Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 6/2005

01-06-2005 | Pediatric Brief Report

Illness severity and parental permission for clinical research in a pediatric ICU population

Authors: Jessie M. Hulst, Jeroen W. B. Peters, Ada van den Bos, Koen F. M. Joosten, Johannes B. van Goudoever, Luc J. I. Zimmermann, Dick Tibboel

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 6/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Research in child subjects requires parental permission. We examined whether parental authorization of involvement in a clinical study is influenced by the child’s severity of illness at the time of the consent decision.

Design and setting

Observational study in a multidisciplinary tertiary pediatric and neonatal intensive care.

Patients and participants

Parents of 421 children (age range from preterm to 18 years) were asked to consent for participation in a study focusing on measuring their child’s nutritional status within 24 h after admission to the ICU. Over 20% of the parents (n=88) refused consent, most of them because they expected the study to be too burdensome for their child.

Measurements and results

Patient and disease characteristics were comparable in the children for whom consent had or had not been obtained. A higher illness severity score did not decrease the probability of obtaining informed consent, but parents of children with a history of disease were 3.2 times less likely to consent.

Conclusions

Parents of children with higher illness severity scores are not more likely to decline permission to include their child in clinical observational research on the ICU. History of disease and subjectively perceived burden to the child are important factors that must be considered.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Declaration of Helsinki (2000) Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. World Medical Association, Edinburgh Declaration of Helsinki (2000) Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. World Medical Association, Edinburgh
2.
go back to reference Mason SA, Allmark PJ (2000) Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study. Lancet 356:2045–2051CrossRefPubMed Mason SA, Allmark PJ (2000) Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study. Lancet 356:2045–2051CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mason S (1997) Obtaining informed consent for neonatal randomised controlled trials—an “elaborate ritual”? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 76:F143–F145PubMed Mason S (1997) Obtaining informed consent for neonatal randomised controlled trials—an “elaborate ritual”? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 76:F143–F145PubMed
4.
go back to reference Stuijvenberg M van, Suur MH, de Vos S, Tjiang GC, Steyerberg EW, Derksen-Lubsen G, Moll HA (1998) Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study. Arch Dis Child 79:120–125PubMed Stuijvenberg M van, Suur MH, de Vos S, Tjiang GC, Steyerberg EW, Derksen-Lubsen G, Moll HA (1998) Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study. Arch Dis Child 79:120–125PubMed
5.
go back to reference Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S (2003) Do they understand? I. Parental consent for children participating in clinical anesthesia and surgery research. Anesthesiology 98:603–608CrossRefPubMed Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S (2003) Do they understand? I. Parental consent for children participating in clinical anesthesia and surgery research. Anesthesiology 98:603–608CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Zupancic JA, Gillie P, Streiner DL, Watts JL, Schmidt B (1997) Determinants of parental authorization for involvement of newborn infants in clinical trials. Pediatrics 99:E6CrossRef Zupancic JA, Gillie P, Streiner DL, Watts JL, Schmidt B (1997) Determinants of parental authorization for involvement of newborn infants in clinical trials. Pediatrics 99:E6CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Harth SC, Thong YH (1990) Sociodemographic and motivational characteristics of parents who volunteer their children for clinical research: a controlled study. BMJ 300:1372–1375PubMed Harth SC, Thong YH (1990) Sociodemographic and motivational characteristics of parents who volunteer their children for clinical research: a controlled study. BMJ 300:1372–1375PubMed
8.
go back to reference Harth SC, Johnstone RR, Thong YH (1992) The psychological profile of parents who volunteer their children for clinical research: a controlled study. J Med Ethics 18:86–93PubMed Harth SC, Johnstone RR, Thong YH (1992) The psychological profile of parents who volunteer their children for clinical research: a controlled study. J Med Ethics 18:86–93PubMed
9.
go back to reference Harth SC, Thong YH (1995) Parental perceptions and attitudes about informed consent in clinical research involving children. Soc Sci Med 41:1647–1651CrossRefPubMed Harth SC, Thong YH (1995) Parental perceptions and attitudes about informed consent in clinical research involving children. Soc Sci Med 41:1647–1651CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pierro A, Spitz L (1997) Informed consent in clinical research: the crisis in paediatrics. Lancet 349:1703CrossRef Pierro A, Spitz L (1997) Informed consent in clinical research: the crisis in paediatrics. Lancet 349:1703CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hulst JM, van den Bos A, Peters J, Mourik M, van Goudoever J, Joosten K, Zimmermann L, HA B, Tibboel D (2002) Severity of illness does not influence parental informed consent. Pediatr Res 52:800 Hulst JM, van den Bos A, Peters J, Mourik M, van Goudoever J, Joosten K, Zimmermann L, HA B, Tibboel D (2002) Severity of illness does not influence parental informed consent. Pediatr Res 52:800
12.
go back to reference McIntosh N, Bates P, Brykczynska G, Dunstan G, Goldman A, Harvey D, Larcher V, McCrae D, McKinnon A, Patton M, Saunders J, Shelley P (2000) Guidelines for the ethical conduct of medical research involving children. Royal College of Paediatrics, Child Health: Ethics Advisory Committee. Arch Dis Child 82:177–182CrossRefPubMed McIntosh N, Bates P, Brykczynska G, Dunstan G, Goldman A, Harvey D, Larcher V, McCrae D, McKinnon A, Patton M, Saunders J, Shelley P (2000) Guidelines for the ethical conduct of medical research involving children. Royal College of Paediatrics, Child Health: Ethics Advisory Committee. Arch Dis Child 82:177–182CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (2002) Manual for the review of medical research involving human subjects. Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects,– The Hague Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (2002) Manual for the review of medical research involving human subjects. Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects,– The Hague
14.
go back to reference Hulst J, Joosten K, Zimmermann L, Hop W, Van Buuren S, Büller H, Tibboel D, Van Goudoever J (2004) Malnutrition in critically ill children: from admission to 6 months after discharge. Clin Nutr 23:223–232CrossRefPubMed Hulst J, Joosten K, Zimmermann L, Hop W, Van Buuren S, Büller H, Tibboel D, Van Goudoever J (2004) Malnutrition in critically ill children: from admission to 6 months after discharge. Clin Nutr 23:223–232CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR (1988) Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score. Crit Care Med 16:1110–1116PubMed Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR (1988) Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score. Crit Care Med 16:1110–1116PubMed
16.
go back to reference The International Neonatal Network (1993) The CRIB (clinical risk index for babies) score: a tool for assessing initial neonatal risk and comparing performance of neonatal intensive care units. Lancet 342:193–198CrossRefPubMed The International Neonatal Network (1993) The CRIB (clinical risk index for babies) score: a tool for assessing initial neonatal risk and comparing performance of neonatal intensive care units. Lancet 342:193–198CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Keene AR, Cullen DJ (1983) Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: update 1983. Crit Care Med 11:1–3PubMed Keene AR, Cullen DJ (1983) Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: update 1983. Crit Care Med 11:1–3PubMed
18.
go back to reference Gill D, Crawley FP, LoGiudice M, Grosek S, Kurz R, de Lourdes-Levy M, Mjones S, Nicolopoulos D, Rubino A, Sauer PJ, Siimes M, Weindig M, Zach M, Chambers TL (2003) Guidelines for informed consent in biomedical research involving paediatric populations as research participants. Eur J Pediatr 162:455–458CrossRefPubMed Gill D, Crawley FP, LoGiudice M, Grosek S, Kurz R, de Lourdes-Levy M, Mjones S, Nicolopoulos D, Rubino A, Sauer PJ, Siimes M, Weindig M, Zach M, Chambers TL (2003) Guidelines for informed consent in biomedical research involving paediatric populations as research participants. Eur J Pediatr 162:455–458CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Alderson P (1993) Children’s consent to surgery. Open University Press, Buckingham Alderson P (1993) Children’s consent to surgery. Open University Press, Buckingham
20.
go back to reference Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Siewert M, Malviya S (1998) Factors that influence parents’ decisions to consent to their child’s participation in clinical anesthesia research. Anesth Analg 86:50–53CrossRefPubMed Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Siewert M, Malviya S (1998) Factors that influence parents’ decisions to consent to their child’s participation in clinical anesthesia research. Anesth Analg 86:50–53CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Simon C, Zyzanski SJ, Eder M, Raiz P, Kodish ED, Siminoff LA (2003) Groups potentially at risk for making poorly informed decisions about entry into clinical trials for childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:2173–2178CrossRefPubMed Simon C, Zyzanski SJ, Eder M, Raiz P, Kodish ED, Siminoff LA (2003) Groups potentially at risk for making poorly informed decisions about entry into clinical trials for childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:2173–2178CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sauer PJ (2002) Research in children. A report of the Ethics Working Group of the CESP. Eur J Pediatr 161:1–5PubMed Sauer PJ (2002) Research in children. A report of the Ethics Working Group of the CESP. Eur J Pediatr 161:1–5PubMed
23.
go back to reference Simons SH, van Dijk M, van Lingen RA, Roofthooft D, Duivenvoorden HJ, Jongeneel N, Bunkers C, Smink E, Anand KJ, van den Anker JN, Tibboel D (2003) Routine morphine infusion in preterm newborns who received ventilatory support: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 290:2419–2427CrossRefPubMed Simons SH, van Dijk M, van Lingen RA, Roofthooft D, Duivenvoorden HJ, Jongeneel N, Bunkers C, Smink E, Anand KJ, van den Anker JN, Tibboel D (2003) Routine morphine infusion in preterm newborns who received ventilatory support: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 290:2419–2427CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Singhal N, Oberle K, Burgess E, Huber-Okrainec J (2002) Parents’ perceptions of research with newborns. J Perinatol 22:57–63CrossRefPubMed Singhal N, Oberle K, Burgess E, Huber-Okrainec J (2002) Parents’ perceptions of research with newborns. J Perinatol 22:57–63CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Illness severity and parental permission for clinical research in a pediatric ICU population
Authors
Jessie M. Hulst
Jeroen W. B. Peters
Ada van den Bos
Koen F. M. Joosten
Johannes B. van Goudoever
Luc J. I. Zimmermann
Dick Tibboel
Publication date
01-06-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 6/2005
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2647-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2005

Intensive Care Medicine 6/2005 Go to the issue