Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2018

01-05-2018 | Original Article

Coordinating bracket torque and incisor inclination

Part 1: The development of widely applicable equations

Authors: Bernd Zimmer, Hiba Sino

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this investigation was to develop equations to describe the geometric relations among “targeted incisor inclinations” (tU1, tL1) accommodating different cephalometric norms (Ricketts, Bergen, etc.) with the “expected inclinations” (eU1, eL1), as they can be generated by bracket torque values according to Andrews, Roth, Ricketts, and MBT.

Methods

In its key parts, the present study is a theoretical work in which structural relationships are described using standard mathematical and geometric methodologies.

Results

The “targeted norm-inclinations” (tU1, tL1) were calculated relative to a single reference plane (BOP according to Downs), thus, allowing for a direct comparison of different cephalometric values. Referring to the “expected inclinations” (eU1, eL1), it was found that in addition to bracket torque (BT) morphological and structural parameters also have to be taken into account. These are the “torque coordination angle” (TCA) representing the variation in dental morphology and, the correction angles between BOP and the upper (uOP) (α1) or the lower (lOP) occlusal plane (β1). Moreover, the angles α2 between an upper (uBPP) and β2 between a lower bracket positioning plane (lBPP) and the occlusal planes (uOP, lOP) have to be considered. As a consequence, suitable equations were developed (eU1(BOP) = 90° − BT(U1) − TCA(U1) + α1 − α2, and eL1(BOP) = 90° − BT(L1) − TCA(L1) + β1 − β2), allowing the calculation of expected torque-dependent inclinations (eU1, eL1) and representing the prerequisite for a comparison with the cephalometric targeted values (tU1, tL1).

Conclusions

By developing suitable equations, it became possible to name and quantify those parameters that are responsible for incisor inclinations and enable a comparison with targeted cephalometric values.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aldrees AM (2010) Evaluation of incisors inclination in five cephalometric analysis methods. Pak Oral Dent J 30:418–424 Aldrees AM (2010) Evaluation of incisors inclination in five cephalometric analysis methods. Pak Oral Dent J 30:418–424
3.
go back to reference Andrews LF (1976) In: Andrews LF (ed) Die Straight-Wire-Apparatur. “A”-Company, München, p 4, 23, 25, 26, 67 (Deutsche Übersetzung der Originalarbeit “The Straight-Wire-Appliance” 1975) Andrews LF (1976) In: Andrews LF (ed) Die Straight-Wire-Apparatur. “A”-Company, München, p 4, 23, 25, 26, 67 (Deutsche Übersetzung der Originalarbeit “The Straight-Wire-Appliance” 1975)
4.
go back to reference Baumrind S, Frantz RC (1971) The reliability of head film landmarks. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 60:111–127CrossRefPubMed Baumrind S, Frantz RC (1971) The reliability of head film landmarks. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 60:111–127CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bennett JC, McLaughlin RP (1998) Bracketplazierung. In: Bennett JC, McLaughlin RP (eds) Kieferorthopädisches Management mit der vorprogrammierten Apparatur: Planung und Durchführung in Fallbeispielen. Dt. Ärzte-Verlag, Köln, pp 27–40,57,58 Bennett JC, McLaughlin RP (1998) Bracketplazierung. In: Bennett JC, McLaughlin RP (eds) Kieferorthopädisches Management mit der vorprogrammierten Apparatur: Planung und Durchführung in Fallbeispielen. Dt. Ärzte-Verlag, Köln, pp 27–40,57,58
6.
go back to reference Björk A, Skieller V (1972) Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod 62:339–383CrossRefPubMed Björk A, Skieller V (1972) Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod 62:339–383CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bryant RM, Sadowsky PL, Dent M, Hazelrig JB (1984) Variability in three morphologic features of the permanent maxillary central incisor. Am J Orthod 86:25–32CrossRefPubMed Bryant RM, Sadowsky PL, Dent M, Hazelrig JB (1984) Variability in three morphologic features of the permanent maxillary central incisor. Am J Orthod 86:25–32CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Carlsson R, Rönnerman A (1973) Crown-root angles of upper central incisors. Am J Orthod 64:147–154CrossRefPubMed Carlsson R, Rönnerman A (1973) Crown-root angles of upper central incisors. Am J Orthod 64:147–154CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chan CK, Tng TH, Hägg U, Cooke MS (1994) Effects of cephalometric landmark validity on incisor angulation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106:487–495CrossRefPubMed Chan CK, Tng TH, Hägg U, Cooke MS (1994) Effects of cephalometric landmark validity on incisor angulation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106:487–495CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Corelius M, Linder-Aronson S (1976) The relationship between lower incisor inclination and various reference lines. Angle Orthod 46:111–117PubMed Corelius M, Linder-Aronson S (1976) The relationship between lower incisor inclination and various reference lines. Angle Orthod 46:111–117PubMed
11.
go back to reference Downs WB (1948) Variations in facial relationship: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 34:812–840CrossRefPubMed Downs WB (1948) Variations in facial relationship: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 34:812–840CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Durão AP, Morosolli A, Pittayapat P, Bolstad N, Ferreira AP, Jacobs R (2015) Cephalometric landmark variability among orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists: a comparative study. Imaging Sci Dent 45:213–220CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Durão AP, Morosolli A, Pittayapat P, Bolstad N, Ferreira AP, Jacobs R (2015) Cephalometric landmark variability among orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists: a comparative study. Imaging Sci Dent 45:213–220CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Harries EF, Hassankiadeh S, Harries JT (1993) Maxillary incisor crown-root relationships in different angle malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103:48–53CrossRef Harries EF, Hassankiadeh S, Harries JT (1993) Maxillary incisor crown-root relationships in different angle malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103:48–53CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hasund A, Boe O (1980) Floating norms as a guidance for the positioning of the lower incisors. Angle Orthod 50:165–168PubMed Hasund A, Boe O (1980) Floating norms as a guidance for the positioning of the lower incisors. Angle Orthod 50:165–168PubMed
15.
go back to reference Heinig N, Göz G (2001) Clinical application and its effects of the forsus spring. A study of a new Herbst hybrid. J Orofac Orthop 62:436–450CrossRefPubMed Heinig N, Göz G (2001) Clinical application and its effects of the forsus spring. A study of a new Herbst hybrid. J Orofac Orthop 62:436–450CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Jacobson A (1988) Update on the Wits Appraisal. Angle Orthod 58:205–216PubMed Jacobson A (1988) Update on the Wits Appraisal. Angle Orthod 58:205–216PubMed
18.
go back to reference Jarabak JR, Fizell JA (1972) In: Jarabak JR, Fizell JA (eds) Cephalometrics. Lightwire Edgewise Appliances, vol I. Mosby, St Louis, pp 128–166 Jarabak JR, Fizell JA (1972) In: Jarabak JR, Fizell JA (eds) Cephalometrics. Lightwire Edgewise Appliances, vol I. Mosby, St Louis, pp 128–166
19.
go back to reference Li JL, Kau CH, Wang M (2014) Changes of occlusal plane inclination after orthodontic treatment in different dentoskeletal frames. Prog Orthod 15:1–10CrossRef Li JL, Kau CH, Wang M (2014) Changes of occlusal plane inclination after orthodontic treatment in different dentoskeletal frames. Prog Orthod 15:1–10CrossRef
20.
go back to reference van Loenen M, Degrieck J, De Pauw G, Dermau L (2005) Anterior tooth morphology and its effect on torque. Eur J Orthod 27:258–262CrossRefPubMed van Loenen M, Degrieck J, De Pauw G, Dermau L (2005) Anterior tooth morphology and its effect on torque. Eur J Orthod 27:258–262CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Trevisi HJ (2001) Bracket positioning and case set-up. In: McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Parkinson THJM (eds) Systemized orthodontic treatment mechanics. Mosby International, Spain, pp 8–12, 55–69 McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Trevisi HJ (2001) Bracket positioning and case set-up. In: McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Parkinson THJM (eds) Systemized orthodontic treatment mechanics. Mosby International, Spain, pp 8–12, 55–69
22.
go back to reference Normenausschuss Dental (NADENT) im DIN (2010) Zahnheilkunde – Brackets und Röhrchen für die Kieferorthopädie. Beuth-Verlag, Berlin (Deutsche Fassung) Normenausschuss Dental (NADENT) im DIN (2010) Zahnheilkunde – Brackets und Röhrchen für die Kieferorthopädie. Beuth-Verlag, Berlin (Deutsche Fassung)
23.
go back to reference Okeson JP (2008) In: Okeson JP (ed) Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion, 6th edn. Elsevier Mosby, St. Louis Okeson JP (2008) In: Okeson JP (ed) Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion, 6th edn. Elsevier Mosby, St. Louis
24.
go back to reference Platou C, Zachrisson BU (1983) Incisor position in Scandinavian children with ideal occlusion: a comparison with the Ricketts and Steiner standards. Am J Orthod 83:341–352CrossRefPubMed Platou C, Zachrisson BU (1983) Incisor position in Scandinavian children with ideal occlusion: a comparison with the Ricketts and Steiner standards. Am J Orthod 83:341–352CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Polat-Ozsoy O, Gokcelik A, Memikoglu TU (2009) Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods. Eur J Orthod 31:254–259CrossRefPubMed Polat-Ozsoy O, Gokcelik A, Memikoglu TU (2009) Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods. Eur J Orthod 31:254–259CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rakosi T (1988) In: Rakosi T (ed) Atlas und Anleitung zur praktischen Fernröntgenanalyse, 2nd edn. Hanser, München, Wien, p 51, 52 Rakosi T (1988) In: Rakosi T (ed) Atlas und Anleitung zur praktischen Fernröntgenanalyse, 2nd edn. Hanser, München, Wien, p 51, 52
27.
go back to reference Ricketts RM (1981) Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod 51:115–150PubMed Ricketts RM (1981) Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod 51:115–150PubMed
28.
go back to reference Roth RH (1985) Treatment mechanics for the straight wire appliance. In: Roth RH (ed) Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. Mosby, St. Louis Roth RH (1985) Treatment mechanics for the straight wire appliance. In: Roth RH (ed) Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. Mosby, St. Louis
29.
go back to reference Roth RH (1987) The straight-wire appliance. 17 years later. J Clin Orthod 21:632–642PubMed Roth RH (1987) The straight-wire appliance. 17 years later. J Clin Orthod 21:632–642PubMed
30.
go back to reference Saquib AS, Lekha K, Gauraf M (2015) Relationship between occlusal plane and three levels of ala tragus line in dentulous and partially dentulous patients in different age groups: a pilot study. J Clin Diagn Res 9:39–42CrossRef Saquib AS, Lekha K, Gauraf M (2015) Relationship between occlusal plane and three levels of ala tragus line in dentulous and partially dentulous patients in different age groups: a pilot study. J Clin Diagn Res 9:39–42CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Schudy FF (1963) Cant of the occlusal plane and axial inclinations of teeth. Angle Orthod 33:69–82 Schudy FF (1963) Cant of the occlusal plane and axial inclinations of teeth. Angle Orthod 33:69–82
32.
go back to reference Schwarz AM (1958) In: Schwarz AM (ed) Die Röntgendiagnostik. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Wien, Innsbruck, p 51, 69, 74, 88 Schwarz AM (1958) In: Schwarz AM (ed) Die Röntgendiagnostik. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Wien, Innsbruck, p 51, 69, 74, 88
33.
go back to reference Segner D (1989) Floating norms as a means to describe individual skeletal patterns. Eur J Orthod 11:214–220CrossRefPubMed Segner D (1989) Floating norms as a means to describe individual skeletal patterns. Eur J Orthod 11:214–220CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Segner D, Hasund A (1994) In: Segner D (ed) Individualisierte Kephalometrie. Segner Verlag, Hamburg, p 35, 93–95 Segner D, Hasund A (1994) In: Segner D (ed) Individualisierte Kephalometrie. Segner Verlag, Hamburg, p 35, 93–95
35.
go back to reference Schopf P (2008) In: Schopf P (ed) Curriculum Kieferorthopädie, 4th edn. Quintessenz, Berlin, Chicago, Tokio, Barcelona, Istanbul, London, Mailand, Moskau, Neu-Delhi, Paris, Peking, pp 74–80 Schopf P (2008) In: Schopf P (ed) Curriculum Kieferorthopädie, 4th edn. Quintessenz, Berlin, Chicago, Tokio, Barcelona, Istanbul, London, Mailand, Moskau, Neu-Delhi, Paris, Peking, pp 74–80
36.
go back to reference Steiner CC (1960) The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 46:721–735CrossRef Steiner CC (1960) The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 46:721–735CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Taylor RM (1969) Variation in form of human teeth. An anthropologic and forensic study of maxillary incisors. J Dent Res 48:5–16CrossRefPubMed Taylor RM (1969) Variation in form of human teeth. An anthropologic and forensic study of maxillary incisors. J Dent Res 48:5–16CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Tweed CH (1953) Evolutionary trends in orthodontics, past, present and future. Am J Orthod 39:81–108CrossRef Tweed CH (1953) Evolutionary trends in orthodontics, past, present and future. Am J Orthod 39:81–108CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Tweed CH (1954) The Frankfort-Mandibular incisal angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 24:121–169 Tweed CH (1954) The Frankfort-Mandibular incisal angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 24:121–169
40.
go back to reference Woelfel JB (1990) In: Woelfel JB (ed) Dental anatomy: its relevance to dentistry, 4th edn. Verlag Lea und Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 54–56 Woelfel JB (1990) In: Woelfel JB (ed) Dental anatomy: its relevance to dentistry, 4th edn. Verlag Lea und Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 54–56
Metadata
Title
Coordinating bracket torque and incisor inclination
Part 1: The development of widely applicable equations
Authors
Bernd Zimmer
Hiba Sino
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-018-0129-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2018 Go to the issue

Mitteilungen DGKFO

Mitteilungen DGKFO