Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 6/2020

01-06-2020 | Leukopenia | Original Article

Age-dependent hemato- and nephrotoxicity in patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin

Authors: Fabian Weykamp, Katharina Seidensaal, Stefan Rieken, Kim Green, Stephan Mende, Karim Zaoui, Kolja Freier, Sebastian Adeberg, Jürgen Debus, Stefan Ezechiel Welte

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and purpose

In cases of simultaneous chemoradiotherapy (CRT), early recognition of toxic side effects is important, as drug discontinuation may prevent further injury. It appears favorable to undertake further steps to investigate whether patient subgroups behave differently depending on their toxicity profile.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 125 consecutive patients with non-metastasized carcinoma of the head and neck who were treated with CRT (cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly) in 2013/2014. Patients were planned to receive six cycles of cisplatin. Statistical analyses were performed using the chi2 test, t-test, Kaplan–Meier method, and the log-rank test, as appropriate.

Results

Eighty-six patients did not reach the intended sixth cycle (68.8%; 60.0% of whom were ≥60 years, p < 0.05). Acute kidney injury (glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73m2) was the most common reason for drug discontinuation (26.7%; 82.6% of whom were ≥60 years; p < 0.01), followed by leukopenia <3/nL (23.3%; 75% of whom were <60 years; p < 0.01) and infection (11.6%). Patients who underwent ≥5 cycles were associated with prolonged overall survival and metastasis-free survival after CRT (p < 0.02; median follow-up 24 months), especially patients <60 years.

Conclusion

Acute kidney injury was the most common side effect in patients ≥60 years, whereas leukopenia characteristically occurred significantly more often in younger patients. Discontinuing cisplatin during CRT was associated with a worse outcome, especially in patients <60 years.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2006) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 354:567–578CrossRef Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2006) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 354:567–578CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Xiang M, Holsinger FC, Colevas AD, Chen MM, Le QT, Beadle BM (2018) Survival of patients with head and neck cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin or concurrent cetuximab: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare analysis. Cancer 124:4486–4494CrossRef Xiang M, Holsinger FC, Colevas AD, Chen MM, Le QT, Beadle BM (2018) Survival of patients with head and neck cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin or concurrent cetuximab: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare analysis. Cancer 124:4486–4494CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sun XS, Sire C, Tao Y et al (2018) A phase II randomized trial of pembrolizumab versus cetuximab, concomitant with radiotherapy (RT) in locally advanced (LA) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN): first results of the GORTEC 2015-01 “PembroRad” trial. J Clin Oncol 36:6018–6018CrossRef Sun XS, Sire C, Tao Y et al (2018) A phase II randomized trial of pembrolizumab versus cetuximab, concomitant with radiotherapy (RT) in locally advanced (LA) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN): first results of the GORTEC 2015-01 “PembroRad” trial. J Clin Oncol 36:6018–6018CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gooi Z, Fakhry C, Goldenberg D et al (2016) AHNS Series: Do you know your guidelines?Principles of radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a review of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Head Neck 38:987–992CrossRef Gooi Z, Fakhry C, Goldenberg D et al (2016) AHNS Series: Do you know your guidelines?Principles of radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a review of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Head Neck 38:987–992CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Onbasi Y, Lettmaier S, Hecht M et al (2019) Is there a patient population with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region who might benefit from de-intensification of postoperative radiotherapy? Strahlenther Onkol 195:482–495CrossRef Onbasi Y, Lettmaier S, Hecht M et al (2019) Is there a patient population with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region who might benefit from de-intensification of postoperative radiotherapy? Strahlenther Onkol 195:482–495CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tribius S, Meyer MS, Pflug C et al (2018) Socioeconomic status and quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 194:737–749CrossRef Tribius S, Meyer MS, Pflug C et al (2018) Socioeconomic status and quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 194:737–749CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nieder C, Kampe TA, Pawinski A, Dalhaug A (2018) Patient-reported symptoms before palliative radiotherapy predict survival differences. Strahlenther Onkol 194:533–538CrossRef Nieder C, Kampe TA, Pawinski A, Dalhaug A (2018) Patient-reported symptoms before palliative radiotherapy predict survival differences. Strahlenther Onkol 194:533–538CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Alterio D, Gerardi MA, Cella L et al (2017) Radiation-induced acute dysphagia: prospective observational study on 42 head and neck cancer patients. Strahlenther Onkol 193:971–981CrossRef Alterio D, Gerardi MA, Cella L et al (2017) Radiation-induced acute dysphagia: prospective observational study on 42 head and neck cancer patients. Strahlenther Onkol 193:971–981CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Korner P, Ehrmann K, Hartmannsgruber J et al (2017) Patient-reported symptoms during radiotherapy: clinically relevant symptom burden in patients treated with palliative and curative intent. Strahlenther Onkol 193:570–577CrossRef Korner P, Ehrmann K, Hartmannsgruber J et al (2017) Patient-reported symptoms during radiotherapy: clinically relevant symptom burden in patients treated with palliative and curative intent. Strahlenther Onkol 193:570–577CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Grégoire V, Eisbruch A, Hamoir M, Levendag P (2006) Proposal for the delineation of the nodal CTV in the node-positive and the post-operative neck. Radiother Oncol 79:15–20CrossRef Grégoire V, Eisbruch A, Hamoir M, Levendag P (2006) Proposal for the delineation of the nodal CTV in the node-positive and the post-operative neck. Radiother Oncol 79:15–20CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Grégoire V, Levendag P, Ang KK et al (2003) CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC, RTOG consensus guidelines. Radiother Oncol 69:227–236CrossRef Grégoire V, Levendag P, Ang KK et al (2003) CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC, RTOG consensus guidelines. Radiother Oncol 69:227–236CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kirkpatrick JP, van der Kogel AJ, Schultheiss TE (2010) Radiation dose—volume effects in the spinal cord. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:S42–S9CrossRef Kirkpatrick JP, van der Kogel AJ, Schultheiss TE (2010) Radiation dose—volume effects in the spinal cord. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:S42–S9CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mayo C, Martel MK, Marks LB, Flickinger J, Nam J, Kirkpatrick J (2010) Radiation dose—volume effects of optic nerves and chiasm. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:S28–S35CrossRef Mayo C, Martel MK, Marks LB, Flickinger J, Nam J, Kirkpatrick J (2010) Radiation dose—volume effects of optic nerves and chiasm. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:S28–S35CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Deasy JO, Moiseenko V, Marks L, Chao KC, Nam J, Eisbruch A (2010) Radiotherapy dose—volume effects on salivary gland function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:S58–S63CrossRef Deasy JO, Moiseenko V, Marks L, Chao KC, Nam J, Eisbruch A (2010) Radiotherapy dose—volume effects on salivary gland function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:S58–S63CrossRef
15.
go back to reference United Nations (2013) World population ageing 2013. United Nations Publ, New York, USACrossRef United Nations (2013) World population ageing 2013. United Nations Publ, New York, USACrossRef
16.
go back to reference Orimo H, Ito H, Suzuki T, Araki A, Hosoi T, Sawabe M (2006) Reviewing the definition of “elderly”. Geriatr Gerontol Int 6:149–158CrossRef Orimo H, Ito H, Suzuki T, Araki A, Hosoi T, Sawabe M (2006) Reviewing the definition of “elderly”. Geriatr Gerontol Int 6:149–158CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Peng L, Xu C, Chen Y‑P et al (2019) Optimizing the cumulative cisplatin dose during radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: dose-effect analysis for a large cohort. Oral Oncol 89:102–106CrossRef Peng L, Xu C, Chen Y‑P et al (2019) Optimizing the cumulative cisplatin dose during radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: dose-effect analysis for a large cohort. Oral Oncol 89:102–106CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Otty Z, Skinner MB, Dass J et al (2011) Efficacy and tolerability of weekly low-dose cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol 7:287–292CrossRef Otty Z, Skinner MB, Dass J et al (2011) Efficacy and tolerability of weekly low-dose cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol 7:287–292CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Spreafico A, Huang SH, Xu W et al (2015) Differential impact of cisplatin dose intensity on human papillomavirus (HPV)-related (+) and HPV-unrelated (−) locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). J Clin Oncol 33:6020–6020CrossRef Spreafico A, Huang SH, Xu W et al (2015) Differential impact of cisplatin dose intensity on human papillomavirus (HPV)-related (+) and HPV-unrelated (−) locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). J Clin Oncol 33:6020–6020CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Motwani SS, McMahon GM, Humphreys BD, Partridge AH, Waikar SS, Curhan GC (2018) Development and validation of a risk prediction model for acute kidney injury after the first course of cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 36:682–688CrossRef Motwani SS, McMahon GM, Humphreys BD, Partridge AH, Waikar SS, Curhan GC (2018) Development and validation of a risk prediction model for acute kidney injury after the first course of cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 36:682–688CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pignon J‑P, Le Maitre A, Maillard E, Bourhis J, Group M‑NC (2009) Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol 92:4–14CrossRef Pignon J‑P, Le Maitre A, Maillard E, Bourhis J, Group M‑NC (2009) Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol 92:4–14CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Melotek JM, Cooper BT, Koshy M, Silverman JS, Spiotto MT (2016) Weekly versus every-three-weeks platinum-based chemoradiation regimens for head and neck cancer. Head Neck Surg 45:62 Melotek JM, Cooper BT, Koshy M, Silverman JS, Spiotto MT (2016) Weekly versus every-three-weeks platinum-based chemoradiation regimens for head and neck cancer. Head Neck Surg 45:62
23.
go back to reference Becker-Schiebe M, Christiansen H (2018) Wöchentliche oder dreiwöchentliche Cisplatin-Gaben bei der kombinierten Radiochemotherapie lokal fortgeschrittener Kopf-Hals-Tumoren? Strahlenther Onkol 194:468–470CrossRef Becker-Schiebe M, Christiansen H (2018) Wöchentliche oder dreiwöchentliche Cisplatin-Gaben bei der kombinierten Radiochemotherapie lokal fortgeschrittener Kopf-Hals-Tumoren? Strahlenther Onkol 194:468–470CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Morse RT, Ganju RG, TenNapel MJ et al (2019) Weekly cisplatin chemotherapy dosing versus triweekly chemotherapy with concurrent radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 41:2492–2499CrossRef Morse RT, Ganju RG, TenNapel MJ et al (2019) Weekly cisplatin chemotherapy dosing versus triweekly chemotherapy with concurrent radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 41:2492–2499CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mohamed A, Twardy B, Zordok MA et al (2019) Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly versus triweekly cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: comparative analysis. Head Neck 41:1490–1498CrossRef Mohamed A, Twardy B, Zordok MA et al (2019) Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly versus triweekly cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: comparative analysis. Head Neck 41:1490–1498CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Espeli V, Zucca E, Ghielmini M et al (2012) Weekly and 3‑weekly cisplatin concurrent with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer. Oral Oncol 48:266–271CrossRef Espeli V, Zucca E, Ghielmini M et al (2012) Weekly and 3‑weekly cisplatin concurrent with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer. Oral Oncol 48:266–271CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tsan D‑L, Lin C‑Y, Kang C‑J et al (2012) The comparison between weekly and three-weekly cisplatin delivered concurrently with radiotherapy for patients with postoperative high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Radiat Oncol 7:215CrossRef Tsan D‑L, Lin C‑Y, Kang C‑J et al (2012) The comparison between weekly and three-weekly cisplatin delivered concurrently with radiotherapy for patients with postoperative high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Radiat Oncol 7:215CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ et al (2003) The oral neurokinin‑1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:4112–4119CrossRef Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ et al (2003) The oral neurokinin‑1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:4112–4119CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Herrstedt J, Summers Y, Daugaard G et al (2018) Amisulpride in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a dose-escalation study. Support Care Cancer 26:139–145CrossRef Herrstedt J, Summers Y, Daugaard G et al (2018) Amisulpride in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a dose-escalation study. Support Care Cancer 26:139–145CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Age-dependent hemato- and nephrotoxicity in patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin
Authors
Fabian Weykamp
Katharina Seidensaal
Stefan Rieken
Kim Green
Stephan Mende
Karim Zaoui
Kolja Freier
Sebastian Adeberg
Jürgen Debus
Stefan Ezechiel Welte
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-019-01550-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 6/2020 Go to the issue