Top

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Published in:

01-07-2005 | Original Paper

The process of care in residential facilities

A national survey in Italy

Authors: Giovanni Santone, Giovanni de Girolamo, Ian Falloon, Angelo Fioritti, Rocco Micciolo, Angelo Picardi, Enrico Zanalda, for the PROGRES Group

Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | Issue 7/2005

Abstract

Background

Although residential facilities (RFs) have largely replaced mental hospitals (MHs) in most developed countries for the long-term residential care of severely impaired patients, the process of care in RFs has not been well studied. The aim of this paper is to investigate the process of care in 265 RFs, representing 19.3% of all RFs in Italy, and to devise a classification of RFs based on process characteristics.

Methods

Structured interviews were conducted with the manager and staff of each RF. Residents were evaluated using standardized rating instruments.

Results

Most RFs had specific admission criteria, with one third having a waiting list that averaged about 3 months. There was no formal limitation to the length of stay in three quarters of RFs, and turnover rates were very low. Although a homelike atmosphere was found in many RFs, most facilities had restrictive rules on patients’ daily lives and behaviours. RFs carried out several external activities targeted at integrating patients within the local community. Standardized assessment instruments and written treatment plans were rarely used. A cluster analysis based on the levels of restrictiveness and the standardization of the process of care classified RFs into five groups that differed with respect to daily staff coverage, size, geographical distribution and proportion of former MH residents. No significant intercluster differences were associated with the current clinical and psychosocial characteristics of residents, or with several other outcome variables.

Conclusions

This study provides naturalistic evidence of the heterogeneity of the process of residential care on a large scale. Future efforts should focus on developing an empirical classification of RFs, as well as on national and international standards of care and staffing to address patients’ needs.

Aubry TD et al (1995) Public attitudes and intentions regarding tenants of community mental health residences who are neighbours. Community Ment Health J 31:39–52PubMed

Brunt D, Hansson L (2002) A comparison of the psychosocial environment of two types of residences for persons with severe mental illness: small congregate community residences and psychiatric inpatient settings. Int J Soc Psychiatry 48:243–252CrossRefPubMed

Carling PJ (1993) Housing and supports for persons with mental illness: emerging approaches to research and practice. Hosp/Community Psychiatry 44:439–449

Cook JR (1998) Interactions between group homes and neighbours: neighbour preferences. J Behav Health Serv Res 25:425–436PubMed

Cournos F (1987) The impact of environmental factors on outcome in residential programmes. Hosp/Community Psychiatry 38:848–852

Cullen D et al (1997) Community and hospital residential care: a comparative evaluation. Br J Psychol Med 14:92–98

Cutler DL (1986) Community residential options for the chronically mentally ill. Community Ment Health J 22:61–73CrossRefPubMed

Dash P et al (2003) Increasing the impact of health services research. BMJ 327:1351–1359CrossRef

de Girolamo G, Cozza M (2000) The Italian psychiatric reform: a 20-year perspective. Int J Law Psychiatry 23:197–214CrossRefPubMed

10.

de Girolamo G et al (2002) Residential care in Italy: a national survey of non-hospital facilities. Br J Psychiatry 181:220–225CrossRefPubMed

11.

de Girolamo G et al (2005) The severely mentally ill in residential facilities: a national survey in Italy. Psychol Med 35:421–431CrossRefPubMed

12.

Drachman D (1981) A residential continuum for the chronically mentally ill: a Markov probability model. Eval Health Prof 4:93–104PubMed

13.

Friedrich RM et al (1999) Family and client perspectives on alternative residential settings for persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 50:509–514PubMed

14.

Geller JL, Fisher WH (1993) The linear continuum of transitional residences: debunking the myth. Am J Psychiatry 150:1070–1076PubMed

15.

Goering P et al (1992) Social networks of resident in supportive housing. Community Ment Health J 28:199–214CrossRefPubMed

16.

Grigoletti L et al (2004) I costi delle strutture residenziali psichiatriche italiane. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 4:262–269

17.

Gudeman JE, Shore MF (1984) Beyond deinstitutionalization. A new class of facilities for the mentally ill. N Engl J Med 311:832–836PubMed

18.

Hull JT, Thompson JC (1981) Predicting adaptive functioning among mentally ill persons in community settings. Am J Community Psychol 9:247–268CrossRefPubMed

19.

Humberstone V (2002) The experiences of people with schizophrenia living in supported accommodation: a qualitative study using grounded theory methodology. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 36:367–372CrossRefPubMed

20.

Jones J (2000) Mental health care reforms in Britain and Italy since 1950: a cross-national comparative study. Health Place 6:171–187CrossRefPubMed

21.

Lucca AM, Allen GJ (2001) A statewide assessment of rehabilitation programmes: general characteristics and services. Psychiatr Rehabil J 24:205–213PubMed

22.

Macry P (1997) Rethinking a stereotype: territorial differences and family models in the modernization of Italy. J Mod Ital Stud 2:188–214

23.

Marino S et al (1996) The provision of psychiatric care in Southern Italy. Results from the ‘Psychiatric in Southern Italy’s Services’ (DE PISIS) survey. Int J Soc Psychiatry 42:181–192PubMed

24.

McCarthy J, Nelson G (1991) An evaluation of supportive housing for current and former psychiatric patients. Hosp Community Psychiatry 42:1254–1256PubMed

25.

Mollica RF (1983) From asylum to community. The threatened disintegration of public psychiatry. N Engl J Med 308:367–373PubMed

26.

Moos RH et al (2000) Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) ratings: determinants and roles as predictors of one-year treatment outcomes. J Clin Psychol 56:449–461CrossRefPubMed

27.

Moos RH et al (2002) Global Assessment of Functioning ratings and the allocation and outcomes of mental health services. Psychiatr Serv 53:730–737CrossRefPubMed

28.

Nagy MP et al (1988) Effects of facility characteristics on the social adjustment of mentally ill residents of board-and-care homes. Hosp Community Psychiatry 39:1281–1286PubMed

29.

Nelson G et al (1992) Social network transactions of psychiatric patients. Soc Sci Med 34:433–445CrossRefPubMed

30.

O’Driscoll C, Leff J (1993) The TAPS project. 8: Design of the research study on the long-stay patients. Br J Psychiatry 162(suppl 19):18–24

31.

Owen C et al (1996) Housing accommodation preferences of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatr Serv 47:628–632PubMed

32.

Progetto obiettivo ‘Tutela della salute mentale (1998–2000)’. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana 274:4–13 (24 November 1999)

33.

Segal SP, Kotler PL (1993) Sheltered care residence: ten-year personal outcomes. Am J Orthopsychiatry 63:80–91PubMed

34.

Shepherd G et al (1996) Residential care in hospital and in the community—quality of care and quality of life. Br J Psychiatry 168:448–456PubMed

35.

Solomon J, Fioritti A (2002) Motivational intervention as applied to systems change: the case of dual diagnosis. Subst Use Misuse 37:1833–1851CrossRefPubMed

36.

Tanzman B (1993) An overview of surveys of mental health consumers’ preferences for housing and support services. Hosp Community Psychiatry 44:450–455PubMed

37.

Thornicroft G, Bebbington P (1989) Deinstitutionalisation—from hospital closure to services development. Br J Psychiatry 155:739–753PubMed

38.

Timko C et al (2003) Trends in acute mental health care: comparing psychiatric and substance abuse treatment programmes. J Behav Health Serv Res 30:145–160PubMed

39.

Trieman N, Leff J (1996) The TAPS projects. 36: The most difficult to place psychiatric in-patients. Outcome one year after relocation. Br J Psychiatry 169:289–292PubMed

40.

UK Department of Mental Health (2002) Dual diagnosis good practice guide. UK Department of Health, London

41.

WHO (1996) Psychosocial rehabilitation: a consensus statement. Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse. WHO, Geneva (Publication WHO/MNH/MND/96.2)

42.

Wing JK, Furlong R (1986) A haven for the severely disabled within the context of a comprehensive psychiatric community service. Br J Psychiatry 149:449–457PubMed

43.

Wing JK et al (1998) Health of the Nation Outcome Scales Community Psychiatry (HoNOS) research and development. Br J Psychiatry 172:11–18PubMed

Title: The process of care in residential facilities
A national survey in Italy
Authors: Giovanni Santone
Giovanni de Girolamo
Ian Falloon
Angelo Fioritti
Rocco Micciolo
Angelo Picardi
Enrico Zanalda
for the PROGRES Group
Publication date: 01-07-2005
Publisher: Steinkopff-Verlag
Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology / Issue 7/2005
Print ISSN: 0933-7954
Electronic ISSN: 1433-9285
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0922-1

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

The process of care in residential facilities

A national survey in Italy

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 7/2005

A cross-cultural study on expressed emotion in carers of people with dementia and schizophrenia: Japan and England

APOE polymorphism, socioeconomic status and cognitive function in mid-life

Deprivation: different implications for forensic psychiatric need in urban and rural areas

The assessment of need for mental health services

Relationships between demographic variables and quality of life in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients

Social and lifestyle determinants of depression, anxiety, sleeping disorders and self-evaluated quality of life in Russia