Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 9/2008

01-09-2008 | Original

Trigger performance of mid-level ICU mechanical ventilators during assisted ventilation: a bench study

Authors: Juliana C. Ferreira, Daniel W. Chipman, Robert M. Kacmarek

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 9/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To compare the triggering performance of mid-level ICU mechanical ventilators with a standard ICU mechanical ventilator.

Design

Experimental bench study.

Setting

The respiratory care laboratory of a university-affiliated teaching hospital.

Subject

A computerized mechanical lung model, the IngMar ASL5000.

Interventions

Ten mid-level ICU ventilators were compared to an ICU ventilator at two levels of lung model effort, three combinations of respiratory mechanics (normal, COPD and ARDS) and two modes of ventilation, volume and pressure assist/control. A total of 12 conditions were compared.

Measurements and main results

Performance varied widely among ventilators. Mean inspiratory trigger time was <100 ms for only half of the tested ventilators. The mean inspiratory delay time (time from initiation of the breath to return of airway pressure to baseline) was longer than that for the ICU ventilator for all tested ventilators except one. The pressure drop during triggering (Ptrig) was comparable with that of the ICU ventilator for only two ventilators. Expiratory Settling Time (time for pressure to return to baseline) had the greatest variability among ventilators.

Conclusions

Triggering differences among these mid-level ICU ventilators and with the ICU ventilator were identified. Some of these ventilators had a much poorer triggering response with high inspiratory effort than the ICU ventilator. These ventilators do not perform as well as ICU ventilators in patients with high ventilatory demand.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Takeuchi M, Williams P, Hess D, Kacmarek RM (2002) Continuous positive airway pressure in new-generation mechanical ventilators: a lung model study. Anesthesiology 96:162–172PubMedCrossRef Takeuchi M, Williams P, Hess D, Kacmarek RM (2002) Continuous positive airway pressure in new-generation mechanical ventilators: a lung model study. Anesthesiology 96:162–172PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Richard JC, Carlucci A, Breton L, Langlais N, Jaber S, Maggiore S, Fougere S, Harf A, Brochard L (2002) Bench testing of pressure support ventilation with three different generations of ventilators. Intensive Care Med 28:1049–1057PubMedCrossRef Richard JC, Carlucci A, Breton L, Langlais N, Jaber S, Maggiore S, Fougere S, Harf A, Brochard L (2002) Bench testing of pressure support ventilation with three different generations of ventilators. Intensive Care Med 28:1049–1057PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chatmongkolchart S, Williams P, Hess DR, Kacmarek RM (2001) Evaluation of inspiratory rise time and inspiration termination criteria in new-generation mechanical ventilators: a lung model study. Respir Care 46:666–677PubMed Chatmongkolchart S, Williams P, Hess DR, Kacmarek RM (2001) Evaluation of inspiratory rise time and inspiration termination criteria in new-generation mechanical ventilators: a lung model study. Respir Care 46:666–677PubMed
4.
go back to reference Tassaux D, Strasser S, Fonseca S, Dalmas E, Jolliet P (2002) Comparative bench study of triggering, pressurization, and cycling between the home ventilator VPAP II and three ICU ventilators. Intensive Care Med 28:1254–1261PubMedCrossRef Tassaux D, Strasser S, Fonseca S, Dalmas E, Jolliet P (2002) Comparative bench study of triggering, pressurization, and cycling between the home ventilator VPAP II and three ICU ventilators. Intensive Care Med 28:1254–1261PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Stell IM, Paul G, Lee KC, Ponte J, Moxham J (2001) Noninvasive ventilator triggering in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A test lung comparison. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:2092–2097PubMed Stell IM, Paul G, Lee KC, Ponte J, Moxham J (2001) Noninvasive ventilator triggering in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A test lung comparison. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:2092–2097PubMed
6.
go back to reference Bunburaphong T, Imanaka H, Nishimura M, Hess D, Kacmarek RM (1997) Performance characteristics of bilevel pressure ventilators: a lung model study. Chest 111:1050–1060PubMedCrossRef Bunburaphong T, Imanaka H, Nishimura M, Hess D, Kacmarek RM (1997) Performance characteristics of bilevel pressure ventilators: a lung model study. Chest 111:1050–1060PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Battisti A, Tassaux D, Janssens JP, Michotte JB, Jaber S, Jolliet P (2005) Performance characteristics of 10 home mechanical ventilators in pressure-support mode: a comparative bench study. Chest 127:1784–1792PubMedCrossRef Battisti A, Tassaux D, Janssens JP, Michotte JB, Jaber S, Jolliet P (2005) Performance characteristics of 10 home mechanical ventilators in pressure-support mode: a comparative bench study. Chest 127:1784–1792PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Miyoshi E, Fujino Y, Mashimo T, Nishimura M (2000) Performance of transport ventilator with patient-triggered ventilation. Chest 118:1109–1115PubMedCrossRef Miyoshi E, Fujino Y, Mashimo T, Nishimura M (2000) Performance of transport ventilator with patient-triggered ventilation. Chest 118:1109–1115PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zanetta G, Robert D, Guerin C (2002) Evaluation of ventilators used during transport of ICU patients—a bench study. Intensive Care Med 28:443–451PubMedCrossRef Zanetta G, Robert D, Guerin C (2002) Evaluation of ventilators used during transport of ICU patients—a bench study. Intensive Care Med 28:443–451PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ramar K, Sassoon CS (2005) Potential advantages of patient–ventilator synchrony. [review] [50 refs]. Respir Care Clin N Am 11:307–317PubMedCrossRef Ramar K, Sassoon CS (2005) Potential advantages of patient–ventilator synchrony. [review] [50 refs]. Respir Care Clin N Am 11:307–317PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tobin MJ, Jubran A, Laghi F (2001) Patient–ventilator interaction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:1059–1063PubMed Tobin MJ, Jubran A, Laghi F (2001) Patient–ventilator interaction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:1059–1063PubMed
12.
go back to reference Kondili E, Xirouchaki N, Georgopoulos D (2007) Modulation and treatment of patient–ventilator dyssynchrony. Curr Opin Crit Care 13:84–89PubMedCrossRef Kondili E, Xirouchaki N, Georgopoulos D (2007) Modulation and treatment of patient–ventilator dyssynchrony. Curr Opin Crit Care 13:84–89PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bigatello LM, Nishimura M, Imanaka H, Hess D, Kimball WR, Kacmarek RM (1997) Unloadiing of the work of breathing by proportional assist ventilation in a lung model. Crit Care Med 25:267–272PubMedCrossRef Bigatello LM, Nishimura M, Imanaka H, Hess D, Kimball WR, Kacmarek RM (1997) Unloadiing of the work of breathing by proportional assist ventilation in a lung model. Crit Care Med 25:267–272PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Prinianakis G, Kondili E, Georgopoulos D (2005) Patient–ventilator interaction: an overview. Respir Care Clin N Am 11:201–224PubMedCrossRef Prinianakis G, Kondili E, Georgopoulos D (2005) Patient–ventilator interaction: an overview. Respir Care Clin N Am 11:201–224PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Williams P, Kratohvil J, Ritz R, Hess DR, Kacmarek RM (2000) Pressure support and pressure assist/control: are there differences? an evaluation of the newest intensive care unit ventilators. Respir Care 45:1169–1181PubMed Williams P, Kratohvil J, Ritz R, Hess DR, Kacmarek RM (2000) Pressure support and pressure assist/control: are there differences? an evaluation of the newest intensive care unit ventilators. Respir Care 45:1169–1181PubMed
17.
go back to reference Ferreira CJ, Chipman DW, Kacmarek RM (2006) (Abstract) Performance of mechanical ventilators in the setting of patient effort: a bench study. Respir Care 51:1284 Ferreira CJ, Chipman DW, Kacmarek RM (2006) (Abstract) Performance of mechanical ventilators in the setting of patient effort: a bench study. Respir Care 51:1284
18.
go back to reference Lofaso F, Brochard L, Hang T, Lorino H, Harf A, Isabey D (1996) Home versus intensive care pressure support devices. experimental and clinical comparison. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153:1591–1599PubMed Lofaso F, Brochard L, Hang T, Lorino H, Harf A, Isabey D (1996) Home versus intensive care pressure support devices. experimental and clinical comparison. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153:1591–1599PubMed
Metadata
Title
Trigger performance of mid-level ICU mechanical ventilators during assisted ventilation: a bench study
Authors
Juliana C. Ferreira
Daniel W. Chipman
Robert M. Kacmarek
Publication date
01-09-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 9/2008
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1125-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2008

Intensive Care Medicine 9/2008 Go to the issue