Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 17-10-2023 | Original Article

Posttreatment stability following therapy using passive self-ligating brackets: extraction vs. nonextraction

Authors: Babak Sayahpour, Diana Lau, Sara Eslami, Sarah Buehling, Stefan Kopp, Abdolreza Jamilian, Sachin Chhatwani

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of lower premolar extraction on posttreatment stability one year following fixed orthodontic treatment with passive self-ligating brackets (Damon system, Ormco, Orange, CA, USA).

Methods

All patients were treated with fixed orthodontic appliances using passive self-ligating brackets (Damon). For retention, removable Hawley retainers were used. Two groups of patients were included in the study. Each group consisted of 23 patients: group Ex consisted of 10 male and 13 female patients (13.4 ± 1.6 years old) with extraction of lower first premolars and group NonEx consisted of 11 male and 12 female patients (13.4 ± 3.9 years old) without dental extractions. The patients’ dental models and photographs were assessed at T0 (pretreatment), T1 (the end of active orthodontic treatment: 3.3 ± 1.0 years in the Ex and 2.3 ± 0.8 years in the NonEx group) and at T2 (1 year posttreatment). All lower casts were scanned and the following dental parameters were recorded and compared between the two groups: intercanine width (ICW), anterior arch width (AAW), intermolar width (IMW), Little’s irregularity index (LII) and gingival recessions.

Results

An increase in ICW (group Ex: 1.20 ± 2.51 mm and group NonEx: 0.84 ± 1.48 mm) by the end of active treatment (T1; P < 0.05), as well as a relapse regarding the ICW (group Ex: −0.1 ± 0.47 mm and group NonEx: −67% ± 0.38 mm) one year post-treatment (T2) were recorded in the samples. Relapse in the non-extraction group was statistically and clinically significant, whereas ICW values remained relatively stable in the extraction group during the posttreatment period (T1–T2). The irregularity index decreased during treatment (group Ex: −8.79 ± 6.36 mm and group NonEx: −5.24 ± 2.99 mm) and relapsed in both groups (group Ex: 0.57 ± 90 mm and group NonEx: 0.27 ± 0.53). The rate of relapse in LII was correlated to the relapse rate of ICW. A reduction of IMW was recorded in the Ex group (−1.89 ± 1.82 mm) during active treatment (P < 0.05), which remained stable 1 year posttreatment. AAW increased in both groups (group Ex: 2.77 ± 1.77 mm and group NonEx: 1.77 ± 2.04 mm) throughout active treatment and remained stable at T2.

Conclusion

Intergroup comparison revealed that ICW remained stable 1 year posttreatment in the Ex group, whereas high relapse of ICW was recorded in the NonEx group. Furthermore, risk of a relapse of LII appears to be higher in cases with a relapse of the ICW.
Literature
15.
go back to reference Miller PD (2018) Miller classification of marginal tissue recession revisited after 35 years. Compend Contin Educ Dent 39(8):514–520PubMed Miller PD (2018) Miller classification of marginal tissue recession revisited after 35 years. Compend Contin Educ Dent 39(8):514–520PubMed
16.
go back to reference Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Br Med J 2(4158):358–359CrossRef Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Br Med J 2(4158):358–359CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Posttreatment stability following therapy using passive self-ligating brackets: extraction vs. nonextraction
Authors
Babak Sayahpour
Diana Lau
Sara Eslami
Sarah Buehling
Stefan Kopp
Abdolreza Jamilian
Sachin Chhatwani
Publication date
17-10-2023
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-023-00501-2