Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2013

01-01-2013 | Original article

Precision of indirect bonding of lingual brackets using the Quick Modul System (QMS)®

Authors: Dr. K. Schubert, T. Halbich, P.-G. Jost-Brinkmann, R. Müller-Hartwich

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Almost all common laboratory procedures for lingual orthodontic appliances use indirect bonding of brackets via transfer trays. Ensuring precise transfer of these bracket positions to the oral cavity is especially important, as subsequent manual adjustments are challenging in lingual orthodontics and even minor errors of bracket placement may result in considerably deviating tooth positions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vivo the precision of indirect bonding of lingual brackets using the “Quick Modul System” (QMS®; Halbich Lingualtechnik, Berlin, Germany).

Materials and methods

The study included eight consecutive patients treated with lingual brackets. After placing the brackets on a setup cast, the resultant positions were digitized with an optical scanner (OraScanner®; OraMetrix, Richardson, TX, USA). Individual transfer copings (QMS®) were used to transfer the brackets to the mouth, followed by intraoral scanning and virtual superimposition to analyze how much the intraoral bracket positions deviated from the positions on the cast.

Results

Translational deviations added up to a mean transfer error of 0.12 mm in the mesiodistal, 0.13 mm in the orovestibular, and 0.10 mm in the vertical planes. Mean deviations in rotational directions amounted to 2.20° of inclination, 3.21° of angulation, and 2.29° of rotation.

Conclusion

The transfer system investigated in this study is capable of transferring bracket positions with good clinical precision. No differences between the bracket types and both modifications of the transfer copings were noted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aguirre MJ, King GJ, Waldron JM (1982) Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 82:269–276 Aguirre MJ, King GJ, Waldron JM (1982) Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 82:269–276
2.
go back to reference Cash AC, Good SA, Curtis RV et al (2004) An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets—are standards as expected? Angle Orthod 74:450–453PubMed Cash AC, Good SA, Curtis RV et al (2004) An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets—are standards as expected? Angle Orthod 74:450–453PubMed
3.
go back to reference Chen SY, Liang WM, Chen FN (2004) Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials. J Dent 32:603–609PubMedCrossRef Chen SY, Liang WM, Chen FN (2004) Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials. J Dent 32:603–609PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience, New York Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience, New York
6.
go back to reference Dörfer S, König M, Jost-Brinkmann P-G (2006) Übertragungsgenauigkeit beim indirekten Platzieren von Brackets. Kieferorthopädie 20:91–104 Dörfer S, König M, Jost-Brinkmann P-G (2006) Übertragungsgenauigkeit beim indirekten Platzieren von Brackets. Kieferorthopädie 20:91–104
7.
go back to reference Fritz U, Diedrich P, Wiechmann D (2002) Lingual technique—patients’ characteristics, motivation and acceptance. Interpretation of a retrospective survey. J Orofac Orthop 63:227–233PubMedCrossRef Fritz U, Diedrich P, Wiechmann D (2002) Lingual technique—patients’ characteristics, motivation and acceptance. Interpretation of a retrospective survey. J Orofac Orthop 63:227–233PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Germane N, Bentley BEJ, Isaacson RJ (1989) Three biologic variables modifying faciolingual tooth angulation by straight-wire appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96:312–319PubMedCrossRef Germane N, Bentley BEJ, Isaacson RJ (1989) Three biologic variables modifying faciolingual tooth angulation by straight-wire appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96:312–319PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gracco A, Tracey S (2011) The Insignia system of customized orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 45:442–451PubMed Gracco A, Tracey S (2011) The Insignia system of customized orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 45:442–451PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hickham JH (1993) Predictable indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod 27:215–217PubMed Hickham JH (1993) Predictable indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod 27:215–217PubMed
11.
go back to reference Hodge TM, Dhopatkar AA, Rock WP et al (2004) A randomized clinical trial comparing the accuracy of direct versus indirect bracket placement. J Orthod 31:132–137PubMedCrossRef Hodge TM, Dhopatkar AA, Rock WP et al (2004) A randomized clinical trial comparing the accuracy of direct versus indirect bracket placement. J Orthod 31:132–137PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jost-Brinkmann P-G, Gunawan A, Knieknecht A et al (2000) Bracketplatzierung mit der Slot-Machine. Kieferorthopädie 14:197–204 Jost-Brinkmann P-G, Gunawan A, Knieknecht A et al (2000) Bracketplatzierung mit der Slot-Machine. Kieferorthopädie 14:197–204
13.
go back to reference Kalange JT (1999) Ideal appliance placement with APC brackets and indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod 33:516–526PubMed Kalange JT (1999) Ideal appliance placement with APC brackets and indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod 33:516–526PubMed
14.
go back to reference Koo BC, Chung CH, Vanarsdall RL (1999) Comparison of the accuracy of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:346–351PubMedCrossRef Koo BC, Chung CH, Vanarsdall RL (1999) Comparison of the accuracy of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:346–351PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Matsuno I, Okuda S, Nodera Y (2003) The hybrid core system for indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod 37:160–161PubMed Matsuno I, Okuda S, Nodera Y (2003) The hybrid core system for indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod 37:160–161PubMed
16.
go back to reference Meier B, Wiemer KB, Miethke R-R (2003) Invisalign—patient profiling. Analysis of a prospective survey. J Orofac Orthop 64:352–358PubMedCrossRef Meier B, Wiemer KB, Miethke R-R (2003) Invisalign—patient profiling. Analysis of a prospective survey. J Orofac Orthop 64:352–358PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Meling TR, Odegaard J, Seqner D (1998) On bracket slot height: a methodologic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113:387–393PubMed Meling TR, Odegaard J, Seqner D (1998) On bracket slot height: a methodologic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113:387–393PubMed
18.
go back to reference Miethke R-R (1997) Third order tooth movements with straight wire appliances. Influence of vestibular tooth crown morphology in the vertical plane. J Orofac Orthop 58:186–197PubMedCrossRef Miethke R-R (1997) Third order tooth movements with straight wire appliances. Influence of vestibular tooth crown morphology in the vertical plane. J Orofac Orthop 58:186–197PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Moran KI (1987) Relative wire stiffness due to lingual versus labial interbracket distance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 92:24–32PubMedCrossRef Moran KI (1987) Relative wire stiffness due to lingual versus labial interbracket distance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 92:24–32PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Müller-Hartwich R, Präger TM, Jost-Brinkmann P-G (2007) SureSmile: CAD/CAM system for orthodontic treatment planning, simulation and fabrication of customized archwires. Int J Comput Dent 10:53–62PubMed Müller-Hartwich R, Präger TM, Jost-Brinkmann P-G (2007) SureSmile: CAD/CAM system for orthodontic treatment planning, simulation and fabrication of customized archwires. Int J Comput Dent 10:53–62PubMed
22.
go back to reference Nedwed V, Miethke RR (2005) Motivation, acceptance and problems of Invisalign patients. J Orofac Orthop 66:162–173PubMedCrossRef Nedwed V, Miethke RR (2005) Motivation, acceptance and problems of Invisalign patients. J Orofac Orthop 66:162–173PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pauls AH (2010) Therapeutic accuracy of individualized brackets in lingual orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop 71:348–361PubMedCrossRef Pauls AH (2010) Therapeutic accuracy of individualized brackets in lingual orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop 71:348–361PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rummel V, Wiechmann D, Sachdeva RC (1999) Precision finishing in lingual orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 33:101–113PubMed Rummel V, Wiechmann D, Sachdeva RC (1999) Precision finishing in lingual orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 33:101–113PubMed
25.
go back to reference Sachdeva R, Fruge JF, Fruge AM et al (2005) SureSmile: a report of clinical findings. J Clin Orthod 39:297–314PubMed Sachdeva R, Fruge JF, Fruge AM et al (2005) SureSmile: a report of clinical findings. J Clin Orthod 39:297–314PubMed
26.
go back to reference Scholz RP (1983) Indirect bonding revisited. J Clin Orthod 17:529–536PubMed Scholz RP (1983) Indirect bonding revisited. J Clin Orthod 17:529–536PubMed
27.
go back to reference Scuzzo G, Takemoto K (2010) Lingual Orthodontics. Quintessenz, Berlin S 15–53 Scuzzo G, Takemoto K (2010) Lingual Orthodontics. Quintessenz, Berlin S 15–53
28.
go back to reference Shpack N, Geron S, Floris I et al (2007) Bracket placement in lingual vs labial systems and direct vs indirect bonding. Angle Orthod 77:509–517PubMedCrossRef Shpack N, Geron S, Floris I et al (2007) Bracket placement in lingual vs labial systems and direct vs indirect bonding. Angle Orthod 77:509–517PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Silverman E, Cohen M (1975) A report on a major improvement in the indirect bonding technique. J Clin Orthod 9:270–276PubMed Silverman E, Cohen M (1975) A report on a major improvement in the indirect bonding technique. J Clin Orthod 9:270–276PubMed
30.
go back to reference Wendl B, Droschl H, Muchitsch P (2008) Indirect bonding: a new transfer method. Eur J Orthod 30:100–107PubMedCrossRef Wendl B, Droschl H, Muchitsch P (2008) Indirect bonding: a new transfer method. Eur J Orthod 30:100–107PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wiechmann D (1999) Lingual orthodontics (part 1): laboratory procedure. J Orofac Orthop 60:371–379PubMedCrossRef Wiechmann D (1999) Lingual orthodontics (part 1): laboratory procedure. J Orofac Orthop 60:371–379PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Wiechmann D (2000) Lingual orthodontics (part 3): intraoral sandblasting and indirect bonding. J Orofac Orthop 61:280–291PubMedCrossRef Wiechmann D (2000) Lingual orthodontics (part 3): intraoral sandblasting and indirect bonding. J Orofac Orthop 61:280–291PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Precision of indirect bonding of lingual brackets using the Quick Modul System (QMS)®
Authors
Dr. K. Schubert
T. Halbich
P.-G. Jost-Brinkmann
R. Müller-Hartwich
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-012-0122-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2013 Go to the issue

Letter to the editor

Letter to the editor

Letter to the editor

Letter to the editor