Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2014

01-07-2014 | Original article

Combined fixed–functional treatment of skeletal class II malocclusions with the EVAA appliance

A preliminary study

Authors: Dr. F. Deniz Uzuner, N. Darendeliler, E. Yucel

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the skeletal and dental effects of the EVAA appliance with those of an activator appliance in growing children with skeletal Class II anomalies.

Materials and methods

A total of 34 subjects with Class II anomalies were recruited for this study. They were divided into three groups: the EVAA group (n=13; mean chronological age: 11 years 9 months), activator group (n=13; mean chronological age: 11 years 8 months) and control group (n=8; mean chronological age: 10 years 8 months). Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken at the beginning and end of functional therapy. Fixed orthodontic treatment was completed in the EVAA group. A statistical software program (SPSS 18) was used for one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons with the Duncan test.

Results

We observed a significant decrease in the ANB, convexity, and 1┴NA (°), while a significant increase appeared in upper anterior facial height, posterior facial height, 1┴NB (mm), SN-lower occlusal plane values in the EVAA and activator groups after treatment (p<0.05). No significant difference in study parameters in the control group during the treatment period except for the increase in SNA and 1┴NA (mm) values (p<0.05) were observed. There were no significant differences between EVAA and activator treatment groups in terms of study parameters except for the articular angle, which was significantly higher in the EVAA group after therapy (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The effects of EVAA appliances were similar to those of activator treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blackwood HO (1991) Clinical management of the Jasper Jumper. J Clin Orthod 25:755–760PubMed Blackwood HO (1991) Clinical management of the Jasper Jumper. J Clin Orthod 25:755–760PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bishara SE, Ziaga RR (1989) Functional appliances: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 95:250–258PubMedCrossRef Bishara SE, Ziaga RR (1989) Functional appliances: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 95:250–258PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Courtney M, Harkness M, Herbison P (1996) Maxillary and cranial base changes during treatment with functional appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109:616–624PubMedCrossRef Courtney M, Harkness M, Herbison P (1996) Maxillary and cranial base changes during treatment with functional appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109:616–624PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Creekmore TD, Radney LJ (1983) Frankel appliance therapy: orthopedic or orthodontic. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 83:89–108CrossRef Creekmore TD, Radney LJ (1983) Frankel appliance therapy: orthopedic or orthodontic. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 83:89–108CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cura N, Saraç M, Öztürk Y, Sürmeli N (1996) Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination and Bass appliances: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110:36–45PubMedCrossRef Cura N, Saraç M, Öztürk Y, Sürmeli N (1996) Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination and Bass appliances: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110:36–45PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Eroğlu E, Darendeliler N, Uzuner D (1998) Simultaneous fixed and functional treatment of skeletal class 2 malocclusion with EVAA appliance. Turk Ortodonti Dergisi 11:295–311 Eroğlu E, Darendeliler N, Uzuner D (1998) Simultaneous fixed and functional treatment of skeletal class 2 malocclusion with EVAA appliance. Turk Ortodonti Dergisi 11:295–311
7.
go back to reference Falck F, Frankel R (1989) Clinical relevance of step by step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Frankel appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96:333–341PubMedCrossRef Falck F, Frankel R (1989) Clinical relevance of step by step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Frankel appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96:333–341PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Franchi L, Baccetti T, Mcnamara JA (2000) Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:335–340PubMedCrossRef Franchi L, Baccetti T, Mcnamara JA (2000) Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:335–340PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gianelly A, Arena SA, Bernstein L (1984) Acomparison of class II treatment changes noted with the light wire, edgewise and Frankel appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 86:269–276CrossRef Gianelly A, Arena SA, Bernstein L (1984) Acomparison of class II treatment changes noted with the light wire, edgewise and Frankel appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 86:269–276CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gunay EA, Arun T, Nalbantgil D (2011) Evaluation of the immediate dentofacial changes in late adolescent patients treated with the Forsus™ FRD. Eur J Dent 5:423–432PubMedCentralPubMed Gunay EA, Arun T, Nalbantgil D (2011) Evaluation of the immediate dentofacial changes in late adolescent patients treated with the Forsus™ FRD. Eur J Dent 5:423–432PubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hassel B, Farman AG (1995) Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107:58–66PubMedCrossRef Hassel B, Farman AG (1995) Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107:58–66PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jasper JJ, Mc Namara JA (1995) The correction of interarch malocclusion using a fixed force module. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108:641–650PubMedCrossRef Jasper JJ, Mc Namara JA (1995) The correction of interarch malocclusion using a fixed force module. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108:641–650PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jakobsson SO, Paulin G (1990) The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgeno cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 12:174–184PubMedCrossRef Jakobsson SO, Paulin G (1990) The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgeno cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 12:174–184PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Lange DW, Kalra V, Broadbent Jr BH et al (1995) Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the bianotor. Angle Orthod 65:423–430PubMed Lange DW, Kalra V, Broadbent Jr BH et al (1995) Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the bianotor. Angle Orthod 65:423–430PubMed
16.
go back to reference Maltagliati LA, Henriques JFC, Janson G et al (2004) Influence of orthopaedic treatment on hard and soft facial structures on individuals presenting with Class II, Div I malocclusion. A comparative study. J Appl Oral Sci 12:164–170PubMedCrossRef Maltagliati LA, Henriques JFC, Janson G et al (2004) Influence of orthopaedic treatment on hard and soft facial structures on individuals presenting with Class II, Div I malocclusion. A comparative study. J Appl Oral Sci 12:164–170PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Morris DO, Illing HM, Lee RT (1998) A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part II. The soft tissues. Eur J Orthod 20:663–684PubMedCrossRef Morris DO, Illing HM, Lee RT (1998) A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part II. The soft tissues. Eur J Orthod 20:663–684PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ngan PW, Byczek E, Scheick J (1997) Longitudinal evaluation of growth changes in Class II Division 1 subjects. Semin Orthod 3:222–231PubMedCrossRef Ngan PW, Byczek E, Scheick J (1997) Longitudinal evaluation of growth changes in Class II Division 1 subjects. Semin Orthod 3:222–231PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nielsen IL (1984) Facial growth during treatment with the function regulator appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 85:401–410CrossRef Nielsen IL (1984) Facial growth during treatment with the function regulator appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 85:401–410CrossRef
20.
go back to reference O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F et al (2003) Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:128–137CrossRef O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F et al (2003) Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:128–137CrossRef
21.
go back to reference O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F et al (2003) Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:234–243CrossRef O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F et al (2003) Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:234–243CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pancherz H (1979) Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 76:426–442 Pancherz H (1979) Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 76:426–442
23.
go back to reference Pancherz H (1984) A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 85:125–134CrossRef Pancherz H (1984) A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 85:125–134CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ruf S, Batromejus S, Pancherz H (2001) Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod 71:4–11PubMed Ruf S, Batromejus S, Pancherz H (2001) Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod 71:4–11PubMed
25.
go back to reference Shyagali TR, Bhayya DP (2010) Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect of twin block appliance in Class II div 1 malocclusion. J Int Oral Health 2:57–64 Shyagali TR, Bhayya DP (2010) Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect of twin block appliance in Class II div 1 malocclusion. J Int Oral Health 2:57–64
26.
go back to reference Türkkahraman H, Sayın MÖ (2006) Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects. Eur J Orthod 28:27–34PubMedCrossRef Türkkahraman H, Sayın MÖ (2006) Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects. Eur J Orthod 28:27–34PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Uysal T, Ramoglu SI, Basciftci FA, Sari Z (2006) Chronologic age and skeletal maturation of the cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist: Is there a relationship? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:622–628PubMedCrossRef Uysal T, Ramoglu SI, Basciftci FA, Sari Z (2006) Chronologic age and skeletal maturation of the cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist: Is there a relationship? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:622–628PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Van der Schueren GL, De Smit AA (1994) Combined fixed-functional Class II treatment case report. J Clin Orthod 28:15–20 Van der Schueren GL, De Smit AA (1994) Combined fixed-functional Class II treatment case report. J Clin Orthod 28:15–20
29.
go back to reference Weiland FJ, Ingervall B, Bantleon HP, Droschl H (1997) Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper Jumper. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:19–27PubMedCrossRef Weiland FJ, Ingervall B, Bantleon HP, Droschl H (1997) Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper Jumper. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:19–27PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Combined fixed–functional treatment of skeletal class II malocclusions with the EVAA appliance
A preliminary study
Authors
Dr. F. Deniz Uzuner
N. Darendeliler
E. Yucel
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-014-0218-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2014 Go to the issue

Informationen

Mitteilungen