Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 4/2013

01-08-2013 | Original Article

Technical complications during removal of locking screws from locking compression plates: a prospective multicenter study

Authors: N. Schwarz, S. Euler, M. Schlittler, T. Ulbing, P. Wilhelm, G. Fronhöfer, M. Irnstorfer

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the risk for technical complications in patients undergoing removal of locking compression plates (LCP) with head locking screws.

Methods

A total of 205 patients who were scheduled for implant removal surgery after a healed fracture of the femur, tibia, humerus, distal radius, or clavicle in nine Austrian clinics were prospectively included in the study, all of whom had previously undergone fracture fixation by plates, with titanium implants used in 98 % of the patients. Intraoperative technical complications and the methods used to solve them were documented by the surgeon.

Results

During the course of this study, a total of 1,462 locking screws were removed from 204 LCPs. While 95 % of these screws could be removed without difficulties, technical complications were reported for 41 patients with 78 screws which could not be removed with standard screwdrivers and required the use of additional instruments. The estimated risk for the occurrence of at least one technical complication during implant removal surgery was 20.1 %. The most frequently observed complications were screws that could not be loosened because they were jammed in the LCP, screws with a damaged recess in which the screwdriver turned freely, as well as a combination of both events. The majority of these screws could be removed with the use of a conical extraction screw or by drilling off the screw head. In one patient, an intraoperative refracture of the humerus occurred during plate removal. Even though there is a rate of 20 % for technical complications when removing the implants, only a few patients experience a clinical impact.

Conclusions

Titanium LCPs are prone to technical complications during implant removal, but the majority of the issues can be solved using special techniques.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ochs BG, Gonser CE, Baron HC, Stöckle U, Badke A, Stuby FM. Refracture of long bones after implant removal. An avoidable complication? Unfallchirurg. 2012;115:323–9.PubMedCrossRef Ochs BG, Gonser CE, Baron HC, Stöckle U, Badke A, Stuby FM. Refracture of long bones after implant removal. An avoidable complication? Unfallchirurg. 2012;115:323–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vos D, Hanson B, Verhofstad M. Implant removal of osteosynthesis: the Dutch practice. Results of a survey. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2012;6:6–13.PubMedCrossRef Vos D, Hanson B, Verhofstad M. Implant removal of osteosynthesis: the Dutch practice. Results of a survey. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2012;6:6–13.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hanson B, van der Werken C, Stengel D. Surgeons’ beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:73–81.PubMedCrossRef Hanson B, van der Werken C, Stengel D. Surgeons’ beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:73–81.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Busam ML, Esther RJ, Obremskey WT. Hardware removal: indications and expectations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:113–20.PubMed Busam ML, Esther RJ, Obremskey WT. Hardware removal: indications and expectations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:113–20.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Wang J, Chidambaram R, Mok D. Is removal of clavicle plate after fracture union necessary? Int J Shoulder Surg. 2011;5:85–9.PubMedCrossRef Wang J, Chidambaram R, Mok D. Is removal of clavicle plate after fracture union necessary? Int J Shoulder Surg. 2011;5:85–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Beaupre GS, Csongradi JJ. Refracture risk after plate removal in the forearm. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:87–92.PubMedCrossRef Beaupre GS, Csongradi JJ. Refracture risk after plate removal in the forearm. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:87–92.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference van Nortwick SS, Yao J, Ladd AL. Titanium integration with bone, welding, and screw head destruction complicating hardware removal of the distal radius: report of 2 cases. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:1388–92.PubMedCrossRef van Nortwick SS, Yao J, Ladd AL. Titanium integration with bone, welding, and screw head destruction complicating hardware removal of the distal radius: report of 2 cases. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:1388–92.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hamilton P, Doig S, Williamson O. Technical difficulty of metal removal after LISS plating. Injury. 2004;35:626–8.PubMedCrossRef Hamilton P, Doig S, Williamson O. Technical difficulty of metal removal after LISS plating. Injury. 2004;35:626–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Suzuki T, Smith WR, Stahel PF, Morgan SJ, Baron AJ, Hak DJ. Technical problems and complications in the removal of the less invasive stabilization system. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:369–73.PubMedCrossRef Suzuki T, Smith WR, Stahel PF, Morgan SJ, Baron AJ, Hak DJ. Technical problems and complications in the removal of the less invasive stabilization system. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:369–73.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bae JH, Oh JK, Oh CW, Hur CR. Technical difficulties of removal of locking screw after locking compression plating. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:91–5.PubMedCrossRef Bae JH, Oh JK, Oh CW, Hur CR. Technical difficulties of removal of locking screw after locking compression plating. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:91–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ehlinger M, Adam P, Simon P, Bonnomet F. Technical difficulties in hardware removal in titanium compression plates with locking screws. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:373–6.PubMedCrossRef Ehlinger M, Adam P, Simon P, Bonnomet F. Technical difficulties in hardware removal in titanium compression plates with locking screws. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:373–6.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Georgiadis GM, Gove NK, Smith AD, Rodway IP. Removal of the less invasive stabilization system. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:562–4.PubMedCrossRef Georgiadis GM, Gove NK, Smith AD, Rodway IP. Removal of the less invasive stabilization system. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:562–4.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kumar G, Dunlop C. Case report: a technique to remove a jammed locking screw from a locking plate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:613–6.PubMedCrossRef Kumar G, Dunlop C. Case report: a technique to remove a jammed locking screw from a locking plate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:613–6.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wagner M, Frigg R. AO manual of fracture management: internal fixators. Stuttgart: Thieme;2006. pp. 163–79. Wagner M, Frigg R. AO manual of fracture management: internal fixators. Stuttgart: Thieme;2006. pp. 163–79.
16.
go back to reference Hayes JS, Seidenglanz U, Pearce AI, Pearce SG, Archer CW, Richards RG. Surface polishing positively influences ease of plate and screw removal. Eur Cell Mater. 2010;26:117–26. Hayes JS, Seidenglanz U, Pearce AI, Pearce SG, Archer CW, Richards RG. Surface polishing positively influences ease of plate and screw removal. Eur Cell Mater. 2010;26:117–26.
17.
go back to reference Pearce AI, Pearce SG, Schwieger K, Milz S, Schneider E, Archer CW, Richards RG. Effect of surface topography on removal of cortical bone screws in a novel sheep model. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:1377–83.PubMedCrossRef Pearce AI, Pearce SG, Schwieger K, Milz S, Schneider E, Archer CW, Richards RG. Effect of surface topography on removal of cortical bone screws in a novel sheep model. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:1377–83.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Technical complications during removal of locking screws from locking compression plates: a prospective multicenter study
Authors
N. Schwarz
S. Euler
M. Schlittler
T. Ulbing
P. Wilhelm
G. Fronhöfer
M. Irnstorfer
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0301-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 4/2013 Go to the issue

ESTES News 4.2013

Estes News