Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2/2020

01-03-2020 | Randomized Clinical Trials

Effects of micro-osteoperforations on intraoral miniscrew anchored maxillary molar distalization

A randomized clinical trial

Authors: Kemal Gulduren, DDS, Hayriye Tumer, Ulas Oz

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to study the effects of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) on miniscrew-supported maxillary molar distalization.

Methods

As part of a single center, split-mouth, randomized clinical trial, 20 eligible subjects were randomly recruited from patients who had applied to the orthodontics department of a university dental hospital. In the experimental group, subjects were randomized to receive MOPs to either the left or right maxillary molar region (n = 10). The control group (n = 10) and the contralateral sides of the experimental group (n = 10) did not receive any MOPs. In both groups, distalization of the maxillary molars was performed by miniscrew-supported distalization appliances. Using 3D models, maxillary molar distalization at 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks was measured. Pain, discomfort, eating difficulty, and speech problem levels were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS 0–10). Periodontal evaluations were performed.

Results

In all, 18 subjects completed the study. The mean amount of tooth movement was significantly greater on the MOP side compared to contralateral side of the experimental group at all time points. After 12 weeks, the maxillary molars on the MOP side moved 1.17-fold more than those on the contralateral side. No significant differences were found regarding amount of tooth movement between the control group and the MOP and contralateral sides of the experimental group. The rates of tooth movement in the MOP sides of the experimental group, contralateral sides of the experimental group, and the control group were 0.029, 0.025, and 0.028 mm/day, respectively. Pain VAS scores after intervention were significantly increased on the MOP side compared with the contralateral side of the experimental group but not at any other time point. No differences in periodontal scores between the groups were observed.

Conclusions

A 1.17-fold increase in the rate of tooth movement in the MOP group compared with the contralateral side was recorded. However the accelerating effect of MOPs was lower than expected. The mean pain level was statistically greater in the MOP group compared to the contralateral side only on the first day of application.
Literature
1.
Alansari S, Sangsuwon C, Vongthongleur T, Kwal R, Chneh TM, Lee YB, Nervina J, Teixeira C, Alikhani M (2015) Biological principles behind accelerated tooth movement. Semin Orthod 21(3):151–161CrossRef
2.
Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, Corpodian C, Barrera LM, Alansari S, Khoo E, Teixeira C (2013) Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144(5):639–648PubMedCrossRef
3.
Alkebsi A, Al-Maaitah E, Al-Shorman H, Alhaija AE (2018) Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 153(6):771–785PubMedCrossRef
4.
Al-Naoum F, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A (2014) Does alveolar corticotomy accelerate orthodontic tooth movement when retracting upper canines? A split-mouth design randomized controlled trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72(10):1880–1889PubMedCrossRef
5.
Andrade I Jr, Taddei SR, Garlet GP, Garlet TP, Teixeira AL, Silva TA, Teixeira MM (2009) CCR5 down-regulates osteoclast function in orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res 88(11):1037–1041PubMedCrossRef
6.
Arias OR, Marquez-Orozco MC (2006) Aspirin, acetaminophen, and ibuprofen: their effects on orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130(3):364–370PubMedCrossRef
7.
Attri S, Mittal R, Batra P, Sonar S, Sharma K, Raghavan S, Rai KS (2018) Comparison of rate of tooth movement and pain perception during accelerated tooth movement associated with conventional fixed appliances with micro-osteoperforations—a randomised controlled trial. J Orthod 45(4):225–233PubMedCrossRef
8.
Bartzela T, Türp JC, Motschall E, Maltha JC (2009) Medication effects on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135(1):16–26PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
Buschang PH, Campbell PM, Ruso S (2012) Accelerating tooth movement with corticotomies: is it possible and desirable? Semin Orthod 18(4):286–294CrossRef
11.
Celebi AA, Demirer S, Catalbas B, Arikan S (2013) Effect of ovarian activity on orthodontic tooth movement and gingival crevicular fluid levels of interleukin-1β and prostaglandin E(2) in cats. Angle Orthod 83(1):70–75PubMedCrossRef
12.
Chan E, Dalci O, Petocz P, Papadopoulou AK, Darendeliler MA (2018) Physical properties of root cementum: part 26. Effects of micro-osteoperforations on orthodontic root resorption: a microcomputed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 153(2):204–213PubMedCrossRef
13.
Cheung T, Park J, Lee D, Kim C, Olson J, Javadi S, Lawson G, McCabe J, Moon W, Ting K, Hong C (2016) Ability of mini-implant-facilitated micro-osteoperforations to accelerate tooth movement in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 150(6):958–967PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Cruz DR, Kohara EK, Ribeiro MS, Wetter NU (2004) Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the orthodontic movement velocity of human teeth: A preliminary study. Lasers Surg Med 35(2):117–120PubMedCrossRef
15.
Ding WH, Li W, Chen F, Zhang JF, Lv Y, Chen XY, Lin WW, Fu Z, Shi JJ (2015) Comparison of molar intrusion efficiency and bone density by CT in patients with different vertical facial morphology. J Oral Rehabil 42(5):355–362PubMedCrossRef
16.
Doig GS, Simpson F (2005) Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers. J Crit Care 20(2):187–193PubMedCrossRef
17.
Dudic A, Giannopoulou C, Kiliaridis S (2013) Factors related to the rate of orthodontically induced tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 143(5):616–621PubMedCrossRef
18.
Dudic A, Giannopoulou C, Leuzinger M, Kiliaridis S (2009) Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135(4):434–437PubMedCrossRef
19.
Dudic A, Giannopoulou C, Martinez M, Montet X, Kiliaridis S (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of digitized periapical radiographs validated against micro-computed tomography scanning in evaluating orthodontically induced apical root resorption. Eur J Oral Sci 116(5):467–472PubMedCrossRef
20.
Fang J, Li Y, Zhang K, Zhao Z, Mei L (2016) Escaping the adverse impacts of NSAIDs on tooth movement during orthodontics. Medicine 95(16):e3256PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Feizbakhsh M, Zandian D, Heidarpour M, Farhad SZ, Fallahi HR (2018) The use of micro-osteoperforation concept for accelerating differential tooth movement. J World Fed Orthod 7(2):56–60
22.
23.
Frost HM (1983) The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review. Henry Ford Hosp Med J 31(1):3–9PubMed
24.
Garlet TP, Coelho U, Silva JS, Garlet GP (2007) Cytokine expression pattern in compression and tension sides of the periodontal ligament during orthodontic tooth movement in humans. Eur J Oral Sci 115(5):355–362PubMedCrossRef
25.
Haruyama N, Igarashi K, Saeki S, Otsuka-Isoya M, Shinoda H, Mitani H (2002) Estrous-cycle-dependent variation in orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res 81(6):406–410PubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
Henneman S, Von den Hoff JW, Maltha JC (2008) Mechanobiology of tooth movement. Eur J Orthod 30(3):299–306PubMedCrossRef
28.
Khalaf K (2014) Factors affecting the formation, severity and location of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. J Oral Maxillofac Res 5(1):e4PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Kouskoura T, Katsaros C, von Gunten S (2017) The potential use of pharmacological agents to modulate orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). Front Physiol 8:67PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z (2009) On a path to unfolding the biological mechanisms of orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res 88(7):597–608PubMedCrossRef
31.
Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC (2004) Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126(1):42–47PubMedCrossRef
32.
33.
Nienkemper M, Handschel J, Drescher D (2014) Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading. Int J Oral Sci 6(1):1–6PubMedCrossRef
34.
Okamoto A, Ohnishi T, Bandow K, Kakimoto K, Chiba N, Maeda A, Fukunaga T, Miyawaki S, Matsuguchi T (2009) Reduction of orthodontic tooth movement by experimentally induced periodontal inflammation in mice. Eur J Oral Sci 117(3):238–247PubMedCrossRef
35.
Oliveira DD, Oliveira BFD, Soares RV (2010) Alveolar corticotomies in orthodontics: Indications and effects on tooth movement. Dental Press J Orthod 15(4):144–157CrossRef
36.
Paetyangkul A, Türk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, Jones AS, Petocz P, Cheng LL, Darendeliler MA (2011) Physical properties of root cementum: Part 16. Comparisons of root resorption and resorption craters after the application of light and heavy continuous and controlled orthodontic forces for 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139(3):e279–e284PubMedCrossRef
37.
Paoloni V, Lione R, Farisco F, Halazonetis DJ, Franchi L, Cozza P (2017) Morphometric covariation between palatal shape and skeletal pattern in Class II growing subjects. Eur J Orthod 39(4):371–376PubMedCrossRef
38.
Pavlin D, Anthony R, Raj V, Gakunga PT (2015) Cyclic loading (vibration) accelerates tooth movement in orthodontic patients: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Semin Orthod 21(3):187–194CrossRef
39.
Pepicelli A, Woods M, Briggs C (2005) The mandibular muscles and their importance in orthodontics: a contemporary review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128(6):774–780PubMedCrossRef
40.
Pinto AS, Alves LS, Maltz M, Susin C, Zenkner JEA (2018) Does the duration of fixed orthodontic treatment affect caries activity among adolescents and young adults? Caries Res 52(6):463–467PubMedCrossRef
41.
Pinto AS, Alves LS, Zenkner JEDA, Zanatta FB, Maltz M (2017) Gingival enlargement in orthodontic patients: effect of treatment duration. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 152(4):477–482PubMedCrossRef
42.
Segal GR, Schiffman PH, Tuncay OC (2004) Meta-analysis of the treatment-related factors of external apical root resorption. Orthod Craniofac Res 7(2):71–78PubMedCrossRef
43.
Sivarajan S, Doss JG, Papageorgiou SN, Cobourne MT, Wey MC (2019) Mini-implant supported canine retraction with micro-osteoperforation: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod 89(2):183–189PubMedCrossRef
44.
Sugimori T, Yamaguchi M, Shimizu M, Kikuta J, Hikida T, Hikida M, Murakami Y, Suemitsu M, Kuyama K, Kasai K (2018) Micro-osteoperforations accelerate orthodontic tooth movement by stimulating periodontal ligament cell cycles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 154(6):788–796PubMedCrossRef
45.
Teixeira CC, Khoo E, Tran J, Chartres I, Liu Y, Thant LM, Khabensky I, Gart LP, Cisneros G, Alikhani M (2010) Cytokine expression and accelerated tooth movement. J Dent Res 89(10):1135–1141PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Tsai CY, Yang TK, Hsieh HY, Yang LY (2016) Comparison of the effects of micro-osteoperforation and corticision on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Angle Orthod 86(4):558–564PubMedCrossRef
47.
Tsichlaki A, Chin SY, Pandis N, Fleming PS (2016) How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 149(3):308–318PubMedCrossRef
48.
Uribe F, Padala S, Allareddy V, Nanda R (2014) Patients’, parents’, and orthodontists’ perceptions of the need for and costs of additional procedures to reduce treatment time. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145(4 Suppl):S65–S73PubMedCrossRef
49.
Wilmes B, Drescher D, Nienkemper M (2009) A miniplate system for improved stability of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod 43(8):494–501PubMed
50.
Wilmes B, Drescher D (2008) A miniscrew system with interchangeable abutments. J Clin Orthod 42(10):574–580PubMed
Metadata
Title
Effects of micro-osteoperforations on intraoral miniscrew anchored maxillary molar distalization
A randomized clinical trial
Authors
Kemal Gulduren, DDS
Hayriye Tumer
Ulas Oz
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-019-00207-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2/2020 Go to the issue

Original Article

Effects of orthodontic force magnitude on cell apoptosis and RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Age effect on orthodontic tooth movement rate and the composition of gingival crevicular fluid

Original Article

Effects of contact compressive force on bracket bond strength and adhesive thickness

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Letter to the Editor

Testing for accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability

Original Article

The variability of the curve of Spee