Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 1/2012

01-02-2012 | Tips&Tricks

Open to laparoscopic conversion in hemoperitoneum of unknown origin

Authors: S. Paun, I. Negoi, R. Ganescu, M. Beuran

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Demonstrating the potential, in spite of the current trend, of closing an open emergency surgical procedure and to convert it to a minimally invasive approach.

Methods

Case report of an open converted to a laparoscopic approach in an emergency setting for hemoperitoneum of unknown origin.

Results

A 28-year-old-female patient was transported to the operating room for suspected acute appendicitis. Through McBurney’s incision, hemoperitoneum was found. She was hemodynamically stable. The open incision was closed and a laparoscopic approach established. The diagnosis was a ruptured right ectopic pregnancy with mild hemoperitoneum. After a laparoscopic salpingectomy, her recovery was uneventful.

Conclusions

For selected cases, the conversion of an open procedure to a laparoscopic approach offers a real benefit for the patient, avoiding a large laparotomy and its associated morbidity.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bouyer J. Epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy: incidence, risk factors and outcomes. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2003;32:S8–17. Bouyer J. Epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy: incidence, risk factors and outcomes. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2003;32:S8–17.
2.
go back to reference Bouyer J, Coste J, Fernandez H, Pouly JL, Job-Spira N. Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3224–30.PubMedCrossRef Bouyer J, Coste J, Fernandez H, Pouly JL, Job-Spira N. Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3224–30.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Varma R, Gupta J. Tubal ectopic pregnancy. Clin Evid (Online). 2009;pii:1406. Varma R, Gupta J. Tubal ectopic pregnancy. Clin Evid (Online). 2009;pii:1406.
5.
go back to reference Clausen I. Conservative versus radical surgery for tubal pregnancy. A review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75:8–12.PubMedCrossRef Clausen I. Conservative versus radical surgery for tubal pregnancy. A review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75:8–12.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hajenius PJ, Mol F, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, van der Veen F. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1):CD000324. Hajenius PJ, Mol F, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, van der Veen F. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1):CD000324.
7.
go back to reference Hajenius PJ, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, van der Veen F. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(1):CD000324. Hajenius PJ, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, van der Veen F. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(1):CD000324.
9.
go back to reference Neugebauer EAM, Sauerland S, Fingerhut A, Millat B, Buess G. European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES): guidelines for endoscopic surgery. Berlin: Springer; 2006. Neugebauer EAM, Sauerland S, Fingerhut A, Millat B, Buess G. European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES): guidelines for endoscopic surgery. Berlin: Springer; 2006.
10.
go back to reference Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg. 2005;242:439–50.PubMed Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg. 2005;242:439–50.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Pritts TA, Ko CY, Esposito TJ. Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery. 2010;148:625–35.PubMedCrossRef Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Pritts TA, Ko CY, Esposito TJ. Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery. 2010;148:625–35.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD001546. Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD001546.
13.
go back to reference Cariati A, Masini R. Hospital bill in open and laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg. 2004;240:562–3.PubMedCrossRef Cariati A, Masini R. Hospital bill in open and laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg. 2004;240:562–3.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Open to laparoscopic conversion in hemoperitoneum of unknown origin
Authors
S. Paun
I. Negoi
R. Ganescu
M. Beuran
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-011-0173-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 1/2012 Go to the issue