Published in:
01-05-2016 | Editorial
The Berlin definition met our needs: not sure
Author:
Jean-Louis Vincent
Published in:
Intensive Care Medicine
|
Issue 5/2016
Login to get access
Excerpt
I was fortunate to be one of the participants involved in elaborating the new criteria for the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in Berlin in 2012 [
1]. I appreciated the discussions during this process and support the outcome. At the same time, I respectfully wonder whether this intellectual performance really helps our patients. Developing new definitions may appear to bring some uniformity to the patient populations included in clinical trials, but it does not eliminate the underlying heterogeneity; it may, therefore, actually contribute to generate additional negative trials. So are these new ARDS definitions really a major advance? …