Top

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Open Access 19-12-2023 | Original Article

Fixed orthodontic appliances and adolescents’ peer relations in school

A social network analysis using cross-sectional survey data

Authors: Teresa Kruse, Isabelle Graf, Bert Braumann, Hanno Kruse, Clemens Kroneberg

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Abstract

Purpose

Studies from the 1970s and 1980s, but also recent investigations on social media suggest that wearing a fixed orthodontic appliance can be a cause of bullying and social exclusion. With the greater uptake of orthodontic treatment in recent decades, it can be assumed that fixed braces are increasingly perceived as normal or even socially desirable. This study investigated how wearing visible fixed braces affects adolescents’ social position in their peer networks using cross-sectional survey data.

Methods

A total of 3002 students in the seventh grade (ages 12/13) at 39 secondary schools were asked about their social relationships in school. These directed network data were used to compare different indegrees (friendship, popularity and victimisation) of students with and without fixed braces. Statistical analyses were performed using ordinary least squares multiple regression models with school cohort fixed effects.

Results

In all, 19% of the surveyed students indicated that they wear visible fixed braces. Girls with fixed braces were slightly more likely to be nominated for friendship and popularity and slightly less likely to be nominated for victimisation than girls without fixed braces (p < 0.05). These associations also remained stable when controlling for socioeconomic differences. Among boys, all observed associations were statistically insignificant.

Conclusion

We found no evidence that wearing fixed braces in adolescence is socially sanctioned by peers. Rather, female students with fixed braces even tend to hold a slightly more favourable position in their peer networks than girls without braces do. These analyses exemplify how network-analytic approaches can be successfully applied in interdisciplinary research at the intersection of sociology, epidemiology and medicine.

Alexander C, Piazza M, Mekos D, Valente T (2001) Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. J Adolesc Health 29:22–30CrossRefPubMed

Badran SA, Al-Khateeb S (2013) Factors influencing the uptake of orthodontic treatment. J Public Health Dent 73:339–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphd.12034CrossRefPubMed

Bearman PS, Moody J, Stovel K (2004) Chains of affection: The structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks. Am J Sociol 110:44–91CrossRef

Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323:892–895CrossRefPubMed

Brambor T, Clark WR, Golder M (2006) Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Polit anal 14:63–82CrossRef

Burden DJ (1995) The influence of social class, gender, and peers on the uptake of orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 17:199–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/17.3.199CrossRefPubMed

Burt RS (1982) Toward a structural theory of action. Academic Press, New YorkCrossRef

Chan A, Antoun JS, Morgaine KC, Farella M (2017) Accounts of bullying on Twitter in relation to dentofacial features and orthodontic treatment. J Oral Rehabil 44:244–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12487CrossRefPubMed

Chestnutt IG, Burden DJ, Steele JG et al. (2006) The orthodontic condition of children in the United Kingdom, 2003. Br Dent J 200:609–612;quiz 638. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813640

10.

Cohen J (2013) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic pressCrossRef

11.

de la Haye K, Dijkstra JK, Lubbers MJ, van Rijsewijk L, Stolk R (2017) The dual role of friendship and antipathy relations in the marginalization of overweight children in their peer networks: The TRAILS Study. PLoS ONE 12:e178130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

DiBiase AT, Sandler PJ (2001) Malocclusion, orthodontics and bullying. Dent Update 28:464–466. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2001.28.9.464CrossRefPubMed

13.

Flashman J (2012) Academic achievement and its impact on friend dynamics. Sociol Educ 85:61–80CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Friedkin NE (1991) Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. Am J Sociol 96:1478–1504CrossRef

15.

Fryer RG Jr, Torelli P (2010) An empirical analysis of ‘acting white. J Public Econ 94:380–396CrossRef

16.

Galambos NL, Barker ET, Tilton-Weaver LC (2003) Who gets caught at maturity gap? A study of pseudomature, immature, and mature adolescents. Int J Behav Dev 27:253–263CrossRef

17.

Gest SD, Graham-Bermann SA, Hartup WW (2001) Peer experience: Common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status. Soc Dev 10:23–40CrossRef

18.

Graf I, Gerwing H, Hoefer K et al (2020) Social media and orthodontics: A mixed-methods analysis of orthodontic-related posts on Twitter and Instagram. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 158:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.08.012CrossRefPubMed

19.

Harris KM (2013) The add health study: Design and accomplishments. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, DOI, Chapel Hill, pp 1–22

20.

Haynie DL (2001) Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? Am J Sociol 106:1013–1057CrossRef

21.

Hjalmarsson S (2018) Poor kids? Economic resources and adverse peer relations in a nationally representative sample of Swedish adolescents. J Youth Adolescence 47:88–104CrossRef

22.

Kaiser AK, Kretschmer D, Leszczensky L (2021) Social network-based cohorting to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV‑2 in secondary schools: A simulation study in classrooms of four European countries. The Lancet Regional Health-Europe 8:100166.

23.

Kalter F, Kogan I, Dollmann J (2019) Studying integration from adolescence to early adulthood: Design, content, and research potential of the CILS4EU-DE data. Eur Sociol Rev 35:280–297CrossRef

24.

Kershaw S, Newton JT, Williams DM (2008) The influence of tooth colour on the perceptions of personal characteristics among female dental patients: comparisons of unmodified, decayed and ‘whitened’ teeth. Br Dent J 204:E9CrossRefPubMed

25.

Kreager DA, Rulison K, Moody J (2011) Delinquency and the structure of adolescent peer groups. Criminology 49:95–127CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Krey KF, Hirsch C (2012) Frequency of orthodontic treatment in German children and adolescents: influence of age, gender, and socio-economic status. Eur J Orthod 34:152–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq155CrossRefPubMed

27.

Kuhlman DC, Lima TA, Duplat CB, Capelli JJ (2016) Esthetic perception of orthodontic appliances by Brazilian children and adolescents. Dental Press J Orthod 21:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.5.058-066.oarCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Lee F, Butts CT (2020) On the validity of perceived social structure. J Math Psychol 98:102384CrossRef

29.

Lindauer SJ, Powell JA, Leypoldt BC, Tufekci E, Shroff B (2009) Influence of patient financial account status on orthodontic appointment attendance. Angle Orthod 79:755–758. https://doi.org/10.2319/061808-318.1CrossRefPubMed

30.

Loesch DZ, Hopper JL, Rogucka E, Huggins RM (1995) Timing and genetic rapport between growth in skeletal maturity and height around puberty: similarities and differences between girls and boys. Am J Hum Genet 56:753–759PubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Lusher D, Koskinen J, Robins G (2013) Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory. Methods (and applications. Cambridge University Press)

32.

Maccoby EE (1990) Gender and relationships. A developmental account. Am Psychol 45:513–520. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.45.4.513CrossRefPubMed

33.

Montgomery SC, Donnelly M, Bhatnagar P et al (2020) Peer social network processes and adolescent health behaviors: A systematic review. Prev Med 130:105900CrossRefPubMed

34.

Moody J (2001) Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America. Am J Sociol 107:679–716CrossRef

35.

Papadimitriou A, Kakali L, Pazera P, Doulis I, Kloukos D (2020) Social media and orthodontic treatment from the patient’s perspective: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 42:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz029CrossRefPubMed

36.

Patel A, Rodd HD, Baker SR et al (2010) Are social judgements made by children in relation to orthodontic appliances? J Orthod 37:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1179/14653121042948CrossRefPubMed

37.

Pratt MC, Kluemper GT, Hartsfield JK Jr., Fardo D, Nash DA (2011) Evaluation of retention protocols among members of the American Association of Orthodontists in the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:520–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.10.023CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Quillian L, Campbell ME (2003) Beyond black and white: The present and future of multiracial friendship segregation. American, Sociological Review, DOI, pp 540–566

39.

Rinchuse DJ, Rinchuse DJ (2002) Orthodontics justified as a profession. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:93–96. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.120401CrossRefPubMed

40.

Rosvall MD, Fields HW, Ziuchkovski J, Rosenstiel SF, Johnston WM (2009) Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:276CrossRef

41.

Schafer K, Ludwig B, Meyer-Gutknecht H, Schott TC (2015) Quantifying patient adherence during active orthodontic treatment with removable appliances using microelectronic wear-time documentation. Eur J Orthod 37:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju012CrossRefPubMed

42.

Seehra J, Newton JT, Dibiase AT (2013) Interceptive orthodontic treatment in bullied adolescents and its impact on self-esteem and oral-health-related quality of life. Eur J Orthod 35:615–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjs051CrossRefPubMed

43.

Seeling S, Prütz F (2018) Inanspruchnahme kieferorthopädischer Behandlung durch Kinder und Jugendliche in Deutschland – Querschnittergebnisse aus KiGGS Welle 2 und Trends. J Health Monit 3:78–85. https://doi.org/10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-094CrossRef

44.

Shaw WC, Meek SC, Jones DS (1980) Nicknames, teasing, harassment and the salience of dental features among school children. Br J Orthod 7:75–80. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.7.2.75CrossRefPubMed

45.

Shaw WC, Richmond S, Kenealy PM, Kingdon A, Worthington H (2007) A 20-year cohort study of health gain from orthodontic treatment: psychological outcome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.009CrossRefPubMed

46.

Smith KP, Christakis NA (2008) Social networks and health. Annu Rev Sociol 34:405–429CrossRef

47.

Smith L, Wong L, Phemister L et al (2018) “Why, why, why do I have such big teeth, why?” Low socio-economic status and access to orthodontic treatment. NZ. Dent J 114:64–72

48.

Snijders TA, Van de Bunt GG, Steglich CE (2010) Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social networks 32:44–60.

49.

Steinberg L, Morris AS (2001) Adolescent development. Annu Rev Psychol 52:83–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83CrossRefPubMed

50.

Strauss RS, Pollack HA (2003) Social marginalization of overweight children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157:746–752. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.157.8.746CrossRefPubMed

51.

Tilton-Weaver LC, Vitunski ET, Galambos NL (2001) Five images of maturity in adolescence: What does “grown up” mean? J Adolesc 24:143–158CrossRefPubMed

52.

Twigge E, Roberts RM, Jamieson L, Dreyer CW, Sampson WJ (2016) Qualitative evaluation of pretreatment patient concerns in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 150:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.017CrossRefPubMed

53.

Ulhaq A, McMahon AD, Buchanan S, Goold S, Conway DI (2012) Socioeconomic deprivation and NHS orthodontic treatment delivery in Scotland. Br Dent J 213:E5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.724CrossRefPubMed

54.

Valente TW, Pitts SR (2017) An appraisal of social network theory and analysis as applied to public health: challenges and opportunities. Annu Rev Public Health 38:103–118CrossRefPubMed

55.

Vedovello SA, Ambrosano GM, Pereira AC et al (2016) Association between malocclusion and the contextual factors of quality of life and socioeconomic status. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 150:58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.022CrossRefPubMed

56.

Walton DK, Fields HW, Johnston WM et al (2010) Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:698CrossRef

57.

Wheeler TT, McGorray SP, Yurkiewicz L, Keeling SD, King GJ (1994) Orthodontic treatment demand and need in third and fourth grade schoolchildren. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 106:22–33CrossRef

58.

Williams DM, Chestnutt IG, Bennett PD, Hood K, Lowe R (2006) Characteristics attributed to individuals with dental fluorosis. Community Dent Health 23:209–216PubMed

59.

Woolridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

60.

Zhang S, De La Ji HKM (2018) An R. reviews, vol 19. Applications of social network analysis to obesity: a systematic review. Obesity, pp 976–988

61.

Ziuchkovski JP, Fields HW, Johnston WM, Lindsey DT (2008) Assessment of perceived orthodontic appliance attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.025CrossRef

Title: Fixed orthodontic appliances and adolescents’ peer relations in school
A social network analysis using cross-sectional survey data
Authors: Teresa Kruse
Isabelle Graf
Bert Braumann
Hanno Kruse
Clemens Kroneberg
Publication date: 19-12-2023
Publisher: Springer Medizin
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-023-00506-x

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Fixed orthodontic appliances and adolescents’ peer relations in school

A social network analysis using cross-sectional survey data

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content