Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 7/2012

01-07-2012 | Original article

Postoperative versus definitive chemoradiation in early-stage anal cancer

Results of a matched-pair analysis

Authors: Dr. B. Berger, M.D., M. Menzel, G. Breucha, M. Bamberg, M. Weinmann

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 7/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and purpose

The goal of the present study was to comparatively assess the results of definitive chemoradiation (CRT) with or without previous macroscopically complete resection in patients with early-stage node-negative (T1–2 N0) anal carcinoma.

Patients and methods

A total of 20 patients with T1–2 N0 anal carcinoma who received radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy following incidental R0/1 tumor resection (S/CRT group) were selected. These were matched to 20 comparable patients who underwent definitive chemoradiation without previous surgery (CRT group). Major objectives of this analysis were treatment outcomes in terms of locoregional tumor control (LRC), overall survival (OS), colostomy-free survival, and toxicity.

Results

Patients treated postoperatively received significantly lower RT doses (median 54.0 Gy vs. 59.7 Gy; p < 0.001) and less frequently concomitant chemotherapy than those treated definitely. The 5-year LRC and 5-year OS rates were 97.5% and 90.0%, respectively, without significant differences between the S/CRT and the CRT groups. The distribution of acute and late toxicities was comparable, and the 5-year colostomy-free survival was 95% in both groups.

Conclusion

This matched-pair comparison of incidental R0/1 resection plus dose-reduced CRT with standard definitive CRT of early-stage anal cancer shows similar treatment results. Thus, dose-reduced RT with or without chemotherapy may be considered in R0/1 resected patients with T1–2 N0 anal carcinoma.
Literature
1.
go back to reference UKCCR Anal Cancer Trial Working Party (1996) Epidermoid anal cancer: results from the UKCCCR randomised trial of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin. UKCCCR Anal Cancer Trial Working Party. UK Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research. Lancet 348:1049–1054CrossRef UKCCR Anal Cancer Trial Working Party (1996) Epidermoid anal cancer: results from the UKCCCR randomised trial of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin. UKCCCR Anal Cancer Trial Working Party. UK Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research. Lancet 348:1049–1054CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Winter KA, Gunderson LL et al (2008) Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299:1914–1921PubMedCrossRef Ajani JA, Winter KA, Gunderson LL et al (2008) Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299:1914–1921PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bannas P, Weber C, Adam G et al (2011) Contrast-enhanced [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging and radiotherapy planning in patients with anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:445–451PubMedCrossRef Bannas P, Weber C, Adam G et al (2011) Contrast-enhanced [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging and radiotherapy planning in patients with anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:445–451PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bartelink H, Roelofsen F, Eschwege F et al (1997) Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups. J Clin Oncol 15:2040–2049PubMed Bartelink H, Roelofsen F, Eschwege F et al (1997) Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups. J Clin Oncol 15:2040–2049PubMed
5.
go back to reference Boman BM, Moertel CG, O’Connell MJ et al (1984) Carcinoma of the anal canal. A clinical and pathologic study of 188 cases. Cancer 54:114–125PubMedCrossRef Boman BM, Moertel CG, O’Connell MJ et al (1984) Carcinoma of the anal canal. A clinical and pathologic study of 188 cases. Cancer 54:114–125PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Coquard R, Cenni JC, Artru P et al (2009) Definitive treatment of anal canal carcinoma with radiotherapy: adverse impact of a pre-radiation resection. A retrospective study of 57 patients treated with curative intent. Cancer Radiother 13:715–720PubMedCrossRef Coquard R, Cenni JC, Artru P et al (2009) Definitive treatment of anal canal carcinoma with radiotherapy: adverse impact of a pre-radiation resection. A retrospective study of 57 patients treated with curative intent. Cancer Radiother 13:715–720PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Engstrom PF, Arnoletti JP, Benson AB 3rd et al (2010) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Anal carcinoma. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 8:106–120 Engstrom PF, Arnoletti JP, Benson AB 3rd et al (2010) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Anal carcinoma. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 8:106–120
8.
go back to reference Flam M, John M, Pajak TF et al (1996) Role of mitomycin in combination with fluorouracil and radiotherapy, and of salvage chemoradiation in the definitive nonsurgical treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: results of a phase III randomized intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 14:2527–2539PubMed Flam M, John M, Pajak TF et al (1996) Role of mitomycin in combination with fluorouracil and radiotherapy, and of salvage chemoradiation in the definitive nonsurgical treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: results of a phase III randomized intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 14:2527–2539PubMed
9.
go back to reference Fraunholz I, Grau K, Weiss C, Rodel C (2011) Patient- and treatment-related risk factors for nausea and emesis during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 187:1–6PubMedCrossRef Fraunholz I, Grau K, Weiss C, Rodel C (2011) Patient- and treatment-related risk factors for nausea and emesis during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 187:1–6PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fraunholz I, Rabeneck D, Weiss C, Rodel C (2010) Combined-modality treatment for anal cancer: current strategies and future directions. Strahlenther Onkol 186:361–366PubMedCrossRef Fraunholz I, Rabeneck D, Weiss C, Rodel C (2010) Combined-modality treatment for anal cancer: current strategies and future directions. Strahlenther Onkol 186:361–366PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Glynne-Jones R, Northover JM, Cervantes A (2010) Anal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v87–92PubMedCrossRef Glynne-Jones R, Northover JM, Cervantes A (2010) Anal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v87–92PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Adams R et al (2011) “Mind the gap” – the impact of variations in the duration of the treatment gap and overall treatment time in the first UK Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:1488–1494PubMedCrossRef Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Adams R et al (2011) “Mind the gap” – the impact of variations in the duration of the treatment gap and overall treatment time in the first UK Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:1488–1494PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hatfield P, Cooper R, Sebag-Montefiore D (2008) Involved-field, low-dose chemoradiotherapy for early-stage anal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:419–424PubMedCrossRef Hatfield P, Cooper R, Sebag-Montefiore D (2008) Involved-field, low-dose chemoradiotherapy for early-stage anal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:419–424PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hu K, Minsky BD, Cohen AM et al (1999) 30 Gy may be an adequate dose in patients with anal cancer treated with excisional biopsy followed by combined-modality therapy. J Surg Oncol 70:71–77PubMedCrossRef Hu K, Minsky BD, Cohen AM et al (1999) 30 Gy may be an adequate dose in patients with anal cancer treated with excisional biopsy followed by combined-modality therapy. J Surg Oncol 70:71–77PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Janssen S, Meier zu Eissen J, Kolbert G et al (2009) Anal cancer treated with radio-chemotherapy: correlation between length of treatment interruption and outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1421–1428PubMedCrossRef Janssen S, Meier zu Eissen J, Kolbert G et al (2009) Anal cancer treated with radio-chemotherapy: correlation between length of treatment interruption and outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1421–1428PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lammering G, De Ruysscher D, Baardwijk A van et al (2010) The use of FDG-PET to target tumors by radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 186:471–481PubMedCrossRef Lammering G, De Ruysscher D, Baardwijk A van et al (2010) The use of FDG-PET to target tumors by radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 186:471–481PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Longo WE, Vernava AM 3rd, Wade TP et al (1994) Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Predictors of initial treatment failure and results of salvage therapy. Ann Surg 220:40–49PubMedCrossRef Longo WE, Vernava AM 3rd, Wade TP et al (1994) Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Predictors of initial treatment failure and results of salvage therapy. Ann Surg 220:40–49PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Northover J, Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D et al (2010) Chemoradiation for the treatment of epidermoid anal cancer: 13-year follow-up of the first randomised UKCCCR Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I). Br J Cancer 102:1123–1128PubMedCrossRef Northover J, Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D et al (2010) Chemoradiation for the treatment of epidermoid anal cancer: 13-year follow-up of the first randomised UKCCCR Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I). Br J Cancer 102:1123–1128PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ortholan C, Ramaioli A, Peiffert D et al (2005) Anal canal carcinoma: early-stage tumors ( or ( 10 mm (T1 or Tis): therapeutic options and original pattern of local failure after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:479–485PubMedCrossRef Ortholan C, Ramaioli A, Peiffert D et al (2005) Anal canal carcinoma: early-stage tumors ( or ( 10 mm (T1 or Tis): therapeutic options and original pattern of local failure after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:479–485PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Smith DE, Shah KH, Rao AR et al (1994) Cancer of the anal canal: treatment with chemotherapy and low-dose radiation therapy. Radiology 191:569–572PubMed Smith DE, Shah KH, Rao AR et al (1994) Cancer of the anal canal: treatment with chemotherapy and low-dose radiation therapy. Radiology 191:569–572PubMed
21.
go back to reference Sunesen KG, Norgaard M, Lundby L et al (2011) Cause-specific colostomy rates after radiotherapy for anal cancer: a Danish multicentre cohort study. J Clin Oncol 29:3535–3540PubMedCrossRef Sunesen KG, Norgaard M, Lundby L et al (2011) Cause-specific colostomy rates after radiotherapy for anal cancer: a Danish multicentre cohort study. J Clin Oncol 29:3535–3540PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Welzel G, Hagele V, Wenz F, Mai SK (2011) Quality of life outcomes in patients with anal cancer after combined radiochemotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 187:175–182PubMedCrossRef Welzel G, Hagele V, Wenz F, Mai SK (2011) Quality of life outcomes in patients with anal cancer after combined radiochemotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 187:175–182PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Young SC, Solomon MJ, Hruby G, Frizelle FA (2009) Review of 120 anal cancer patients. Colorectal Dis 11:909–914PubMedCrossRef Young SC, Solomon MJ, Hruby G, Frizelle FA (2009) Review of 120 anal cancer patients. Colorectal Dis 11:909–914PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Zagar TM, Willett CG, Czito BG (2010) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: toxicity versus outcomes. Oncology (Williston Park) 24:815–823, 828 Zagar TM, Willett CG, Czito BG (2010) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: toxicity versus outcomes. Oncology (Williston Park) 24:815–823, 828
25.
go back to reference Zilli T, Schick U, Ozsahin M et al (2012) Node-negative T1-T2 anal cancer: radiotherapy alone or concomitant chemoradiotherapy? Radiother Oncol 102:62–67PubMedCrossRef Zilli T, Schick U, Ozsahin M et al (2012) Node-negative T1-T2 anal cancer: radiotherapy alone or concomitant chemoradiotherapy? Radiother Oncol 102:62–67PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Postoperative versus definitive chemoradiation in early-stage anal cancer
Results of a matched-pair analysis
Authors
Dr. B. Berger, M.D.
M. Menzel
G. Breucha
M. Bamberg
M. Weinmann
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-012-0120-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 7/2012 Go to the issue