Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2011

Open Access 01-06-2011 | Original Article

Outcomes following operative and non-operative management of humeral midshaft fractures: a prospective, observational cohort study of 47 patients

Authors: J. J. van Middendorp, F. Kazacsay, P. Lichtenhahn, N. Renner, R. Babst, G. Melcher

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although the non-operative management of closed humeral midshaft fractures has been advocated for years, the increasing popularity of operative intervention has left the optimal treatment choice unclear.

Objective

To compare the outcomes of operative and non-operative treatment of traumatic closed humeral midshaft fractures in adult patients.

Methods

A multicentre prospective comparative cohort study across 20 centres was conducted. Patients with AO type 12 A2, A3 and B2 fractures were treated with a functional brace or a retrograde-inserted unreamed humeral nail. Follow-up measurements were taken at 6, 12 and 52 weeks after the injury. The primary outcome was fracture healing after 1 year. Secondary outcomes included sub-items of the Constant score, general patient satisfaction, complications and cost-effectiveness parameters. Functions of the uninjured extremity were used as reference parameters. Intention-to-treat analysis was applied with the use of t-tests, Fisher’s exact tests, Mann–Whitney U-tests and adjusted analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results

Forty-seven patients were included. The patient sample consisted of 23 women and 24 men, with a mean age of 52.7 years (range 17–86 years). Of the 47 cases, 14 were treated non-operatively and 33 operatively. The follow-up rate at 1 year was 81%. After 1 year, 11 fractures (100%) healed in the non-operative group and at least 24 fractures (≥89%) healed in the operative group [1 non-union patient (4%) and no data for 2 patients (7%)]. There were no significant differences in pain, range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder and elbow, and return to work after 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 1 year. Although operatively treated patients showed significantly greater shoulder abduction strength (p = 0.036), elbow flexion strength (p = 0.021), functional hand positioning (p = 0.008) and return to recreational activities (p = 0.043) after 6 weeks, no statistically significant differences existed in any outcome measure at the 1-year follow-up.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that the non-operative management of humeral midshaft fractures can be expected to have similar functional outcomes and patient satisfaction at 1 year, despite an early benefit to operative treatment. If no radiological evidence of fracture healing exists in non-operatively treated patients during early follow-up, a switch to surgical treatment results in good functional outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brinker MR, O’Connor DP. The incidence of fractures and dislocations referred for orthopaedic services in a capitated population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(2):290–7.PubMed Brinker MR, O’Connor DP. The incidence of fractures and dislocations referred for orthopaedic services in a capitated population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(2):290–7.PubMed
2.
go back to reference van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HGM, Cooper C. Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone. 2001;29(6):517–22.PubMedCrossRef van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HGM, Cooper C. Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone. 2001;29(6):517–22.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rose SH, Melton LJ 3rd, Morrey BF, Ilstrup DM, Riggs BL. Epidemiologic features of humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;(168):24–30. Rose SH, Melton LJ 3rd, Morrey BF, Ilstrup DM, Riggs BL. Epidemiologic features of humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;(168):24–30.
5.
go back to reference Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber KJ. Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(1):42–54.PubMedCrossRef Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber KJ. Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(1):42–54.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pollock JW, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. Distal humerus fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008;39(2):187–200, vi.PubMedCrossRef Pollock JW, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. Distal humerus fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008;39(2):187–200, vi.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Throckmorton TW, Zarkadas PC, Steinmann SP. Distal humerus fractures. Hand Clin. 2007;23(4):457–69, vi.PubMedCrossRef Throckmorton TW, Zarkadas PC, Steinmann SP. Distal humerus fractures. Hand Clin. 2007;23(4):457–69, vi.PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Papasoulis E, Drosos GI, Ververidis AN, Verettas DA. Functional bracing of humeral shaft fractures. A review of clinical studies. Injury. 2010;41(7):e21–4.PubMedCrossRef Papasoulis E, Drosos GI, Ververidis AN, Verettas DA. Functional bracing of humeral shaft fractures. A review of clinical studies. Injury. 2010;41(7):e21–4.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chapman JR, Henley MB, Agel J, Benca PJ. Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(3):162–6.PubMedCrossRef Chapman JR, Henley MB, Agel J, Benca PJ. Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(3):162–6.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference McCormack RG, Brien D, Buckley RE, McKee MD, Powell J, Schemitsch EH. Fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail. A prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(3):336–9.PubMedCrossRef McCormack RG, Brien D, Buckley RE, McKee MD, Powell J, Schemitsch EH. Fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail. A prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(3):336–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference McKee MD. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM, Koval KJ, Tornetta P, Wirth MA, editors. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p. 1118–59. McKee MD. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM, Koval KJ, Tornetta P, Wirth MA, editors. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p. 1118–59.
13.
go back to reference Schatzker J. Fractures of the humerus (12-A, B, and C). In: Schatzker J, Tile M, editors. The rationale of operative fracture care. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2005. p. 91–102.CrossRef Schatzker J. Fractures of the humerus (12-A, B, and C). In: Schatzker J, Tile M, editors. The rationale of operative fracture care. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2005. p. 91–102.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rommens PM, Blum J, Runkel M. Retrograde nailing of humeral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;(350):26–39. Rommens PM, Blum J, Runkel M. Retrograde nailing of humeral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;(350):26–39.
15.
go back to reference Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, Latta LL, Capps CA. Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(4):478–86.PubMed Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, Latta LL, Capps CA. Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(4):478–86.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Nast-Kolb D, Knoefel WT, Schweiberer L. The treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Results of a prospective AO multicenter study. Unfallchirurg. 1991;94(9):447–54.PubMed Nast-Kolb D, Knoefel WT, Schweiberer L. The treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Results of a prospective AO multicenter study. Unfallchirurg. 1991;94(9):447–54.PubMed
17.
go back to reference [No authors listed]. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 1997;277(11):925–6.CrossRef [No authors listed]. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 1997;277(11):925–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P. Classification AO des fractures. Tome I. Les os longs. 1st ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1987. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P. Classification AO des fractures. Tome I. Les os longs. 1st ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1987.
19.
go back to reference Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(4):453–8.PubMed Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(4):453–8.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Sarmiento A, Kinman PB, Galvin EG, Schmitt RH, Phillips JG. Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59(5):596–601.PubMed Sarmiento A, Kinman PB, Galvin EG, Schmitt RH, Phillips JG. Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59(5):596–601.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Gaston MS, Simpson AHRW. Inhibition of fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(12):1553–60.PubMedCrossRef Gaston MS, Simpson AHRW. Inhibition of fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(12):1553–60.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rüedi TP, Buckley RE, Moran CG, editors. AO principles of fracture management, vol. 2: specific fractures. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme Verlag; 2007. p. 598–604. Rüedi TP, Buckley RE, Moran CG, editors. AO principles of fracture management, vol. 2: specific fractures. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme Verlag; 2007. p. 598–604.
23.
go back to reference Morshed S, Corrales L, Genant H, Miclau T 3rd. Outcome assessment in clinical trials of fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 1):62–7.PubMedCrossRef Morshed S, Corrales L, Genant H, Miclau T 3rd. Outcome assessment in clinical trials of fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 1):62–7.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;(214):160–4. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;(214):160–4.
25.
go back to reference Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Constant–Murley score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;19(1):157–64.CrossRef Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Constant–Murley score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;19(1):157–64.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ryf C, Weymann A, editors. Range of motion—AO Neutral-0 method. 1st ed. New York: Thieme Verlag; 1999. Ryf C, Weymann A, editors. Range of motion—AO Neutral-0 method. 1st ed. New York: Thieme Verlag; 1999.
27.
go back to reference Cheng HR, Lin J. Prospective randomized comparative study of antegrade and retrograde locked nailing for middle humeral shaft fracture. J Trauma. 2008;65(1):94–102.PubMedCrossRef Cheng HR, Lin J. Prospective randomized comparative study of antegrade and retrograde locked nailing for middle humeral shaft fracture. J Trauma. 2008;65(1):94–102.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Putti AB, Uppin RB, Putti BB. Locked intramedullary nailing versus dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009;17(2):139–41. Putti AB, Uppin RB, Putti BB. Locked intramedullary nailing versus dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009;17(2):139–41.
29.
go back to reference Klestil T, Rangger C, Kathrein A, Brenner E, Beck E. The conservative and surgical therapy of traumatic humeral shaft fractures. Chirurg. 1997;68(11):1132–6.PubMedCrossRef Klestil T, Rangger C, Kathrein A, Brenner E, Beck E. The conservative and surgical therapy of traumatic humeral shaft fractures. Chirurg. 1997;68(11):1132–6.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Wallny T, Sagebiel C, Westerman K, Wagner UA, Reimer M. Comparative results of bracing and interlocking nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop. 1997;21(6):374–9.PubMedCrossRef Wallny T, Sagebiel C, Westerman K, Wagner UA, Reimer M. Comparative results of bracing and interlocking nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop. 1997;21(6):374–9.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, Montori VM, Cook DJ, Yusuf S, Sackett DL, Cinà CS, Walter SD, Haynes B, Schünemann HJ, Norman GR, Guyatt GH. Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;330(7482):88.PubMedCrossRef Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, Montori VM, Cook DJ, Yusuf S, Sackett DL, Cinà CS, Walter SD, Haynes B, Schünemann HJ, Norman GR, Guyatt GH. Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;330(7482):88.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ekholm R, Tidermark J, Törnkvist H, Adami J, Ponzer S. Outcome after closed functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(9):591–6.PubMedCrossRef Ekholm R, Tidermark J, Törnkvist H, Adami J, Ponzer S. Outcome after closed functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(9):591–6.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Ring D, Chin K, Taghinia AH, Jupiter JB. Nonunion after functional brace treatment of diaphyseal humerus fractures. J Trauma. 2007;62(5):1157–8.PubMedCrossRef Ring D, Chin K, Taghinia AH, Jupiter JB. Nonunion after functional brace treatment of diaphyseal humerus fractures. J Trauma. 2007;62(5):1157–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Outcomes following operative and non-operative management of humeral midshaft fractures: a prospective, observational cohort study of 47 patients
Authors
J. J. van Middendorp
F. Kazacsay
P. Lichtenhahn
N. Renner
R. Babst
G. Melcher
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-011-0099-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2011 Go to the issue

Abstracts

Abstracts