (1996) A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to determine in situ forces of knee ligaments. J Biomech 29(10):1357–1360PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Reuben JD et al (1989) Three-dimensional dynamic motion analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee joint. Am J Sports Med 17(4):463–471PubMedCrossRef Reuben JD et al (1989) Three-dimensional dynamic motion analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee joint. Am J Sports Med 17(4):463–471PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Slocum DB et al (1976) Clinical test for anterolateral rotary instability of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 118:63–69PubMed Slocum DB et al (1976) Clinical test for anterolateral rotary instability of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 118:63–69PubMed
Metadata
Title
Development of a simple device for measurement of rotational knee laxity
Authors
Volker Musahl
Kevin M. Bell
Andrew G. Tsai
Ryan S. Costic
Robert Allaire
Thore Zantop
James J. Irrgang
Freddie H. Fu
Publication date
01-08-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 8/2007
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-007-0317-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2007

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2007 Go to the issue