Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 7/2014

01-07-2014 | Original

Predictors of insufficient amikacin peak concentration in critically ill patients receiving a 25 mg/kg total body weight regimen

Authors: Etienne de Montmollin, Lila Bouadma, Nathalie Gault, Bruno Mourvillier, Eric Mariotte, Sarah Chemam, Laurent Massias, Emmanuelle Papy, Florence Tubach, Michel Wolff, Romain Sonneville

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 7/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Amikacin requires pharmacodynamic targets of peak serum concentration (C max) of 8–10 times the minimal inhibitory concentration, corresponding to a target C max of 60–80 mg/L for the less susceptible bacteria. Even with new dosing regimens of 25 mg/kg, 30 % of patients do not meet the pharmacodynamic target. We aimed to identify predictive factors for insufficient C max in a population of critically ill patients.

Methods

Prospective observational monocentric study of patients admitted to a general ICU and requiring a loading dose of amikacin. Amikacin was administered intravenously at the dose of 25 mg/kg of total body weight. Independent determinants of C max < 60 mg/L were identified by mixed model multivariate analysis.

Results

Over a 1-year period, 181 episodes in 146 patients (SAPS 2 = 51 [41–68]) were included. At inclusion, the SOFA score was 8 [6–12], 119 (66 %) episodes required vasopressors, 150 (83 %) mechanical ventilation, and 81 (45 %) renal replacement therapy. The amikacin C max was 69 [54.9–84.4] mg/L. Overall, 60 (33 %) episodes had a C max < 60 mg/L. The risk of C max < 60 mg/L associated with BMI < 25 kg/m2 varied across quarters of inclusion. Independent risk factors for C max < 60 mg/L were a BMI < 25 kg/m2 over the first quarter (odds ratio (OR) 15.95, 95 % confidence interval (CI) [3.68–69.20], p < 0.001) and positive 24-h fluid balance (OR per 250-mL increment 1.06, 95 % [CI 1.01–1.11], p = 0.018).

Conclusions

Despite an amikacin dose of 25 mg/kg of total body weight, 33 % of patients still had an amikacin C max < 60 mg/L. Positive 24-h fluid balance was identified as a predictive factor of C max < 60 mg/L. When total body weight is used, low BMI tended to be associated with amikacin underdosing. These results suggest the need for higher doses in patients with a positive 24-h fluid balance in order to reach adequate therapeutic targets.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Kumar A, Safdar N, Kethireddy S, Chateau D (2010) A survival benefit of combination antibiotic therapy for serious infections associated with sepsis and septic shock is contingent only on the risk of death: a meta-analytic/meta-regression study. Crit Care Med 38:1651–1664. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e96b91 PubMedCrossRef Kumar A, Safdar N, Kethireddy S, Chateau D (2010) A survival benefit of combination antibiotic therapy for serious infections associated with sepsis and septic shock is contingent only on the risk of death: a meta-analytic/meta-regression study. Crit Care Med 38:1651–1664. doi:10.​1097/​CCM.​0b013e3181e96b91​ PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Observatoire National de l’Epidémiologie de la Resistance Bactérienne aux Antibiotiques (ONERBA) (2011) Rapport d’activité 2009-10/Annual report 2009-10. www.onerba.org, Vivactis Plus. Accessed 20 Mar 2014 Observatoire National de l’Epidémiologie de la Resistance Bactérienne aux Antibiotiques (ONERBA) (2011) Rapport d’activité 2009-10/Annual report 2009-10. www.​onerba.​org, Vivactis Plus. Accessed 20 Mar 2014
6.
go back to reference Moore RD, Lietman PS, Smith CR (1987) Clinical response to aminoglycoside therapy: importance of the ratio of peak concentration to minimal inhibitory concentration. J Infect Dis 155:93–99PubMedCrossRef Moore RD, Lietman PS, Smith CR (1987) Clinical response to aminoglycoside therapy: importance of the ratio of peak concentration to minimal inhibitory concentration. J Infect Dis 155:93–99PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zelenitsky SA, Harding GKM, Sun S et al (2003) Treatment and outcome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: an antibiotic pharmacodynamic analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 52:668–674. doi:10.1093/jac/dkg403 PubMedCrossRef Zelenitsky SA, Harding GKM, Sun S et al (2003) Treatment and outcome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: an antibiotic pharmacodynamic analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 52:668–674. doi:10.​1093/​jac/​dkg403 PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Beckhouse MJ, Whyte IM, Byth PL et al (1988) Altered aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics in the critically ill. Anaesth Intensive Care 16:418–422PubMed Beckhouse MJ, Whyte IM, Byth PL et al (1988) Altered aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics in the critically ill. Anaesth Intensive Care 16:418–422PubMed
11.
go back to reference Marik PE, Havlik I, Monteagudo FS, Lipman J (1991) The pharmacokinetic of amikacin in critically ill adult and paediatric patients: comparison of once- versus twice-daily dosing regimens. J Antimicrob Chemother 27 (Suppl C):81–89CrossRef Marik PE, Havlik I, Monteagudo FS, Lipman J (1991) The pharmacokinetic of amikacin in critically ill adult and paediatric patients: comparison of once- versus twice-daily dosing regimens. J Antimicrob Chemother 27 (Suppl C):81–89CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Craig W (2010) Amikacin. In: Kucer’s the use of antibiotics, 6th edn. Edward Arnold, London, pp 712–726 Craig W (2010) Amikacin. In: Kucer’s the use of antibiotics, 6th edn. Edward Arnold, London, pp 712–726
15.
go back to reference Lugo G, Castañeda-Hernández G (1997) Relationship between hemodynamic and vital support measures and pharmacokinetic variability of amikacin in critically ill patients with sepsis. Crit Care Med 25:806–811PubMedCrossRef Lugo G, Castañeda-Hernández G (1997) Relationship between hemodynamic and vital support measures and pharmacokinetic variability of amikacin in critically ill patients with sepsis. Crit Care Med 25:806–811PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference de Montmollin E, Gault N, Bouadma L et al (2013) Risk factors for insufficient serum amikacin peak concentrations in critically ill adults. 53rd ICAAC, Denver, Colorado. Category A, 1035 de Montmollin E, Gault N, Bouadma L et al (2013) Risk factors for insufficient serum amikacin peak concentrations in critically ill adults. 53rd ICAAC, Denver, Colorado. Category A, 1035
17.
go back to reference Blaser J, König C, Fatio R et al (1995) Multicenter quality control study of amikacin assay for monitoring once-daily dosing regimens. International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Ther Drug Monit 17:133–136PubMedCrossRef Blaser J, König C, Fatio R et al (1995) Multicenter quality control study of amikacin assay for monitoring once-daily dosing regimens. International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Ther Drug Monit 17:133–136PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963PubMedCrossRef Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP et al (1981) APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med 9:591–597PubMedCrossRef Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP et al (1981) APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med 9:591–597PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710PubMedCrossRef Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA et al (2004) Acute renal failure—definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 8:R204–R212. doi:10.1186/cc2872 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA et al (2004) Acute renal failure—definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 8:R204–R212. doi:10.​1186/​cc2872 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E et al (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1373–1379PubMedCrossRef Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E et al (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1373–1379PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rubin DB, Schenker N (1991) Multiple imputation in health-care databases: an overview and some applications. Stat Med 10:585–598PubMedCrossRef Rubin DB, Schenker N (1991) Multiple imputation in health-care databases: an overview and some applications. Stat Med 10:585–598PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lugo G, Castañeda-Hernández G (1997) Amikacin Bayesian forecasting in critically ill patients with sepsis and cirrhosis. Ther Drug Monit 19:271–276PubMedCrossRef Lugo G, Castañeda-Hernández G (1997) Amikacin Bayesian forecasting in critically ill patients with sepsis and cirrhosis. Ther Drug Monit 19:271–276PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Pea F, Viale P, Furlanut M (2005) Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability. Clin Pharmacokinet 44:1009–1034PubMedCrossRef Pea F, Viale P, Furlanut M (2005) Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability. Clin Pharmacokinet 44:1009–1034PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Cohen P, Collart L, Prober CG et al (1990) Gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates undergoing extracorporal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Infect Dis J 9:562–566PubMedCrossRef Cohen P, Collart L, Prober CG et al (1990) Gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates undergoing extracorporal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Infect Dis J 9:562–566PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Southgate WM, DiPiro JT, Robertson AF (1989) Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in neonates on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 33:817–819PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Southgate WM, DiPiro JT, Robertson AF (1989) Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in neonates on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 33:817–819PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predictors of insufficient amikacin peak concentration in critically ill patients receiving a 25 mg/kg total body weight regimen
Authors
Etienne de Montmollin
Lila Bouadma
Nathalie Gault
Bruno Mourvillier
Eric Mariotte
Sarah Chemam
Laurent Massias
Emmanuelle Papy
Florence Tubach
Michel Wolff
Romain Sonneville
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 7/2014
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3276-x

Other articles of this Issue 7/2014

Intensive Care Medicine 7/2014 Go to the issue