Top

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

Published in:

01-08-2022 | Original Article

Risk factors for hardware-related complications after extra-articular distal humerus fracture fixation using an anatomical locking plate

Authors: Hyoung-Seok Jung, Yoo-Sun Won, Yang-Seon Choi, Jae-Sung Lee

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 1/2023

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors of hardware-related complications in patients treated with anatomical locking plate fixation for extra-articular distal humerus fractures.

Methods

From 2013 to 2020, patients with extra-articular distal humerus fractures who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with an extra-articular distal humerus locking plate (EADHP) were retrospectively reviewed and categorized according to the presence/absence of hardware-related complications. Hardware-related complications were defined as the occurrence of skin prominence on the plate and discomfort in activities of daily living. Patient demographics, the lateral condylar angle, lateral body length, shaft-condylar angle of the humerus, and plate length were analyzed.

Results

Of the 29 patients, 10 (34%) did not develop hardware-related complications (group A), whereas 19 (66%) did (group B). Patient demographics did not differ between the groups. However, the number of patients who underwent hardware removal was significantly greater in group B (16/19) than in group A (4/10; p = 0.032). Radiologic assessment revealed no significant difference in the lateral condylar or shaft-condylar angle. However, the lateral body length was greater in group A than in group B (44.5 ± 4.8 vs. 39.5 ± 3.7, p = 0.007). The plate length significantly differed between the groups. Twelve of 19 (63%) patients in group B received short-hole plates (six holes), while nine of ten (90%) patients in group A received long-hole plates (eight holes). In the multivariable analysis, the lateral body length of the distal humerus (p = 0.047, odds ratio = 0.734, 95% confidence interval: 0.542–0.996) and plate length (p = 0.036, odds ratio = 0.076, 95% confidence interval: 0.542–0.996) were associated with hardware-related complications.

Conclusions

Most patients developed hardware-related complications, particularly with short plates, mainly because of the narrow lateral body length of the distal humerus. Surgeons should be careful to secure EADHP in the appropriate position, especially when short plates are used in patients with narrow lateral body length.

Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J, Hansson K, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus an epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(11):1469–73.CrossRefPubMed

Jain D, Goyal GS, Garg R, Mahindra P, Yamin M, Selhi HS. Outcome of anatomic locking plate in extraarticular distal humeral shaft fractures. Indian J Orthop. 2017;51(1):86–92. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.197554.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Scolaro JA, Voleti P, Makani A, Namdari S, Mirza A, Mehta S. Surgical fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures with a posterolateral plate through a triceps-reflecting technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(2):251–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.020.CrossRefPubMed

Scolaro JA, Hsu JE, Svach DJ, Mehta S. Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three different implants. Injury. 2014;45(12):2040–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.036.CrossRefPubMed

Meloy GM, Mormino MA, Siska PA, Tarkin IS. A paradigm shift in the surgical reconstruction of extra-articular distal humeral fractures: single-column plating. Injury. 2013;44(11):1620–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.005.CrossRefPubMed

Yang KH, Park HW, Park SJ, Jung SH. Lateral J-plate fixation in comminuted intercondylar fracture of the humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123(5):234–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0508-x.CrossRefPubMed

Capo JT, Debkowska MP, Liporace F, Beutel BG, Melamed E. Outcomes of distal humerus diaphyseal injuries fixed with a single-column anatomic plate. Int Orthop. 2014;38(5):1037–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2213-x.CrossRefPubMed

Matsunaga FT, Tamaoki MJ, Matsumoto MH, Netto NA, Faloppa F, Belloti JC. Minimally invasive osteosynthesis with a bridge plate versus a functional brace for humeral shaft fractures: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(7):583–92. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.16.00628.CrossRefPubMed

Tejwani NC, Murthy A, Park J, McLaurin TM, Egol KA, Kummer FJ. Fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures using one locking plate versus two reconstruction plates: a laboratory study. J Trauma. 2009;66(3):795–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318181e53c.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Trikha V, Agrawal P, Das S, Gaba S, Kumar A. Functional outcome of extra-articular distal humerus fracture fixation using a single locking plate: a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017;25(3):2309499017727948. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017727948.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Zhou Z, Tang Z, Zhao X, Chen W, Chen X, Mu M, et al. Mismatch of AO anatomically shaped distal humeral plate with humeral shaft forward flexion angulation in adult Chinese population. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24(7):1145–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1431-2.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Lim JR, Yoon TH, Lee HM, Chun YM. Anatomic fit of precontoured extra-articular distal humeral locking plates: a cadaveric study. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021;24(2):66–71. https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2021.00227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Goldfarb CA, Patterson JM, Sutter M, Krauss M, Steffen JA, Galatz L. Elbow radiographic anatomy: measurement techniques and normative data. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(9):1236–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.026.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Hanson B, van der Werken C, Stengel D. Surgeons’ beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:73. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Lovald S, Mercer D, Hanson J, Cowgill I, Erdman M, Robinson P, et al. Complications and hardware removal after open reduction and internal fixation of humeral fractures. J Trauma. 2011;70(5):1273–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318215bedd (discussion 7-8).CrossRefPubMed

16.

Lim JR, Yoon TH, Choi YR, Lee HM, Chun YM. Biomechanical evaluation of a modified proximal humeral locking plate application for distal extra-articular diaphyseal humeral fractures. J Orthop Res. 2021;39(9):1877–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24925.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Sohn HS, Shin SJ. Modified use of a proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate in extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal humeral fractures. Injury. 2019;50(7):1300–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.05.030.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Saracco M, Smimmo A, De Marco D, Palmacci O, Malerba G, Vitiello R, et al. Surgical approach for fracture of distal humerus: Posterior vs lateral. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2020;12(Suppl 1):8664. https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8664.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Lauder A, Richard MJ. Management of distal humerus fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020;30(5):745–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02626-1.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Lotzien S, Hoberg C, Rausch V, Rosteius T, Schildhauer TA, Gessmann J. Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral midshaft fractures: anterior versus posterior plate fixation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):527. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2888-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Zhiquan A, Bingfang Z, Yeming W, Chi Z, Peiyan H. Minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis (MIPO) of middle and distal third humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(9):628–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815928c2.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Levy JC, Kalandiak SP, Hutson JJ, Zych G. An alternative method of osteosynthesis for distal humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(1):43–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200501000-00008.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Ali N, Ahmad Mir N, Ahmad Dar T, Nawaz Rather M, Ahmad Mir W, S S, et al. Outcome of extra-articular distal humerus fractures fixed by single column extra-articular distal humerus locking compression plate using triceps sparing postero-lateral approach. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2018;6(4):306–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Conaway WK, Hennrikus WL, Ravanbakhsh S, Winthrop Z, Mahajan J. Surgical treatment of displaced pediatric lateral condyle fractures of the humerus by the posterior approach. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2018;27(2):128–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/bpb.0000000000000481.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Aktekin CN, Toprak A, Ozturk AM, Altay M, Ozkurt B, Tabak AY. Open reduction via posterior triceps sparing approach in comparison with closed treatment of posteromedial displaced Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2008;17(4):171–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0b013e3283046530.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Risk factors for hardware-related complications after extra-articular distal humerus fracture fixation using an anatomical locking plate
Authors: Hyoung-Seok Jung
Yoo-Sun Won
Yang-Seon Choi
Jae-Sung Lee
Publication date: 01-08-2022
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02064-0

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Risk factors for hardware-related complications after extra-articular distal humerus fracture fixation using an anatomical locking plate

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Intensive hands-on microsurgery course provides a solid foundation for performing clinical microvascular surgery

The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures

Biomechanical comparison of screw vs. cerclage refixation in orthogeriatric lesser trochanteric fractures: a cadaveric study

Morphometric analysis of the lateral column of the distal humerus with an interest on radio-capitellar arthroplasty design. A computed tomography anatomical study on 50 elbows

Gunshot wound versus blunt liver injuries: different liver-related complications and outcomes