Top

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

Published in:

01-08-2013 | Review Article

Indications for implant removal after fracture healing: a review of the literature

Authors: D. I. Vos, M. H. J. Verhofstad

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 4/2013

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this review was to collect and summarize published data on the indications for implant removal after fracture healing, since these are not well defined and guidelines hardly exist.

Methods

A literature search was performed.

Results

Though there are several presumed benefits of implant removal, such as functional improvement and pain relief, the surgical procedure can be very challenging and may lead to complications or even worsening of the complaints. Research has focused on the safety of metal implants (e.g., risk of corrosion, allergy, and carcinogenesis). For these reasons, implants have been removed routinely for decades. Along with the introduction of titanium alloy implants, the need for implant removal became a subject of debate in view of potential (dis)advantages since, in general, implants made of titanium alloys are more difficult to remove. Currently, the main indications for removal from both the upper and lower extremity are mostly ‘relative’ and patient-driven, such as pain, prominent material, or simply the request for removal. True medical indications like infection or intra-articular material are minor reasons.

Conclusion

This review illustrates the great variety of view points in the literature, with large differences in opinions and practices about the indications for implant removal after fracture healing. Since some studies have described asymptomatic patients developing complaints after removal, the general advice nowadays is to remove implants after fracture healing only in symptomatic patients and after a proper informed consent. Well-designed prospective studies on this subject are urgently needed in order to form guidelines based on scientific evidence.

Hanson B, van der Werken C, Stengel D. Surgeons’ beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:73.PubMedCrossRef

Busam ML, Esther RJ, Obremskey WT. Hardware removal: indications and expectations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(2):113–20.PubMed

Loder RT, Feinberg JR. Orthopaedic implants in children: survey results regarding routine removal by the pediatric and nonpediatric specialists. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(4):510–9.PubMedCrossRef

Böstman O, Pihlajamäki H. Routine implant removal after fracture surgery: a potentially reducible consumer of hospital resources in trauma units. J Trauma. 1996;41(5):846–9.PubMedCrossRef

Mølster A, Behring J, Gjerdet NR, Ekeland A. Removal of osteosynthetic implants. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2002;122(23):2274–6.PubMed

Jamil W, Allami M, Choudhury MZ, Mann C, Bagga T, Roberts A. Do orthopaedic surgeons need a policy on the removal of metalwork? A descriptive national survey of practicing surgeons in the United Kingdom. Injury. 2008;39(3):362–7.PubMedCrossRef

AWMF online (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften). Implantatentfernung. 2010. http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/012-004.html.

Black J. Does corrosion matter? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70(4):517–20.PubMed

Levine DL, Staehle RW. Crevice corrosion in orthopedic implant metals. J Biomed Mater Res. 1977;11(4):553–61.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Thomas KA, Cook SD, Harding AF, Haddad RJ Jr. Tissue reaction to implant corrosion in 38 internal fixation devices. Orthopedics. 1988;11(3):441–51.PubMed

11.

Grogan CH. Experimental studies in metal cancerigenesis. VIII. On the etiological factor in chromate cancer. Cancer. 1957;10(3):625–38.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Hallab N, Merritt K, Jacobs JJ. Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(3):428–36.PubMed

13.

Thomas P, Thomsen M. Allergy diagnostics in implant intolerance. Orthopade. 2008;37(2):131–5.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Müller A, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, Willenegger H, editors. Manual of internal fixation. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 1979.

15.

Kettunen J, Kröger H, Bowditch M, Joukainen J, Suomalainen O. Bone mineral density after removal of rigid plates from forearm fractures: preliminary report. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8(6):772–6.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Rosson JW, Petley GW, Shearer JR. Bone structure after removal of internal fixation plates. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(1):65–7.PubMed

17.

Rosson J, Murphy W, Tonge C, Shearer J. Healing of residual screw holes after plate removal. Injury. 1991;22(5):383–4.PubMedCrossRef

18.

du Preez LA, Bütow KW, Swart TJ. Implant failure due to titanium hypersensitivity/allergy?—Report of a case. SADJ. 2007;62(1):22, 24–5.PubMed

19.

Krischak GD, Gebhard F, Mohr W, Krivan V, Ignatius A, Beck A, et al. Difference in metallic wear distribution released from commercially pure titanium compared with stainless steel plates. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(2):104–13.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Serhan H, Slivka M, Albert T, Kwak SD. Is galvanic corrosion between titanium alloy and stainless steel spinal implants a clinical concern? Spine J. 2004;4(4):379–87.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Ehlinger M, Adam P, Simon P, Bonnomet F. Technical difficulties in hardware removal in titanium compression plates with locking screws. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95(5):373–6.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Richards RG. The effect of surface roughness on fibroblast adhesion in vitro. Injury. 1996;27(Suppl 3):SC38–43.PubMed

23.

Meredith DO, Riehle MO, Curtis AS, Richards RG. Is surface chemical composition important for orthopaedic implant materials? J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(2):405–13.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Hayes JS, Seidenglanz U, Pearce AI, Pearce SG, Archer CW, Richards RG. Surface polishing positively influences ease of plate and screw removal. Eur Cell Mater. 2010;19:117–26.PubMed

25.

Pearce AI, Pearce SG, Schwieger K, Milz S, Schneider E, Archer CW, et al. Effect of surface topography on removal of cortical bone screws in a novel sheep model. J Orthop Res. 2008;26(10):1377–83.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Hayes JS, Vos DI, Hahn J, Pearce SG, Richards RG. An in vivo evaluation of surface polishing of TAN intermedullary nails for ease of removal. Eur Cell Mater. 2009;18:15–26.PubMed

27.

Sanderson PL, Ryan W, Turner PG. Complications of metalwork removal. Injury. 1992;23(1):29–30.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Richards RH, Palmer JD, Clarke NM. Observations on removal of metal implants. Injury. 1992;23(1):25–8.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Minkowitz RB, Bhadsavle S, Walsh M, Egol KA. Removal of painful orthopaedic implants after fracture union. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):1906–12.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Müller-Färber J. Metal removal after osteosyntheses. Indications and risks. Orthopade. 2003;32(11):1039–57. quiz 58.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Krettek C, Müller C, Meller R, Jagodzinski M, Hildebrand F, Gaulke R. Is routine implant removal after trauma surgery sensible? Unfallchirurg. 2012;115(4):315–22.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Raney EM, Freccero DM, Dolan LA, Lighter DE, Fillman RR, Chambers HG. Evidence-based analysis of removal of orthopaedic implants in the pediatric population. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(7):701–4.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Morshed S, Humphrey M, Corrales LA, Millett M, Hoffinger SA. Retention of flexible intramedullary nails following treatment of pediatric femur fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(7):509–14.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Gorter EA, Vos DI, Sier CF, Schipper IB. Implant removal associated complications in children with limb fractures due to trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011;37(6):623–7.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Berkes M, Obremskey WT, Scannell B, Ellington JK, Hymes RA, Bosse M; Southeast Fracture Consortium. Maintenance of hardware after early postoperative infection following fracture internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(4):823–8.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Rightmire E, Zurakowski D, Vrahas M. Acute infections after fracture repair: management with hardware in place. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(2):466–72.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Trampuz A, Widmer AF. Infections associated with orthopedic implants. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2006;19(4):349–56.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Trampuz A, Zimmerli W. Diagnosis and treatment of infections associated with fracture-fixation devices. Injury. 2006;37(Suppl 2):S59–66.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Vos D, Hanson B, Verhofstad M. Implant removal of osteosynthesis: the Dutch practice. Results of a survey. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2012;6(1):6.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Hidaka S, Gustilo RB. Refracture of bones of the forearm after plate removal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(8):1241–3.PubMed

41.

Deluca PA, Lindsey RW, Ruwe PA. Refracture of bones of the forearm after the removal of compression plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(9):1372–6.PubMed

42.

Rumball K, Finnegan M. Refractures after forearm plate removal. J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4(2):124–9.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Labosky DA, Cermak MB, Waggy CA. Forearm fracture plates: to remove or not to remove. J Hand Surg Am. 1990;15(2):294–301.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Langkamer VG, Ackroyd CE. Removal of forearm plates. a review of the complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(4):601–4.PubMed

45.

Rosson JW, Shearer JR. Refracture after the removal of plates from the forearm. an avoidable complication. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(3):415–7.PubMed

46.

Chia J, Soh CR, Wong HP, Low YP. Complications following metal removal: a follow-up of surgically treated forearm fractures. Singapore Med J. 1996;37(3):268–9.PubMed

47.

Gyuricza C, Carlson MG, Weiland AJ, Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Daluiski A. Removal of locked volar plates after distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(6):982–5.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Lovald S, Mercer D, Hanson J, Cowgill I, Erdman M, Robinson P, et al. Complications and hardware removal after open reduction and internal fixation of humeral fractures. J Trauma. 2011;70(5):1273–7. discussion 1227–8.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Boerger TO, Patel G, Murphy JP. Is routine removal of intramedullary nails justified. Injury. 1999;30(2):79–81.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Husain A, Pollak AN, Moehring HD, Olson SA, Chapman MW. Removal of intramedullary nails from the femur: a review of 45 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(8):560–2.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Brumback RJ, Ellison TS, Poka A, Bathon GH, Burgess AR. Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Part III: long-term effects of static interlocking fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(1):106–12.PubMed

52.

Toms AD, Morgan-Jones RL, Spencer-Jones R. Intramedullary femoral nailing: removing the nail improves subjective outcome. Injury. 2002;33(3):247–9.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Dodenhoff RM, Dainton JN, Hutchins PM. Proximal thigh pain after femoral nailing. causes and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(5):738–41.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Gösling T, Hufner T, Hankemeier S, Zelle BA, Muller-Heine A, Krettek C. Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;423:222–6.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Hui C, Jorgensen I, Buckley R, Fick G. Incidence of intramedullary nail removal after femoral shaft fracture healing. Can J Surg. 2007;50(1):13–8.PubMed

56.

Kukla C, Gaebler C, Mousavi M, Vécsei V, Heinz T. Indications for implant removal in healed proximal femoral fractures. Acta Chir Austriaca. 2000;32:196–8.

57.

Krettek C, Mommsen P. Implant removal after intramedullary osteosyntheses. Literature review, technical details, and tips and tricks. Unfallchirurg. 2012;115(4):299–314.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Keating JF, Orfaly R, O’Brien PJ. Knee pain after tibial nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(1):10–3.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Karladani AH, Ericsson PA, Granhed H, Karlsson L, Nyberg P. Tibial intramedullary nails—should they be removed? A retrospective study of 71 patients. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(5):668–71.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Leliveld MS, Verhofstad MH. Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve, a possible cause for anterior knee pain after tibial nailing? Injury. 2012;43(6):779–83.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Sidky A, Buckley RE. Hardware removal after tibial fracture has healed. Can J Surg. 2008;51(4):263–8.PubMed

62.

Gösling T, Hüfner T, Hankemeier S, Müller U, Richter M, Krettek C. Indication for removal of tibial nails. Chirurg. 2005;76(8):789–94.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Im GI, Lee KB. Difficulties in removing ACE tibial intramedullary nail. Int Orthop. 2003;27(6):355–8.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Seligson D, Howard PA, Martin R. Difficulty in removal of certain intramedullary nails. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;340:202–6.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Brown OL, Dirschl DR, Obremskey WT. Incidence of hardware-related pain and its effect on functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15(4):271–4.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Williams AA, Witten DM, Duester R, Chou LB. The benefits of implant removal from the foot and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(14):1316–20.PubMedCrossRef

67.

Georgiadis GM. Percutaneous removal of buried antegrade femoral nails. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(1):52–5.PubMedCrossRef

68.

Jago ER, Hindley CJ. The removal of metalwork in children. Injury. 1998;29(6):439–41.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Indications for implant removal after fracture healing: a review of the literature
Authors: D. I. Vos
M. H. J. Verhofstad
Publication date: 01-08-2013
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0283-5

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Indications for implant removal after fracture healing: a review of the literature

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Estes News

Management of chronic traumatic arteriovenous fistula of the lower extremities

Cause of death and time of death distribution of trauma patients in a Level I trauma centre in the Netherlands

More on acetabular fractures: the Trojan War and the Roman Empire

Pain and quality of life 1 year after admission to the emergency department: factors associated with pain

Technical complications during removal of locking screws from locking compression plates: a prospective multicenter study