Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 6/2021

Open Access 01-06-2021 | Brachytherapy | Original Article

Long-term results of robotic radiosurgery for non brachytherapy patients with cervical cancer

Authors: Janis Morgenthaler, Christhardt Köhler, Volker Budach, Jalid Sehouli, Carmen Stromberger, Angela Besserer, Maike Trommer, Christian Baues, Simone Marnitz

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Consolidation brachytherapy is a critical treatment component for cervical cancer patients undergoing primary chemoradiation. Some patients are unsuitable for brachytherapy for a variety of reasons. The use of alternatives (LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery or external beam boosts) compromise oncologic results in cervical cancer patients. Thus, we evaluated the value of brachytherapy-like doses prescriptions using robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife®, CR, Acuuray, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Methods

From 06/2011 to 06/2015, 31 patients (median age 53 years; range 30–77 years) with histologically proven FIGO stages IB-IVB cervical cancer underwent primary chemoradiation. All patients were either not suitable for intracervical brachytherapy for a variety of reasons or refused the brachytherapy. To achieve an adequate dose within the tumor, a CK boost was applied after fiducial implantation. In 29 patients, a dose of either five times 6 Gy or five times 5 Gy was prescribed to the target volume. Two patients received three times 5 Gy. The target dose was prescribed to the 70% isodose. Treatment toxicity was documented once weekly regarding vaginal mucositis, bladder, and bowel irritation according to CTCAE v. 4.03. If possible 3 months after completion of treatment intracervical curettage was performed to exclude residual tumor and the patients were followed up clinically. Sparing of organs at risk (OAR) and outcome in terms of local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed.

Results

Of the 31 patients, 30 have completed CK boost therapy. The median follow-up time was 40 months (range 5–84 months). General treatment tolerability was good. Except for 1 patient, who had diarrhea grade 3, no treatment related side effects above grade 2 were reported. Sparing of OAR was excellent. The 1‑, 3‑, and 5‑year OS rates were 89, 60, and 57% respectively across all stages. Seven patients showed progression (28%), only two of them with local relapse (8%), resulting in an LC rate of 92% after 3 and 5 years. Mean PFS was 41 months (range 2–84 months). Patients with local recurrence had PFS of 5 and 8 months. Five patients developed distant metastases. Fifteen patients (48%) underwent intracervical curettage 3 months after completion of treatment of which 14 (93%) had complete pathologic response.

Conclusion

Brachytherapy remains the standard of care for patients diagnosed with cervical cancer and indication for primary chemoradiation. In terms of local control, CyberKnife®-based boost concepts provide excellent local control. It can be an alternative for patients who cannot receive adequate brachytherapy. Distant relapse still remains a challenge in this context.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Georg P, Pötter R, Georg D, Lang S, Dimopoulos JCA, Sturdza AE et al (2012) Dose effect relationship for late side effects of the rectum and urinary bladder in magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(2):653–657CrossRef Georg P, Pötter R, Georg D, Lang S, Dimopoulos JCA, Sturdza AE et al (2012) Dose effect relationship for late side effects of the rectum and urinary bladder in magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(2):653–657CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tanderup K, Fokdal LU, Sturdza A, Haie-Meder C, Mazeron R, van Limbergen E et al (2016) Effect of tumor dose, volume and overall treatment time on local control after radiochemotherapy including MRI guided brachytherapy of locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 120(3):441–446CrossRef Tanderup K, Fokdal LU, Sturdza A, Haie-Meder C, Mazeron R, van Limbergen E et al (2016) Effect of tumor dose, volume and overall treatment time on local control after radiochemotherapy including MRI guided brachytherapy of locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 120(3):441–446CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Eifel PJ, Ho A, Khalid N, Erickson B, Owen J (2014) Patterns of radiation therapy practice for patients treated for intact cervical cancer in 2005 to 2007: a quality research in radiation oncology study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 89(2):249–256CrossRef Eifel PJ, Ho A, Khalid N, Erickson B, Owen J (2014) Patterns of radiation therapy practice for patients treated for intact cervical cancer in 2005 to 2007: a quality research in radiation oncology study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 89(2):249–256CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gill BS, Lin JF, Krivak TC, Sukumvanich P, Laskey RA, Ross MS et al (2014) National cancer data base analysis of radiation therapy consolidation modality for cervical cancer: the impact of new technological advancements. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 90(5):1083–1090CrossRef Gill BS, Lin JF, Krivak TC, Sukumvanich P, Laskey RA, Ross MS et al (2014) National cancer data base analysis of radiation therapy consolidation modality for cervical cancer: the impact of new technological advancements. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 90(5):1083–1090CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Han K, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Pintilie M, Viswanathan AN (2013) Trends in the utilization of brachytherapy in cervical cancer in the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87(1):111–119CrossRef Han K, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Pintilie M, Viswanathan AN (2013) Trends in the utilization of brachytherapy in cervical cancer in the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87(1):111–119CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Barraclough LH, Swindell R, Livsey JE, Hunter RD, Davidson SE (2008) External beam boost for cancer of the cervix uteri when intracavitary therapy cannot be performed. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71(3):772–778CrossRef Barraclough LH, Swindell R, Livsey JE, Hunter RD, Davidson SE (2008) External beam boost for cancer of the cervix uteri when intracavitary therapy cannot be performed. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71(3):772–778CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lin AJ, Kidd E, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, Mutic S, Thaker PH et al (2019) Intensity modulated radiation therapy and image-guided adapted brachytherapy for cervix cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 103(5):1088–1097CrossRef Lin AJ, Kidd E, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, Mutic S, Thaker PH et al (2019) Intensity modulated radiation therapy and image-guided adapted brachytherapy for cervix cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 103(5):1088–1097CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lin JF, Berger JL, Krivak TC, Beriwal S, Chan JK, Sukumvanich P et al (2014) Impact of facility volume on therapy and survival for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 132(2):416–422CrossRef Lin JF, Berger JL, Krivak TC, Beriwal S, Chan JK, Sukumvanich P et al (2014) Impact of facility volume on therapy and survival for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 132(2):416–422CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mazeron R, Castelnau-Marchand P, Dumas I, del Campo ER, Kom LK, Martinetti F et al (2015) Impact of treatment time and dose escalation on local control in locally advanced cervical cancer treated by chemoradiation and image-guided pulsed-dose rate adaptive brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 114(2):257–263CrossRef Mazeron R, Castelnau-Marchand P, Dumas I, del Campo ER, Kom LK, Martinetti F et al (2015) Impact of treatment time and dose escalation on local control in locally advanced cervical cancer treated by chemoradiation and image-guided pulsed-dose rate adaptive brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 114(2):257–263CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Smith GL, Eifel PJ (2014) Trends in the utilization of brachytherapy in cervical cancer in the United States. In regard to Han et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88(2):459–460CrossRef Smith GL, Eifel PJ (2014) Trends in the utilization of brachytherapy in cervical cancer in the United States. In regard to Han et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88(2):459–460CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Smith GL, Jiang J, Giordano SH, Meyer LA, Eifel PJ (2015) Trends in the quality of treatment for patients with intact cervical cancer in the United States, 1999 through 2011. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 92(2):260–267CrossRef Smith GL, Jiang J, Giordano SH, Meyer LA, Eifel PJ (2015) Trends in the quality of treatment for patients with intact cervical cancer in the United States, 1999 through 2011. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 92(2):260–267CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tanderup K, Eifel PJ, Yashar CM, Pötter R, Grigsby PW (2014) Curative radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: brachytherapy is NOT optional. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88(3):537–539CrossRef Tanderup K, Eifel PJ, Yashar CM, Pötter R, Grigsby PW (2014) Curative radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: brachytherapy is NOT optional. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88(3):537–539CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cengiz M, Dogan A, Ozyigit G, Erturk E, Yildiz F, Selek U et al (2012) Comparison of intracavitary brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy dose distribution for cervical cancer. Brachytherapy 11(2):125–129CrossRef Cengiz M, Dogan A, Ozyigit G, Erturk E, Yildiz F, Selek U et al (2012) Comparison of intracavitary brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy dose distribution for cervical cancer. Brachytherapy 11(2):125–129CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Haas JA, Witten MR, Clancey O, Episcopia K, Accordino D, Chalas E (2012) CyberKnife boost for patients with cervical cancer unable to undergo brachytherapy. Front Oncol 2:25CrossRef Haas JA, Witten MR, Clancey O, Episcopia K, Accordino D, Chalas E (2012) CyberKnife boost for patients with cervical cancer unable to undergo brachytherapy. Front Oncol 2:25CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Harada Y, Miyazaki S (2017) CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for primary and metastatic cancer in the cervix. Cureus 9(12):e2002PubMedPubMedCentral Harada Y, Miyazaki S (2017) CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for primary and metastatic cancer in the cervix. Cureus 9(12):e2002PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Marnitz S, Köhler C, Budach V, Neumann O, Kluge A, Wlodarczyk W et al (2013) Brachytherapy-emulating robotic radiosurgery in patients with cervical carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 8(1):109CrossRef Marnitz S, Köhler C, Budach V, Neumann O, Kluge A, Wlodarczyk W et al (2013) Brachytherapy-emulating robotic radiosurgery in patients with cervical carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 8(1):109CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Neumann O, Kluge A, Lyubina O, Wlodarczyk W, Jahn U, Köhler C et al (2014) Robotergestützte Radiochirurgie als eine Alternative zur Brachytherapie bei Patientinnen mit Zervixkarzinom. Strahlenther Onkol 190(6):538–545CrossRef Neumann O, Kluge A, Lyubina O, Wlodarczyk W, Jahn U, Köhler C et al (2014) Robotergestützte Radiochirurgie als eine Alternative zur Brachytherapie bei Patientinnen mit Zervixkarzinom. Strahlenther Onkol 190(6):538–545CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Otahal B, Dolezel M, Cvek J, Simetka O, Klat J, Knybel L et al (2014) Dosimetric comparison of MRI-based HDR brachytherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with advanced cervical cancer: a virtual brachytherapy study. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 19(6):399–404CrossRef Otahal B, Dolezel M, Cvek J, Simetka O, Klat J, Knybel L et al (2014) Dosimetric comparison of MRI-based HDR brachytherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with advanced cervical cancer: a virtual brachytherapy study. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 19(6):399–404CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Patil N, Chakraborty S, D’Souza D (2013) Comparison of intracavitary brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy dose distribution for cervical cancer: in regard to Cengiz et al. Brachytherapy 12(4):387CrossRef Patil N, Chakraborty S, D’Souza D (2013) Comparison of intracavitary brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy dose distribution for cervical cancer: in regard to Cengiz et al. Brachytherapy 12(4):387CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Podder T, Fried D, Holland B, Rosenman J, Biswas T (2012) SU-E-T-412: can CyberKnife SBRT be an alternative to brachytherapy for cervical cancer treatment? Med Phys 39(6):3799–3799CrossRef Podder T, Fried D, Holland B, Rosenman J, Biswas T (2012) SU-E-T-412: can CyberKnife SBRT be an alternative to brachytherapy for cervical cancer treatment? Med Phys 39(6):3799–3799CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Seo Y, Kim M‑S, Yoo H‑J, Jang W‑I, Rhu S‑Y, Choi S‑C et al (2016) Salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally recurrent uterine cervix cancer at the pelvic sidewall: feasibility and complication. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 12(2):e280–8CrossRef Seo Y, Kim M‑S, Yoo H‑J, Jang W‑I, Rhu S‑Y, Choi S‑C et al (2016) Salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally recurrent uterine cervix cancer at the pelvic sidewall: feasibility and complication. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 12(2):e280–8CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pötter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E, Barillot I, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J et al (2006) Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol 78:67–77CrossRef Pötter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E, Barillot I, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J et al (2006) Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol 78:67–77CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pötter R, Tanderup K, Kirisits C, de Leeuw A, Kirchheiner K, Nout R et al (2018) The EMBRACE II study: the outcome and prospect of two decades of evolution within the GEC-ESTRO GYN working group and the EMBRACE studies. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 9:48–60CrossRef Pötter R, Tanderup K, Kirisits C, de Leeuw A, Kirchheiner K, Nout R et al (2018) The EMBRACE II study: the outcome and prospect of two decades of evolution within the GEC-ESTRO GYN working group and the EMBRACE studies. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 9:48–60CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Marnitz S, Köhler C, Rauer A, Schneider A, Budach V, Tsunoda A et al (2014) Patterns of care in patients with cervical cancer 2012: results of a survey among German radiotherapy departments and out-patient health care centers. Strahlenther Onkol 190(1):34–40CrossRef Marnitz S, Köhler C, Rauer A, Schneider A, Budach V, Tsunoda A et al (2014) Patterns of care in patients with cervical cancer 2012: results of a survey among German radiotherapy departments and out-patient health care centers. Strahlenther Onkol 190(1):34–40CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mangler M, Zech N, Schneider A, Köhler C, Marnitz S (2013) Aspects of therapy for cervical cancer in Germany 2012—results from a survey of German gynaecological hospitals. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 73(3):227–238CrossRef Mangler M, Zech N, Schneider A, Köhler C, Marnitz S (2013) Aspects of therapy for cervical cancer in Germany 2012—results from a survey of German gynaecological hospitals. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 73(3):227–238CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Marnitz S, Köhler C, Budach V, Neumann O, Kluge A, Wlodarczyk W et al (2013) Brachytherapy-emulating robotic radiosurgery in patients with cervical carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 8(1):109CrossRef Marnitz S, Köhler C, Budach V, Neumann O, Kluge A, Wlodarczyk W et al (2013) Brachytherapy-emulating robotic radiosurgery in patients with cervical carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 8(1):109CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tomé WA, Fowler JF (2002) On cold spots in tumor subvolumes. Med Phys 29(7):1590–1598CrossRef Tomé WA, Fowler JF (2002) On cold spots in tumor subvolumes. Med Phys 29(7):1590–1598CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Schmid MP, Mansmann B, Federico M, Dimopoulous JCA, Georg P, Fidarova E et al (2013) Residual tumour volumes and grey zones after external beam radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) in cervical cancer patients. A low-field MRI study. Strahlenther Onkol 189(3):238–244CrossRef Schmid MP, Mansmann B, Federico M, Dimopoulous JCA, Georg P, Fidarova E et al (2013) Residual tumour volumes and grey zones after external beam radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) in cervical cancer patients. A low-field MRI study. Strahlenther Onkol 189(3):238–244CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Creasman WT et al (2006) Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95(1):S43–S103CrossRef Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Creasman WT et al (2006) Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95(1):S43–S103CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sturdza A, Pötter R, Fokdal LU, Haie-Meder C, Tan LT, Mazeron R et al (2016) Image guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: improved pelvic control and survival in retroEMBRACE, a multicenter cohort study. Radiother Oncol 120(3):428–433CrossRef Sturdza A, Pötter R, Fokdal LU, Haie-Meder C, Tan LT, Mazeron R et al (2016) Image guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: improved pelvic control and survival in retroEMBRACE, a multicenter cohort study. Radiother Oncol 120(3):428–433CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Long-term results of robotic radiosurgery for non brachytherapy patients with cervical cancer
Authors
Janis Morgenthaler
Christhardt Köhler
Volker Budach
Jalid Sehouli
Carmen Stromberger
Angela Besserer
Maike Trommer
Christian Baues
Simone Marnitz
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01685-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 6/2021 Go to the issue