Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2015

01-11-2015 | Original article

Identification of a stable reference area for superimposing mandibular digital models

Authors: K. An, I. Jang, D.-S. Choi, P.-G. Jost-Brinkmann, Prof. Dr. B.-K. Cha

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the stability of buccal and lingual alveolar bone surfaces for superimposing three-dimensional (3D) digital models of dental casts.

Materials and methods

The pre- and posttreatment dental casts and lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained from 10 adult patients who had undergone orthodontic treatment entailing the extraction of four premolars. Five of them had bilateral mandibular tori and the other 5 patients had no torus. Dental casts were scanned with a three-dimensional (3D) surface scanning system and 3D digital models were reconstructed using 3D reverse modeling software. The pre- and posttreatment digital models were superimposed on the following reference areas by the best-fit method: Area 1, bilateral lingual surfaces of the alveolar process of the posterior teeth; Area 2, the lingual alveolar surface of the anterior and posterior teeth; Area 3, bilateral surfaces of the posterior teeth’s buccal and lingual alveolar surfaces; Area 4, bilateral mandibular tori. The horizontal and vertical movements of the mandibular central incisors and first molars were measured on cephalometric radiographs and on the 3D digital models.

Results

In the 5 patients without a mandibular torus, the median differences between cephalograms and 3D digital models ranged from 0.8–1.9 mm and the maximum differences from 1.5–10.0 mm. The median and maximum differences between cephalograms and 3D digital models superimposed on Area 2 were greater than those superimposed on Areas 1 and 3. In the patients with mandibular tori, the median differences between cephalograms and 3D digital models were under 1.0 mm, the maximum difference being 0.7 mm.

Conclusion

The buccal and lingual alveolar surface near the dentition seems to be inappropriate as a reference area for superimposing 3D mandibular digital models of patients without a mandibular torus. Mandibular tori in adult patients are stable structures which can be used as reference areas for the superimposition of 3D mandibular digital models.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Almeida MA, Phillips C, Kula K et al (1995) Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts. Angle Orthod 65:43–48PubMed Almeida MA, Phillips C, Kula K et al (1995) Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts. Angle Orthod 65:43–48PubMed
2.
go back to reference Ashmore JL, Kurland BF, King GJ et al (2002) A 3-dimensional analysis of molar movement during headgear treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:18–29CrossRefPubMed Ashmore JL, Kurland BF, King GJ et al (2002) A 3-dimensional analysis of molar movement during headgear treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:18–29CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bailey LTJ, Esmailnejad A, Almeida MA (1996) Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts in extraction and nonextraction cases. Angle Orthod 66:73–78PubMed Bailey LTJ, Esmailnejad A, Almeida MA (1996) Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts in extraction and nonextraction cases. Angle Orthod 66:73–78PubMed
4.
go back to reference Björk A, Skieller V (1972) Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod 62:339–383CrossRefPubMed Björk A, Skieller V (1972) Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod 62:339–383CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Björk A, Skieller V (1983) Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 5:1–46CrossRefPubMed Björk A, Skieller V (1983) Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 5:1–46CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cha BK, Lee JY, Jost-Brinkmann P-G et al (2007) Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology. Eur J Orthod 29:325–331CrossRefPubMed Cha BK, Lee JY, Jost-Brinkmann P-G et al (2007) Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology. Eur J Orthod 29:325–331CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Choi JI, Cha BK, Jost-Brinkmann P-G et al (2012) Validity of palatal superimposition of 3-dimensional digital models in cases treated with rapid maxillary expansion and maxillary protraction headgear. Korean J Orthod 42:235–241PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Choi JI, Cha BK, Jost-Brinkmann P-G et al (2012) Validity of palatal superimposition of 3-dimensional digital models in cases treated with rapid maxillary expansion and maxillary protraction headgear. Korean J Orthod 42:235–241PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Choi DS, Jeong YM, Jang I et al (2010) Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models. Angle Orthod 80:497–503PubMed Choi DS, Jeong YM, Jang I et al (2010) Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models. Angle Orthod 80:497–503PubMed
9.
go back to reference Gardner SD, Chaconas SJ (1976) Posttreatment and postretention changes following orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod 46:151–161PubMed Gardner SD, Chaconas SJ (1976) Posttreatment and postretention changes following orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod 46:151–161PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hooton EA (1918) On certain Eskimoid characters in Icelandic skulls. Am J Phys Anthropol 1:53–76CrossRef Hooton EA (1918) On certain Eskimoid characters in Icelandic skulls. Am J Phys Anthropol 1:53–76CrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference Hrdlicka A (1940) Mandibular and maxillary hyperostoses. Am J Phys Anthropol 27:1–67CrossRef Hrdlicka A (1940) Mandibular and maxillary hyperostoses. Am J Phys Anthropol 27:1–67CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jang I, Tanaka M, Koga Y et al (2009) A novel method for the assessment of three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 79:447–453CrossRefPubMed Jang I, Tanaka M, Koga Y et al (2009) A novel method for the assessment of three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 79:447–453CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kim BM, Lee SH (1990) Statistical study of torus palatinus and torus mandibularis in 1758 dental patients. J Kyungpook Univ Sch Dent 7:85–94 Kim BM, Lee SH (1990) Statistical study of torus palatinus and torus mandibularis in 1758 dental patients. J Kyungpook Univ Sch Dent 7:85–94
15.
go back to reference Lucien De Coster B (1953) A new line of reference for the study of lateral facial teleradiographs. Am J Orthod 39:304–306CrossRef Lucien De Coster B (1953) A new line of reference for the study of lateral facial teleradiographs. Am J Orthod 39:304–306CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LE (1993) The effects of premolar-extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in “clear-cut” extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod 63:257–272PubMed Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LE (1993) The effects of premolar-extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in “clear-cut” extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod 63:257–272PubMed
17.
go back to reference Mulie RM, Hoeve AT (1976) The limitations of tooth movement within the symphysis, studied with laminagraphy and standardized occlusal films. J Clin Orthod 10:882–893PubMed Mulie RM, Hoeve AT (1976) The limitations of tooth movement within the symphysis, studied with laminagraphy and standardized occlusal films. J Clin Orthod 10:882–893PubMed
18.
go back to reference Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE (2009) Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, 3. Aufl. Saunders Elsevier, St. Louis Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE (2009) Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, 3. Aufl. Saunders Elsevier, St. Louis
19.
go back to reference Pancherz H (1982) The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 82:104–113CrossRefPubMed Pancherz H (1982) The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 82:104–113CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N et al (1997) Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:165–170CrossRefPubMed Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N et al (1997) Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:165–170CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wehrbein H, Bauer W, Diedrich P (1996) Mandibular incisors, alveolar bone, and symphysis after orthodontic treatment. A retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110:239–246CrossRefPubMed Wehrbein H, Bauer W, Diedrich P (1996) Mandibular incisors, alveolar bone, and symphysis after orthodontic treatment. A retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110:239–246CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Identification of a stable reference area for superimposing mandibular digital models
Authors
K. An
I. Jang
D.-S. Choi
P.-G. Jost-Brinkmann
Prof. Dr. B.-K. Cha
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-015-0310-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2015 Go to the issue