Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2/2015

01-03-2015 | Original article

Effect of archwire qualities and bracket designs on the force systems during leveling of malaligned teeth

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The force systems during multiband treatment are influenced by the selection of the bracket–archwire combinations. Resin models replicated from casts reflecting the pretreatment intraoral situation of a patient’s mandible were used to explore how different bracket systems and archwire qualities would affect the force systems developing during simulated orthodontic leveling of several malaligned teeth.

Materials and methods

Leveling movements of the malaligned teeth 32, 33, and 34 were simulated using the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS). Two bracket types and three archwire qualities were compared, the former featuring a slot width of 0.022” (0.56 mm) and including one conventional (Freedom MIM Roth by ODS) and one passive self-ligating (Carriere MBT by ODS) design. Both were combined with three NiTi round 0.014” (0.36 mm) archwire products, two of them standard products (CuNiTi by Ormco; EuroArch by ODS) and one being a low-cost (NiTi Superelastic by Modern Arch) product. Measured parameters included force, torque, translation, and rotation.

Results

Archwire qualities are critical to the force systems developing in the leveling stage. On the other hand, the finding that lower force/torque values result in less tooth movement is not primarily due to wire selection. Our most striking result was that the ODS EuroArch wire resulted in very low force and torque values both with the conventional and with the self-ligating brackets. Almost identical patterns with these two bracket designs were found, and none of the measured parameters revealed a significant advantage for any of the bracket–archwire combinations over the others.

Conclusion

In our experimental simulations of tooth leveling, wire-quality selection was found to be a key modifier of force, torque, translation, and rotation. Clearly, however, neither the wire qualities nor the bracket designs made a decisive difference to the amounts of leveling movement induced to malaligned teeth; other factors like tooth class or nature of the malalignment seem to be more important in this regard. A therapeutic benefit of self-ligating over conventional brackets was not demonstrable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bantleon HP, Droschel H (1988) Fronttorque mithilfe der Teilbogentechnik. Fortschr Kieferorthop 49:203–212CrossRefPubMed Bantleon HP, Droschel H (1988) Fronttorque mithilfe der Teilbogentechnik. Fortschr Kieferorthop 49:203–212CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Berger JL (1990) The influence of the SPEED bracket’s self-ligating design on force levels in tooth movement: a comparative in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97:219–228CrossRefPubMed Berger JL (1990) The influence of the SPEED bracket’s self-ligating design on force levels in tooth movement: a comparative in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97:219–228CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bourauel C, Drescher D, Thier M (1992) An experimental apparatus for the simulation of three-dimensional movements in orthodontics. J Biomed Eng 14:371–378CrossRefPubMed Bourauel C, Drescher D, Thier M (1992) An experimental apparatus for the simulation of three-dimensional movements in orthodontics. J Biomed Eng 14:371–378CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bourauel C, Drescher D, Nolte LP (1993) Computergestützte Entwicklung kieferorthopädischer Behandlungselemente aus NiTi-Memory-Legierungen am Beispiel einer pseudoelastischen Retraktionsfeder. Fortschr Kieferorthop 54:45–56CrossRefPubMed Bourauel C, Drescher D, Nolte LP (1993) Computergestützte Entwicklung kieferorthopädischer Behandlungselemente aus NiTi-Memory-Legierungen am Beispiel einer pseudoelastischen Retraktionsfeder. Fortschr Kieferorthop 54:45–56CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bourauel C, Drescher D, Ebling J et al (1997) Superelastic nickel titanium alloy retraction springs—an experimental investigation of force systems. Eur J Orthod 19:491–500CrossRefPubMed Bourauel C, Drescher D, Ebling J et al (1997) Superelastic nickel titanium alloy retraction springs—an experimental investigation of force systems. Eur J Orthod 19:491–500CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Burstone CJ, Pryputniewicz RJ (1980) Holographic determination of centers of rotation produced by orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod 77:396–409CrossRefPubMed Burstone CJ, Pryputniewicz RJ (1980) Holographic determination of centers of rotation produced by orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod 77:396–409CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Diedrich P (2000) Praxis der Zahnheilkunde − Kieferorthopädie, Bd II. Urban und Fischer, München Jena, S 87–88 Diedrich P (2000) Praxis der Zahnheilkunde − Kieferorthopädie, Bd II. Urban und Fischer, München Jena, S 87–88
8.
go back to reference Drescher D, Bourauel C, Schumacher HA (1989) Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 96:397–404CrossRef Drescher D, Bourauel C, Schumacher HA (1989) Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 96:397–404CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Drescher D, Bourauel C, Thier M (1991) Orthodontisches Meß- und Simulations-system (OMSS) für die statische und dynamische Analyse der Zahnbewegung. Fortschr Kieferorthop 52:133–140CrossRefPubMed Drescher D, Bourauel C, Thier M (1991) Orthodontisches Meß- und Simulations-system (OMSS) für die statische und dynamische Analyse der Zahnbewegung. Fortschr Kieferorthop 52:133–140CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Drescher D, Bourauel C, Thier M (1992) Eine Pseudoelastische NiTi-Aufrichtefeder für Molaren-Entwurf, biomechanische Prüfung und klinische Anwendung. Fortschr Kieferorthop 53:286–296CrossRefPubMed Drescher D, Bourauel C, Thier M (1992) Eine Pseudoelastische NiTi-Aufrichtefeder für Molaren-Entwurf, biomechanische Prüfung und klinische Anwendung. Fortschr Kieferorthop 53:286–296CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fansa M (2009) Nivellierungseffektivität von selbstligierenden und konventionellen Brackets bei kombinierter Zahnfehlstellung. Med Dissertation, Universität Bonn Fansa M (2009) Nivellierungseffektivität von selbstligierenden und konventionellen Brackets bei kombinierter Zahnfehlstellung. Med Dissertation, Universität Bonn
12.
go back to reference Fuck LM, Wiechmann D, Drescher D (2006) Initiale Kraftsysteme in der Anfangsphase der orthodontischen Therapie- ein Vergleich unterschiedlicher Nivellierungsbögen. Fortschr Kieferorthop 67:6–18CrossRef Fuck LM, Wiechmann D, Drescher D (2006) Initiale Kraftsysteme in der Anfangsphase der orthodontischen Therapie- ein Vergleich unterschiedlicher Nivellierungsbögen. Fortschr Kieferorthop 67:6–18CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gabersek G (2007) Kraftsysteme in Abhängigkeit von der Zahnfehlstellung-Nivellierungsbögen im Vergleich. Dissertation, Universität Düsseldorf Gabersek G (2007) Kraftsysteme in Abhängigkeit von der Zahnfehlstellung-Nivellierungsbögen im Vergleich. Dissertation, Universität Düsseldorf
14.
16.
go back to reference Jones ML, Staniford H, Chan C (1990) Comparison of superelastic NiTi and multi-stranded stainless steel wires in initial alignment. J Clin Orthod 24:611–613PubMed Jones ML, Staniford H, Chan C (1990) Comparison of superelastic NiTi and multi-stranded stainless steel wires in initial alignment. J Clin Orthod 24:611–613PubMed
17.
go back to reference Kahl-Nieke B (2009) Einführung in die Kieferorthopädie: Diagnostik, Behandlungsplanung, Therapie. Deutscher Ärzte Verlag, Köln, S 181–186 Kahl-Nieke B (2009) Einführung in die Kieferorthopädie: Diagnostik, Behandlungsplanung, Therapie. Deutscher Ärzte Verlag, Köln, S 181–186
18.
go back to reference Kurol J, Owmann-Moll P (1998) Hyalinization and root resorption during early orthodontic tooth movement in adolescents. Angle Orthod 68:161–166PubMed Kurol J, Owmann-Moll P (1998) Hyalinization and root resorption during early orthodontic tooth movement in adolescents. Angle Orthod 68:161–166PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kusy RP, Stevens LE (1987) Triple-stranded stainless steel wires—evaluation of mechanical properties and comparison with titanium alloy alternatives. Angle Orthod 57:18–32PubMed Kusy RP, Stevens LE (1987) Triple-stranded stainless steel wires—evaluation of mechanical properties and comparison with titanium alloy alternatives. Angle Orthod 57:18–32PubMed
20.
go back to reference Linge L, Dahm S (1994) Praktische Aspekte von superelastischen Drahtbögen in der Edgewisetechnik. Fortschr Kieferorthop 55:324–329CrossRefPubMed Linge L, Dahm S (1994) Praktische Aspekte von superelastischen Drahtbögen in der Edgewisetechnik. Fortschr Kieferorthop 55:324–329CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Maijer R, Smith DC (1990) Time savings with self-ligating brackets. J Clin Orthod 24:29–31PubMed Maijer R, Smith DC (1990) Time savings with self-ligating brackets. J Clin Orthod 24:29–31PubMed
22.
go back to reference Matarese G, Nucera R, Militi A et al (2008) Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: An experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:708–715CrossRefPubMed Matarese G, Nucera R, Militi A et al (2008) Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: An experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:708–715CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Miura F, Mogi M, Ohura Y, Hamanaka H (1986) The super-elastic property of Japanese NiTi alloy wire for use in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 90:1–10CrossRefPubMed Miura F, Mogi M, Ohura Y, Hamanaka H (1986) The super-elastic property of Japanese NiTi alloy wire for use in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 90:1–10CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Mohlin B, Müller H, Ödman J, Thilander B (1991) Examination of Chinese NiTi wire by a combined clinical and laboratory approach. Eur J Orthod 13:386–391CrossRefPubMed Mohlin B, Müller H, Ödman J, Thilander B (1991) Examination of Chinese NiTi wire by a combined clinical and laboratory approach. Eur J Orthod 13:386–391CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Morina E, Keilig L, Jäger A, Bourauel C (2009) Analyse des biomechanischen Verhaltens von kieferorthopädischen Brackets mit unterschiedlichen Verschlussmechanismen. Biomed Tech 54:89–97CrossRef Morina E, Keilig L, Jäger A, Bourauel C (2009) Analyse des biomechanischen Verhaltens von kieferorthopädischen Brackets mit unterschiedlichen Verschlussmechanismen. Biomed Tech 54:89–97CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Pandis N, Eliades T, Partowi S, Bourauel C (2008) Forces exerted by conventional and self-ligating brackets during simulated first- and second-order corrections. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:738–742CrossRefPubMed Pandis N, Eliades T, Partowi S, Bourauel C (2008) Forces exerted by conventional and self-ligating brackets during simulated first- and second-order corrections. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:738–742CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Pandis N, Eliades T, Bourauel C (2009) Comparative assessment of forces generated during simulated alignment with self-ligating and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod 31:590–595CrossRefPubMed Pandis N, Eliades T, Bourauel C (2009) Comparative assessment of forces generated during simulated alignment with self-ligating and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod 31:590–595CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Pedersen E, Andersen K, Gjessing PE (1990) Electronic determination of centres of rotation produced by orthodontic force systems. Eur J Orthod 12:272–280CrossRefPubMed Pedersen E, Andersen K, Gjessing PE (1990) Electronic determination of centres of rotation produced by orthodontic force systems. Eur J Orthod 12:272–280CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Pizzoni L, Ravnholt G, Melsen B (1998) Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod 20:283–291CrossRefPubMed Pizzoni L, Ravnholt G, Melsen B (1998) Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod 20:283–291CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Read-Ward GE, Jones SP, Davies EH (1997) A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. Br J Orthod 24:309–317CrossRefPubMed Read-Ward GE, Jones SP, Davies EH (1997) A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. Br J Orthod 24:309–317CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Reitan K (1957) Some factors determining the evaluation of forces in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 43:32–46CrossRef Reitan K (1957) Some factors determining the evaluation of forces in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 43:32–46CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Rucker BK, Kusy RP (2002) Elastic flexural properties of multistranded stainless steel versus conventional nickel titanium archwires. Angle Orthod 72:302–309PubMed Rucker BK, Kusy RP (2002) Elastic flexural properties of multistranded stainless steel versus conventional nickel titanium archwires. Angle Orthod 72:302–309PubMed
33.
go back to reference Schumacher HA, Bourauel C, Drescher D (1991) Bogengeführte Zahnbewegung-Dynamik, Effektivität und Nebenwirkung. Fortschr Kieferorthop 52:141–152CrossRefPubMed Schumacher HA, Bourauel C, Drescher D (1991) Bogengeführte Zahnbewegung-Dynamik, Effektivität und Nebenwirkung. Fortschr Kieferorthop 52:141–152CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Schumacher HA, Bourauel C, Drescher D (1992) Deaktivierungsverhalten und Effektivität verschiedener orthodontischer Nivellierungsbögen- eine dynamische Analyse der Kraftsysteme. Fortschr Kieferorthop 53:273–285CrossRefPubMed Schumacher HA, Bourauel C, Drescher D (1992) Deaktivierungsverhalten und Effektivität verschiedener orthodontischer Nivellierungsbögen- eine dynamische Analyse der Kraftsysteme. Fortschr Kieferorthop 53:273–285CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Shivapuja PK, Berger J (1994) A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106:472–480CrossRefPubMed Shivapuja PK, Berger J (1994) A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106:472–480CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Sims APT, Waters NE, Birnie DJ, Pethybridget RJ (1993) A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation. Eur J Orthod 15:377–385CrossRefPubMed Sims APT, Waters NE, Birnie DJ, Pethybridget RJ (1993) A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation. Eur J Orthod 15:377–385CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Stolzenberg J (1935) The Russell attachment and its improved advantages. Int J Orthod 19:837–840 Stolzenberg J (1935) The Russell attachment and its improved advantages. Int J Orthod 19:837–840
38.
go back to reference Thorstenson BS, Kusy RP (2001) Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 120:361–370CrossRefPubMed Thorstenson BS, Kusy RP (2001) Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 120:361–370CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Thorstenson BS, Kusy RP (2002) Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:472–448CrossRefPubMed Thorstenson BS, Kusy RP (2002) Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:472–448CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Voudouris JC (1997) Interactive edgewise mechanisms: form and function comparison with conventional edgewise brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111:119–140CrossRefPubMed Voudouris JC (1997) Interactive edgewise mechanisms: form and function comparison with conventional edgewise brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111:119–140CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Voudouris JC, Kuftinec MM et al (2003) Selbstligierende Twin-Brackets (Teil I)—Ist weniger mehr? Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 35:13–18CrossRef Voudouris JC, Kuftinec MM et al (2003) Selbstligierende Twin-Brackets (Teil I)—Ist weniger mehr? Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 35:13–18CrossRef
43.
go back to reference West AE, Jones ML, Newcombe RG (1995) Multiflex versus superelastic: a randomized clinical trial of the tooth alignment ability of initial arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108:464–471CrossRefPubMed West AE, Jones ML, Newcombe RG (1995) Multiflex versus superelastic: a randomized clinical trial of the tooth alignment ability of initial arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108:464–471CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Yee JA, Türk T, Elekdag-Türk S et al (2009) Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:150.e1–150.e9CrossRefPubMed Yee JA, Türk T, Elekdag-Türk S et al (2009) Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:150.e1–150.e9CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of archwire qualities and bracket designs on the force systems during leveling of malaligned teeth
Publication date
01-03-2015
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-014-0276-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2/2015 Go to the issue

Informationen

Mitteilungsseiten