Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 12/2020

01-12-2020 | Acute Respiratory Distress-Syndrome | Original

Clinical features, ventilatory management, and outcome of ARDS caused by COVID-19 are similar to other causes of ARDS

Authors: Carlos Ferrando, Fernando Suarez-Sipmann, Ricard Mellado-Artigas, María Hernández, Alfredo Gea, Egoitz Arruti, César Aldecoa, Graciela Martínez-Pallí, Miguel A. Martínez-González, Arthur S. Slutsky, Jesús Villar, on behalf of the COVID-19 Spanish ICU Network

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The main characteristics of mechanically ventilated ARDS patients affected with COVID-19, and the adherence to lung-protective ventilation strategies are not well known. We describe characteristics and outcomes of confirmed ARDS in COVID-19 patients managed with invasive mechanical ventilation (MV).

Methods

This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study in consecutive, mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS (as defined by the Berlin criteria) affected with with COVID-19 (confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in nasal or pharyngeal swab specimens), admitted to a network of 36 Spanish and Andorran intensive care units (ICUs) between March 12 and June 1, 2020. We examined the clinical features, ventilatory management, and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 ARDS patients, and compared some results with other relevant studies in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients.

Results

A total of 742 patients were analysed with complete 28-day outcome data: 128 (17.1%) with mild, 331 (44.6%) with moderate, and 283 (38.1%) with severe ARDS. At baseline, defined as the first day on invasive MV, median (IQR) values were: tidal volume 6.9 (6.3–7.8) ml/kg predicted body weight, positive end-expiratory pressure 12 (11–14) cmH2O. Values of respiratory system compliance 35 (27–45) ml/cmH2O, plateau pressure 25 (22–29) cmH2O, and driving pressure 12 (10–16) cmH2O were similar to values from non-COVID-19 ARDS patients observed in other studies. Recruitment maneuvers, prone position and neuromuscular blocking agents were used in 79%, 76% and 72% of patients, respectively. The risk of 28-day mortality was lower in mild ARDS [hazard ratio (RR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.33–0.93), p = 0.026] and moderate ARDS [hazard ratio (RR) 0.69 (95% CI 0.47–0.97), p = 0.035] when compared to severe ARDS. The 28-day mortality was similar to other observational studies in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients.

Conclusions

In this large series, COVID-19 ARDS patients have features similar to other causes of ARDS, compliance with lung-protective ventilation was high, and the risk of 28-day mortality increased with the degree of ARDS severity.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
15.
go back to reference Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators, Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura ÉA et al (2017) Effect of lung recruitment and titrated positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs low PEEP on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1335–1345. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.14171CrossRef Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators, Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura ÉA et al (2017) Effect of lung recruitment and titrated positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs low PEEP on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1335–1345. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jama.​2017.​14171CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Guérin C, Beuret P, Constantin JM, Investigators of the APRONET Study Group, the REVA Network, the Réseau recherche de la Société Française d’Anesthésie-Réanimation (SFAR-recherche), and the ESICM Trials Group et al (2018) A prospective international observational prevalence study on prone positioning of ARDS patients: the APRONET (ARDS Prone Position Network) study. Intensive Care Med 44:22–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4996-5CrossRefPubMed Guérin C, Beuret P, Constantin JM, Investigators of the APRONET Study Group, the REVA Network, the Réseau recherche de la Société Française d’Anesthésie-Réanimation (SFAR-recherche), and the ESICM Trials Group et al (2018) A prospective international observational prevalence study on prone positioning of ARDS patients: the APRONET (ARDS Prone Position Network) study. Intensive Care Med 44:22–37. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00134-017-4996-5CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical features, ventilatory management, and outcome of ARDS caused by COVID-19 are similar to other causes of ARDS
Authors
Carlos Ferrando
Fernando Suarez-Sipmann
Ricard Mellado-Artigas
María Hernández
Alfredo Gea
Egoitz Arruti
César Aldecoa
Graciela Martínez-Pallí
Miguel A. Martínez-González
Arthur S. Slutsky
Jesús Villar
on behalf of the COVID-19 Spanish ICU Network
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06192-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Intensive Care Medicine 12/2020 Go to the issue