Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Original

Standardized EEG analysis to reduce the uncertainty of outcome prognostication after cardiac arrest

Authors: Filippo Bongiovanni, Federico Romagnosi, Giuseppina Barbella, Arianna Di Rocco, Andrea O. Rossetti, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Claudio Sandroni, Mauro Oddo

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Post-resuscitation guidelines recommend a multimodal algorithm for outcome prediction after cardiac arrest (CA). We aimed at evaluating the prevalence of indeterminate prognosis after application of this algorithm and providing a strategy for improving prognostication in this population.

Methods

We examined a prospective cohort of comatose CA patients (n = 485) in whom the ERC/ESICM algorithm was applied. In patients with an indeterminate outcome, prognostication was investigated using standardized EEG classification (benign, malignant, highly malignant) and serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE). Neurological recovery at 3 months was dichotomized as good (Cerebral Performance Categories [CPC] 1–2) vs. poor (CPC 3–5).

Results

Using the ERC/ESICM algorithm, 155 (32%) patients were prognosticated with poor outcome; all died at 3 months. Among the remaining 330 (68%) patients with an indeterminate outcome, the majority (212/330; 64%) showed good recovery. In this patient subgroup, absence of a highly malignant EEG by day 3 had 99.5 [97.4–99.9] % sensitivity for good recovery, which was superior to NSE < 33 μg/L (84.9 [79.3–89.4] % when used alone; 84.4 [78.8–89] % when combined with EEG, both p < 0.001). Highly malignant EEG had equal specificity (99.5 [97.4–99.9] %) but higher sensitivity than NSE for poor recovery. Further analysis of the discriminative power of outcome predictors revealed limited value of NSE over EEG.

Conclusions

In the majority of comatose CA patients, the outcome remains indeterminate after application of ERC/ESICM prognostication algorithm. Standardized EEG background analysis enables accurate prediction of both good and poor recovery, thereby greatly reducing uncertainty about coma prognostication in this patient population.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
21.
go back to reference Sandroni C (2016) EEG for prognostication in postanoxic coma: what you predict depends on when you predict. Minerva Anestesiol 82:919–922PubMed Sandroni C (2016) EEG for prognostication in postanoxic coma: what you predict depends on when you predict. Minerva Anestesiol 82:919–922PubMed
24.
go back to reference Hirsch LJ, LaRoche SM, Gaspard N et al (2013) American clinical neurophysiology society’s standardized critical care EEG terminology: 2012 version. J Clin Neurophysiol 30:27CrossRef Hirsch LJ, LaRoche SM, Gaspard N et al (2013) American clinical neurophysiology society’s standardized critical care EEG terminology: 2012 version. J Clin Neurophysiol 30:27CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hirsch LJ, Claassen J, Mayer SA, Emerson RG (2004) Stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs): a common EEG phenomenon in the critically ill. Epilepsia 45:109–123CrossRef Hirsch LJ, Claassen J, Mayer SA, Emerson RG (2004) Stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs): a common EEG phenomenon in the critically ill. Epilepsia 45:109–123CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Standardized EEG analysis to reduce the uncertainty of outcome prognostication after cardiac arrest
Authors
Filippo Bongiovanni
Federico Romagnosi
Giuseppina Barbella
Arianna Di Rocco
Andrea O. Rossetti
Fabio Silvio Taccone
Claudio Sandroni
Mauro Oddo
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05921-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Intensive Care Medicine 5/2020 Go to the issue