Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Sports Medicine
Published in: Sports Medicine 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Systematic Review

Effects of Psychological and Psychosocial Interventions on Sport Performance: A Meta-Analysis

Authors: Daniel J. Brown, David Fletcher

Published in: Sports Medicine | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Psychologists are increasingly supporting the quest for performance enhancement in sport and there is a need to evaluate the evidence base underpinning their work.

Objectives

To synthesize the most rigorous available research that has evaluated psychological, social, and psychosocial interventions with sport performers on variables relating to their athletic performance, and to address some of the perplexing issues in the sport psychology intervention literature (e.g., do interventions have a lasting effect on sport performance?).

Methods

Randomized controlled trials were identified through electronic databases, hand-searching volumes of pertinent journals, scrutinizing reference lists of previous reviews, and contacting experts in the evaluation of interventions in this field. Included studies were required to evaluate the effects of psychological, social, or psychosocial interventions on sport performance in athletes when compared to a no-treatment or placebo-controlled treatment comparison group. A random effects meta-analysis calculating the standardized mean difference (Hedges’ g), meta-regressions, and trim and fill analyses were conducted. Data were analyzed at post-test and follow-up (ranging from 1 to 4 weeks after the intervention finished) assessments.

Results

Psychological and psychosocial interventions were shown to enhance sport performance at post-test (k = 35, n = 997, Hedges’ g = 0.57, 95 % CI = 0.22–0.92) and follow-up assessments (k = 8, n = 189, Hedges’ g = 1.16, 95 % CI = 0.25–2.08); no social interventions were included or evaluated. Larger effects were found for psychosocial interventions and there was some evidence that effects were greatest in coach-delivered interventions and in samples with a greater proportion of male participants.

Conclusions

Psychological and psychosocial interventions have a moderate positive effect on sport performance, and this effect may last at least a month following the end of the intervention. Future research would benefit from following guidelines for intervention reporting.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
This inclusion criterion was established because sole treatments or comparisons between active treatments lack a meaningful comparison, particularly in view of the aforementioned limitations of previous reviews in this area of sport psychology research.
 
2
Hand-searched journals include: European Journal of Sport Science (2001–2015); International Journal of Applied Sport Sciences (2000–2015); International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (2003–2015); International Journal of Sport Psychology (1970–2015); Journal of Applied Sport Psychology (1989–2015); Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology (2007–2015); Journal of Sport Psychology (1979–1987) and Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (1988–2015); Journal of Sport Behavior (1978–2015); Journal of Sport Psychology in Action (2010–2015); Journal of Sports Sciences (1983–2015); Psychology of Sport and Exercise (2000–2015); Research Quarterly in Sport and Exercise (2000–2015); Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports (1991–2015); Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology (2012–2015); and The Sport Psychologist (1984–2015).
 
3
Researchers were selected based on having published four or more sport-related intervention studies.
 
4
Descriptive accounts are available from the first author on request.
 
5
Correlation matrix available from the first author on request.
 
Literature
1.
Gardner F, Moore Z. Clinical sport psychology. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2006.
2.
Hackfort D, editor. Psycho-social issues and interventions in elite sport. Frankfurt: Lang; 1994.
3.
4.
Meyers AW, Whelan JP, Murphy SM. Cognitive behavioral strategies in athletic performance enhancement. In: Hersen M, Eisler RM, Miller PM, editors. Progress in behavior modification. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole; 1996. p. 137–64.
5.
Murphy SM, editor. Sport psychology interventions. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1995.
6.
7.
Vealey RS. Mental skills training in sports. In: Tenenbaum G, Eklund RC, editors. Handbook of sport psychology. New York City: Wiley; 2007. p. 287–309.
8.
Whelan JP, Meyers AW, Berman JS. Cognitive-behavior interventions for athletic performance enhancement. In: Annual meeting of the American Psychological Association; New Orleans, LA, 1989.
9.
Barkham M, Mellor-Clark J. Bridging evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence: developing a rigorous and relevant knowledge for the psychological therapies. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2003;10:319–27. doi:10.​1002/​cpp.​379.CrossRef
10.
11.
12.
Greenspan MJ, Feltz DL. Psychological interventions with athletes in competitive situations: a review. Sport Psychol. 1989;3:219–36.CrossRef
13.
14.
15.
Martin GL, Thompson K, Regehr K. Studies using single-subject designs in sport psychology: 30 years of research. Behav Analyst. 2004;27:263–80.
16.
17.
18.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking review in health care. York: York Publishing Services Ltd; 2009.
19.
Egger M, Smith GD, O’Rourke K. Rationale, potentials, and promise of systematic reviews. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books; 2001. p. 3–19.CrossRef
20.
21.
Feltz DL, Landers DM. The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: a meta-analysis. J Sport Psychol. 1983;5:25–57.CrossRef
22.
23.
Kyllo LB, Landers DM. Goal setting in sport and exercise: a research synthesis to resolve the controversy. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1995;17:117–37.CrossRef
24.
Martin LJ, Carron AV, Burke SM. Team building interventions in sport: a meta-analysis. Sport Exerc Psychol Rev. 2009;5:3–18.
25.
Rovio E, Arvinen-Barrow M, Weigand DA, et al. Team building in sport: a narrative review of the program effectiveness, current methods, and theoretical underpinnings. Athl Insight Online J Sport Psychol. 2010;12:147–64.
26.
27.
Tod D, Hardy J, Oliver E. Effects of self-talk: a systematic review. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011;33:666–87.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Rumbold JL, Fletcher D, Daniels K. A systematic review of stress management interventions with sport performers. Sport Exerc Perform Psychol. 2012;1:173–93. doi:10.​1037/​a0026628.CrossRef
29.
Dishman RK. Identity crisis in North American sport psychology: academics in professional issues. J Sport Psychol. 1983;5:123–34.CrossRef
30.
Egger M, Jüni P, Bartlett C, et al. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technol Asses. 2003;7:1–76.
31.
Reeves BC, Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, et al. Including non-randomized studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
32.
Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. In: Gage NL, editor. Handbook of research on teaching. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1963. p. 1–76.
33.
34.
Gresham FM, Gansle KA, Noell GH, et al. Treatment integrity of school-based behavioral intervention studies: 1980–1990. Sch Psychol Rev. 1993;22:254–72.
35.
36.
37.
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
38.
Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
39.
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, et al. Comprehensive meta-analysis: a computer program for research synthesis. 3.0th ed. Englewood: Biostat; 2014.
40.
41.
Gleser LJ, Olkin I. Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, editors. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York City: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. p. 357–76.
42.
43.
Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books; 2001. p. 285–312.CrossRef
44.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988.
45.
46.
Egger M, Smith GD. Principles of and procedures for systematic reviews. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books; 2001. p. 23–42.CrossRef
47.
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, et al. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley; 2009.CrossRef
48.
Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York City: Academic Press; 1985.
49.
Borenstein M. Effect sizes for continuous data. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, editors. Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York City: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. p. 221–35.
50.
51.
52.
53.
Englert C, Bertrams A, Furley P, et al. Is ego depletion associated with increased distractibility? Results from a basketball free throw task. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2015;18:26–31.CrossRef
54.
Landers DM, Petruzzello SJ, Salazar W, et al. The influence of electrocortical biofeedback on performance in pre-elite archers. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 1991;23:123–9.CrossRef
55.
56.
Barker JB, Jones MV, Greenlees I. Assessing the immediate and maintained effects of hypnosis on self-efficacy and soccer wall-volley performance. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010;32:243–52.CrossRefPubMed
57.
58.
Burroughs WA. Visual simulation training of baseball batters. Int J Sport Psychol. 1984;15:117–26.
59.
Caserta RJ, Young J, Janelle CM. Old dogs, new tricks: training the perceptual skills of senior tennis players. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007;29:479–97.CrossRefPubMed
60.
61.
Gabbett TJ, Carius J, Mulvey M. Does improved decision-making ability reduce the physiological demands of game-based activities in field sport athletes? J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22:2027–35.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Hazell J, Cotterill ST, Hill DM. An exploration of pre-performance routines, self-efficacy, anxiety and performance in semi-professional soccer. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14:603–10.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Hill KL, Borden F. The effect of attentional cueing scripts on competitive bowling performance. Int J Sport Psychol. 1995;26:503–12.
64.
65.
Kress J, Schroeder J, Potteiger JA, et al. The use of psychological skills training to increase 10 KM cycling performance: an exploratory investigation. Int Sports J. 1999;3:44–54.
66.
Lane A, Streeter B. The effectiveness of goal setting as a strategy to improve basketball shooting performance. Int J Sport Psychol. 2003;34:138–50.
67.
68.
Lorains M, Ball K, MacMahon C. An above real time training intervention for sport decision making. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2013;14:670–4.CrossRef
69.
Madden G, McGown C. The effect of hemisphericity, imagery, and relaxation on volleyball performance. J Hum Movement Stud. 1988;14:197–204.
70.
Malouff JM, McGee JA, Halford HT, et al. Effects of pre-competition positive imagery and self-instructions on accuracy of serving in tennis. J Sport Behav. 2008;31:264–75.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
Predebon J, Docker SB. Free-throw shooting performance as a function of preshot routines. Percept Motor Skill. 1992;75:167–71.CrossRef
83.
Ramsey R, Cumming J, Edwards MG, et al. Examining the emotion aspect of PETTLEP-based imagery with penalty taking in soccer. J Sport Behav. 2010;33:295–314.
84.
Shafizadeh M, Platt GK. Effect of verbal cueing on trajectory anticipation in the penalty kick among novice football goalkeepers. Percept Motor Skill. 2012;114:174–84.CrossRef
85.
Shelton TO, Mahoney MJ. The content and effect of “psyching-up” strategies in weight lifters. Cognitive Ther Res. 1978;2:275–84.CrossRef
86.
87.
Weinberg RS, Seabourne TG, Jackson A. Effects of visuo-motor behavior rehearsal, relaxation, and imagery on karate performance. J Sport Psychol. 1981;3:228–38.CrossRef
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Br Med J. 2009;339:b2700. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​b2700.CrossRef
93.
Bushman BJ, Wang MC. A procedure for combining sample standardized mean differences and vote counts to estimate the population standardized mean difference in fixed event models. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:66–80. doi:10.​1037/​1082-989X.​1.​1.​66.CrossRef
94.
Bushman BJ, Wang MC. Vote counting methods in meta-analysis. In: Cooper HM, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, editors. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York City: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. p. 207–20.
95.
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Br Med J. 2010;2010:340. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​c869.
96.
American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. 6th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2010.
97.
98.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Br Med J. 2009;339:b2535. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​b2535.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effects of Psychological and Psychosocial Interventions on Sport Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Authors
Daniel J. Brown
David Fletcher
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Sports Medicine / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0552-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Sports Medicine 1/2017 Go to the issue

Systematic Review

Plasma/Serum Zinc Status During Aerobic Exercise Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Systematic Review

Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review

Original Research Article

Combined Oral Contraceptives Increase High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein but Not Haptoglobin in Female Athletes

Systematic Review

Socioeconomic Correlates of Sedentary Behavior in Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Systematic Review

Characteristics of Teacher Training in School-Based Physical Education Interventions to Improve Fundamental Movement Skills and/or Physical Activity: A Systematic Review

Letter to the Editor

Authors’ Reply to Wang: “On Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Intervertebral Disc Ageing”