Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2017

01-06-2017 | Original Article

Severe intimate partner violence affecting both young and elderly patients of both sexes

Authors: E.A.M Hackenberg, V. Sallinen, V. Koljonen, L. Handolin

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects 25–35 % of women and men in Western countries. Despite the high prevalence of IPV among trauma patients, very little is known about the associated injuries. Most previous studies excluded male victims and IPV is often limited to violence against women. Few reports on IPV among elderly patients exist.

Methods

We examined self-reports of IPV among patients at two major trauma centers of the Helsinki Central Hospital in Finland. Based on previous studies, we hypothesized that we would find the most severe injuries among young and middle-aged women.

Results

We identified 29 patients with a total of 105 injuries; patients typically presented with multiple injuries. Half of all patients required hospitalization or surgery. Contrary to previous studies, 17 % of our cohort were male, while 17 % of patients were 65 years or older. We found that 40 % of male victims presented with a New Injury Severity Score (NISS) over 15, indicating severe trauma. Two elderly patients presented with an NISS of 27, the highest in our study.

Conclusions

IPV leads to severe injury across all age groups among both male and female patients. The injury mechanism should be clearly defined for all trauma patients, keeping IPV in mind as a potential cause despite patient age or gender.

Literature
  1. Krug E. World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
  2. Kjaerum M. Prevalence of physical and sexual violence. In: Violence against women: an EU-wide survey. Europe: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights; 2014.
  3. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, et al. The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. 2011.
  4. Dannenberg AL, Baker SP, Li G. Intentional and unintentional injuries in women. An overview. Ann Epidemiol. 1994;4(2):133–9. doi:10.​1016/​1047-2797(94)90059-0.View ArticlePubMed
  5. Brown J. Male perpetrators, the gender symmetry debate, and the rejection-abuse cycle: Implications for treatment. Am J Mens Health. 2012;6(4):331–43. doi:10.​1177/​1557988312439404​s.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Band-Winterstein T, Eisikovits Z. “Aging out” of violence: The multiple faces of intimate violence over the life span. Qual Health Res. 2009;19(2):164–80. doi:10.​1177/​1049732308329305​.View ArticlePubMed
  7. Stark E, Flitcraft A. Women at risk: domestic violence and women’s health. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1996.View Article
  8. Max W, Rice DP, Finkelstein E, Bardwell RA, Leadbetter S. The economic toll of intimate partner violence against women in the united states. Violence Vict. 2004;19(3):259–72.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Wisner CL, Gilmer TP, Saltzman LE, Zink TM. Intimate partner violence against women: do victims cost health plans more? J Fam Pract. 1999;48(6):439–43.PubMed
  10. Stockl H, Devries K, Rotstein A, et al. The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review. Lancet. 2013;382(9895):859–65. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(13)61030-2.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet. 2002;359(9314):1331–6. pii:S0140-6736(02)08336-8.View ArticlePubMed
  12. PRAISE Investigators, Sprague S, Bhandari M, et al. Prevalence of abuse and intimate partner violence surgical evaluation (PRAISE) in orthopaedic fracture clinics: a multinational prevalence study. Lancet. 2013;382(9895):866–876. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(13)61205-2.
  13. Osler T, Baker SP, Long W. A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma. 1997;43(6):922–5 discussion 925–6.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Noponen T. Scars of ordinary life: Abuse and Body Map form as a tool in work against violence (“Arjen arvet: Pahoinpitely-ja kehokarttalomake väkivaltatyön välineenä”). Tampere: Police University College; 2007.
  15. Heiskanen M, Ruuskanen E. Volence against men in Finland (Tuhansien iskujen maa. Miesten kokema väkivalta Suomessa.) European institute for crime prevention and control, affiliated with the United Nations. 2010.
  16. Lehti M. Homicides, homicide offenders and victims in Finland 2014. (Henkirikoskatsaus.) The National Research Institute of Legal Policy. 2014.
  17. Wahlsten P, Koiranen V, Saukko P. Survey of medico-legal investigation of homicides in the city of Turku, Finland. J Forensic Leg Med. 2007;14(5):243–52. pii:S1353-1131(06)00179-9.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Pereira AR, Vieira DN, Magalhaes T. Fatal intimate partner violence against women in portugal: a forensic medical national study. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(8):1099–107. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jflm.​2013.​09.​015.View ArticlePubMed
  19. Parks SE, Johnson LL, McDaniel DD, Gladden M. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Surveillance for violent deaths—national violent death reporting system, 16 states, 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014;63(1):1–33. pii:ss6301a1.PubMed
  20. Wu V, Huff H, Bhandari M. Pattern of physical injury associated with intimate partner violence in women presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2010;11(2):71–82. doi:10.​1177/​1524838010367503​.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Bhandari M, Sprague S, Tornetta P, 3rd, et al. (Mis)perceptions about intimate partner violence in women presenting for orthopaedic care: a survey of canadian orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(7):1590–1597. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​G.​01188.
  22. Wester W, Wong SL, Lagro-Janssen AL. What do abused women expect from their family physicians? A qualitative study among women in shelter homes. Women Health. 2007;45(1):105–19. doi:10.​1300/​J013v45n01_​07.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Todahl J, Walters E. Universal screening for intimate partner violence: a systematic review. J Marital Fam Ther. 2011;37(3):355–69. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1752-0606.​2009.​00179.​x.View ArticlePubMed
  24. Straus MA. Future research on gender symmetry in physical assaults on partners. Violence Against Women. 2006;12(11):1086–97.View ArticlePubMed
  25. Carmo R, Grams A, Magalhaes T. Men as victims of intimate partner violence. J Forensic Leg Med. 2011;18(8):355–9. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jflm.​2011.​07.​006.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Burkert NT, Rasky E, Freidl W, et al. Female and male victims of violence in an urban emergency room–prevalence, sociodemographic characteristics, alcohol intake, and injury patterns. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013;125(5–6):134–8. doi:10.​1007/​s00508-013-0329-z.View ArticlePubMed
  27. Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Basile KC, Walters ML, Chen J, Merrick MT. Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, united states, 2011. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014;63(8):1–18. pii:ss6308a1.PubMedPubMed Central
Metadata
Title
Severe intimate partner violence affecting both young and elderly patients of both sexes
Authors
E.A.M Hackenberg
V. Sallinen
V. Koljonen
L. Handolin
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0646-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2017 Go to the issue