Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2/2022

01-03-2022 | Original article

Effects of customized resin base on bonding strength of spherical self-ligating brackets

Authors: Li Ji, Zheng Chen, Chun-hui Liao, Shuang-fei Hu, Zi-xin Luo, Bo-wen Lian, Hong He, DDS, MS, PhD

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Fabricating resin bases has become an easy and economical method to achieve the customization of brackets. This study aimed to assess the effect of the resin base on bonding strength of spherical self-ligating brackets.

Methods

A defined amount of adhesive was bonded to the bracket base and constituted the new resin base. The thickness of the adhesive was measured and controlled at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm, and a group without a resin base was used as a control. Sixty extracted human premolars were randomly divided into five groups. The brackets in each group were bonded to the specimen, and debonding tests were conducted. The shear bond strength (SBS) was calculated according to the measured debonding force in relation to the base area. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score and the residual location of the fractured resin base were recorded. Enamel damage was also analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. After assessing for data normality and homogeneity, statistical comparisons between the groups and correlations among parameters were determined. P < 0.05 was regarded as significant.

Results

The correlation analysis revealed an inverse correlation between the resin base thickness and the SBS (Coeff = −0.719, P < 0.01). The highest SBS was 9.33 MPa, in the control group, which was significantly greater than the lowest SBS (6.03 MPa), in the 2.0-mm group (P < 0.05). Multiple comparisons analysis revealed no differences in SBS between the 1.0-, 1.5- and 2.0-mm groups. Nonparametric analysis found that only the ARI score in the 0.5-mm group (2.92) was significantly different (P < 0.05) from that in the control group (1.25). As the thickness of the resin base increased, the fractured resin base tended to remain at the bracket base, and the risk of enamel damage decreased.

Conclusions

As the thickness of the resin base increased, the bonding strength of the spherical bracket decreased. However, the required clinical bonding strength was still satisfied when the thickness was less than 2.0 mm. The existence of a resin base could protect the enamel surface from damage caused by debonding. The customization of spherical brackets by tailoring a resin base can be applied in clinical practice because of the clinically acceptable bonding strength.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mao XY, Chen DP (2009) The crown inclination of the teeth and its clinical value. Shanghai J Stomatol 18:656–660 Mao XY, Chen DP (2009) The crown inclination of the teeth and its clinical value. Shanghai J Stomatol 18:656–660
2.
go back to reference Papageorgiou SN, Sifakakis I, Keilig L, Patcas R, Affolter S, Eliades T, Bourauel C (2016) Torque differences according to tooth morphology and bracket placement: a finite element study. Eur J Orthod 39(4):411–418 Papageorgiou SN, Sifakakis I, Keilig L, Patcas R, Affolter S, Eliades T, Bourauel C (2016) Torque differences according to tooth morphology and bracket placement: a finite element study. Eur J Orthod 39(4):411–418
3.
go back to reference Mavroskoufis F, Ritchie GM (1980) Variation in size and form between left and right maxillary central incisor teeth. J Prosthet Dent 43(3):254–257CrossRef Mavroskoufis F, Ritchie GM (1980) Variation in size and form between left and right maxillary central incisor teeth. J Prosthet Dent 43(3):254–257CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sung JW, Yub TK, Moon HK (2013) Debonding forces of three different customized bases of a lingual bracket system. Korean J Orthod 43(5):235–241CrossRef Sung JW, Yub TK, Moon HK (2013) Debonding forces of three different customized bases of a lingual bracket system. Korean J Orthod 43(5):235–241CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fillion D (2010) Clinical advantages of the Orapix-straight wire lingual technique. Int Orthod 8(2):125–151PubMed Fillion D (2010) Clinical advantages of the Orapix-straight wire lingual technique. Int Orthod 8(2):125–151PubMed
6.
go back to reference Andrews LF (1976) The straight-wire appliance, origin, controversy, commentary. J Clin Orthod 10(2):99–114PubMed Andrews LF (1976) The straight-wire appliance, origin, controversy, commentary. J Clin Orthod 10(2):99–114PubMed
7.
go back to reference Vardimon AD, Lambertz W (1986) Statistical evaluation of torque angles in reference to straight-wire appliance (SWA) theories. Am J Orthod 89(1):56–66CrossRef Vardimon AD, Lambertz W (1986) Statistical evaluation of torque angles in reference to straight-wire appliance (SWA) theories. Am J Orthod 89(1):56–66CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Alexander RG (1983) The vari-simplex discipline. Part 1: Concept and appliance design. J Clin Orthod 17(6):380–392PubMed Alexander RG (1983) The vari-simplex discipline. Part 1: Concept and appliance design. J Clin Orthod 17(6):380–392PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kyung HM, Kim BC, Sung JH (1999) The effect of resin base thickness on shear bonding strength in lingual tooth surface. J Lingual Orthod 2(1):15 Kyung HM, Kim BC, Sung JH (1999) The effect of resin base thickness on shear bonding strength in lingual tooth surface. J Lingual Orthod 2(1):15
11.
go back to reference Kim JH, Hwang HS (1998) Shear bond strength and failure patterns according to the thickness of resin base in bracket bonding. Korean J Orthod 28(4):659–668 Kim JH, Hwang HS (1998) Shear bond strength and failure patterns according to the thickness of resin base in bracket bonding. Korean J Orthod 28(4):659–668
12.
go back to reference Fu ZR, Cai X, Tian FC (2016) Effect of base layer thickness of a self-adhesive resin on dentin bonding strength. Chin J Stomatol 51(2):93–96 Fu ZR, Cai X, Tian FC (2016) Effect of base layer thickness of a self-adhesive resin on dentin bonding strength. Chin J Stomatol 51(2):93–96
13.
go back to reference Hiro T, Iglesia F, Andreu P (2008) Indirect bonding technique in lingual orthodontics: the HIRO system. Prog Orthod 9(2):34–45PubMed Hiro T, Iglesia F, Andreu P (2008) Indirect bonding technique in lingual orthodontics: the HIRO system. Prog Orthod 9(2):34–45PubMed
14.
go back to reference Arima VO, Mario VF, Valdrighi HC, Lucato AS, Santamaria M, Vedovello SA (2017) Debonding forces of different pads in a lingual bracket system. Dental Press J Orthod 22(4):34–40CrossRef Arima VO, Mario VF, Valdrighi HC, Lucato AS, Santamaria M, Vedovello SA (2017) Debonding forces of different pads in a lingual bracket system. Dental Press J Orthod 22(4):34–40CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wiechmann D, Rummel V, Thalheim A, Simon JS, Wiechmann L (2003) Customized brackets and archwires for lingual orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124(5):593–599CrossRef Wiechmann D, Rummel V, Thalheim A, Simon JS, Wiechmann L (2003) Customized brackets and archwires for lingual orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124(5):593–599CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sha HN, Choi SH, Yu HS, Cha CJ, Kim KM, Lin CP (2018) Debonding force and shear bond strength of an array of CAD/CAM-based customized orthodontic brackets, placed by indirect bonding—An In Vitro study. PLoS ONE 13(9):1–14CrossRef Sha HN, Choi SH, Yu HS, Cha CJ, Kim KM, Lin CP (2018) Debonding force and shear bond strength of an array of CAD/CAM-based customized orthodontic brackets, placed by indirect bonding—An In Vitro study. PLoS ONE 13(9):1–14CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD (2001) Bond strength to surface enamel for different tooth types. Dent Mater 17(2):184–189CrossRef Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD (2001) Bond strength to surface enamel for different tooth types. Dent Mater 17(2):184–189CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Reynolds IR (1975) A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 2:171–178CrossRef Reynolds IR (1975) A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 2:171–178CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rüger D, Harzer W, Krisjane Z, Tansche E (2011) Shear bond strength after multiple bracket bonding with or without repeated etching. Eur J Orthod 33(5):521–527CrossRef Rüger D, Harzer W, Krisjane Z, Tansche E (2011) Shear bond strength after multiple bracket bonding with or without repeated etching. Eur J Orthod 33(5):521–527CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shaymaa EE, Shaza MH, Noha FI (2014) Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests. Prog Orthod 15:331–338 Shaymaa EE, Shaza MH, Noha FI (2014) Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests. Prog Orthod 15:331–338
21.
go back to reference Rastelli MC, Coelho U, Jimenez EO (2010) Evaluation of shear bond strength of brackets bonded with orthodontic fluoride-releasing composite resins. Dental Press J Orthod 15(3):106CrossRef Rastelli MC, Coelho U, Jimenez EO (2010) Evaluation of shear bond strength of brackets bonded with orthodontic fluoride-releasing composite resins. Dental Press J Orthod 15(3):106CrossRef
22.
go back to reference MacColl GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC (1998) The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113(3):276–281CrossRef MacColl GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC (1998) The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113(3):276–281CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Reynolds RI (1975) Composite filling materials as adhesives in orthodontics. Br Dent J 138(3):83–83CrossRef Reynolds RI (1975) Composite filling materials as adhesives in orthodontics. Br Dent J 138(3):83–83CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Gwinnett AJ, Gorelick L (1977) Microscopic evaluation of enamel after debonding: Clinical application. Am J Orthod 71(6):651–665CrossRef Gwinnett AJ, Gorelick L (1977) Microscopic evaluation of enamel after debonding: Clinical application. Am J Orthod 71(6):651–665CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Romano FL, Tavares SW, Nouer DF, Consani S (2005) Shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with self-etching primer. Angle Orthod 75(5):849–853PubMed Romano FL, Tavares SW, Nouer DF, Consani S (2005) Shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with self-etching primer. Angle Orthod 75(5):849–853PubMed
26.
go back to reference Arash V, Naghipour F, Ravadgar M, Karkhah A, Barati MS (2017) Shear bond strength of ceramic and metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primer and conventional bonding adhesives. Electron physician 9(1):3584–3591CrossRef Arash V, Naghipour F, Ravadgar M, Karkhah A, Barati MS (2017) Shear bond strength of ceramic and metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primer and conventional bonding adhesives. Electron physician 9(1):3584–3591CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effects of customized resin base on bonding strength of spherical self-ligating brackets
Authors
Li Ji
Zheng Chen
Chun-hui Liao
Shuang-fei Hu
Zi-xin Luo
Bo-wen Lian
Hong He, DDS, MS, PhD
Publication date
01-03-2022
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00329-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2/2022 Go to the issue

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Mitteilungen der DGKFO