Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 10/2014

Open Access 01-10-2014 | Original Paper

What service users with psychotic disorders want in a mental health crisis or relapse: thematic analysis of joint crisis plans

Authors: Simone Farrelly, Gill Brown, Diana Rose, Elizabeth Doherty, R. Claire Henderson, Max Birchwood, Max Marshall, Waquas Waheed, George Szmukler, Graham Thornicroft

Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | Issue 10/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Recent legislation and guidance in England emphasises the importance of service user choice in care planning. However, it is not obvious how best to facilitate choices in care planning, and some clinicians are concerned that service users may make ‘unwise’ decisions. This study aimed to examine mental health service users’ preferences and priorities in the event of a future mental health crisis or relapse.

Method

Thematic analysis of 221 joint crisis plans (JCP) developed by service users and their clinical team as part of the CRIMSON randomised controlled trial. Participants had a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder, at least one psychiatric admission in the past 2 years, contact with a community mental health team, and complex care needs.

Results

Two major categories of preferences were identified: first the manner in which crisis care would be delivered; and second, specific treatment interventions. Most service users requested full involvement in decisions about their care, clear and consistent treatment plans, access to familiar clinicians who knew them well, and to be treated with respect and compassion. Some service users requested hospitalisation, but the majority preferred alternatives. The most frequently preferred intervention was care by a home treatment team. Just under half made a treatment refusal, the majority being for specific medications, alternatives were offered.

Conclusions

Joint crisis planning resulted in service users making choices that were clinically reasonable. The technique employed by JCPs appeared to empower service users by engaging them in a productive dialogue with their clinicians.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Department of Health (2012) Liberating the NHS: no decision about me, without me. Further consultation on proposals to secure shared decision-making. Department of Health, London Department of Health (2012) Liberating the NHS: no decision about me, without me. Further consultation on proposals to secure shared decision-making. Department of Health, London
2.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009) The NICE guideline on core interventions in the treatment and management of schizophrenia in adults in primary and secondary care (updated edition). British Psychological Society and the Royal College of Psychiatrists, London National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009) The NICE guideline on core interventions in the treatment and management of schizophrenia in adults in primary and secondary care (updated edition). British Psychological Society and the Royal College of Psychiatrists, London
3.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011) Service user experience in adult mental health: improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS mental health services. NICE clinical guideline 136. British Psychological Society and the Royal College of Psychiatrists, London National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011) Service user experience in adult mental health: improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS mental health services. NICE clinical guideline 136. British Psychological Society and the Royal College of Psychiatrists, London
4.
go back to reference Department of Constitutional Affairs (2005) Mental capacity act—code of practice. The Stationery Office (TSO), Norwich Department of Constitutional Affairs (2005) Mental capacity act—code of practice. The Stationery Office (TSO), Norwich
5.
go back to reference Borneo A (2008) Your choice: results from the ‘your treatment, your choice survey’. Rethink, London Borneo A (2008) Your choice: results from the ‘your treatment, your choice survey’. Rethink, London
6.
go back to reference Farrelly S, Szmukler G, Henderson C, Birchwood M, Marshall M, Waheed W, Thornicroft G (2013) Individualisation in crisis planning for people with psychotic disorders. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 1–7. doi:10.1017/S2045796013000401 Farrelly S, Szmukler G, Henderson C, Birchwood M, Marshall M, Waheed W, Thornicroft G (2013) Individualisation in crisis planning for people with psychotic disorders. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 1–7. doi:10.​1017/​S204579601300040​1
7.
go back to reference Goss C, Moretti F, Mazzi MA, Del Piccolo L, Rimondini M, Zimmerman C (2008) Involving patients in decisions during psychiatric consultations. Br J Psychiatry 193:416–421PubMedCrossRef Goss C, Moretti F, Mazzi MA, Del Piccolo L, Rimondini M, Zimmerman C (2008) Involving patients in decisions during psychiatric consultations. Br J Psychiatry 193:416–421PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gould D (2012) Service users’ experiences of recovery under the 2008 care programme approach. A research study. Mental Health Foundation & National Service User Network, London Gould D (2012) Service users’ experiences of recovery under the 2008 care programme approach. A research study. Mental Health Foundation & National Service User Network, London
9.
go back to reference Ong LML, De Haes J, Hoos AM, Lammes FB (1995) Doctor–patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 40:903–918PubMedCrossRef Ong LML, De Haes J, Hoos AM, Lammes FB (1995) Doctor–patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 40:903–918PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Seale C, Chaplin R, Lelliott P, Quirk A (2006) Sharing decisions in consultations involving anti-psychotic medication: a qualitative study of psychiatrists’ experiences. Soc Sci Med 62:2861–2873PubMedCrossRef Seale C, Chaplin R, Lelliott P, Quirk A (2006) Sharing decisions in consultations involving anti-psychotic medication: a qualitative study of psychiatrists’ experiences. Soc Sci Med 62:2861–2873PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Henderson C, Swanson JW, Szmukler G, Thornicroft G, Zinkler M (2008) A typology of advance statements in mental health care. Psychiatr Serv 59:63–71PubMedCrossRef Henderson C, Swanson JW, Szmukler G, Thornicroft G, Zinkler M (2008) A typology of advance statements in mental health care. Psychiatr Serv 59:63–71PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Henderson C, Flood C, Leese M, Thornicroft G, Sutherby K, Szmukler G (2009) Views of service users and providers on joint crisis plans. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 44:369–376PubMedCrossRef Henderson C, Flood C, Leese M, Thornicroft G, Sutherby K, Szmukler G (2009) Views of service users and providers on joint crisis plans. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 44:369–376PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bogdanoski T (2009) Psychiatric advance directives: the new frontier in mental health law reform in Australia? J Law Med 16:891–904PubMed Bogdanoski T (2009) Psychiatric advance directives: the new frontier in mental health law reform in Australia? J Law Med 16:891–904PubMed
14.
go back to reference Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Ferron J, Elbogen EB, Van Dorn RA, Kim M, Scheyett AM (2005) Psychiatrists’ views and attitudes about psychiatric advance directives. Int J Foren Mental Health 4:107–117CrossRef Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Ferron J, Elbogen EB, Van Dorn RA, Kim M, Scheyett AM (2005) Psychiatrists’ views and attitudes about psychiatric advance directives. Int J Foren Mental Health 4:107–117CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Swanson JW, Swartz MS, Elbogen EB, Van Dorn RA, Ferron J, Wagner HR, McCauley BJ, Kim M (2006) Facilitated psychiatric advance directives: a randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness. Am J Psychiatry 163:1943–1951PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Swanson JW, Swartz MS, Elbogen EB, Van Dorn RA, Ferron J, Wagner HR, McCauley BJ, Kim M (2006) Facilitated psychiatric advance directives: a randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness. Am J Psychiatry 163:1943–1951PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Thornicroft G, Farrelly S, Szmukler G, Birchwood M, Waheed W, Flach C, Barrett B, Byford S, Henderson C, Sutherby K, Lester H, Rose D, Dunn G, Leese M, Marshall M (2013) Randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment for people with psychosis: clinical outcomes. Lancet 381:1634–1641PubMedCrossRef Thornicroft G, Farrelly S, Szmukler G, Birchwood M, Waheed W, Flach C, Barrett B, Byford S, Henderson C, Sutherby K, Lester H, Rose D, Dunn G, Leese M, Marshall M (2013) Randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment for people with psychosis: clinical outcomes. Lancet 381:1634–1641PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Henderson C, Flood C, Leese M, Thornicroft G, Sutherby K, Szmukler G (2004) Effect of joint crisis plans on use of compulsory treatment in psychiatry: single blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ 329:136PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Henderson C, Flood C, Leese M, Thornicroft G, Sutherby K, Szmukler G (2004) Effect of joint crisis plans on use of compulsory treatment in psychiatry: single blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ 329:136PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Backlar P, McFarland BH, Swanson JW, Mahler J (2001) Consumer, provider, and informal caregiver opinions on psychiatric advance directives. Adm Policy Mental Health 28:427–441CrossRef Backlar P, McFarland BH, Swanson JW, Mahler J (2001) Consumer, provider, and informal caregiver opinions on psychiatric advance directives. Adm Policy Mental Health 28:427–441CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Backlar P, McFarland BH, Swanson JW, Mahler J (2001) Consumer, provider, and informal caregiver opinions on psychiatric advance directives. Adm Policy Mental Health 28:427–441CrossRef Backlar P, McFarland BH, Swanson JW, Mahler J (2001) Consumer, provider, and informal caregiver opinions on psychiatric advance directives. Adm Policy Mental Health 28:427–441CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Varekamp I (2004) Ulysses directives in The Netherlands: opinions of psychiatrists and clients. Health Policy 70:291–301PubMedCrossRef Varekamp I (2004) Ulysses directives in The Netherlands: opinions of psychiatrists and clients. Health Policy 70:291–301PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Atkinson JM, Garner HC, Gilmour WH (2004) Models of advance directives in mental health care: stakeholder views. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39:680CrossRef Atkinson JM, Garner HC, Gilmour WH (2004) Models of advance directives in mental health care: stakeholder views. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39:680CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44:681–692PubMedCrossRef Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44:681–692PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sutherby K, Szmukler G (1998) Crisis cards and self-help crisis initiatives. Psychiatr Bull 22:4–7CrossRef Sutherby K, Szmukler G (1998) Crisis cards and self-help crisis initiatives. Psychiatr Bull 22:4–7CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sutherby K, Szmukler G, Halpern A, Alexander M, Thornicroft G, Johnson C, Wright S (1999) A study of ‘crisis cards’ in a community psychiatric service. Acta Psychiatr Scand 100:56–61PubMedCrossRef Sutherby K, Szmukler G, Halpern A, Alexander M, Thornicroft G, Johnson C, Wright S (1999) A study of ‘crisis cards’ in a community psychiatric service. Acta Psychiatr Scand 100:56–61PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Thornicroft G, Farrelly S, Birchwood M, Marshall M, Szmukler G, Waheed W, Byford S, Dunn G, Henderson C, Lester H, Leese M, Rose D, Sutherby K (2010) CRIMSON [CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement] protocol: a randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis. Trials 11:102PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Thornicroft G, Farrelly S, Birchwood M, Marshall M, Szmukler G, Waheed W, Byford S, Dunn G, Henderson C, Lester H, Leese M, Rose D, Sutherby K (2010) CRIMSON [CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement] protocol: a randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis. Trials 11:102PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Srebnik DS, Rutherford LT, Peto T, Russo J, Zick E, Jaffe C (2010) The content and clinical utility of psychiatric advance directives. Psychiatr Serv 56:592–598CrossRef Srebnik DS, Rutherford LT, Peto T, Russo J, Zick E, Jaffe C (2010) The content and clinical utility of psychiatric advance directives. Psychiatr Serv 56:592–598CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Papageorgiou A, Janmohamed A, King M, Davidson O, Dawson J (2004) Advance directives for patients compulsorily admitted to hospital with serious mental disorders: directive content and feedback from patients and professionals. J Mental Health 13:379–388CrossRef Papageorgiou A, Janmohamed A, King M, Davidson O, Dawson J (2004) Advance directives for patients compulsorily admitted to hospital with serious mental disorders: directive content and feedback from patients and professionals. J Mental Health 13:379–388CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Boyatzis RE (1998) Transforming qualitative information—thematic analysis and code development. Sage, Thousand Oaks Boyatzis RE (1998) Transforming qualitative information—thematic analysis and code development. Sage, Thousand Oaks
29.
go back to reference van Nieuwenhuizen A, Henderson C, Kassam A, Graham T, Murray J, Howard LM, Thornicroft G (2013) Emergency department staff views and experiences of diagnostic overshadowing related to people with mental illness. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 22:255–262PubMedCrossRef van Nieuwenhuizen A, Henderson C, Kassam A, Graham T, Murray J, Howard LM, Thornicroft G (2013) Emergency department staff views and experiences of diagnostic overshadowing related to people with mental illness. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 22:255–262PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Srebnik DS, Rutherford LT, Peto T, Russo J, Zick E, Jaffe C, Holtzheimer P (2005) The content and clinical utility of psychiatric advance directives. Psychiatr Serv 56:592–598PubMedCrossRef Srebnik DS, Rutherford LT, Peto T, Russo J, Zick E, Jaffe C, Holtzheimer P (2005) The content and clinical utility of psychiatric advance directives. Psychiatr Serv 56:592–598PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Department of Health (2012) Inpatients formally detailed in hospitals under the mental health act 1986–2011. Department of Health Information Centre Statistical Bulletin, London Department of Health (2012) Inpatients formally detailed in hospitals under the mental health act 1986–2011. Department of Health Information Centre Statistical Bulletin, London
Metadata
Title
What service users with psychotic disorders want in a mental health crisis or relapse: thematic analysis of joint crisis plans
Authors
Simone Farrelly
Gill Brown
Diana Rose
Elizabeth Doherty
R. Claire Henderson
Max Birchwood
Max Marshall
Waquas Waheed
George Szmukler
Graham Thornicroft
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology / Issue 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0933-7954
Electronic ISSN: 1433-9285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-014-0869-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2014

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 10/2014 Go to the issue