Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 2/2022

01-04-2022 | Original Article

Functional outcome predictors after spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer for restoration of shoulder abduction in traumatic brachial plexus injuries in adults: the effect of time from injury to surgery

Authors: Davi Jorge Fontoura Solla, Adilson José Manoel de Oliveira, Ricardo Salemi Riechelmann, Roberto Sérgio Martins, Mario Gilberto Siqueira

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Shoulder abduction is crucial for daily activities, and its restoration is one of the surgical priorities. We evaluated the predictive factors of shoulder abduction functional outcome after spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer, with special emphasis on the effect of time from injury to the surgery, in the treatment of traumatic brachial plexus injuries.

Method

This cohort included adult patients who underwent SAN-to-SSN transfer with a preoperative Medical Research Council strength grade 0 and a follow-up of minimum 18 months. The primary outcome was shoulder abduction function (bad, < 30°; good, 30°–60°; or excellent, > 60°). Demographics, trauma characteristics, time lapse between injury and surgery, concomitant axillary nerve reconstruction, and surgery duration were registered. Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify predictors of functional outcomes.

Results

The records of 83 patients (86.7% men, mean age 28.8 ± 9.8 years) were analysed. Mean body mass index was 24.1 ± 3.7 kg/m2, and 43.1% were overweight/obese. Motorcycle crashes were the most common trauma mechanism (88.0%). Excellent, good, and bad outcomes were achieved by 20.4%, 38.6%, and 41.0%, respectively. Older patients tended to have worse outcomes (p = 0.074), as well as left-sided lesions (p = 0.015) or those contralateral to manual dominance (p = 0.057). The longer the interval between injury and surgery the worse the outcome: excellent, 5.5 (4.3–7.1); good, 6.9 (5.9–8.7); and bad, 8.2 (5.7–10.1) months (p = 0.018). After multivariable analysis, longer time interval predicted lower odds of better outcomes (OR 0.823, 95% CI 0.699–0.970, p = 0.020; 17.7% lower odds of good or excellent outcome for each additional month). The odd of good or excellent outcomes was also associated with axillary nerve reconstruction (OR 2.767, 95% CI 1.016–7.536, p = 0.046), but not with age or lesion laterality.

Conclusions

Excellent or good functional outcomes for shoulder abduction were achieved by almost sixty percent of adults who underwent SAN-to-SSN transfer for reconstruction of traumatic brachial plexus injuries, associated or not with axillary nerve reconstruction strategies. Longer delays from injury to surgery predicted worse outcomes, and the best time frame seemed to be less than 6 months.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Allieu Y, Cenac P. Neurotization via the spinal accessory nerve in complete paralysis due to multiple avulsion injuries of the brachial plexus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;237:67–74.CrossRef Allieu Y, Cenac P. Neurotization via the spinal accessory nerve in complete paralysis due to multiple avulsion injuries of the brachial plexus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;237:67–74.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Baltzer HL, Wagner ER, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Evaluation of infraspinatus reinnervation and function following spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer in adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Microsurgery. 2017;37:365–70.CrossRef Baltzer HL, Wagner ER, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Evaluation of infraspinatus reinnervation and function following spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer in adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Microsurgery. 2017;37:365–70.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Combined injury of the accessory nerve and brachial plexus. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:390–6.CrossRef Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Combined injury of the accessory nerve and brachial plexus. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:390–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Birch R. Timing of surgical reconstruction for closed traumatic injury to the supraclavicular brachial plexus. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015;40:562–7.CrossRef Birch R. Timing of surgical reconstruction for closed traumatic injury to the supraclavicular brachial plexus. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015;40:562–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bonnel F, Allieu Y, Sugata Y, Rabischong P. Anatomico-surgical bases of neurotization for root avulsion of the brachial plexus. Anat Clin. 1979;1:291–6.CrossRef Bonnel F, Allieu Y, Sugata Y, Rabischong P. Anatomico-surgical bases of neurotization for root avulsion of the brachial plexus. Anat Clin. 1979;1:291–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Coulet B, Boretto JG, Lazerges C, Chammas M. A comparison of intercostal and partial ulnar nerve transfers in restoring elbow flexion following upper brachial plexus injury (C5–C6+/−C7). J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:1297–303.CrossRef Coulet B, Boretto JG, Lazerges C, Chammas M. A comparison of intercostal and partial ulnar nerve transfers in restoring elbow flexion following upper brachial plexus injury (C5–C6+/−C7). J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:1297–303.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dolan RT, Butler JS, Murphy SM, Hynes D, Cronin KJ. Health-related quality of life and functional outcomes following nerve transfers for traumatic upper brachial plexus injuries. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012;37:642–51.CrossRef Dolan RT, Butler JS, Murphy SM, Hynes D, Cronin KJ. Health-related quality of life and functional outcomes following nerve transfers for traumatic upper brachial plexus injuries. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012;37:642–51.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference El-Gammal TA, Fathi NA. Outcomes of surgical treatment of brachial plexus injuries using nerve grafting and nerve transfers. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2002;18:7–15.CrossRef El-Gammal TA, Fathi NA. Outcomes of surgical treatment of brachial plexus injuries using nerve grafting and nerve transfers. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2002;18:7–15.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Faglioni W, Siqueira MG, Martins RS, Heise CO, Foroni L. The epidemiology of adult traumatic brachial plexus lesions in a large metropolis. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:1025–8.CrossRef Faglioni W, Siqueira MG, Martins RS, Heise CO, Foroni L. The epidemiology of adult traumatic brachial plexus lesions in a large metropolis. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:1025–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fu SY, Gordon T. Contributing factors to poor functional recovery after delayed nerve repair: prolonged denervation. J Neurosci. 1995;15:3886–955.CrossRef Fu SY, Gordon T. Contributing factors to poor functional recovery after delayed nerve repair: prolonged denervation. J Neurosci. 1995;15:3886–955.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gordon T, Tyreman N, Raji MA. The basis for diminished functional recovery after delayed peripheral nerve repair. J Neurosci. 2011;31:5325–34.CrossRef Gordon T, Tyreman N, Raji MA. The basis for diminished functional recovery after delayed peripheral nerve repair. J Neurosci. 2011;31:5325–34.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hems TE. Timing of surgical reconstruction for closed traumatic injury to the supraclavicular brachial plexus. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015;40:568–72.CrossRef Hems TE. Timing of surgical reconstruction for closed traumatic injury to the supraclavicular brachial plexus. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015;40:568–72.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Martin E, Senders JT, DiRisio AC, Smith TR, Broekman MLD. Timing of surgery in traumatic brachial plexus injury: a systematic review. J Neurosurg. 2019;130:1333–455.CrossRef Martin E, Senders JT, DiRisio AC, Smith TR, Broekman MLD. Timing of surgery in traumatic brachial plexus injury: a systematic review. J Neurosurg. 2019;130:1333–455.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Midha R. Epidemiology of brachial plexus injuries in a multitrauma population. Neurosurgery. 1997;40:1182–9.CrossRef Midha R. Epidemiology of brachial plexus injuries in a multitrauma population. Neurosurgery. 1997;40:1182–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nagano A. Treatment of brachial plexus injury. J Orthop Sci. 1998;3:71–80.CrossRef Nagano A. Treatment of brachial plexus injury. J Orthop Sci. 1998;3:71–80.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Siqueira MG, Martins RS, Solla D, Faglioni W, Foroni L, Heise CO. Functional outcome of spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve to restore shoulder function: results in upper and complete traumatic brachial plexus palsy in adults. Neurol India. 2019;67:S77–S81.CrossRef Siqueira MG, Martins RS, Solla D, Faglioni W, Foroni L, Heise CO. Functional outcome of spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve to restore shoulder function: results in upper and complete traumatic brachial plexus palsy in adults. Neurol India. 2019;67:S77–S81.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Socolovsky M, di Masi G, Bonilla G, Lovaglio AC, López D. Age as a predictor of long-term results in patients with brachial plexus palsies undergoing surgical repair. Oper Neurosurg. 2018;15:15–24.CrossRef Socolovsky M, di Masi G, Bonilla G, Lovaglio AC, López D. Age as a predictor of long-term results in patients with brachial plexus palsies undergoing surgical repair. Oper Neurosurg. 2018;15:15–24.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Socolovsky M, Di Masi G, Bonilla G, Malessy M. Spinal to accessory nerve transfer in traumatic brachial plexus palsy: is body mass index a predictor of outcome? Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:159–63.CrossRef Socolovsky M, Di Masi G, Bonilla G, Malessy M. Spinal to accessory nerve transfer in traumatic brachial plexus palsy: is body mass index a predictor of outcome? Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:159–63.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Socolovsky M, Malessy M, Lopez D, Guedes F, Flores L. Current concepts in plasticity and nerve transfers: relationship between surgical techniques and outcomes. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42:E13.CrossRef Socolovsky M, Malessy M, Lopez D, Guedes F, Flores L. Current concepts in plasticity and nerve transfers: relationship between surgical techniques and outcomes. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42:E13.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Souza FH, Bernardino SN, Filho HC, Gobbato PL, Martins RS, Martins HA, Silva-Neto RP. Comparison between the anterior and posterior approach for transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve in late traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:2345–9.CrossRef Souza FH, Bernardino SN, Filho HC, Gobbato PL, Martins RS, Martins HA, Silva-Neto RP. Comparison between the anterior and posterior approach for transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve in late traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:2345–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Terzis JK, Barbitsioti A. Primary restoration of elbow flexion in adult post-traumatic plexopathy patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:72–84.CrossRef Terzis JK, Barbitsioti A. Primary restoration of elbow flexion in adult post-traumatic plexopathy patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:72–84.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Terzis JK, Kostas I. Suprascapular nerve reconstruction in 118 cases of adult posttraumatic brachial plexus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:613–29.CrossRef Terzis JK, Kostas I. Suprascapular nerve reconstruction in 118 cases of adult posttraumatic brachial plexus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:613–29.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(6):710–8.CrossRef Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(6):710–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Functional outcome predictors after spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer for restoration of shoulder abduction in traumatic brachial plexus injuries in adults: the effect of time from injury to surgery
Authors
Davi Jorge Fontoura Solla
Adilson José Manoel de Oliveira
Ricardo Salemi Riechelmann
Roberto Sérgio Martins
Mario Gilberto Siqueira
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01501-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 2/2022 Go to the issue