Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 6/2017

01-12-2017 | Systematic Review

Individual Preferences for Child and Adolescent Vaccine Attributes: A Systematic Review of the Stated Preference Literature

Authors: Christine Michaels-Igbokwe, Shannon MacDonald, Gillian R. Currie

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Discrete choice experiments are increasingly used to assess preferences for vaccines and vaccine service delivery.

Objectives

To synthesize and critically assess the application of discrete choice experiments in childhood/adolescent vaccines, to describe how discrete choice experiments have been applied to understand preferences, and to evaluate the use of discrete choice experiment data to inform estimates of vaccine uptake.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of six electronic databases. Included studies were discrete choice experiments and conjoint analyses published from 2000 to 2016 related to childhood/adolescent vaccines where respondents were parents, children/adolescents, or service providers. Validity assessment was used to assess study quality and risk of bias.

Results

In total, 27 articles were included, representing 21 different studies. A majority of articles were published between 2011 and 2016. Vaccines studied included human papillomavirus (24%), influenza (19%), meningococcal vaccines (14%), childhood vaccines (14%), hypothetical vaccines (10%), hepatitis B (5%), and diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis, and Haemophilus influenzae type b (5%). Most studies assessed parent preferences (67%). The most common attributes were risk (24%), degree/duration of protection (21%), and cost (15%). Commonly reported outcome measures were estimates of uptake (33%), willingness-to-pay (22%), and other marginal rates of substitution (14%). Validity assessments yielded high scores overall. Areas of weakness included low response rates, inefficient experimental design, and failure to conduct formative qualitative work and a pilot of the discrete choice experiment.

Conclusion

This is the first systematic review of childhood/adolescent vaccine-related discrete choice experiments. In future, special attention should be paid to ensuring that choice context and discrete choice experiment design are compatible to generate reliable estimates of uptake.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Omer SB, Salmon DA, Orenstein WA, et al. Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(19):1981–8.CrossRefPubMed Omer SB, Salmon DA, Orenstein WA, et al. Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(19):1981–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dubé E, Laberge C, Guay M, et al. Vaccine hesitancy: an overview. Hum Vaccine Imunother. 2013;9(8):1763–73.CrossRef Dubé E, Laberge C, Guay M, et al. Vaccine hesitancy: an overview. Hum Vaccine Imunother. 2013;9(8):1763–73.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Thomson A, Robinson K, Vallée-Tourangeau G. The 5As: a practical taxonomy for the determinants of vaccine uptake. Vaccine. 2016;34(8):1018–24.CrossRefPubMed Thomson A, Robinson K, Vallée-Tourangeau G. The 5As: a practical taxonomy for the determinants of vaccine uptake. Vaccine. 2016;34(8):1018–24.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mills E, Jadad AR, Ross C, Wilson K. Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental beliefs and attitudes toward childhood vaccination identifies common barriers to vaccination. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(11):1081–8.CrossRefPubMed Mills E, Jadad AR, Ross C, Wilson K. Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental beliefs and attitudes toward childhood vaccination identifies common barriers to vaccination. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(11):1081–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Brown KF, Kroll JS, Hudson MJ, et al. Factors underlying parental decisions about combination childhood vaccinations including MMR: a systematic review. Vaccine. 2010;28(26):4235–48.CrossRefPubMed Brown KF, Kroll JS, Hudson MJ, et al. Factors underlying parental decisions about combination childhood vaccinations including MMR: a systematic review. Vaccine. 2010;28(26):4235–48.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hensher D, Rose J, Greene W. Applied choice analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.CrossRef Hensher D, Rose J, Greene W. Applied choice analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Clark MD, Determann D, Petrou S, et al. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(9):883–902.CrossRefPubMed Clark MD, Determann D, Petrou S, et al. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(9):883–902.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lancaster KJ. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ. 1966;74:132–57.CrossRef Lancaster KJ. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ. 1966;74:132–57.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mandeville KL, Lagarde M, Hanson K. The use of discrete choice experiments to inform health workforce policy: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):367.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mandeville KL, Lagarde M, Hanson K. The use of discrete choice experiments to inform health workforce policy: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):367.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661–77.CrossRefPubMed Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661–77.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health: a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13.CrossRefPubMed Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health: a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Adams J, Bateman B, Becker F, et al. Effectiveness and acceptability of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory schemes for increasing uptake of vaccinations in preschool children: systematic review, qualitative study and discrete choice experiment. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(94):1–176.CrossRef Adams J, Bateman B, Becker F, et al. Effectiveness and acceptability of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory schemes for increasing uptake of vaccinations in preschool children: systematic review, qualitative study and discrete choice experiment. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(94):1–176.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Adams J, McNaughton RJ, Wigham S, et al. Acceptability of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions for preschool vaccinations: triangulation of findings from three linked studies. PloS One. 2016;11(6):e0156843.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Adams J, McNaughton RJ, Wigham S, et al. Acceptability of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions for preschool vaccinations: triangulation of findings from three linked studies. PloS One. 2016;11(6):e0156843.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Brown DS, Poulos C, Johnson FR, et al. Adolescent girls’ preferences for HPV vaccines: a discrete choice experiment. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2014;24:93–121.CrossRefPubMed Brown DS, Poulos C, Johnson FR, et al. Adolescent girls’ preferences for HPV vaccines: a discrete choice experiment. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2014;24:93–121.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference de Bekker-Grob EW, Chorus CG. Random regret-based discrete-choice modelling: an application to healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(7):623–34.CrossRefPubMed de Bekker-Grob EW, Chorus CG. Random regret-based discrete-choice modelling: an application to healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(7):623–34.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Flood EM, Ryan KJ, Rousculp MD, et al. A survey of children’s preferences for influenza vaccine attributes. Vaccine. 2011;29(26):4334–40.CrossRefPubMed Flood EM, Ryan KJ, Rousculp MD, et al. A survey of children’s preferences for influenza vaccine attributes. Vaccine. 2011;29(26):4334–40.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Flood EM, Ryan KJ, Rousculp MD, et al. Parent preferences for pediatric influenza vaccine attributes. Clin Pediatr. 2011;50(4):338–47.CrossRef Flood EM, Ryan KJ, Rousculp MD, et al. Parent preferences for pediatric influenza vaccine attributes. Clin Pediatr. 2011;50(4):338–47.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gidengil C, Lieu TA, Payne K, et al. Parental and societal values for the risks and benefits of childhood combination vaccines. Vaccine. 2012;30(23):3445–52.CrossRefPubMed Gidengil C, Lieu TA, Payne K, et al. Parental and societal values for the risks and benefits of childhood combination vaccines. Vaccine. 2012;30(23):3445–52.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hofman R, de Bekker-Grob EW, Raat H, et al. Parents’ preferences for vaccinating daughters against human papillomavirus in the Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:454.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hofman R, de Bekker-Grob EW, Raat H, et al. Parents’ preferences for vaccinating daughters against human papillomavirus in the Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:454.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Hofman R, de Bekker-Grob EW, Richardus JH, et al. Have preferences of girls changed almost 3 years after the much debated start of the HPV vaccination program in the Netherlands? A discrete choice experiment. PloS One. 2014;9(8):e104772.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hofman R, de Bekker-Grob EW, Richardus JH, et al. Have preferences of girls changed almost 3 years after the much debated start of the HPV vaccination program in the Netherlands? A discrete choice experiment. PloS One. 2014;9(8):e104772.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Lambooij MS, Harmsen IA, Veldwijk J, et al. Consistency between stated and revealed preferences: a discrete choice experiment and a behavioural experiment on vaccination behaviour compared. BMC Med Res Method. 2015;15:19.CrossRef Lambooij MS, Harmsen IA, Veldwijk J, et al. Consistency between stated and revealed preferences: a discrete choice experiment and a behavioural experiment on vaccination behaviour compared. BMC Med Res Method. 2015;15:19.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lloyd AJ, Nafees B, Ziani E, et al. What are the preferences of health care professionals in Germany regarding fully liquid, ready-to-use hexavalent pediatric vaccine versus hexavalent pediatric vaccine that needs reconstitution? Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:1517–24.PubMedPubMedCentral Lloyd AJ, Nafees B, Ziani E, et al. What are the preferences of health care professionals in Germany regarding fully liquid, ready-to-use hexavalent pediatric vaccine versus hexavalent pediatric vaccine that needs reconstitution? Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:1517–24.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Marshall H, Chen G, Clarke M, Ratcliffe J. Adolescent, parent and societal preferences and willingness to pay for meningococcal B vaccine: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2016;34(5):671–7.CrossRefPubMed Marshall H, Chen G, Clarke M, Ratcliffe J. Adolescent, parent and societal preferences and willingness to pay for meningococcal B vaccine: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2016;34(5):671–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ngorsuraches S, Nawanukool K, Petcharamanee K, Poopantrakool U. Parents’ preferences and willingness-to-pay for human papilloma virus vaccines in Thailand. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2015;8(1):20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ngorsuraches S, Nawanukool K, Petcharamanee K, Poopantrakool U. Parents’ preferences and willingness-to-pay for human papilloma virus vaccines in Thailand. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2015;8(1):20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Pereira CCA, Mulligan M, Bridges JFP, Bishai D. Determinants of influenza vaccine purchasing decision in the US: a conjoint analysis. Vaccine. 2011;29(7):1443–7.CrossRefPubMed Pereira CCA, Mulligan M, Bridges JFP, Bishai D. Determinants of influenza vaccine purchasing decision in the US: a conjoint analysis. Vaccine. 2011;29(7):1443–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Poulos C, Reed Johnson F, Krishnarajah G, et al. Pediatricians’ preferences for infant meningococcal vaccination. Value Health. 2015;18(1):67–77.CrossRefPubMed Poulos C, Reed Johnson F, Krishnarajah G, et al. Pediatricians’ preferences for infant meningococcal vaccination. Value Health. 2015;18(1):67–77.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Sadique MZ, Devlin N, Edmunds WJ, Parkin D. The effect of perceived risks on the demand for vaccination: results from a discrete choice experiment. PloS One. 2013;8(2):e54149.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sadique MZ, Devlin N, Edmunds WJ, Parkin D. The effect of perceived risks on the demand for vaccination: results from a discrete choice experiment. PloS One. 2013;8(2):e54149.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Shono A, Kondo M. Parents’ preferences for seasonal influenza vaccine for their children in Japan. Vaccine. 2014;32(39):5071–6.CrossRefPubMed Shono A, Kondo M. Parents’ preferences for seasonal influenza vaccine for their children in Japan. Vaccine. 2014;32(39):5071–6.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Shono A, Kondo M. Mothers’ preferences regarding new combination vaccines for their children in Japan, 2014. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13(4):766–71.CrossRefPubMed Shono A, Kondo M. Mothers’ preferences regarding new combination vaccines for their children in Japan, 2014. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13(4):766–71.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Veldwijk J, Determann D, Lambooij MS, et al. Exploring how individuals complete the choice tasks in a discrete choice experiment: an interview study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Veldwijk J, Determann D, Lambooij MS, et al. Exploring how individuals complete the choice tasks in a discrete choice experiment: an interview study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Veldwijk J, Lambooij MS, Bruijning-Verhagen PCJ, et al. Parental preferences for rotavirus vaccination in young children: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2014;32(47):6277–83.CrossRefPubMed Veldwijk J, Lambooij MS, Bruijning-Verhagen PCJ, et al. Parental preferences for rotavirus vaccination in young children: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2014;32(47):6277–83.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Veldwijk J, Lambooij MS, van Til JA, et al. Words or graphics to present a discrete choice experiment: does it matter? Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(11):1376–84.CrossRefPubMed Veldwijk J, Lambooij MS, van Til JA, et al. Words or graphics to present a discrete choice experiment: does it matter? Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(11):1376–84.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Veldwijk J, van der Heide I, Rademakers J, et al. Preferences for vaccination: does health literacy make a difference? Med Decis Mak. 2015;35(8):948–58.CrossRef Veldwijk J, van der Heide I, Rademakers J, et al. Preferences for vaccination: does health literacy make a difference? Med Decis Mak. 2015;35(8):948–58.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Bishai D, Brice R, Girod I, et al. Conjoint analysis of French and German parents’ willingness to pay for meningococcal vaccine. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(2):143–54.CrossRefPubMed Bishai D, Brice R, Girod I, et al. Conjoint analysis of French and German parents’ willingness to pay for meningococcal vaccine. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(2):143–54.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference de Bekker-Grob EW, Hofman R, Donkers B, et al. Girls’ preferences for HPV vaccination: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2010;28(41):6692–7.CrossRefPubMed de Bekker-Grob EW, Hofman R, Donkers B, et al. Girls’ preferences for HPV vaccination: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2010;28(41):6692–7.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Hall J, Kenny P, King M, et al. Using stated preference discrete choice modelling to evaluate the introduction of varicella vaccination. Health Econ. 2002;11(5):457–65.CrossRefPubMed Hall J, Kenny P, King M, et al. Using stated preference discrete choice modelling to evaluate the introduction of varicella vaccination. Health Econ. 2002;11(5):457–65.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Kenny P, Hall J, Viney R, Haas M. Do participants understand a stated preference health survey? A qualitative approach to assessing validity. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19(4):664–81.CrossRefPubMed Kenny P, Hall J, Viney R, Haas M. Do participants understand a stated preference health survey? A qualitative approach to assessing validity. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19(4):664–81.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Sapede C, Girod I. Willingness of adult’s in Europe to pay for a new vaccine: the application of discrete choice-based conjoint analysis. Int J Market Res. 2002;44(4):463–76. Sapede C, Girod I. Willingness of adult’s in Europe to pay for a new vaccine: the application of discrete choice-based conjoint analysis. Int J Market Res. 2002;44(4):463–76.
40.
go back to reference Ngene 1.1: user manual and reference guide. Version 13/05/2011 ed. Australia: ChoiceMetrics Pty Ltd.; 2011. Ngene 1.1: user manual and reference guide. Version 13/05/2011 ed. Australia: ChoiceMetrics Pty Ltd.; 2011.
41.
go back to reference de Bekker-Grob EW, Donkers B, Jonker MF, Stolk EA. Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide. Patient. 2015;8(5):373–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Bekker-Grob EW, Donkers B, Jonker MF, Stolk EA. Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide. Patient. 2015;8(5):373–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012;21(2):145–72.CrossRefPubMed de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012;21(2):145–72.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Amaya-Amaya M, Gerard K, Ryan M. Discrete choice experiments in a nutshell. In: Ryan M, Amaya-Amaya M, Gerard K, editors. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care: the economics of non-market goods and resources. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008. p. 13–46. Amaya-Amaya M, Gerard K, Ryan M. Discrete choice experiments in a nutshell. In: Ryan M, Amaya-Amaya M, Gerard K, editors. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care: the economics of non-market goods and resources. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008. p. 13–46.
44.
go back to reference Hensher D, Rose J, Greene W. Applied choice analysis: a primer. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.CrossRef Hensher D, Rose J, Greene W. Applied choice analysis: a primer. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Lancsar E, Swait J. Reconceptualising the external validity of discrete choice experiments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(10):951–65.CrossRefPubMed Lancsar E, Swait J. Reconceptualising the external validity of discrete choice experiments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(10):951–65.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Individual Preferences for Child and Adolescent Vaccine Attributes: A Systematic Review of the Stated Preference Literature
Authors
Christine Michaels-Igbokwe
Shannon MacDonald
Gillian R. Currie
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0244-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 6/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine