Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 2/2021

01-04-2021 | Care | Original Article

Different approaches towards geriatric trauma care for hip fracture patients: an inter-hospital comparison

Authors: Jip Kusen, Puck van der Vet, Frans-Jasper Wijdicks, Marijn Houwert, Marcel Dijkgraaf, Marije Hamaker, Olivia Geraghty, Egbert-Jan Verleisdonk, Detlef van der Velde

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Hip fractures in geriatric patients have high morbidity and mortality rates. The implementation of a multidisciplinary geriatric care pathway (GCP) may improve treatment for this patient population. This study focusses on two level II hospitals with a different treatment protocols. A comparison was made between a multidisciplinary GCP and extensive standard care with a focus on geriatric hip fracture patients to assess if a multidisciplinary GCP leads to lower mortality and morbidity.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 70 years or older with a unilateral proximal hip fracture who underwent surgery between January 2014 and December 2015. The primary outcome measures complications and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures were time to surgery, hospital length of stay (HLOS) and secondary surgical interventions.

Results

This study included a total of 898 patients. No differences were found between major postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, HLOS or the amount of secondary surgical interventions.

Conclusions

Mortality, major complications, HLOS and the amount of secondary surgical interventions showed no differences between both hospitals. This inter-hospital comparison of two types of geriatric care models showed no outcome that favours one specific geriatric care model over another. This provides opportunities for future studies to get a better understanding of what specific factors of geriatric care models contribute most to an improvement in the treatment of this patient population and decide which approach is most cost effective.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Cumming RG, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Epidemiol Rev. 1997;19(2):244–57.CrossRef Cumming RG, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Epidemiol Rev. 1997;19(2):244–57.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rubenstein LZ, Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland D. Impacts of geriatric evaluation and management programs on defined outcomes: overview of the evidence. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(9 Pt 2):8S–16S (discussion 7S–8S).CrossRef Rubenstein LZ, Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland D. Impacts of geriatric evaluation and management programs on defined outcomes: overview of the evidence. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(9 Pt 2):8S–16S (discussion 7S–8S).CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Different approaches towards geriatric trauma care for hip fracture patients: an inter-hospital comparison
Authors
Jip Kusen
Puck van der Vet
Frans-Jasper Wijdicks
Marijn Houwert
Marcel Dijkgraaf
Marije Hamaker
Olivia Geraghty
Egbert-Jan Verleisdonk
Detlef van der Velde
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Care
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01129-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 2/2021 Go to the issue