Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2/2023

19-08-2021 | Original Article

Effects of fluorosed enamel on orthodontic bracket bonding

An in vitro study

Authors: Amal Basalamah, Ahmed Maher, Ahmed Hamdy Whba, Andrea Scribante, Maria Francesca Sfondrini, Dr. Mona A. Montasser

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 2/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effect of enamel deproteinization and air abrasion on shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores, and surface topography when bonding orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel.

Materials and methods

The sample included 90 fluorosed and 30 normal premolars divided into four groups: group I (fluorosed premolars subjected to air abrasion before acid etching), group II (fluorosed premolars subjected to deproteinization before acid etching), group III (fluorosed premolars; control for groups I and II), and group IV (normal premolars; control for group III). Bonding procedures included etching with 37% phosphoric acid, priming with TransbondTM XT primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA), and application of TransbondTM XT adhesive paste (composite; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA). Air abrasion was done using 50 µm aluminum oxide particles under 0.28 MPa pressure for 5 s with the micro-etcher held at a distance of 10 mm. Deproteinization was done for 60 s with 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl).

Results

Fluorosed premolars subjected to deproteinization showed the lowest (median = 6.57 MPa) SBS among the four groups, followed by 8.14, 8.90, 8.14 MPa for groups I, III, and IV respectively. ARI scores were significantly different between the four groups (p = 0.006). Fluorosed enamel etched after air abrasion or deproteinization with NaOCl showed a predominance of type 4 etching pattern with some areas appearing unetched.

Conclusions

Shear bond strength of all groups was within the 6–8 MPa acceptable range for orthodontic purposes. Fluorosed premolars subjected to deproteinization showed the lowest values. Further studies are recommended to scrutinize the deproteinization technique.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clark MB, Slayton RL (2014) Fluoride use in caries prevention in the primary care setting. Pediatrics 134:626–633PubMedCrossRef Clark MB, Slayton RL (2014) Fluoride use in caries prevention in the primary care setting. Pediatrics 134:626–633PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Aoba T, Fejerskov O (2002) Dental fluorosis: chemistry and biology. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 13:155–170PubMedCrossRef Aoba T, Fejerskov O (2002) Dental fluorosis: chemistry and biology. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 13:155–170PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bronckers ALJJ, Lyaruu DM, DenBesten PK (2009) The impact of fluoride on ameloblasts and the mechanisms of enamel fluorosis. J Dent Res 88:877–893PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bronckers ALJJ, Lyaruu DM, DenBesten PK (2009) The impact of fluoride on ameloblasts and the mechanisms of enamel fluorosis. J Dent Res 88:877–893PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dean HT (1934) Classification of mottled enamel diagnosis. J Am Dent Assoc 21:1421–1426 Dean HT (1934) Classification of mottled enamel diagnosis. J Am Dent Assoc 21:1421–1426
6.
go back to reference Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O (1978) Clinical appearance of dental fluorosis inpermanent teeth in relation to histologic changes. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 6:315–328PubMedCrossRef Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O (1978) Clinical appearance of dental fluorosis inpermanent teeth in relation to histologic changes. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 6:315–328PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Horowitz HS, Driscoll WS, Meyers RJ, Heifetz SB, Kingman A (1984) A new method for assessing the prevalence of dental fluorosis—the tooth surface index of fluorosis. J Am Dent Assoc 109:37–41PubMedCrossRef Horowitz HS, Driscoll WS, Meyers RJ, Heifetz SB, Kingman A (1984) A new method for assessing the prevalence of dental fluorosis—the tooth surface index of fluorosis. J Am Dent Assoc 109:37–41PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Isci D, Sahin Saglam AM, Alkis H, Elekdag-Turk S, Turk T (2011) Effects of fluorosis on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a self-etching primer. Eur J Orthod 33:161–166PubMedCrossRef Isci D, Sahin Saglam AM, Alkis H, Elekdag-Turk S, Turk T (2011) Effects of fluorosis on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a self-etching primer. Eur J Orthod 33:161–166PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bakhadher W, Talic N, Al Hezaimi K (2015) Bond strength and micro-computed tomographic evaluation of pre-coated brackets. Aust Orthod J 31:201–207PubMed Bakhadher W, Talic N, Al Hezaimi K (2015) Bond strength and micro-computed tomographic evaluation of pre-coated brackets. Aust Orthod J 31:201–207PubMed
10.
go back to reference Gungor AY, Turkkahraman H, Adanir N, Alkis H (2009) Effects of fluorosis and self etching primers on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. Eur J Dent 3:173–177PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gungor AY, Turkkahraman H, Adanir N, Alkis H (2009) Effects of fluorosis and self etching primers on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. Eur J Dent 3:173–177PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Adanir N, Türkkahraman H, Güngör AY (2007) Effects of fluorosis and bleaching on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. Eur J Dent 1:230–235PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Adanir N, Türkkahraman H, Güngör AY (2007) Effects of fluorosis and bleaching on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. Eur J Dent 1:230–235PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Adanir N, Türkkahraman H, Yalçin Güngör A (2009) Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel. Eur J Orthod 31:276–280PubMedCrossRef Adanir N, Türkkahraman H, Yalçin Güngör A (2009) Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel. Eur J Orthod 31:276–280PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Trakinienė G, Petravičiūtė G, Smailienė D, Narbutaitė J, Armalaitė J, Lopatienė K et al (2019) Impact of fluorosis on the tensile bond strength of metal brackets and the prevalence of enamel microcracks. Sci Rep 9:5957PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Trakinienė G, Petravičiūtė G, Smailienė D, Narbutaitė J, Armalaitė J, Lopatienė K et al (2019) Impact of fluorosis on the tensile bond strength of metal brackets and the prevalence of enamel microcracks. Sci Rep 9:5957PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Denbesten PK, Thariani H (1992) Biological mechanisms of fluorosis and level and timing of systemic exposure to fluoride with respect to fluorosis. J Dent Res 71:1238PubMedCrossRef Denbesten PK, Thariani H (1992) Biological mechanisms of fluorosis and level and timing of systemic exposure to fluoride with respect to fluorosis. J Dent Res 71:1238PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Najafi HZ, Moshkelgosha V, Khanchemehr A, Alizade A, Mokhtar A (2015) The effect of four surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of metallic brackets to the fluorosed enamel. J Dent (Shiraz) 16:251–259 Najafi HZ, Moshkelgosha V, Khanchemehr A, Alizade A, Mokhtar A (2015) The effect of four surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of metallic brackets to the fluorosed enamel. J Dent (Shiraz) 16:251–259
16.
go back to reference Silva-Benítez EL, Zavala-Alonso V, Martinez-Castanon GA, Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Patiño-Marin N, Ortega-Pedrajo I et al (2013) Shear bond strength evaluation of bonded molar tubes on fluorotic molars. Angle Orthod 83:152–157PubMedCrossRef Silva-Benítez EL, Zavala-Alonso V, Martinez-Castanon GA, Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Patiño-Marin N, Ortega-Pedrajo I et al (2013) Shear bond strength evaluation of bonded molar tubes on fluorotic molars. Angle Orthod 83:152–157PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gaur A, Maheshwari S, Verma SK, Tariq M (2016) Effects of adhesion promoter on orthodontic bonding in fluorosed teeth: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Orthod Sci 5:87–91PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gaur A, Maheshwari S, Verma SK, Tariq M (2016) Effects of adhesion promoter on orthodontic bonding in fluorosed teeth: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Orthod Sci 5:87–91PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Grandini S, Balleri P, Ferrari M (2002) Evaluation of glyde file prep in combination with sodium hypoclorite as a root canal irrigant. J Endod 28:300–303PubMedCrossRef Grandini S, Balleri P, Ferrari M (2002) Evaluation of glyde file prep in combination with sodium hypoclorite as a root canal irrigant. J Endod 28:300–303PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ercan E, Ozekinci T, Atakul F, Gul K (2004) Antibacterial activity of 2 % chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25 % sodium hypochlorite in infected root canal: In vivo study. J Endod 30:84–87PubMedCrossRef Ercan E, Ozekinci T, Atakul F, Gul K (2004) Antibacterial activity of 2 % chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25 % sodium hypochlorite in infected root canal: In vivo study. J Endod 30:84–87PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Espinosa R, Valencia R, Uribe M, Ceja I, Saadia M (2008) Enamel deproteinization and its effect on acid etching: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 33:13–19PubMedCrossRef Espinosa R, Valencia R, Uribe M, Ceja I, Saadia M (2008) Enamel deproteinization and its effect on acid etching: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 33:13–19PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sharma R, Verma M (2017) Deproteinization of fluorosed enamel with sodium hypochlorite enhances the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 8:20–25PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sharma R, Verma M (2017) Deproteinization of fluorosed enamel with sodium hypochlorite enhances the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 8:20–25PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Montasser MA, Drummond JL (2009) Reliability of the adhesive remnant index score system with different magnifications. Angle Orthod 79:773–776PubMedCrossRef Montasser MA, Drummond JL (2009) Reliability of the adhesive remnant index score system with different magnifications. Angle Orthod 79:773–776PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Årtun J, Bergland S (1984) Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 85:333–340PubMedCrossRef Årtun J, Bergland S (1984) Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 85:333–340PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gwinnett AJ (1971) Histologic changes in human enamel following treatment with acidic adhesive conditioning agents. Arch Oral Biol 16:731–738PubMedCrossRef Gwinnett AJ (1971) Histologic changes in human enamel following treatment with acidic adhesive conditioning agents. Arch Oral Biol 16:731–738PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Galil KA, Wright GZ (1979) Acid etching patterns on buccal surfaces of permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 1:230–234PubMed Galil KA, Wright GZ (1979) Acid etching patterns on buccal surfaces of permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 1:230–234PubMed
27.
go back to reference Reynolds IR (1975) A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 2:171–178CrossRef Reynolds IR (1975) A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 2:171–178CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Al Shamsi A, Cunningham JL, Lamey PJ, Lynch E (2006) Shear bond strength and residual adhesive after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod 76:694–699PubMed Al Shamsi A, Cunningham JL, Lamey PJ, Lynch E (2006) Shear bond strength and residual adhesive after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod 76:694–699PubMed
29.
go back to reference Katona TR (1997) A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:244–251PubMedCrossRef Katona TR (1997) A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:244–251PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Algera TJ, Feilzer AJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Kleverlaan CJ (2011) A comparison of finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests of the bracket-cement-enamel system. Eur J Orthod 33:608–612PubMedCrossRef Algera TJ, Feilzer AJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Kleverlaan CJ (2011) A comparison of finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests of the bracket-cement-enamel system. Eur J Orthod 33:608–612PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ahuja B, Yeluri R, Baliga S, Munshi AK (2010) Enamel deproteinization before acid etching—a scanning electron microscopic observation. J Clin Pediatr Dent 35:169–172PubMedCrossRef Ahuja B, Yeluri R, Baliga S, Munshi AK (2010) Enamel deproteinization before acid etching—a scanning electron microscopic observation. J Clin Pediatr Dent 35:169–172PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Harleen N, Ramakrishna Y, Munshi AK (2011) Enamel deproteinization before acid etching and its effect on the shear bond strength—an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 36:19–23PubMedCrossRef Harleen N, Ramakrishna Y, Munshi AK (2011) Enamel deproteinization before acid etching and its effect on the shear bond strength—an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 36:19–23PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Aras S, Küçükeçmen HC, Öaroğlu SI (2013) Deproteinization treatment on bond strengths of primary, mature and immature permanent tooth enamel. J Clin Pediatr Dent 37:275–279PubMedCrossRef Aras S, Küçükeçmen HC, Öaroğlu SI (2013) Deproteinization treatment on bond strengths of primary, mature and immature permanent tooth enamel. J Clin Pediatr Dent 37:275–279PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Taniguchi G, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Iwamoto N, Ikeda M, Foxton RM et al (2009) Improving the effect of NaOCl pretreatment on bonding to caries-affected dentin using self-etch adhesives. J Dent 37:769–775PubMedCrossRef Taniguchi G, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Iwamoto N, Ikeda M, Foxton RM et al (2009) Improving the effect of NaOCl pretreatment on bonding to caries-affected dentin using self-etch adhesives. J Dent 37:769–775PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kunawarote S, Nakajima M, Shida K, Kitasako Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J (2010) Effect of dentin pretreatment with mild acidic HOCl solution on microtensile bond strength and surface pH. J Dent 38:261–268PubMedCrossRef Kunawarote S, Nakajima M, Shida K, Kitasako Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J (2010) Effect of dentin pretreatment with mild acidic HOCl solution on microtensile bond strength and surface pH. J Dent 38:261–268PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Guentzel JL, Liang Lam K, Callan MA, Emmons SA, Dunham VL (2008) Reduction of bacteria on spinach, lettuce, and surfaces in food service areas using neutral electrolyzed oxidizing water. Food Microbiol 25:36–41PubMedCrossRef Guentzel JL, Liang Lam K, Callan MA, Emmons SA, Dunham VL (2008) Reduction of bacteria on spinach, lettuce, and surfaces in food service areas using neutral electrolyzed oxidizing water. Food Microbiol 25:36–41PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hamama HHH (2018) Effect of smear layer deproteinization on bonding of self-etch adhesives to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Restor Dent Endod 42:1–16 Hamama HHH (2018) Effect of smear layer deproteinization on bonding of self-etch adhesives to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Restor Dent Endod 42:1–16
38.
go back to reference Suma S, Chandra Shekar BR, Anita G, Kallury A (2012) The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface. Indian J Dent Res 23:230–235PubMedCrossRef Suma S, Chandra Shekar BR, Anita G, Kallury A (2012) The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface. Indian J Dent Res 23:230–235PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Patcas R, Zinelis S, Eliades G, Eliades T (2015) Surface and interfacial analysis of sandblasted and acid-etched enamel for bonding orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 147:S64–75PubMedCrossRef Patcas R, Zinelis S, Eliades G, Eliades T (2015) Surface and interfacial analysis of sandblasted and acid-etched enamel for bonding orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 147:S64–75PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Delport A, Grobler SR (1988) A laboratory evaluation of tensile bond strength of some orthodontic bonding resins to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93:133–137PubMedCrossRef Delport A, Grobler SR (1988) A laboratory evaluation of tensile bond strength of some orthodontic bonding resins to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93:133–137PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Buyukyilmaz T, Usumez S, Karaman AL (2003) Effect of self-etching primer on bond strength—are they reliable? Angle Orthod 73:64–70PubMed Buyukyilmaz T, Usumez S, Karaman AL (2003) Effect of self-etching primer on bond strength—are they reliable? Angle Orthod 73:64–70PubMed
42.
go back to reference Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, De Angelis M, Scribante A, Klersy C (2003) Effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123:633–640PubMedCrossRef Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, De Angelis M, Scribante A, Klersy C (2003) Effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123:633–640PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Zeppieri IL, Chung CH, Mante FK (2003) Effect of saliva on shear bond strength of an orthodontic adhesive used with moisture-insensitive and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:414–419PubMedCrossRef Zeppieri IL, Chung CH, Mante FK (2003) Effect of saliva on shear bond strength of an orthodontic adhesive used with moisture-insensitive and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:414–419PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Britton JC, McInnes P, Weinberg R, Ledoux WR, Retief DH (1998) Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114:243–247CrossRef Britton JC, McInnes P, Weinberg R, Ledoux WR, Retief DH (1998) Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114:243–247CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Jacobsen JR (2000) Effect of altering the type of enamel conditioner on the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:288–294PubMedCrossRef Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Jacobsen JR (2000) Effect of altering the type of enamel conditioner on the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:288–294PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Guan G, Takano-Yamamoto T, Miyamoto M, Hattori T, Ishikawa K, Surzuki K (2000) Shear bond strengths of orthodontic plastic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117:438–443PubMedCrossRef Guan G, Takano-Yamamoto T, Miyamoto M, Hattori T, Ishikawa K, Surzuki K (2000) Shear bond strengths of orthodontic plastic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117:438–443PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Mui B, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV (1999) Opitimization of a procedure for rebonding dislodged orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 69:276–281PubMed Mui B, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV (1999) Opitimization of a procedure for rebonding dislodged orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 69:276–281PubMed
48.
go back to reference Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Zárate-Díaz C, Kusakabe S, Yamamoto K (2010) Bond strengths of different orthodontic adhesives after enamel conditioning with the same self-etching primer. Aust Orthod J 26:84–89PubMed Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Zárate-Díaz C, Kusakabe S, Yamamoto K (2010) Bond strengths of different orthodontic adhesives after enamel conditioning with the same self-etching primer. Aust Orthod J 26:84–89PubMed
49.
go back to reference Claudino D, Kuga MC, Belizário L, Pereira JR (2018) Enamel evaluation by scanning electron microscopy after debonding brackets and removal of adhesive remnants. J Clin Exp Dent 10:e248–e251PubMedPubMedCentral Claudino D, Kuga MC, Belizário L, Pereira JR (2018) Enamel evaluation by scanning electron microscopy after debonding brackets and removal of adhesive remnants. J Clin Exp Dent 10:e248–e251PubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference Atabek Ş, Özden AN (2019) Comparison of the effect of proanthocyanidin surface treatments on shear bond strength of different cements. Materials (Basel) 12:2676PubMedCrossRef Atabek Ş, Özden AN (2019) Comparison of the effect of proanthocyanidin surface treatments on shear bond strength of different cements. Materials (Basel) 12:2676PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Oztürk B, Malkoç S, Koyutürk AE, Catalbas B, Ozer F (2008) Influence of different tooth types on the bond strength of two orthodontic adhesive systems. Eur J Orthod 30:407–412PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Oztürk B, Malkoç S, Koyutürk AE, Catalbas B, Ozer F (2008) Influence of different tooth types on the bond strength of two orthodontic adhesive systems. Eur J Orthod 30:407–412PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effects of fluorosed enamel on orthodontic bracket bonding
An in vitro study
Authors
Amal Basalamah
Ahmed Maher
Ahmed Hamdy Whba
Andrea Scribante
Maria Francesca Sfondrini
Dr. Mona A. Montasser
Publication date
19-08-2021
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00342-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2/2023 Go to the issue

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Mitteilungen der DGKFO