Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Public Health 3/2013

01-06-2013 | Hints & Kinks

Use of areas under the receiver operating curve (AROCs) and some caveats

Authors: B. Kowall, W. Rathmann, K. Strassburger

Published in: International Journal of Public Health | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Excerpt

Assessment of diagnostic and prognostic scores is an important public health issue, and is needed to validate the performance of scores, to find out which of several scores does best, or to assess whether a given score improves after inclusion of additional variables. To make this decision, areas under the receiver operating curves (AROCs), sometimes called c-values, are widely used. …
Literature
go back to reference Babyak MA (2004) What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosom Med 66:411–421PubMedCrossRef Babyak MA (2004) What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosom Med 66:411–421PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Greenland S (2008) The need for reorientation toward cost-effective prediction: comments on ‘Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond′ by M.J. Pencina et al., statistics in medicine. Stat Med 27:199–206. doi:10.1002/sim.2929 Greenland S (2008) The need for reorientation toward cost-effective prediction: comments on ‘Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond′ by M.J. Pencina et al., statistics in medicine. Stat Med 27:199–206. doi:10.​1002/​sim.​2929
go back to reference Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996) Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:361–387PubMedCrossRef Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996) Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:361–387PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pencina MJ, D′Agostino RB (2004) Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation. Stat Med 23:2109–2123PubMedCrossRef Pencina MJ, D′Agostino RB (2004) Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation. Stat Med 23:2109–2123PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pencina MJ, D′Agostino RB Sr, D′Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 27:157–172PubMedCrossRef Pencina MJ, D′Agostino RB Sr, D′Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 27:157–172PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rathmann W, Kowall B, Heier M et al (2010) Prediction models for incident Type 2 diabetes mellitus in the older population: KORA S4/F4 cohort study. Diabet Med 27:1116–1123PubMedCrossRef Rathmann W, Kowall B, Heier M et al (2010) Prediction models for incident Type 2 diabetes mellitus in the older population: KORA S4/F4 cohort study. Diabet Med 27:1116–1123PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Use of areas under the receiver operating curve (AROCs) and some caveats
Authors
B. Kowall
W. Rathmann
K. Strassburger
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel
Published in
International Journal of Public Health / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1661-8556
Electronic ISSN: 1661-8564
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0401-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

International Journal of Public Health 3/2013 Go to the issue