Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 5/2016

01-09-2016 | Original Article

Landmarks of the Frankfort horizontal plane

Reliability in a three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system

Authors: Elisabeth Hofmann, Rolf Fimmers, Matthias Schmid, Ursula Hirschfelder, Andreas Detterbeck, Klaus Hertrich

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The goal was to investigate whether the three-dimensional (3D) reliability of the landmarks defining the Frankfort horizontal plane (FH) can be enhanced by reducing variance with the help of nearby anatomical structures.

Methods

Twenty multislice computed tomography (MSCT) datasets of evidently symmetrical patients (11 female and 9 male patients, 6.1–16 years old) were selected from 695 datasets archived at our department. In the 3D reconstructions, we located the anthropometric landmarks orbitale and porion, then these were modified with the help of frontomalare temporale, radiculare and the most anterior border of the left and right external acoustic pore. The resultant orbitale* and porion* reference points for the Frankfort horizontal plane were then compared to the original landmarks. Statistical analysis was performed.

Results

The superior reliability in the sagittal y-axis and in the transversal x-axis of the new reference points was confirmed. Based on the covariance matrices, the mean maximum standard deviation (square root of the maximum eigenvalue) in the direction of maximum variance was reduced from 0.77/0.94 mm to 0.47/0.48 mm for left/right orbitale, and similar reductions from 0.85/0.92 mm to 0.29/0.30 mm were noted for left/right porion (p < 0.001 for all four points). Vertical reliability did not improve further.

Conclusions

The modifications significantly reduced the variance of the orbitale and porion landmarks, thus, clearly increasing the three-dimensional reliability. Hence these optimized reference points are better suited to construct the FH, which arguably is an important spatial reference plane in orthodontics.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baumrind S, Frantz RC (1971) The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 60(2):111–127CrossRefPubMed Baumrind S, Frantz RC (1971) The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 60(2):111–127CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bewersdorf A (1995) Zur Reproduzierbarkeit dreidimensionaler kephalometrischer Messungen mit dem Digigraph. med. Diss Bewersdorf A (1995) Zur Reproduzierbarkeit dreidimensionaler kephalometrischer Messungen mit dem Digigraph. med. Diss
3.
go back to reference Boldt F, Weinzierl C, Hertrich K, Hirschfelder U (2009) Comparison of the spatial landmark scatter of various 3D digitalization methods. J Orofac Orthop 70(3):247–263CrossRefPubMed Boldt F, Weinzierl C, Hertrich K, Hirschfelder U (2009) Comparison of the spatial landmark scatter of various 3D digitalization methods. J Orofac Orthop 70(3):247–263CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Damstra J, Fourie Z, De Wit M, Ren Y (2012) A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry. Clin Oral Investig 16(1):285–294CrossRefPubMed Damstra J, Fourie Z, De Wit M, Ren Y (2012) A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry. Clin Oral Investig 16(1):285–294CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference De Coster L (1939) The network method in orthodontic diagnosis. Angle Orthod 9(1):3–14 De Coster L (1939) The network method in orthodontic diagnosis. Angle Orthod 9(1):3–14
6.
go back to reference De Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C et al (2009) Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107:256–265CrossRefPubMed De Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C et al (2009) Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107:256–265CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dürer A (1528) Hierin sind begriffen vier Bücher von menschlicher Proportion. Neudruck der Ausgabe Nürnberg 1528, dritte Auflage, Verlag Dr. Alfons Uhl, Nördlingen 1996 Dürer A (1528) Hierin sind begriffen vier Bücher von menschlicher Proportion. Neudruck der Ausgabe Nürnberg 1528, dritte Auflage, Verlag Dr. Alfons Uhl, Nördlingen 1996
8.
go back to reference Fahrmeir L, Hamerle A, Tut G (1996) Multivariate statistische Verfahren (2. Walter de Gruyter, Auflage) Fahrmeir L, Hamerle A, Tut G (1996) Multivariate statistische Verfahren (2. Walter de Gruyter, Auflage)
9.
go back to reference Faure J, Rieffe C, Maltha J (2002) The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 24:1–7CrossRefPubMed Faure J, Rieffe C, Maltha J (2002) The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 24:1–7CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hildebolt C, Vannier M, Knapp R (1990) Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol 82(3):283–294CrossRefPubMed Hildebolt C, Vannier M, Knapp R (1990) Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol 82(3):283–294CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M et al (2005) 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 99(2):212–220CrossRefPubMed Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M et al (2005) 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 99(2):212–220CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kirschneck C, Proff P, Fanghaenel J et al (2013) Differential analysis of orthodontic tooth movement in rats with an improved rat model and three-dimensional imaging. Ann Anat 195(6):539–553CrossRefPubMed Kirschneck C, Proff P, Fanghaenel J et al (2013) Differential analysis of orthodontic tooth movement in rats with an improved rat model and three-dimensional imaging. Ann Anat 195(6):539–553CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kollmann J, Ranke J, Virchow R (1884) Verständigung über ein gemeinsames craniometrisches Verfahren. Archiv der Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte—Zeitschrift für Naturgeschichte und Urgeschichte des Menschen, Band 15, erstes und zweites Vierteljahresheft, pp 1–8 Kollmann J, Ranke J, Virchow R (1884) Verständigung über ein gemeinsames craniometrisches Verfahren. Archiv der Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte—Zeitschrift für Naturgeschichte und Urgeschichte des Menschen, Band 15, erstes und zweites Vierteljahresheft, pp 1–8
16.
go back to reference Kusnoto B, Evans C, BeGole E, de Rijk W (1999) Assessment of 3-dimensional computer-generated cephalometric measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116(4):390–399CrossRefPubMed Kusnoto B, Evans C, BeGole E, de Rijk W (1999) Assessment of 3-dimensional computer-generated cephalometric measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116(4):390–399CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Macri V, Wenzel A (1993) Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms. Eur J Orthod 15(2):137–148CrossRefPubMed Macri V, Wenzel A (1993) Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms. Eur J Orthod 15(2):137–148CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Martin R, Saller K (1957) Lehrbuch der. Anthropologie. 1(3):433–476 (Gustav Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart) Martin R, Saller K (1957) Lehrbuch der. Anthropologie. 1(3):433–476 (Gustav Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart)
19.
go back to reference Medelnik J, Hertrich K, Steinhäuser-Andresen S et al (2011) Accuracy of anatomical landmark identification using different CBCT- and MSCT-based 3D images: an in vitro study. J Orofac Orthop 72(4):261–278CrossRefPubMed Medelnik J, Hertrich K, Steinhäuser-Andresen S et al (2011) Accuracy of anatomical landmark identification using different CBCT- and MSCT-based 3D images: an in vitro study. J Orofac Orthop 72(4):261–278CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Meijer MC (1999) Race and aesthetics in the anthropology of Petrus Camper (1722–1789). Rodopi, Amsterdam Meijer MC (1999) Race and aesthetics in the anthropology of Petrus Camper (1722–1789). Rodopi, Amsterdam
21.
22.
go back to reference Richardson A (1966) An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes, and lines used in cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod 52(9):637–651CrossRefPubMed Richardson A (1966) An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes, and lines used in cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod 52(9):637–651CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ricketts RM (1975) New perspectives on orientation and their benefits to clinical orthodontics—part I. Angle Orthod 45(4):238–248PubMed Ricketts RM (1975) New perspectives on orientation and their benefits to clinical orthodontics—part I. Angle Orthod 45(4):238–248PubMed
24.
go back to reference Schiller PJ (2012) Ein neues Koordinatensystem auf Basis der Frankfurter Horizontalen und Crista galli zur computertomographischen Analyse von Unterkieferasymmetrien—eine Vergleichsstudie. med Diss, Erlangen Schiller PJ (2012) Ein neues Koordinatensystem auf Basis der Frankfurter Horizontalen und Crista galli zur computertomographischen Analyse von Unterkieferasymmetrien—eine Vergleichsstudie. med Diss, Erlangen
25.
go back to reference Schwarz AM (1961) Lehrgang der Gebissregelung Band 1, 3. Auflage, Urban und Schwarzenberg, Wien-Innsbruck, pp 278–295 Schwarz AM (1961) Lehrgang der Gebissregelung Band 1, 3. Auflage, Urban und Schwarzenberg, Wien-Innsbruck, pp 278–295
26.
go back to reference Titiz I, Laubinger M, Keller T et al (2011) Repeatability and reproducibility of landmarks—a three-dimensional computed tomography study. Eur J Orthod 34(3):267–286 Titiz I, Laubinger M, Keller T et al (2011) Repeatability and reproducibility of landmarks—a three-dimensional computed tomography study. Eur J Orthod 34(3):267–286
27.
go back to reference Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N, Nebbe B (1997) Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 112:165–170CrossRef Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N, Nebbe B (1997) Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 112:165–170CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tymofiyeva O, Rottner K, Jakob PM et al (2010) Three-dimensional localization of impacted teeth using magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Oral Investig 14(2):169–176CrossRefPubMed Tymofiyeva O, Rottner K, Jakob PM et al (2010) Three-dimensional localization of impacted teeth using magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Oral Investig 14(2):169–176CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Tweed CH (1946) The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 32(4):175–230CrossRefPubMed Tweed CH (1946) The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 32(4):175–230CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Landmarks of the Frankfort horizontal plane
Reliability in a three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system
Authors
Elisabeth Hofmann
Rolf Fimmers
Matthias Schmid
Ursula Hirschfelder
Andreas Detterbeck
Klaus Hertrich
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0045-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 5/2016 Go to the issue