Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 07-03-2024 | Original Article

Prevalence of malocclusions requiring treatment according to the KIG classification

A multipart cross-sectional study over a 20-year period in the district of Viersen/North Rhine

Authors: Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger, Jan Hourfar, Prof. Dr. Jörg Alexander Lisson, M.Sc.

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and aim

In Germany, the reimbursement of orthodontic treatment costs within the framework of the statutory health insurance (GKV) was restricted on 01 January 2002 by the introduction of the orthodontic indication groups (KIG). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of findings requiring treatment in a specialist practice over a 20-year period. The results were then compared with data from existing older studies.

Patients and methods

The distribution of treatment-eligible KIG (KIG classifications grades 3–5) among patients with statutory health insurance in an orthodontic practice in North Rhine was determined over a 20-year period (2002–2021) after the introduction of the KIG system. This period was additionally scrutinized in four 5‑year periods according to the operating cycles of the practice. Findings were classified into the highest of 19 possible KIG treatment needs levels. Multiple classifications were not made.

Results

Orthodontic treatment was indicated in a total of 4537 (2393 female, 2144 male) patients according to current statutory health insurance guidelines. The KIG classification “D” (increased overjet) was the most frequent within the observed 20 years with 24.3%. Among 11 KIG classifications, 86.1% of the 6 most frequent and 13.9% of the 5 rarest findings were observed constantly over all periods. Of 19 possible indications, “D4” was the most frequent with 19.6%. Of 4537 patients, 20.7% had KIG grade 3, 63.6% KIG grade 4 and 15.7% KIG grade 5. The prevalence of sagittal deviations “D” and “M” was 35.0%, transverse “B” and “K” 17.9% and vertical “O” and “T” 3.7%. Tooth position anomalies “E” and “P” had a share of 24.6%.

Conclusions

The present study confirms existing findings as well as the nationwide data of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Dentists (KZBV) from 2020: The sagittal deviations “D” (increased overjet) and “M” (negative overjet) represented the most frequent findings with KIG D4 as the most common classification. The prevalence and age distribution of KIG grades 3–5 requiring treatment corresponded to nationwide comparative data.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schopf P (2001) Die kieferorthopädischen Indikationsgruppen, 2nd edn. Proll Druck und Verlag, Augsburg Schopf P (2001) Die kieferorthopädischen Indikationsgruppen, 2nd edn. Proll Druck und Verlag, Augsburg
2.
go back to reference (2003) Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses der Zahnärzte und Krankenkassen für die kieferorthopädische Behandlung in der Fassung vom 04. Juni 2003 und vom 24. September 2003 veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger Nr. 226 (S. 24 966) vom 03. Dezember 2003in Kraft getreten am 1. Januar 2004 (2003) Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses der Zahnärzte und Krankenkassen für die kieferorthopädische Behandlung in der Fassung vom 04. Juni 2003 und vom 24. September 2003 veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger Nr. 226 (S. 24 966) vom 03. Dezember 2003in Kraft getreten am 1. Januar 2004
3.
go back to reference Schopf P (2004) Kieferorthopädische Abrechnung mit Erläuterung der ab 01.01.2002 gültigen Kieferorthopädischen Indikationsgruppen [KIG]. Berlin: Quintessenz. Verlag Schopf P (2004) Kieferorthopädische Abrechnung mit Erläuterung der ab 01.01.2002 gültigen Kieferorthopädischen Indikationsgruppen [KIG]. Berlin: Quintessenz. Verlag
4.
go back to reference Glasl B, Ludwig B, Schopf P (2006) Prevalence and development of KIG-relevant symptoms in primary school students from Frankfurt am Main. J Orofac Orthop 67:414–423CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Glasl B, Ludwig B, Schopf P (2006) Prevalence and development of KIG-relevant symptoms in primary school students from Frankfurt am Main. J Orofac Orthop 67:414–423CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Rijpstra C, Lisson JA (2016) Die kieferorthopädischen Indikationsgruppen (KIG) und ihre Grenzen / The orthodontic indication groups and their limits. DZZ 71:25–37 Rijpstra C, Lisson JA (2016) Die kieferorthopädischen Indikationsgruppen (KIG) und ihre Grenzen / The orthodontic indication groups and their limits. DZZ 71:25–37
6.
go back to reference Jordan AR, Kuhr K, Ohm C, Frenzel Baudisch N, Kirschneck C: Sechste Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie (dms · 6). Zahn- und Kieferfehlstellungen bei Kindern. Köln: Institut der Deutschen Zahnärzte (idz); 2021. https://doi.org/10.23786 / S‑2021-01 Jordan AR, Kuhr K, Ohm C, Frenzel Baudisch N, Kirschneck C: Sechste Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie (dms · 6). Zahn- und Kieferfehlstellungen bei Kindern. Köln: Institut der Deutschen Zahnärzte (idz); 2021. https://​doi.​org/​10.​23786 / S‑2021-01
7.
go back to reference Jordan AR, Kuhr K, Frenzel Baudisch N, Kirschneck C (2023) Prevalence of malocclusions in 8‑ and 9‑year-old children in Germany-Results of the Sixth German Oral Health Study (DMS⋅6). J Orofac Orthop 84 (Suppl 1):1–9 Jordan AR, Kuhr K, Frenzel Baudisch N, Kirschneck C (2023) Prevalence of malocclusions in 8‑ and 9‑year-old children in Germany-Results of the Sixth German Oral Health Study (DMS⋅6). J Orofac Orthop 84 (Suppl 1):1–9
8.
go back to reference Jordan AR, Kuhr K, Ohm C, Frenzel Baudisch N (2023) Methodology of the Sixth German Oral Health Study (DMS⋅6) to survey tooth and jaw misalignment. J Orofac Orthop 84 (Suppl 1):10–18 Jordan AR, Kuhr K, Ohm C, Frenzel Baudisch N (2023) Methodology of the Sixth German Oral Health Study (DMS⋅6) to survey tooth and jaw misalignment. J Orofac Orthop 84 (Suppl 1):10–18
9.
go back to reference Bekes K, Kuhr K, Ohm C, Frenzel Baudisch N, Jordan AR (2023) Does orthodontic treatment need have an impact on oral health-related quality of life? J Orofac Orthop 84(Suppl 1):19–25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bekes K, Kuhr K, Ohm C, Frenzel Baudisch N, Jordan AR (2023) Does orthodontic treatment need have an impact on oral health-related quality of life? J Orofac Orthop 84(Suppl 1):19–25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Kirschneck C, Kuhr K, Ohm C, Frenzel Baudisch N, Jordan AR (2023) Comparison of orthodontic treatment need and malocclusion prevalence according to KIG, ICON, and mIOTN in German 8‑ to 9‑year-old children of the Sixth German Oral Health Study (DMS⋅6). J Orofac Orthop 84 (Suppl 1):26–35 Kirschneck C, Kuhr K, Ohm C, Frenzel Baudisch N, Jordan AR (2023) Comparison of orthodontic treatment need and malocclusion prevalence according to KIG, ICON, and mIOTN in German 8‑ to 9‑year-old children of the Sixth German Oral Health Study (DMS⋅6). J Orofac Orthop 84 (Suppl 1):26–35
11.
go back to reference Bäßler-Zeltmann S, Kretschmer I, Göz G (1998) Malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment in 9‑year-old children. Survey based on the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare Scale. J Orofac Orthop 59:193–201CrossRefPubMed Bäßler-Zeltmann S, Kretschmer I, Göz G (1998) Malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment in 9‑year-old children. Survey based on the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare Scale. J Orofac Orthop 59:193–201CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Schopf P (2003) Indication for and frequency of early orthodontic therapy or interceptive measures. J Orofac Orthop 64:186–200CrossRefPubMed Schopf P (2003) Indication for and frequency of early orthodontic therapy or interceptive measures. J Orofac Orthop 64:186–200CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Assimakopoulou T (2004) Evaluierung der Prävalenzrate bei 9 bis 10-jährigen Probanden nach den Kieferorthopädischen Indikationsgruppen (KIG). [Dissertation]. Münster: Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Assimakopoulou T (2004) Evaluierung der Prävalenzrate bei 9 bis 10-jährigen Probanden nach den Kieferorthopädischen Indikationsgruppen (KIG). [Dissertation]. Münster: Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität
14.
go back to reference Tausche E, Luck O, Harzer W (2004) Prevalence of malocclusions in the early mixed dentition and orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod 26:237–244CrossRefPubMed Tausche E, Luck O, Harzer W (2004) Prevalence of malocclusions in the early mixed dentition and orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod 26:237–244CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Grabowski R, Stahl F, Gaebel M, Kundt G (2007) Relationship between occlusal findings and orofacial myofunctional status in primary and mixed dentition. Part I: Prevalence of malocclusions. J Orofac Orthop 68:26–37CrossRefPubMed Grabowski R, Stahl F, Gaebel M, Kundt G (2007) Relationship between occlusal findings and orofacial myofunctional status in primary and mixed dentition. Part I: Prevalence of malocclusions. J Orofac Orthop 68:26–37CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lux CJ, Dücker B, Pritsch M, Komposch G, Niekusch U (2009) Occlusal status and prevalence of occlusal malocclusion traits among 9‑year-old schoolchildren. Eur J Orthod 31:294–299CrossRefPubMed Lux CJ, Dücker B, Pritsch M, Komposch G, Niekusch U (2009) Occlusal status and prevalence of occlusal malocclusion traits among 9‑year-old schoolchildren. Eur J Orthod 31:294–299CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cohen MM Jr (1978) Syndromes with cleft lip and cleft palate. Cleft Palate J 150:306–328 Cohen MM Jr (1978) Syndromes with cleft lip and cleft palate. Cleft Palate J 150:306–328
18.
19.
go back to reference KZBV: Rundschreiben der KZBV Änderungen der Kieferorthopädischen-Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses der Zahnärzte und Krankenkassen Einführung des neuen Systems kieferorthopädischer Indikationsgruppen (KIG), November 2001. KZBV: Rundschreiben der KZBV Änderungen der Kieferorthopädischen-Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses der Zahnärzte und Krankenkassen Einführung des neuen Systems kieferorthopädischer Indikationsgruppen (KIG), November 2001.
20.
go back to reference Brook PH, Shaw WC (1989) The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 11:309–320CrossRefPubMed Brook PH, Shaw WC (1989) The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 11:309–320CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Schopf P (2013) Kieferorthopädische Abrechnung: BEMA, KIG, GOZ 2012. Goä Berlin: Quintessenz Verlags-gmbh Schopf P (2013) Kieferorthopädische Abrechnung: BEMA, KIG, GOZ 2012. Goä Berlin: Quintessenz Verlags-gmbh
22.
23.
go back to reference Brook AH (1974) Dental anomalies of number, form and size: their prevalence in British schoolchildren. J Int Assoc Dent Child 5:37–53PubMed Brook AH (1974) Dental anomalies of number, form and size: their prevalence in British schoolchildren. J Int Assoc Dent Child 5:37–53PubMed
24.
go back to reference Polder BJ, van’t Hof MA, van der Linden FPGM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2004) A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 32:217–226 Polder BJ, van’t Hof MA, van der Linden FPGM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2004) A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 32:217–226
25.
go back to reference Al-Mayali AMY, Nahidh M, Alnajar HA, Fahad AH (2020) Impaction prevalence of permanent teeth pattern from orthodontic view. Eurasia J Biosci 14:2823–2828 Al-Mayali AMY, Nahidh M, Alnajar HA, Fahad AH (2020) Impaction prevalence of permanent teeth pattern from orthodontic view. Eurasia J Biosci 14:2823–2828
26.
go back to reference Stahl F, Grabowski R (2003) Orthodontic findings in the deciduous and early mixed dentition—inferences for a preventive strategy. J Orofac Orthop 64:401–416CrossRefPubMed Stahl F, Grabowski R (2003) Orthodontic findings in the deciduous and early mixed dentition—inferences for a preventive strategy. J Orofac Orthop 64:401–416CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gesch D, Kirbschus A, Schröder W, Bernhardt O, Proff P, Bayerlein T, Gedrange T, Kocher T (2006) Influence of examiner differences on KIG-classification when assessing malocclusions. J Orofac Orthop 67:81–91CrossRefPubMed Gesch D, Kirbschus A, Schröder W, Bernhardt O, Proff P, Bayerlein T, Gedrange T, Kocher T (2006) Influence of examiner differences on KIG-classification when assessing malocclusions. J Orofac Orthop 67:81–91CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prevalence of malocclusions requiring treatment according to the KIG classification
A multipart cross-sectional study over a 20-year period in the district of Viersen/North Rhine
Authors
Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger
Jan Hourfar
Prof. Dr. Jörg Alexander Lisson, M.Sc.
Publication date
07-03-2024
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00518-1