Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2023

Open Access 09-08-2021 | Bone Defect | Original Article

Ex vivo assessment of the buccal and oral bone by CBCT

Authors: Dr. M. Ruetters, Prof. Dr. Dr. T.-S. Kim, Dr. D. Hagenfeld, D. Kronsteiner, Dr. H. Gehrig, M.Sc., Prof. Dr. C.-J. Lux, Dr. S. Sen

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Identifying buccal and oral bone as an important supporting periodontal structure for teeth provides important information for treatment planning in periodontics and orthodontics. This study aims to add evidence to the knowledge of preciseness of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements of the vertical dimension of buccal and oral bone. The hypothesis is that CBCT is an accurate and reliable method to measure vertical vestibular and oral bone loss.

Methods

The amount of vertical buccal and oral bone loss (bl) of 260 sites of 10 human cadavers was investigated clinically and radiographically by CBCT. Radiographic measurements were rated by two blinded raters. Measurements and the corresponding differences between clinical and radiological findings are described by medians and quartiles (Q1–Q3). For statistical analysis, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland–Altman plots were calculated.

Results

The CCC between the raters was 0.994 (95% confidence interval 0.992–0.995). The median bone loss (bl) distance from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the bony defect (BD) was 3.5 mm (range 3–5 mm). The median bl measured in the CBCT was 3.8 mm (range 3.1–4.8 mm). The median difference of the 2 measurements for all sites included in the study (N = 260) was −0.2 mm (−0.7 to 0.3 mm).

Conclusions

CBCT seems to be an accurate and highly reliable method to detect and describe vertical buccal and oral bone loss. It could improve planning and prediction for successful combined periodontal and orthodontic therapies.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Isaacson KG, Thom AR, Atack NE, Horner K, Whaites E (2015) Guidelines for the Use of Radiographs in Clinical Orthodontics Fourth. Edition 4. Isaacson KG, Thom AR, Atack NE, Horner K, Whaites E (2015) Guidelines for the Use of Radiographs in Clinical Orthodontics Fourth. Edition 4.
3.
go back to reference Paatero YV (1954) Pantomography in theory and use. Acta Radiol 41(4):321–335 (Apr)CrossRef Paatero YV (1954) Pantomography in theory and use. Acta Radiol 41(4):321–335 (Apr)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Handelman CS (1996) The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae. Angle Orthod 66(2):95–109 (discussion 109–10) Handelman CS (1996) The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae. Angle Orthod 66(2):95–109 (discussion 109–10)
5.
go back to reference Cortellini P, Bissada NF. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S190–S198. Cortellini P, Bissada NF. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S190–S198.
6.
go back to reference Laursen MG, Rylev M, Melsen B (2020) The role of orthodontics in the repair of gingival recessions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 157(1):29–34 (Jan)CrossRef Laursen MG, Rylev M, Melsen B (2020) The role of orthodontics in the repair of gingival recessions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 157(1):29–34 (Jan)CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Casanova-Sarmiento JA, Arriola-Guillen LE, Ruiz-Mora GA et al (2020) Comparison of anterior mandibular alveolar thickness and height in young adults with different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships: A CBCT Study. Int Orthod 18(1):79–88 (Mar)CrossRef Casanova-Sarmiento JA, Arriola-Guillen LE, Ruiz-Mora GA et al (2020) Comparison of anterior mandibular alveolar thickness and height in young adults with different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships: A CBCT Study. Int Orthod 18(1):79–88 (Mar)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Raber A, Kula K, Ghoneima A (2019) Three-dimensional evaluation of labial alveolar bone overlying the maxillary and mandibular incisors in different skeletal classifications of malocclusion. Int Orthod 17(2):287–295 (Jun)CrossRef Raber A, Kula K, Ghoneima A (2019) Three-dimensional evaluation of labial alveolar bone overlying the maxillary and mandibular incisors in different skeletal classifications of malocclusion. Int Orthod 17(2):287–295 (Jun)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sun L, Zhang L, Shen G et al (2015) Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 147(3):313–323 (Mar)CrossRef Sun L, Zhang L, Shen G et al (2015) Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 147(3):313–323 (Mar)CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Patcas R, Muller L, Ullrich O et al (2012) Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 141(1):41–50 (Jan)CrossRef Patcas R, Muller L, Ullrich O et al (2012) Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 141(1):41–50 (Jan)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Katkar RA, Kummet C, Dawson D et al (2013) Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i‑CAT cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 42(9):20130059CrossRef Katkar RA, Kummet C, Dawson D et al (2013) Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i‑CAT cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 42(9):20130059CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C et al (2015) Effective dose of dental CBCT—a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44(1):20140197CrossRef Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C et al (2015) Effective dose of dental CBCT—a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44(1):20140197CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ruetters M, Hagenfeld D, ElSayed N et al (2020) Ex vivo comparison of CBCT and digital periapical radiographs for the quantitative assessment of periodontal defects. Clin Oral Investig 24(1):377–384 (Jan)CrossRef Ruetters M, Hagenfeld D, ElSayed N et al (2020) Ex vivo comparison of CBCT and digital periapical radiographs for the quantitative assessment of periodontal defects. Clin Oral Investig 24(1):377–384 (Jan)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Abbas F, Hart AA, Oosting J et al (1982) Effect of training and probing force on the reproducibility of pocket depth measurements. J Periodontal Res 17(2):226–234 (Mar)CrossRef Abbas F, Hart AA, Oosting J et al (1982) Effect of training and probing force on the reproducibility of pocket depth measurements. J Periodontal Res 17(2):226–234 (Mar)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D et al (2011) Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40(5):265–273 (Jul)CrossRef Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D et al (2011) Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40(5):265–273 (Jul)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lawrence IKL (1989) A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility. Biometrics 45(1):255–268CrossRef Lawrence IKL (1989) A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility. Biometrics 45(1):255–268CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Team RC (2013) A language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: http://www.R-project.org, Vienna, Austria Team RC (2013) A language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: http://​www.​R-project.​org, Vienna, Austria
19.
go back to reference Andri S. et mult. al. DescTools: Tools for descriptive statistics. R package version 0.99.38. 2020. Andri S. et mult. al. DescTools: Tools for descriptive statistics. R package version 0.99.38. 2020.
20.
go back to reference Lehnert B. BlandAltmanLeh: Plots (Slightly Extended) Bland-Altman Plots. R package version 0.3.1. [2015] b. Lehnert B. BlandAltmanLeh: Plots (Slightly Extended) Bland-Altman Plots. R package version 0.3.1. [2015] b.
21.
go back to reference Federation FDIWD (2014) FDI policy statement on radiation safety in dentistry: adopted by the FDI General Assembly: 13 September 2014, New Delhi, India. Int Dent J 64(6):289–290 (Dec)CrossRef Federation FDIWD (2014) FDI policy statement on radiation safety in dentistry: adopted by the FDI General Assembly: 13 September 2014, New Delhi, India. Int Dent J 64(6):289–290 (Dec)CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R et al (2005) Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34(3):145–149 (May)CrossRef Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R et al (2005) Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34(3):145–149 (May)CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC (2008) Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 139(9):1237–1243 (Sep)CrossRef Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC (2008) Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 139(9):1237–1243 (Sep)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ex vivo assessment of the buccal and oral bone by CBCT
Authors
Dr. M. Ruetters
Prof. Dr. Dr. T.-S. Kim
Dr. D. Hagenfeld
D. Kronsteiner
Dr. H. Gehrig, M.Sc.
Prof. Dr. C.-J. Lux
Dr. S. Sen
Publication date
09-08-2021
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00335-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2023 Go to the issue

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Mitteilungen der DGKFO