Published in:
01-04-2004 | Brief Report
Accuracy of pulse oximetry readings in an animal model of low perfusion caused by emerging pneumonia and sepsis
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 4/2004
Login to get accessAbstract
Objective
To test the effects of low perfusion caused by emerging sepsis on the performance of two new pulse oximetry techniques: Masimo SET in comparison with Nellcor Oxismart XL.
Design
Cohort study with random allocation of two pulse oximetry devices to two sensor sites.
Setting
University animal research facility.
Subjects
Twenty-five adult, anesthetized, ventilated rabbits.
Interventions
Pneumonia/sepsis was induced by tracheal instillation of E. coli.
Measurements and results
Oxygen saturation was measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) and recorded continuously until death. Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) was measured hourly by CO oximetry and whenever a difference of >5% between the devices occurred. SpO2 sensors were positioned at both forelegs and switched hourly. There was no difference in total signal dropout time [median 3.8 min (range 0.4–66.6 min) vs 3.3 min (range 0–94.5 min), Masimo SET vs Oxismart XL]. There were fewer episodes with a false SpO2 reading [1 (range 0–7) vs 2 (range 0–17)] using the Masimo SET vs the Oxismart XL as verified by CO oximetry; p<0.05. Average bias (SpO2–SaO2) was significantly different between the two devices, and variability of bias values increased across time with both devices.
Conclusions
Both devices were capable to measure SpO2 during most of the experimental time in this model of low perfusion and therefore appear to be highly sensitive to pick up a signal; however, low perfusion caused by emerging sepsis may result in inaccurate measurements with both devices. These episodes were less common with the Masimo SET vs the Oxismart XL.