Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 1/2018

01-01-2018 | What's New in Intensive Care

Permissive hypotension during shock resuscitation: equipoise in all patients?

Authors: Francois Lamontagne, John C. Marshall, Neill K. J. Adhikari

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

Recently, the idea that treatment of severely ill patients hinges on correction of deranged physiology has been challenged. Several trials have found benefit from “abnormal” or more permissive resuscitation targets for such interventions as oxygen, feeding, ventilation, blood transfusion, insulin, and hemodynamic support in trauma (Table 1). Similarly, targeting a normal blood pressure during resuscitation has been a core element of shock management, but trials are now evaluating the effects of permissive hypotension. The rationale for such trials is that adequate perfusion may not depend on “normal” blood pressure and that autoregulatory capacity may differ among organs and patient subgroups defined by age and cardiovascular comorbidity.
Table 1
Selected trials of lower intensity vs higher intensity interventions for critically ill patients
First author, yeara
Patient population
Restrictive intervention
Findings
Oxygen
 Girardis, 2016
General critical illness
Target PaO2 between 70 and 100 mmHg and SpO2 94–98% vs. usual care of PaO2 150 mmHg and SpO2 of 97–100%
Restricting oxygen therapy improves survival
Feeding
 Arabi, 2015
General critical illness
Permissive underfeeding (40–60% of calculated caloric requirements) vs. standard enteral feeding (70–100%), with similar protein intake
Restricting non-protein calories does not worsen outcomes
 Rice, 2012
Acute lung injury
Trophic vs. full enteral feeding for 6 days
Restricting enteral feeding for 6 days does not worsen outcomes and reduces gastrointestinal intolerance
Mechanical ventilation
 ARDSNet, 2000
Acute lung injury
Tidal volumes of 6 mL/kg predicted body weight and a plateau pressure of 30 cmH2O vs. tidal volume of 12 mL/kg predicted body weight and a plateau pressure of 50 cmH2O
Low tidal volumes worsen gas exchange but improve survival
Intravenous fluids
 Bickell, 1994
Penetrating trauma and hypotension
Delayed administration of intravenous fluids until reaching the operating room vs. standard fluid resuscitation before reaching the hospital
Delayed fluid therapy and permissive hypotension improve survival
 Maitland, 2011
Severe pediatric febrile illness and hypoperfusion in Africa
No intravenous fluid boluses vs. intravenous boluses (either saline or albumin)
Maintenance intravenous fluid therapy without boluses improves survival
Blood transfusion
 Hebert, 1999
General critical illness
Transfusion to target hemoglobin value of 70 vs. 90 g/L
Restricting blood transfusions does not worsen outcomes
 Villanueva, 2013
Severe acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Transfusion to target hemoglobin value of 70 vs. 90 g/L
Restricting blood transfusions improves survival
 Carson, 2011
High-risk surgery hip fracture surgery
Transfusion to target hemoglobin value of 80 vs. 100 g/L
Restricting blood transfusions does not worsen outcomes
 Holst, 2014
Septic shock
Transfusion to target hemoglobin value of 70 vs. 90 g/L
Restricting blood transfusions does not worsen outcomes
Insulin
 Finfer, 2009
General critical illness
Target blood glucose value of 10.0 mmol/L or less vs. 4.5 to 6.0 mmol/L
Restricting insulin therapy raises blood glucose values but improves survival
aReferences for these trials are in the electronic supplementary material
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Hebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA et al (1999) A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med 340:409–417CrossRefPubMed Hebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA et al (1999) A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med 340:409–417CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kaneko N, Matsuda R, Nakajima T et al (2006) Norepinephrine-induced diastolic dysfunction with aortic valve opening under calcium-loading in rats. Drug Dev Res 67:511–518. doi:10.1002/ddr.20109 CrossRef Kaneko N, Matsuda R, Nakajima T et al (2006) Norepinephrine-induced diastolic dysfunction with aortic valve opening under calcium-loading in rats. Drug Dev Res 67:511–518. doi:10.​1002/​ddr.​20109 CrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Hoogenberg K, Smit AJ, Girbes AR (1998) Effects of low-dose dopamine on renal and systemic hemodynamics during incremental norepinephrine infusion in healthy volunteers. Crit Care Med 26:260–265CrossRefPubMed Hoogenberg K, Smit AJ, Girbes AR (1998) Effects of low-dose dopamine on renal and systemic hemodynamics during incremental norepinephrine infusion in healthy volunteers. Crit Care Med 26:260–265CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Friedrich JO, Adhikari N, Herridge MS et al (2005) Meta-analysis: low-dose dopamine increases urine output but does not prevent renal dysfunction or death. Ann Intern Med 142:510–524CrossRefPubMed Friedrich JO, Adhikari N, Herridge MS et al (2005) Meta-analysis: low-dose dopamine increases urine output but does not prevent renal dysfunction or death. Ann Intern Med 142:510–524CrossRefPubMed
13.
Metadata
Title
Permissive hypotension during shock resuscitation: equipoise in all patients?
Authors
Francois Lamontagne
John C. Marshall
Neill K. J. Adhikari
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4849-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Intensive Care Medicine 1/2018 Go to the issue

Imaging in Intensive Care Medicine

Yellow urticaria following plasma transfusion