Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2014

01-05-2014 | Original article

Orthofile®: a new approach for mechanical interproximal reduction

A scanning electron microscopic enamel evaluation

Authors: Dr. L. Lombardo, M.P. Guarneri, P. D’Amico, C. Molinari, V. Meddis, A. Carlucci, G. Siciliani

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the stripping achieved on different teeth (incisors, canines, and premolars) by two grades of abrasive strips used for the first and tenth time. Our second aim was to test the efficacy of these strips by calculating the time necessary to perform interproximal reductions of 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30 mm.

Methods

Four models were constructed using extracted teeth affixed in wax. The upper and lower arches were set on plaster bases and fixed in wax, carefully creating contact points. All model mouths were treated with artificial saliva (Oral Balance®) in order to simulate the biological conditions in the oral cavity. We then tested specific air-rotor strips of different grades and degrees of wear (15-µm-grain and 25-µm-grain Orthofile® strips). Afterwards the teeth from all samples were cut lengthwise in half, and each mesial and distal portion was gold-plated and observed under SEM at incremental magnification (30, 60, and 100 µm).

Results

The 25-µm-grain strip was more effective than the 15-µm-grain strip, irrespective of the tooth involved. Second, the finishing phase with specific polishing strips after interproximal reduction was fundamental in reducing the number of abrasions and irregularities created by stripping, in particular after using the 25-µm-grain strip. To achieve the best result, the entire abraded area must be polished.

Conclusion

This system permits a rapid and effective stripping procedure in direct proportion to the strip’s grain and in inverse proportion to the wear from its use. Further research will enable us to compare this system with similar procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aasen TO, Espeland L (2005) An approach to maintain orthodontic alignment of lower incisors without the use of retainers. Eur J Orthod 27:209–214PubMedCrossRef Aasen TO, Espeland L (2005) An approach to maintain orthodontic alignment of lower incisors without the use of retainers. Eur J Orthod 27:209–214PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Arends J, Christoffersen J (1986) The nature of early carious lesions in enamel. J Dent Res 65:2–11PubMedCrossRef Arends J, Christoffersen J (1986) The nature of early carious lesions in enamel. J Dent Res 65:2–11PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Arman A et al (2006) Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various stripping methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:131.e7–14PubMedCrossRef Arman A et al (2006) Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various stripping methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:131.e7–14PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Boyd RL (2008) Esthetic orthodontic treatment using the Invisalign appliance for moderate to complex malocclusions. J Dent Educ 72:948–967PubMed Boyd RL (2008) Esthetic orthodontic treatment using the Invisalign appliance for moderate to complex malocclusions. J Dent Educ 72:948–967PubMed
5.
go back to reference Chudasama D, Sheridan JJ (2007) Guidelines for contemporary air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 41:315–320PubMed Chudasama D, Sheridan JJ (2007) Guidelines for contemporary air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 41:315–320PubMed
6.
go back to reference Crain G, Sheridan JJ (1990) Susceptibility to caries and periodontal disease after posterior air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 24:84–85PubMed Crain G, Sheridan JJ (1990) Susceptibility to caries and periodontal disease after posterior air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 24:84–85PubMed
7.
go back to reference Danesh G et al (2007) Enamel surfaces following interproximal reduction with different methods. Angle Orthod 77:1004–1010PubMedCrossRef Danesh G et al (2007) Enamel surfaces following interproximal reduction with different methods. Angle Orthod 77:1004–1010PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Harfin JF de (2000) Interproximal stripping for the treatment of adult crowding. J Clin Orthod 34:424–433PubMed Harfin JF de (2000) Interproximal stripping for the treatment of adult crowding. J Clin Orthod 34:424–433PubMed
9.
go back to reference Fillion D (1993) Apport de la sculpture amélaire interproximale à l’ortodontie de l’adulte (troisième partie). Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 27:353–367CrossRef Fillion D (1993) Apport de la sculpture amélaire interproximale à l’ortodontie de l’adulte (troisième partie). Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 27:353–367CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Grippaudo C et al (2010) Comparison between different interdental stripping methods and evaluation of abrasive strips: SEM analysis. Prog Orthod 11:127–137PubMedCrossRef Grippaudo C et al (2010) Comparison between different interdental stripping methods and evaluation of abrasive strips: SEM analysis. Prog Orthod 11:127–137PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hall NE et al (2007) Predictors of variation in mandibular incisor enamel thickness. J Am Dent Assoc 138:809–815PubMedCrossRef Hall NE et al (2007) Predictors of variation in mandibular incisor enamel thickness. J Am Dent Assoc 138:809–815PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jarjoura K, Gagnon G, Nieberg L (2006) Caries risk after interproximal enamel reduction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:26–30PubMedCrossRef Jarjoura K, Gagnon G, Nieberg L (2006) Caries risk after interproximal enamel reduction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:26–30PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Joseph VP, Rossouw PE, Basson NJ (1992) Orthodontic microabrasive reproximation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102:351–359PubMedCrossRef Joseph VP, Rossouw PE, Basson NJ (1992) Orthodontic microabrasive reproximation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102:351–359PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kravitz ND et al (2008) Influence of attachments and interproximal reduction on the accuracy of canine rotation with Invisalign. A prospective clinical study. Angle Orthod 78:682–687PubMedCrossRef Kravitz ND et al (2008) Influence of attachments and interproximal reduction on the accuracy of canine rotation with Invisalign. A prospective clinical study. Angle Orthod 78:682–687PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ogaard B et al (1988) Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization, part I. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94:68–73PubMedCrossRef Ogaard B et al (1988) Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization, part I. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94:68–73PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Radlanski RJ et al (1988) Plaque accumulations caused by interdental stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94:416–420PubMedCrossRef Radlanski RJ et al (1988) Plaque accumulations caused by interdental stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94:416–420PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rossouw PE, Tortorella A (2003) A pilot investigation of enamel reduction procedures. J Can Dent Assoc 69:384–388PubMed Rossouw PE, Tortorella A (2003) A pilot investigation of enamel reduction procedures. J Can Dent Assoc 69:384–388PubMed
18.
go back to reference Rossouw PE, Tortorella A (2003) Enamel reduction procedures in orthodontic treatment. J Can Dent Assoc 69:378–383PubMed Rossouw PE, Tortorella A (2003) Enamel reduction procedures in orthodontic treatment. J Can Dent Assoc 69:378–383PubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Sheridan JJ, Ledoux PM (1989) Air-rotor stripping and proximal sealants. An SEM evaluation. J Clin Orthod 23:790–794PubMed Sheridan JJ, Ledoux PM (1989) Air-rotor stripping and proximal sealants. An SEM evaluation. J Clin Orthod 23:790–794PubMed
21.
go back to reference Sheridan JJ (2008) On air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 42:381–388PubMed Sheridan JJ (2008) On air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 42:381–388PubMed
22.
go back to reference Stroud JL, Englisch J, Buschang PH (1998) Enamel thickness of the posterior dentition: its implications for nonextraction treatment. Angle Orthod 68:141–146PubMed Stroud JL, Englisch J, Buschang PH (1998) Enamel thickness of the posterior dentition: its implications for nonextraction treatment. Angle Orthod 68:141–146PubMed
23.
go back to reference Twesme DA et al (1994) Air rotor stripping and enamel demineralization in vitro. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 105:142–152PubMedCrossRef Twesme DA et al (1994) Air rotor stripping and enamel demineralization in vitro. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 105:142–152PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Zachrisson BU (2010) Stripping. In: Rakosi T, Graber TM (eds) Orthodontic and dentofacial orthopedic treatment. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 289–312 Zachrisson BU (2010) Stripping. In: Rakosi T, Graber TM (eds) Orthodontic and dentofacial orthopedic treatment. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 289–312
26.
go back to reference Zachrisson BU et al (2011) Dental health assessed after interproximal enamel reduction: caries risk in posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:90–98PubMedCrossRef Zachrisson BU et al (2011) Dental health assessed after interproximal enamel reduction: caries risk in posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:90–98PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Zachrisson BU, Nyøygard L, Mobarak K (2007) Dental health assessed more than 10 years after interproximal enamel reduction of mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131:162–169PubMedCrossRef Zachrisson BU, Nyøygard L, Mobarak K (2007) Dental health assessed more than 10 years after interproximal enamel reduction of mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131:162–169PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Zhong M et al (2000) Clinical evaluation of a new technique for interdental enamel reduction. J Orofac Orthop 61:432–439PubMedCrossRef Zhong M et al (2000) Clinical evaluation of a new technique for interdental enamel reduction. J Orofac Orthop 61:432–439PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Zhong M et al (1999) SEM evaluation of a new technique for interdental stripping. J Clin Orthod 33:286–292PubMed Zhong M et al (1999) SEM evaluation of a new technique for interdental stripping. J Clin Orthod 33:286–292PubMed
Metadata
Title
Orthofile®: a new approach for mechanical interproximal reduction
A scanning electron microscopic enamel evaluation
Authors
Dr. L. Lombardo
M.P. Guarneri
P. D’Amico
C. Molinari
V. Meddis
A. Carlucci
G. Siciliani
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-014-0213-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2014 Go to the issue

Informationen

Mitteilungsseiten