Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2019

01-11-2019 | Original Article

Torque efficiency of a customized lingual appliance

Performance of wires with three different ligature systems

Authors: Marco Migliorati, DDS, MS, PhD, Daniela Poggio, DDS, Sara Drago, MSc, DDS, Alberto Lagazzo, MSc, PhD, Roberto Stradi, MD, DDS, Fabrizio Barberis, MSc, PhD, Armando Silvestrini-Biavati, MD, DDS

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Torque control in lingual orthodontics is key to obtain optimal esthetic results. The aim of this in vitro experimental study was to verify the efficiency of the ligature–archwire–slot system in torque control using a customized lingual appliance.

Methods

An idealized cast with eight extracted human teeth was created and a set of customized lingual brackets was obtained. Tests were performed with the following wires: 0.016″ × 0.022″ nickel-titanium (NiTi), 0.016″ × 0.024″ stainless steel (SS), 0.017″ × 0.025″ βIII titanium (βIIITi), 0.0182″ × 0.0182″ βIIITi, 0.018″ × 0.025″ SS, 0.018″ × 0.025″ NiTi, 0.018″ × 0.025″ βIIITi, and three types of ligatures were tested using a universal testing machine to calculate the efficiency in torque control. A blind statistical analysis was performed.

Results

Based on post hoc multiple comparisons, differences were found for two of the three ligatures when using the 0.016″ × 0.022″ NiTi wires (p < 0.001 for both ligatures). When considering all ligatures, 0.018″ × 0.025″ SS and 0.018″ × 0.025″ βIIITi were significantly different from all other wires (p < 0.001 in all cases). With a moment of 5 Nmm, the 0.016″ × 0.022″ NiTi wire developed median angles of 26.7, 29.8, and 38.7° with the three ligatures, respectively, while the 0.018″ × 0.025″ SS developed median angles of 12.9, 10.7, and 12.7°, respectively.

Conclusions

The ligature type and geometry did not affect the efficiency of torque control, except for the 0.016″ × 0.022″ NiTi wire. The wires generating the greatest moments were the 0.018″ × 0.025″ SS and 0.018″ × 0.025″ βIIITi.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Archambault A, Major TW, Carey JP, Heo G, Badawi H, Major PW (2010) A comparison of torque expression between stainless steel, titanium molybdenum alloy, and copper nickel titanium wires in metallic self-ligating brackets. Angle Orthod 80:884–889CrossRef Archambault A, Major TW, Carey JP, Heo G, Badawi H, Major PW (2010) A comparison of torque expression between stainless steel, titanium molybdenum alloy, and copper nickel titanium wires in metallic self-ligating brackets. Angle Orthod 80:884–889CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bantleon HP, Droschl H (1988) Front torque using a partial arch technic. J Orofac Orthop 49:203–212 Bantleon HP, Droschl H (1988) Front torque using a partial arch technic. J Orofac Orthop 49:203–212
3.
go back to reference Burstone CJ (1966) The mechanics of the segmented arch techniques. Angle Orthod 36:99–120PubMed Burstone CJ (1966) The mechanics of the segmented arch techniques. Angle Orthod 36:99–120PubMed
4.
go back to reference Creekmore TDTD (1979) Creekmore on torque. J Clin Orthod 13:305–310PubMed Creekmore TDTD (1979) Creekmore on torque. J Clin Orthod 13:305–310PubMed
5.
go back to reference Daratsianos N, Bourauel C, Fimmers R, Jäger A, Schwestka-Polly R (2016) In vitro biomechanical analysis of torque capabilities of various 0.018″ lingual bracket-wire systems: total torque play and slot size. Eur J Orthod 38:459–469CrossRef Daratsianos N, Bourauel C, Fimmers R, Jäger A, Schwestka-Polly R (2016) In vitro biomechanical analysis of torque capabilities of various 0.018″ lingual bracket-wire systems: total torque play and slot size. Eur J Orthod 38:459–469CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fulmer DT, Kuftinec MM (1989) Cephalometric appraisal of patients treated with fixed lingual orthodontic appliances: historic review and analysis of cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 95:514–520CrossRef Fulmer DT, Kuftinec MM (1989) Cephalometric appraisal of patients treated with fixed lingual orthodontic appliances: historic review and analysis of cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 95:514–520CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Germane N, Bentley BE Jr, Isaacson RJ (1989) Three biologic variables modifying faciolingual tooth angulation by straight-wire appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96:312–319CrossRef Germane N, Bentley BE Jr, Isaacson RJ (1989) Three biologic variables modifying faciolingual tooth angulation by straight-wire appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96:312–319CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gmyrek H, Bourauel C, Richter G, Harzer W (2002) Torque capacity of metal and plastic brackets with reference to materials, application, technology and biomechanics. J Orofac Orthop 63:113–128CrossRef Gmyrek H, Bourauel C, Richter G, Harzer W (2002) Torque capacity of metal and plastic brackets with reference to materials, application, technology and biomechanics. J Orofac Orthop 63:113–128CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Harzer W, Bourauel C, Gmyrek H (2004) Torque capacity of metal and polycarbonate brackets with and without a metal slot. Eur J Orthod 26:435–441CrossRef Harzer W, Bourauel C, Gmyrek H (2004) Torque capacity of metal and polycarbonate brackets with and without a metal slot. Eur J Orthod 26:435–441CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hemingway R, Williams RL, Hunt JA, Rudge SJ (2001) The influence of bracket type on the force delivery of Ni-Ti archwires. Eur J Orthod 23:233–241CrossRef Hemingway R, Williams RL, Hunt JA, Rudge SJ (2001) The influence of bracket type on the force delivery of Ni-Ti archwires. Eur J Orthod 23:233–241CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hong RK, Lee JG, Sunwoo J, Lim SM (2000) Lingual orthodontics combined with orthognathic surgery in a skeletal Class III patient. J Clin Orthod 34:403–408PubMed Hong RK, Lee JG, Sunwoo J, Lim SM (2000) Lingual orthodontics combined with orthognathic surgery in a skeletal Class III patient. J Clin Orthod 34:403–408PubMed
12.
go back to reference Huang Y, Keilig L, Rahimi A, Reimann S, Eliades T, Jäger A (2009) Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:638–643CrossRef Huang Y, Keilig L, Rahimi A, Reimann S, Eliades T, Jäger A (2009) Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:638–643CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Inami T, Nakano Y, Miyazawa K, Tabuchi M, Goto S (2016) Adult skeletal Class II high-angle case treated with a fully customized lingual bracket appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 150:679–691CrossRef Inami T, Nakano Y, Miyazawa K, Tabuchi M, Goto S (2016) Adult skeletal Class II high-angle case treated with a fully customized lingual bracket appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 150:679–691CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lossdörfer S, Bieber C, Schwestka-Polly R, Wiechmann D (2014) Analysis of the torque capacity of a completely customized lingual appliance of the next generation. Head Face Med 10:4CrossRef Lossdörfer S, Bieber C, Schwestka-Polly R, Wiechmann D (2014) Analysis of the torque capacity of a completely customized lingual appliance of the next generation. Head Face Med 10:4CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Major TW, Carey JP, Nobes DS, Heo G, Major PW (2011) Mechanical effects of third-order movement in self-ligated brackets by the measurement of torque expression. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:e31–44CrossRef Major TW, Carey JP, Nobes DS, Heo G, Major PW (2011) Mechanical effects of third-order movement in self-ligated brackets by the measurement of torque expression. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:e31–44CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mathew RN, Katyal A, Shetty A, Nayak KUS (2016) Effect of increasing the vertical intrusive force to obtain torque control in lingual orthodontics: a three-dimensional finite element method study. Indian J Dent Res 27:163–167CrossRef Mathew RN, Katyal A, Shetty A, Nayak KUS (2016) Effect of increasing the vertical intrusive force to obtain torque control in lingual orthodontics: a three-dimensional finite element method study. Indian J Dent Res 27:163–167CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Miethke RR, Melsen B (1999) Effect of variation in tooth morphology and bracket position on first and third order correction with preadjusted appliances. Am J Orthod 116:329–335CrossRef Miethke RR, Melsen B (1999) Effect of variation in tooth morphology and bracket position on first and third order correction with preadjusted appliances. Am J Orthod 116:329–335CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Morina E, Eliades T, Pandis N, Jäger A, Bourauel C (2008) Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets. Eur J Orthod 30:233–238CrossRef Morina E, Eliades T, Pandis N, Jäger A, Bourauel C (2008) Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets. Eur J Orthod 30:233–238CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Papageorgiou SN, Sifakakis I, Doulis I, Eliades TT, Bourauel C (2016) Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in conventional brackets. Prog Orthod 17:5CrossRef Papageorgiou SN, Sifakakis I, Doulis I, Eliades TT, Bourauel C (2016) Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in conventional brackets. Prog Orthod 17:5CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pauls A, Nienkemper M, Schwestka-Polly R, Wiechmann D (2017) Therapeutic accuracy of completely customized lingual appliance WIN: A retrospective cohort study. J Orofac Orthop 78:52–61CrossRef Pauls A, Nienkemper M, Schwestka-Polly R, Wiechmann D (2017) Therapeutic accuracy of completely customized lingual appliance WIN: A retrospective cohort study. J Orofac Orthop 78:52–61CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Reitan K (1964) Effects of force magnitude and direction of tooth movement on different alveolar bone types. Angle Orthod 34:244–255 Reitan K (1964) Effects of force magnitude and direction of tooth movement on different alveolar bone types. Angle Orthod 34:244–255
23.
go back to reference Schudy GF, Schudy FF (1989) Intrabracket space and interbracket distance: critical factors in clinical orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96:281–294CrossRef Schudy GF, Schudy FF (1989) Intrabracket space and interbracket distance: critical factors in clinical orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96:281–294CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sebanc J, Brantley WA, Pincsak JJ, Conover JP (1984) Variability of effective torque as a function of edge bevel on orthodontic arch wires. Am J Orthod 86:43–51CrossRef Sebanc J, Brantley WA, Pincsak JJ, Conover JP (1984) Variability of effective torque as a function of edge bevel on orthodontic arch wires. Am J Orthod 86:43–51CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Bourauel C (2013) A comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod 35:375–380CrossRef Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Bourauel C (2013) A comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod 35:375–380CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Smith JR, Gorman JC, Kurz C, Dunn RM (1986) Keys to success in lingual therapy. Part 1. J Clin Orthod 20:252–261PubMed Smith JR, Gorman JC, Kurz C, Dunn RM (1986) Keys to success in lingual therapy. Part 1. J Clin Orthod 20:252–261PubMed
27.
go back to reference Wei L, Qiguo R, Jiuxiang L, Baohua X (2009) Torque control of the maxillary incisors in lingual and labial orthodontics: a 3‑dimensional finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:316–322CrossRef Wei L, Qiguo R, Jiuxiang L, Baohua X (2009) Torque control of the maxillary incisors in lingual and labial orthodontics: a 3‑dimensional finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:316–322CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Torque efficiency of a customized lingual appliance
Performance of wires with three different ligature systems
Authors
Marco Migliorati, DDS, MS, PhD
Daniela Poggio, DDS
Sara Drago, MSc, DDS
Alberto Lagazzo, MSc, PhD
Roberto Stradi, MD, DDS
Fabrizio Barberis, MSc, PhD
Armando Silvestrini-Biavati, MD, DDS
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-019-00190-w

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2019 Go to the issue

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Mitteilungen der DGKFO