Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Editorial

Volume responsive, but does the patient need volume?

Author: Jukka Takala

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

Rapid administration of intravenous fluid or a “fluid challenge” is one of the most common interventions in the intensive care patient with manifest or perceived hemodynamic problems. The concept of fluid administration to evaluate cardiovascular function in shock was probably first introduced by Max Harry Weil more than 50 years ago [1] and has been referred to as fluid challenge in textbooks and papers since the mid-1970s [2]. The fluid challenge was described as a concept to evaluate the ability of the heart to handle the fluid load in the presence of clinical signs and symptoms of insufficient circulation. A fundamental principle of fluid challenge was defined by Weil in 1965: “The effect of fluid replacement on the clinical status of the patient in shock is gauged by objective changes in circulation, such as blood pressure, mental alertness, urine flow, peripheral venous filling, and appearance and texture of the skin” [1]. Impaired tissue perfusion was already then recognized as a key defect in acute circulatory failure. Subsequently, administration of large volumes of fluids became popular in the management of the widest spectrum of disorders in intensive care patients. Much of this evolution can be traced back to misinterpretations and oversimplification of basic physiology and pathophysiology—often accompanied by invasive hemodynamic monitoring with the pulmonary artery catheter. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Weil MH, Shubin H, Rosoff L (1965) Fluid repletion in circulatory shock: central venous pressure and other practical guides. JAMA 192:668–674CrossRefPubMed Weil MH, Shubin H, Rosoff L (1965) Fluid repletion in circulatory shock: central venous pressure and other practical guides. JAMA 192:668–674CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Weil MH, Henning RJ (1979) New concepts in the diagnosis and fluid treatment of circulatory shock. Thirteenth annual Becton, Dickinson and Company Oscar Schwidetsky Memorial Lecture. Anesth Analg 58:124–132CrossRefPubMed Weil MH, Henning RJ (1979) New concepts in the diagnosis and fluid treatment of circulatory shock. Thirteenth annual Becton, Dickinson and Company Oscar Schwidetsky Memorial Lecture. Anesth Analg 58:124–132CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Eisenberg PR, Hansbrough JR, Anderson D, Schuster DP (1987) A prospective study of lung water measurements during patient management in an intensive care unit. Am Rev Respir Dis 136:662–868CrossRefPubMed Eisenberg PR, Hansbrough JR, Anderson D, Schuster DP (1987) A prospective study of lung water measurements during patient management in an intensive care unit. Am Rev Respir Dis 136:662–868CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Roth E, Lax LC, Maloney JV Jr (1969) Ringer’s lactate solution and extracellular fluid volume in the surgical patient: a critical analysis. Ann Surg 169:149–164CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Roth E, Lax LC, Maloney JV Jr (1969) Ringer’s lactate solution and extracellular fluid volume in the surgical patient: a critical analysis. Ann Surg 169:149–164CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Cope O, Moore FD (1947) The redistribution of body water and the fluid therapy of the burned patient. Ann Surg 136:1010–1045CrossRef Cope O, Moore FD (1947) The redistribution of body water and the fluid therapy of the burned patient. Ann Surg 136:1010–1045CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Weinstein PD, Doerfler ME (1992) Systemic complications of fluid resuscitation. Crit Care Clin 8:439–448PubMed Weinstein PD, Doerfler ME (1992) Systemic complications of fluid resuscitation. Crit Care Clin 8:439–448PubMed
7.
go back to reference Vincent J-L, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, Gerlach H, Moreno R, Carlet J, Le Gall J-R, Payen D, on behalf of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients Investigators (2006) Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 34:344–353CrossRefPubMed Vincent J-L, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, Gerlach H, Moreno R, Carlet J, Le Gall J-R, Payen D, on behalf of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients Investigators (2006) Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 34:344–353CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul J-L (2015) Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-4134-1 Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul J-L (2015) Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. doi:10.​1007/​s00134-015-4134-1
9.
go back to reference Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul J-L, Pettila V, Wilkman E, Molnar Z, Della Rocca G, Aldecoa C, Artigas A, Sameer J, Sander M, Spies C, Lefrant J-Y, De Backer D, on behalf of the FENICE Investigators and the ESICM Trial Group (2015) Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study. A global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med 41:1529–1537CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul J-L, Pettila V, Wilkman E, Molnar Z, Della Rocca G, Aldecoa C, Artigas A, Sameer J, Sander M, Spies C, Lefrant J-Y, De Backer D, on behalf of the FENICE Investigators and the ESICM Trial Group (2015) Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study. A global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med 41:1529–1537CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Volume responsive, but does the patient need volume?
Author
Jukka Takala
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-4172-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

Intensive Care Medicine 9/2016 Go to the issue